Nanna Sønnichsen Kayed

Timing strategies used in defensive blinking to optical collisions in 5- to 7-month-old infants

When objects approach on a collision course, young babies will blink to protect their eyes. The timing of the blink is crucial, since it serves to protect the eyes from being injured. The image of a looming virtual object approached infants under different constant velocities and constant accelerations. The youngest infants (5– 6 months) blinked when the image of the virtual object reached a threshold visual angle, while older infants (6 –7 months) geared their blinks to the image’s time-tocollision. Infants using a strategy based on time coped successfully with all approach conditions, while infants using a strategy based on visual angle had difficulty with the fastest accelerative approach condition. The findings indicate that infants around 6 months of age shift to a more sophisticated strategy based on time, allowing them to deal with more demanding perceptual tasks.

Refining the COPES to Measure Social Climate in Therapeutic Residential Youth Care

BackgroundPrevious studies have shown that social climate in therapeutic residential youth care (TRC) is important to the welfare of residents, staff, and assessing treatment outcomes. The most influential theory on social climate in residential settings is the theory of Moos. The measurement of the concepts and aspects of this theory using the Community Oriented Programs Environment Scale (COPES) has repeatedly been criticized regarding usability, validity, and reliability, especially for TRC.ObjectiveTo improve the usability and psychometric quality of the COPES by shortening and refining the original subscale structure for usage in TRC.MethodsFour-hundred adolescents living in Norwegian TRC participated. We supplemented confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) with item response theory (IRT) to evaluate model fit, investigate factor loadings, and shorten scales to improve their psychometric qualities and usability in describing social climate in TRC.ResultsThe original subscales were not acceptable as evaluated by the criteria for CFA and IRT. By removing psychometrically weak items, the instrument was shortened to 40 items within the original ten subscales. This short version showed acceptable psychometric qualities based on both CFA and IRT criteria and the instrument retained its content validity. Finally, the original three higher-order dimensions was not supported.ConclusionsCompared to the original instrument, the refined 40-item version of the COPES represents a more usable instrument for measuring social climate in TRC. Future studies are needed to confirm the multifaceted refined short version in comparable samples of youth and staff to further investigate predictive value and construct validity.