Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Nao Hirokawa is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Nao Hirokawa.


rewriting techniques and applications | 2005

Tyrolean termination tool

Nao Hirokawa; Aart Middeldorp

This paper describes the Tyrolean Termination Tool (


conference on automated deduction | 2005

Automating the dependency pair method

Nao Hirokawa; Aart Middeldorp

\mathsf{T}\!_{\mbox{\sf T}}\!\mathsf{T}


Information & Computation | 2007

Tyrolean termination tool: Techniques and features

Nao Hirokawa; Aart Middeldorp

in the sequel), the successor of the Tsukuba Termination Tool [12]. We describe the differences between the two and explain the new features, some of which are not (yet) available in any other termination tool, in some detail.


rewriting techniques and applications | 2004

Dependency Pairs Revisited

Nao Hirokawa; Aart Middeldorp

\mathsf{T}\!_{\mbox{\sf T}}\!\mathsf{T}


artificial intelligence and symbolic computation | 2004

Polynomial Interpretations with Negative Coefficients

Nao Hirokawa; Aart Middeldorp

is a tool for automatically proving termination of rewrite systems based on the dependency pair method of Arts and Giesl [3]. It produces high-quality output and has a convenient web interface. The tool is available at http://cl2-informatik.uibk.ac.at/ttt


Journal of Automated Reasoning archive | 2009

KBO Orientability

Harald Zankl; Nao Hirokawa; Aart Middeldorp

\mathsf{T}\!_{\mbox{\sf T}}\!\mathsf{T}


international conference on logic programming | 2008

Uncurrying for Termination

Nao Hirokawa; Aart Middeldorp; Harald Zankl

incorporates several new improvements to the dependency pair method. In addition, it is now possible to run the tool in fully automatic mode on a collection of rewrite systems. Moreover, besides ordinary (first-order) rewrite systems, the tool accepts simply-typed applicative rewrite systems which are transformed into ordinary rewrite systems by the recent method of Aoto and Yamada [2]. In the next section we describe the differences between the semi automatic mode and the Tsukuba Termination Tool. Section 3 describes the fully automatic mode. In Section 4 we show a termination proof of a simply-typed applicative system obtained by


rewriting techniques and applications | 2003

Tsukuba termination tool

Nao Hirokawa; Aart Middeldorp

\mathsf{T}\!_{\mbox{\sf T}}\!\mathsf{T}


international joint conference on automated reasoning | 2010

Decreasing diagrams and relative termination

Nao Hirokawa; Aart Middeldorp

. In Section 5 we describe how to input a collection of rewrite systems and how to interpret the resulting output. Some implementation details are given in Section 6. The final section contains a short comparison with other tools for automatically proving termination.


Journal of Automated Reasoning | 2013

Uncurrying for Termination and Complexity

Nao Hirokawa; Aart Middeldorp; Harald Zankl

Developing automatable methods for proving termination of term rewrite systems that resist traditional techniques based on simplification orders has become an active research area in the past few years. The dependency pair method of Arts and Giesl is one of the most popular such methods. However, there are several obstacles that hamper its automation. In this paper we present new ideas to overcome these obstacles. We provide ample numerical data supporting our ideas.

Collaboration


Dive into the Nao Hirokawa's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Harald Zankl

University of Innsbruck

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Georg Moser

University of Innsbruck

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge