Naomi Courtemanche

Tension modulates actin filament polymerization mediated by formin and profilin.

Formins promote processive elongation of actin filaments for cytokinetic contractile rings and other cellular structures. In vivo, these structures are exposed to tension, but the effect of tension on these processes was unknown. Here we used single-molecule imaging to investigate the effects of tension on actin polymerization mediated by yeast formin Bni1p. Small forces on the filaments dramatically slowed formin-mediated polymerization in the absence of profilin, but resulted in faster polymerization in the presence of profilin. We propose that force shifts the conformational equilibrium of the end of a filament associated with formin homology 2 domains toward the closed state that precludes polymerization, but that profilin–actin associated with formin homology 1 domains reverses this effect. Thus, physical forces strongly influence actin assembly by formin Bni1p.

Protein Folding and Stability Using Denaturants

Measurements of protein folding and thermodynamic stability provide insight into the forces and energetics that determine structure, and can inform on protein domain organization, interdomain interactions, and effects of mutations on structure. This chapter describes methods, theory, and data analysis for the most accessible means to determine the thermodynamics of protein folding: chemical denaturation. Topics include overall features of the folding reaction, advances in instrumentation, optimization of reagent purity, mechanistic models for analysis, and statistical and structural interpretation of fitted thermodynamic parameters. Examples in which stability measurements have provided insight into structure and function will be taken from studies in the authors laboratory on the Notch signaling pathway. It is hoped that this chapter will enable molecular, cell, and structural biologists to make precise measurements of protein stability, and will also provide a strong foundation for biophysics students who wish to undertake experimental studies of protein folding.

The Leucine-Rich Repeat Domain of Internalin B Folds along a Polarized N-Terminal Pathway

The leucine-rich repeat domain of Internalin B is composed of seven tandem leucine-rich repeats, which each contain a short beta strand connected to a 3(10) helix by a short turn, and an N-terminal alpha-helical capping motif. To determine whether folding proceeds along a single, discrete pathway or multiple, parallel pathways, and to map the structure of the transition state ensemble, we examined the effects of destabilizing substitutions of conserved residues in each repeat. We find that, despite the structural redundancy among the repeats, folding proceeds through an N-terminal transition state ensemble in which the extent of structure formation is biased toward repeats one and two and includes both local and interrepeat interactions. Our results suggest that the N-terminal capping motif serves to polarize the folding pathway by acting as a fast-growing nucleus onto which consecutive repeats fold in the transition state ensemble, and highlight the importance of sequence-specific interactions in pathway selection.

Determinants of formin homology 1 (FH1) domain function in actin filament elongation by formins

Background: Formin FH1 domains deliver subunits to actin filament barbed ends. Results: The transfer rate of formin Bni1p depends on FH1 polyproline track sequences and positions. Conclusion: The two FH1 domains of formin dimers deliver actin independently of one another. Significance: Sequence features of other FH1 domains are similar to Bni1p, suggesting a common strategy to maximize actin polymerization rates. Formin-mediated elongation of actin filaments proceeds via association of Formin Homology 2 (FH2) domain dimers with the barbed end of the filament, allowing subunit addition while remaining processively attached to the end. The flexible Formin Homology 1 (FH1) domain, located directly N-terminal to the FH2 domain, contains one or more stretches of polyproline that bind the actin-binding protein profilin. Diffusion of FH1 domains brings associated profilin-actin complexes into contact with the FH2-bound barbed end of the filament, thereby enabling direct transfer of actin. We investigated how the organization of the FH1 domain of budding yeast formin Bni1p determines the rates of profilin-actin transfer onto the end of the filament. Each FH1 domain transfers actin to the barbed end independently of the other and structural evidence suggests a preference for actin delivery from each FH1 domain to the closest long-pitch helix of the filament. The transfer reaction is diffusion-limited and influenced by the affinities of the FH1 polyproline tracks for profilin. Position-specific sequence variations optimize the efficiency of FH1-stimulated polymerization by binding profilin weakly near the FH2 domain and binding profilin more strongly farther away. FH1 domains of many other formins follow this organizational trend. This particular sequence architecture may optimize the efficiency of FH1-stimulated elongation.

Avoiding artefacts when counting polymerized actin in live cells with LifeAct fused to fluorescent proteins

When tagged with a fluorescent protein, actin is not fully functional, so the LifeAct peptide fused to a fluorescent protein is widely used to localize actin filaments in live cells. However, we find that these fusion proteins have many concentration-dependent effects on actin assembly in vitro and in fission yeast cells. mEGFP–LifeAct inhibits actin assembly during endocytosis as well as assembly and constriction of the cytokinetic contractile ring. Purified mEGFP–LifeAct and LifeAct–mCherry bind actin filaments with Kd values of ∼10 μM. LifeAct–mCherry can promote actin filament nucleation and either promote or inhibit filament elongation. Both separately and together, profilin and formins suppress these effects. LifeAct–mCherry can also promote or inhibit actin filament severing by cofilin. These concentration-dependent effects mean that caution is necessary when overexpressing LifeAct fusion proteins to label actin filaments in cells. Therefore, we used low micromolar concentrations of tagged LifeAct to follow assembly and disassembly of actin filaments in cells. Careful titrations also gave an estimate of a peak of ∼190,000 actin molecules (∼500 μm) in the fission yeast contractile ring. These filaments shorten from ∼500 to ∼100 subunits as the ring constricts.

Aip1 Promotes Actin Filament Severing by Cofilin and Regulates Constriction of the Cytokinetic Contractile Ring

Background: Aip1 cooperates with cofilin to disassemble actin filaments. Results: Aip1 increases the rate of filament severing by cofilin by binding the sides of actin filaments, and Δaip1 mutants have cytokinesis defects. Conclusion: Aip1 promotes actin filament severing by the high concentrations of cofilin in cells. Significance: We provide the first evidence that Aip1 promotes filament severing and illustrate its importance to cytokinesis. Aip1 (actin interacting protein 1) is ubiquitous in eukaryotic organisms, where it cooperates with cofilin to disassemble actin filaments, but neither its mechanism of action nor its biological functions have been clear. We purified both fission yeast and human Aip1 and investigated their biochemical activities with or without cofilin. Both types of Aip1 bind actin filaments with micromolar affinities and weakly nucleate actin polymerization. Aip1 increases up to 12-fold the rate that high concentrations of yeast or human cofilin sever actin filaments, most likely by competing with cofilin for binding to the side of actin filaments, reducing the occupancy of the filaments by cofilin to a range favorable for severing. Aip1 does not cap the barbed ends of filaments severed by cofilin. Fission yeast lacking Aip1 are viable and assemble cytokinetic contractile rings normally, but rings in these Δaip1 cells accumulate 30% less myosin II. Further, these mutant cells initiate the ingression of cleavage furrows earlier than normal, shortening the stage of cytokinetic ring maturation by 50%. The Δaip1 mutation has negative genetic interactions with deletion mutations of both capping protein subunits and cofilin mutations with severing defects, but no genetic interaction with deletion of coronin.

Interaction of Profilin with the Barbed End of Actin Filaments

Profilin binds not only to actin monomers but also to the barbed end of the actin filament, where it inhibits association of subunits. To address open questions about the interactions of profilin with barbed ends, we measured the effects of a wide range of concentrations of Homo sapiens profilin 1 on the rate of elongation of individual skeletal muscle actin filaments by total internal reflection fluorescence microscopy. Much higher concentrations of profilin were required to stop elongation by AMP-PNP-actin monomers than ADP-actin monomers. High concentrations of profilin depolymerized barbed ends at a rate much faster than the spontaneous dissociation rates of Mg-ATP-, Mg-AMP-PNP-, Mg-ADP-Pi-, and Mg-ADP-actin subunits. Fitting a thermodynamic model to these data allowed us to determine the affinities of profilin and profilin-actin for barbed ends and the influence of the nucleotide bound to actin on these interactions. Profilin has a much higher affinity for ADP-actin filament barbed ends (Kd = 1 μM) than AMP-PNP-actin filament barbed ends (Kd = 226 μM). ADP-actin monomers associated with profilin bind to ADP-actin filament barbed ends 10% as fast as free ADP-actin monomers, but bound profilin does not affect the rate of association of AMP-PNP-actin monomers with barbed ends. The differences in the affinities of AMP-PNP- and ADP-bound barbed ends for profilin and profilin-actin suggest that conformations of barbed end subunits differ from those of monomers and change upon nucleotide hydrolysis and phosphate release. A structural model revealed minor steric clashes between profilin and actin subunits at the barbed end that explain the biochemical results.

Abl2/Abl-related Gene Stabilizes Actin Filaments, Stimulates Actin Branching by Actin-related Protein 2/3 Complex and Promotes Actin Filament Severing by Cofilin

Background: Arg/Abl2 has two actin-binding domains, but how they influence actin filaments was unknown. Results: Arg and cortactin cooperatively stabilize actin filaments; Arg enhances Arp2/3 complex activation and stimulates severing by cofilin. Conclusion: Arg directly regulates actin filament stability, branching, and severing, which are modulated by cortactin. Significance: These activities may underlie the control of actin-based cellular structures by Arg. Both Arp2/3 complex and the Abl2/Arg nonreceptor tyrosine kinase are essential to form and maintain diverse actin-based structures in cells, including cell edge protrusions in fibroblasts and cancer cells and dendritic spines in neurons. The ability of Arg to promote cell edge protrusions in fibroblasts does not absolutely require kinase activity, raising the question of how Arg might modulate actin assembly and turnover in the absence of kinase function. Arg has two distinct actin-binding domains and interacts physically and functionally with cortactin, an activator of the Arp2/3 complex. However, it was not known whether and how Arg influences actin filament stability, actin branch formation, or cofilin-mediated actin severing or how cortactin influences these reactions of Arg with actin. Arg or cortactin bound to actin filaments stabilizes them from depolymerization. Low concentrations of Arg and cortactin cooperate to stabilize filaments by slowing depolymerization. Arg stimulates formation of actin filament branches by Arp2/3 complex and cortactin. An Arg mutant lacking the C-terminal calponin homology actin-binding domain stimulates actin branch formation by the Arp2/3 complex, indicative of autoinhibition. ArgΔCH can stimulate the Arp2/3 complex even in the absence of cortactin. Arg greatly potentiates cofilin severing of actin filaments, and cortactin attenuates this enhanced severing. The ability of Arg to stabilize filaments, promote branching, and increase severing requires the internal (I/L)WEQ actin-binding domain. These activities likely underlie important roles that Arg plays in the formation, dynamics, and stability of actin-based cellular structures.

Folding thermodynamics and kinetics of the leucine-rich repeat domain of the virulence factor Internalin B.

Although the folding of α‐helical repeat proteins has been well characterized, much less is known about the folding of repeat proteins containing β‐sheets. Here we investigate the folding thermodynamics and kinetics of the leucine‐rich repeat (LRR) domain of Internalin B (InlB), an extracellular virulence factor from the bacterium Lysteria monocytogenes. This domain contains seven tandem leucine‐rich repeats, of which each contribute a single β‐strand that forms a continuous β‐sheet with neighboring repeats, and an N‐terminal α‐helical capping motif. Despite its modular structure, InlB folds in an equilibrium two‐state manner, as reflected by the identical thermodynamic parameters obtained by monitoring its sigmoidal urea‐induced unfolding transition by different spectroscopic probes. Although equilibrium two‐state folding is common in α‐helical repeat proteins, to date, InlB is the only β‐sheet‐containing repeat protein for which this behavior is observed. Surprisingly, unlike other repeat proteins exhibiting equilibrium two‐state folding, InlB also folds by a simple two‐state kinetic mechanism lacking intermediates, aside from the effects of prolyl isomerization on the denatured state. However, like other repeat proteins, InlB also folds significantly more slowly than expected from contact order. When plotted against urea, the rate constants for the fast refolding and single unfolding phases constitute a linear chevron that, when fitted with a kinetic two‐state model, yields thermodynamic parameters matching those observed for equilibrium folding. Based on these kinetic parameters, the transition state is estimated to comprise 40% of the total surface area buried upon folding, indicating that a large fraction of the native contacts are formed in the rate‐limiting step to folding.

Electrostatic interactions between the Bni1p formin FH2 domain and actin influence actin filament nucleation

Formins catalyze nucleation and growth of actin filaments. Here, we study the structure and interactions of actin with the FH2 domain of budding yeast formin Bni1p. We built an all-atom model of the formin dimer on an Oda actin filament 7-mer and studied structural relaxation and interprotein interactions by molecular dynamics simulations. These simulations produced a refined model for the FH2 dimer associated with the barbed end of the filament and showed electrostatic interactions between the formin knob and actin target-binding cleft. Mutations of two formin residues contributing to these interactions (R1423N, K1467L, or both) reduced the interaction energies between the proteins, and in coarse-grained simulations, the formin lost more interprotein contacts with an actin dimer than with an actin 7-mer. Biochemical experiments confirmed a strong influence of these mutations on Bni1p-mediated actin filament nucleation, but not elongation, suggesting that different interactions contribute to these two functions of formins.