Naomi Livni
The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Naomi Livni.
Nature Genetics | 2015
Colin S. Cooper; Rosalind Eeles; David C. Wedge; Peter Van Loo; Gunes Gundem; Ludmil B. Alexandrov; Barbara Kremeyer; Adam Butler; Andy G. Lynch; Niedzica Camacho; Charlie E. Massie; Jonathan Kay; Hayley Luxton; Sandra Edwards; Zsofia Kote-Jarai; Nening Dennis; Sue Merson; Daniel Leongamornlert; Jorge Zamora; Cathy Corbishley; Sarah Thomas; Serena Nik-Zainal; Manasa Ramakrishna; Sarah O'Meara; Lucy Matthews; Jeremy Clark; Rachel Hurst; Richard Mithen; Robert G. Bristow; Paul C. Boutros
Genome-wide DNA sequencing was used to decrypt the phylogeny of multiple samples from distinct areas of cancer and morphologically normal tissue taken from the prostates of three men. Mutations were present at high levels in morphologically normal tissue distant from the cancer, reflecting clonal expansions, and the underlying mutational processes at work in morphologically normal tissue were also at work in cancer. Our observations demonstrate the existence of ongoing abnormal mutational processes, consistent with field effects, underlying carcinogenesis. This mechanism gives rise to extensive branching evolution and cancer clone mixing, as exemplified by the coexistence of multiple cancer lineages harboring distinct ERG fusions within a single cancer nodule. Subsets of mutations were shared either by morphologically normal and malignant tissues or between different ERG lineages, indicating earlier or separate clonal cell expansions. Our observations inform on the origin of multifocal disease and have implications for prostate cancer therapy in individual cases.
Journal of Clinical Oncology | 2010
James Larkin; Rosalie Fisher; Lisa Pickering; Khin Thway; Naomi Livni; Cyril Fisher; Martin Gore
TO THE EDITOR: Mucinous tubular and spindle cell carcinoma (MTSCC) of the kidney is a rare subtype of renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Fewer than 80 cases have been reported in the literature. Patients are usually female, and the mean age of patients in one series was 53 years. The majority of MTSCCs are indolent, and reports of recurrence and distant metastases are rare. Furthermore, almost all cases of nodal or metastatic disease are associated with a high nuclear grade or sarcomatoid element in the primary tumor. There are no published reports of systemic treatment in patients with metastatic disease. We describe here a patient with widespread metastatic MTSCC of the kidney treated successfully with sunitinib. A 61-year-old white female presented with several months of proximal limb myalgia and polyarthralgia. Polymyalgia rheumatica was diagnosed, and prednisone 10 mg daily was commenced. As a result of persistent elevation of inflammatory markers and a lifelong smoking history, chest radiography was undertaken, and a right-sided pulmonary nodule was demonstrated. A computed tomography (CT) scan of chest, abdomen, and pelvis showed a 3-cm right renal mass, a 3-cm left adrenal mass, bulky retroperitoneal adenopathy, a right pulmonary nodule, left hilar adenopathy, and widespread sclerotic bone metastases. Histology from a biopsy of the lower pole renal mass was consistent with an RCC with spindle cell morphology. Zoledronic acid infusions were initiated. Because of the unusually aggressive presentation, a further biopsy of the renal mass was undertaken at our institution. The biopsy was consistent with an MTSCC of the kidney. Biopsy of the retroperitoneal nodal mass was carried out to exclude a higher grade component or a second pathologic process and confirmed the diagnosis of MTSCC. Immunohistochemical staining for c-KIT was absent, as were mutations in exons 9, 11, 13, and 17 of c-KIT and exons 12, 14, and 18 of PDGFRA. The patient became progressively symptomatic with myalgia, arthralgia, and malaise, and sunitinib was commenced at 50 mg daily on the 4 weeks on/2 weeks off schedule, 7 weeks after the first zoledronic acid infusion. The patient tolerated treatment well, experiencing grade 1 mucositis and diarrhea only. Symptomatic improvement was reported within a few days of starting treatment; a restaging CT at 12 weeks demonstrated a reduction in size of the retroperitoneal nodal mass and left adrenal lesion and stability of other lesions, consistent with a partial response to therapy. At 24 weeks, the patient continues to derive clinical benefit from therapy, and a restaging CT shows stable disease. This is the first report, to our knowledge, of MSTCC of the kidney treated with sunitinib, and it is noteworthy that both symptomatic and radiologic responses occurred. A limitation of this report is that despite the fact that biopsies of both renal and retroperitoneal lesions were performed, it remains possible that the patient has a second diagnosis such as non–small-cell lung carcinoma. However, it should be noted that tumor shrinkage occurred in response to sunitinib in the biopsy-proven MSTCC retroperitoneal lymph node lesion. Sunitinib is an oral inhibitor of multiple receptor tyrosine kinases, including vascular endothelial growth factor receptors, plateletderived growth factor receptors, and c-KIT, and is a standard of care for the first-line treatment of advanced clear cell renal carcinoma. A pivotal phase III trial demonstrated a progression-free survival benefit of sunitinib versus interferon alfa but included patients with clear cell histology only. An expanded access trial of sunitinib allowed all histologic subtypes of RCC, but only 13% of patients had non– clear cell histology, and it is not known whether this population included any patients with MSTCC. The molecular pathology of MSTCC is unknown, and as a consequence, it is impossible to speculate with confidence which of the multiple targets of sunitinib may be implicated in a response to therapy. In light of this report, physicians who treat RCC may wish to consider sunitinib therapy for patients with MSTCC.
Oncologist | 2016
Elena Castro; Christos Mikropoulos; Elizabeth Bancroft; Tokhir Dadaev; Chee Goh; Natalie Taylor; Edward J. Saunders; Nigel Borley; Diana Keating; Elizabeth Page; Sibel Saya; Stephen Hazell; Naomi Livni; Nandita M. deSouza; David E. Neal; Freddie C. Hamdy; Pardeep Kumar; Antonis C. Antoniou; Zsofia Kote-Jarai; Rosalind Eeles
A better assessment of prostate cancer (PrCa) risk is needed to improve screening. The PROFILE pilot study explored the feasibility of single nucleotide polymorphism profiling in men with a family history (FH) of PrCa to investigate the probability of detecting PrCa at prostate biopsy (PB). The results of the present pilot study have demonstrated that PB is a feasible and safe method of PrCa screening in men with a FH.
PLOS Genetics | 2017
Niedzica Camacho; Peter Van Loo; S Edwards; Jonathan Kay; Lucy Matthews; Kerstin Haase; Jeremy Clark; Nening Dennis; Sarah Thomas; Barbara Kremeyer; Jorge Zamora; Adam Butler; Gunes Gundem; Sue Merson; Hayley Luxton; Steve Hawkins; Mohammed J. R. Ghori; Luke Marsden; Adam Lambert; Katalin Karaszi; Gill Pelvender; Charlie E. Massie; Zsofia Kote-Jarai; Keiran Raine; David Jones; William J. Howat; Steven Hazell; Naomi Livni; Cyril Fisher; Christopher Ogden
A variety of models have been proposed to explain regions of recurrent somatic copy number alteration (SCNA) in human cancer. Our study employs Whole Genome DNA Sequence (WGS) data from tumor samples (n = 103) to comprehensively assess the role of the Knudson two hit genetic model in SCNA generation in prostate cancer. 64 recurrent regions of loss and gain were detected, of which 28 were novel, including regions of loss with more than 15% frequency at Chr4p15.2-p15.1 (15.53%), Chr6q27 (16.50%) and Chr18q12.3 (17.48%). Comprehensive mutation screens of genes, lincRNA encoding sequences, control regions and conserved domains within SCNAs demonstrated that a two-hit genetic model was supported in only a minor proportion of recurrent SCNA losses examined (15/40). We found that recurrent breakpoints and regions of inversion often occur within Knudson model SCNAs, leading to the identification of ZNF292 as a target gene for the deletion at 6q14.3-q15 and NKX3.1 as a two-hit target at 8p21.3-p21.2. The importance of alterations of lincRNA sequences was illustrated by the identification of a novel mutational hotspot at the KCCAT42, FENDRR, CAT1886 and STCAT2 loci at the 16q23.1-q24.3 loss. Our data confirm that the burden of SCNAs is predictive of biochemical recurrence, define nine individual regions that are associated with relapse, and highlight the possible importance of ion channel and G-protein coupled-receptor (GPCR) pathways in cancer development. We concluded that a two-hit genetic model accounts for about one third of SCNA indicating that mechanisms, such haploinsufficiency and epigenetic inactivation, account for the remaining SCNA losses.
British Journal of Cancer | 2017
Artitaya Lophatananon; Sarah Stewart-Brown; Zsofia Kote-Jarai; Ali Amin Al Olama; Sara Benlloch Garcia; David E. Neal; Freddie C. Hamdy; Jenny Donovan; Graham G. Giles; Liesel M. FitzGerald; Melissa C. Southey; Paul Pharoah; Nora Pashayan; Henrik Grönberg; Markus Aly; Janet L. Stanford; Hermann Brenner; Aida Karina Dieffenbach; Volker Arndt; Jong Y. Park; Hui-Yi Lin; Thomas A. Sellers; Chavdar Slavov; Radka Kaneva; Vanio Mitev; Jyotsna Batra; Amanda B. Spurdle; Judith A. Clements; Douglas F. Easton; Rosalind Eeles
Background:Evidence on height and prostate cancer risk is mixed, however, recent studies with large data sets support a possible role for its association with the risk of aggressive prostate cancer.Methods:We analysed data from the PRACTICAL consortium consisting of 6207 prostate cancer cases and 6016 controls and a subset of high grade cases (2480 cases). We explored height, polymorphisms in genes related to growth processes as main effects and their possible interactions.Results:The results suggest that height is associated with high-grade prostate cancer risk. Men with height >180 cm are at a 22% increased risk as compared to men with height <173 cm (OR 1.22, 95% CI 1.01–1.48). Genetic variants in the growth pathway gene showed an association with prostate cancer risk. The aggregate scores of the selected variants identified a significantly increased risk of overall prostate cancer and high-grade prostate cancer by 13% and 15%, respectively, in the highest score group as compared to lowest score group.Conclusions:There was no evidence of gene-environment interaction between height and the selected candidate SNPs.Our findings suggest a role of height in high-grade prostate cancer. The effect of genetic variants in the genes related to growth is seen in all cases and high-grade prostate cancer. There is no interaction between these two exposures.Background: Evidence on height and prostate cancer risk is mixed, however, recent studies with large data sets support a possible role for its association with the risk of aggressive prostate cancer. Methods: We analysed data from the PRACTICAL consortium consisting of 6207 prostate cancer cases and 6016 controls and a subset of high grade cases (2480 cases). We explored height, polymorphisms in genes related to growth processes as main effects and their possible interactions. Results: The results suggest that height is associated with high-grade prostate cancer risk. Men with height >180 cm are at a 22% increased risk as compared to men with height <173 cm (OR 1.22, 95% CI 1.01–1.48). Genetic variants in the growth pathway gene showed an association with prostate cancer risk. The aggregate scores of the selected variants identified a significantly increased risk of overall prostate cancer and high-grade prostate cancer by 13% and 15%, respectively, in the highest score group as compared to lowest score group. Conclusions: There was no evidence of gene-environment interaction between height and the selected candidate SNPs. Our findings suggest a role of height in high-grade prostate cancer. The effect of genetic variants in the genes related to growth is seen in all cases and high-grade prostate cancer. There is no interaction between these two exposures.
Nature Genetics | 2015
Colin S. Cooper; Rosalind Eeles; David C. Wedge; Peter Van Loo; Gunes Gundem; Ludmil B. Alexandrov; Barbara Kremeyer; Adam Butler; Andy G. Lynch; Niedzica Camacho; Charlie E. Massie; Jonathan Kay; Hayley Luxton; Sandra Edwards; Zsofia Kote-Jarai; Nening Dennis; Sue Merson; Daniel Leongamornlert; Jorge Zamora; Cathy Corbishley; Sarah Thomas; Serena Nik-Zainal; Manasa Ramakrishna; Sarah O'Meara; Lucy Matthews; Jeremy Clark; Rachel Hurst; Richard Mithen; Robert G. Bristow; Paul C. Boutros
In the version of this article initially published, the following two sentences were omitted from the Acknowledgments: “Sequencing was carried out at the Millard and Muriel Jacobs Genome Facility at the California Institute of Technology. This work was supported by US National Institutes of Health grants to P.W.S. (GM084389) and to R.V.A. (AI056189), by Cornell University salary and start-up funds to E.M.S. and by the Howard Hughes Medical Institute to P.W.S.” The error has been corrected in the HTML and PDF versions of the article.
European Radiology | 2015
Sophie F. Riches; Geoffrey S. Payne; Veronica A. Morgan; David P. Dearnaley; S. Morgan; Mike Partridge; Naomi Livni; Chris Ogden; Nandita M. deSouza
Annals of Diagnostic Pathology | 2012
Khin Thway; John du Parcq; James Larkin; Cyril Fisher; Naomi Livni
Nature Genetics | 2018
David C. Wedge; Gunes Gundem; Thomas J. Mitchell; Dan J. Woodcock; Inigo Martincorena; Mohammed J. R. Ghori; Jorge Zamora; Adam Butler; Hayley C. Whitaker; Zsofia Kote-Jarai; Ludmil B. Alexandrov; Peter Van Loo; Charlie E. Massie; Stefan Dentro; Anne Warren; Clare Verrill; Daniel M. Berney; Nening Dennis; Sue Merson; Steve Hawkins; William J. Howat; Yong-Jie Lu; Adam Lambert; Jonathan Kay; Barbara Kremeyer; Katalin Karaszi; Hayley Luxton; Niedzica Camacho; Luke Marsden; S Edwards
School of Biomedical Sciences; Faculty of Health; Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation | 2017
Artitaya Lophatananon; Sarah Stewart-Brown; Zsofia Kote-Jarai; Ali Amin Al Olama; Sara Benlloch Garcia; David E. Neal; Freddie C. Hamdy; Jenny Donovan; Graham G. Giles; Liesel M. FitzGerald; Melissa C. Southey; Paul Pharoah; Nora Pashayan; Henrik Grönberg; Fredrik Wiklund; Markus Aly; Janet L. Stanford; Hermann Brenner; Aida Karina Dieffenbach; Volker Arndt; Jong Y. Park; Hui-Yi Lin; Thomas A. Sellers; Chavdar Slavov; Radka Kaneva; Vanio Mitev; Jyotsna Batra; Amanda B. Spurdle; Judith A. Clements; Johanna Schleutker