Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Narayan Yoganandan is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Narayan Yoganandan.


Clinical Biomechanics | 2001

Biomechanics of the cervical spine Part 2. Cervical spine soft tissue responses and biomechanical modeling.

Narayan Yoganandan; Srirangam Kumaresan; Frank A. Pintar

OBJECTIVE The responses and contributions of the soft tissue structures of the human neck are described with a focus on mathematical modeling. Spinal ligaments, intervertebral discs, zygapophysial joints, and uncovertebral joints of the cervical spine are included. Finite element modeling approaches have been emphasized. Representative data relevant to the development and execution of the model are discussed. A brief description is given on the functional mechanical role of the soft tissue components. Geometrical characteristics such as length and cross-sectional areas, and material properties such as force-displacement and stress-strain responses, are described for all components. Modeling approaches are discussed for each soft tissue structure. The final discussion emphasizes the normal and abnormal (e.g., degenerative joint disease, iatrogenic alteration, trauma) behaviors of the cervical spine with a focus on all these soft tissue responses. A brief description is provided on the modeling of the developmental biomechanics of the pediatric spine with a focus on soft tissues. Relevance. Experimentally validated models based on accurate geometry, material property, boundary, and loading conditions are useful to delineate the clinical biomechanics of the spine. Both external and internal responses of the various spinal components, a data set not obtainable directly from experiments, can be determined using computational models. Since soft tissues control the complex structural response, an accurate simulation of their anatomic, functional, and biomechanical characteristics is necessary to understand the behavior of the cervical spine under normal and abnormal conditions such as facetectomy, discectomy, laminectomy, and fusion.


Spine | 1988

Tensile strength of spinal ligaments

Joel B. Myklebust; Frank A. Pintar; Narayan Yoganandan; Joseph F. Cusick; Dennis J. Maiman; Thomas J. Myers; Anthony Sances

Spinal ligaments from 41 fresh human male cadavers were tested. The ligaments were tested In situ by sectioning all elements except the one under study. The force deflection curves demonstrated a sigmoidal shape, and the point at which an increase in deflection was obtained with decreasing force was taken as failure. The force and deformation at failure are shown for each ligament as a function of spinal level.


Journal of Biomechanics | 1992

Biomechanical properties of human lumbar spine ligaments

Frank A. Pintar; Narayan Yoganandan; Thomas J. Myers; Ali Elhagediab; Anthony Sances

Biomechanical properties of the six major lumbar spine ligaments were determined from 38 fresh human cadaveric subjects for direct incorporation into mathematical and finite element models. Anterior and posterior longitudinal ligaments, joint capsules, ligamentum flavum, interspinous, and supraspinous ligaments were evaluated. Using the results from in situ isolation tests, individual force-deflection responses from 132 samples were transformed with a normalization procedure into mean force-deflection properties to describe the nonlinear characteristics. Ligament responses based on the mechanical characteristics as well as anatomical considerations, were grouped into T12-L2, L2-L4, and L4-S1 levels maintaining individuality and nonlinearity. A total of 18 data curves are presented. Geometrical measurements of original length and cross-sectional area for these six major ligaments were determined using cryomicrotomy techniques. Derived parameters including failure stress and strain were computed using the strength and geometry information. These properties for the lumbar spinal ligaments which are based on identical definitions used in mechanical testing and geometrical assay will permit more realistic and consistent inputs for analytical models.


Journal of Biomechanical Engineering-transactions of The Asme | 2000

Geometric and Mechanical Properties of Human Cervical Spine Ligaments

Narayan Yoganandan; Srirangam Kumaresan; Frank A. Pintar

This study characterized the geometry and mechanical properties of the cervical ligaments from C2-T1 levels. The lengths and cross-sectional areas of the anterior longitudinal ligament, posterior longitudinal ligament, joint capsules, ligamentum flavum, and interspinous ligament were determined from eight human cadavers using cryomicrotomy images. The geometry was defined based on spinal anatomy and its potential use in complex mathematical models. The biomechanical force-deflection, stiffness, energy, stress, and strain data were obtained from 25 cadavers using in situ axial tensile tests. Data were grouped into middle (C2-C5) and lower (C5-T1) cervical levels. Both the geometric length and area of cross section, and the biomechanical properties including the stiffness, stress, strain, energy, and Youngs modulus, were presented for each of the five ligaments. In both groups, joint capsules and ligamentum flavum exhibited the highest cross-sectional area (p < 0.005), while the longitudinal ligaments had the highest length measurements. Although not reaching statistical significance, for all ligaments, cross-sectional areas were higher in the C5-T1 than in the C2-C5 group; and lengths were higher in the C2-C5 than in the C5-T1 group with the exception of the flavum (Table 1 in the main text). Force-deflection characteristics (plots) are provided for all ligaments in both groups. Failure strains were higher for the ligaments of the posterior (interspinous ligament, joint capsules, and ligamentum flavum) than the anterior complex (anterior and posterior longitudinal ligaments) in both groups. In contrast, the failure stress and Youngs modulus were higher for the anterior and posterior longitudinal ligaments compared to the ligaments of the posterior complex in the two groups. However, similar tendencies in the structural responses (stiffness, energy) were not found in both groups. Researchers attempting to incorporate these data into stress-analysis models can choose the specific parameter(s) based on the complexity of the model used to study the biomechanical behavior of the human cervical spine.


Journal of Orthopaedic Research | 2001

Contribution of disc degeneration to osteophyte formation in the cervical spine: a biomechanical investigation

Srirangam Kumaresan; Narayan Yoganandan; Frank A. Pintar; Dennis J. Maiman; Vijay K. Goel

Cervical spine disorders such as spondylotic radiculopathy and myelopathy are often related to osteophyte formation. Bone remodeling experimental—analytical studies have correlated biomechanical responses such as stress and strain energy density to the formation of bony outgrowth. Using these responses of the spinal components, the present study was conducted to investigate the basis for the occurrence of disc‐related pathological conditions. An anatomically accurate and validated intact finite element model of the C4‐C5‐C6 cervical spine was used to simulate progressive disc degeneration at the C5‐C6 level. Slight degeneration included an alteration of material properties of the nucleus pulposus representing the dehydration process. Moderate degeneration included an alteration of fiber content and material properties of the anulus fibrosus representing the disintegrated nature of the anulus in addition to dehydrated nucleus. Severe degeneration included decrease in the intervertebral disc height with dehydrated nucleus and disintegrated anulus. The intact and three degenerated models were exercised under compression, and the overall force—displacement response, local segmental stiffness, anulus fiber strain, disc bulge, anulus stress, load shared by the disc and facet joints, pressure in the disc, facet and uncovertebral joints, and strain energy density and stress in the vertebral cortex were determined. The overall stiffness (C4‐C6) increased with the severity of degeneration. The segmental stiffness at the degenerated level (C5‐C6) increased with the severity of degeneration. Intervertebral disc bulge and anulus stress and strain decreased at the degenerated level. The strain energy density and stress in vertebral cortex increased adjacent to the degenerated disc. Specifically, the anterior region of the cortex responded with a higher increase in these responses. The increased strain energy density and stress in the vertebral cortex over time may induce the remodeling process according to Wolffs law, leading to the formation of osteophytes.


Clinical Biomechanics | 2001

Biomechanics of the cervical spine Part 3: minor injuries

Nikolai Bogduk; Narayan Yoganandan

Minor injuries of the cervical spine are essentially defined as injuries that do not involve a fracture. Archetypical of minor cervical injury is the whiplash injury. Among other reasons, neck pain after whiplash has been controversial because critics do not credit that an injury to the neck can occur in a whiplash accident. In pursuit of the injury mechanism, bioengineers have used mathematical modelling, cadaver studies, and human volunteers to study the kinematics of the neck under the conditions of whiplash. Particularly illuminating have been cinephotographic and cineradiographic studies of cadavers and of normal volunteers. They demonstrate that externally, the head and neck do not exceed normal physiological limits. However, the cervical spine undergoes a sigmoid deformation very early after impact. During this deformation, lower cervical segments undergo posterior rotation around an abnormally high axis of rotation, resulting in abnormal separation of the anterior elements of the cervical spine, and impaction of the zygapophysial joints. The demonstration of a mechanism for injury of the zygapophysial joints complements postmortem studies that reveal lesions in these joints, and clinical studies that have demonstrated that zygapophysial joint pain is the single most common basis for chronic neck pain after injury.


Spine | 2001

Whiplash Syndrome : Kinematic Factors Influencing Pain Patterns

Joseph F. Cusick; Frank A. Pintar; Narayan Yoganandan

Study Design. The overall, local, and segmental kinematic responses of intact human cadaver head–neck complexes undergoing an inertia-type rear-end impact were quantified. High-speed, high-resolution digital video data of individual facet joint motions during the event were statistically evaluated. Objectives. To deduce the potential for various vertebral column components to be exposed to adverse strains that could result in their participation as pain generators, and to evaluate the abnormal motions that occur during this traumatic event. Summary of Background Data. The vertebral column is known to incur a nonphysiologic curvature during the application of an inertial-type rear-end impact. No previous studies, however, have quantified the local component motions (facet joint compression and sliding) that occur as a result of rear-impact loading. Methods. Intact human cadaver head–neck complexes underwent inertia-type rear-end impact with predominant moments in the sagittal plane. High-resolution digital video was used to track the motions of individual facet joints during the event. Localized angular motion changes at each vertebral segment were analyzed to quantify the abnormal curvature changes. Facet joint motions were analyzed statistically to obtain differences between anterior and posterior strains. Results. The spine initially assumed an S-curve, with the upper spinal levels in flexion and the lower spinal levels in extension. The upper C-spine flexion occurred early in the event (approximately 60 ms) during the time the head maintained its static inertia. The lower cervical spine facet joints demonstrated statistically greater compressive motions in the dorsal aspect than in the ventral aspect, whereas the sliding anteroposterior motions were the same. Conclusions. The nonphysiologic kinematic responses during a whiplash impact may induce stresses in certain upper cervical neural structures or lower facet joints, resulting in possible compromise sufficient to elicit either neuropathic or nociceptive pain. These dynamic alterations of the upper level (occiput to C2) could impart potentially adverse forces to related neural structures, with subsequent development of a neuropathic pain process. The pinching of the lower facet joints may lead to potential for local tissue injury and nociceptive pain.


Spine | 1986

Experimental spinal injuries with vertical impact.

Narayan Yoganandan; Anthony Sances; Dennis J. Maiman; Joel B. Myklebust; Peter Pech; Sanford J. Larson

Fifteen fresh, intact, human male cadavers suspended head down were dropped vertically from a height of 0.9- 1.5 meters. In eight specimens the heads were restrained to simulate muscle forces. The head-neck complex was oriented for maximal axial loading of the cervical and upper thoracic spine. In several cadavers, load cells were placed in cervical bodies. Head impact forces of 3,000-7,000 N in the unrestrained, and 9,800-14,600 N in the restrained, cadavers were recorded. There were more cervical and upper thoracic fractures in the restrained cadavers than in the nonrestrained subjects. The biomechanic and pathologic findings, including results of cryomicrotomography and computed tomography (CT), are discussed.


Clinical Biomechanics | 1999

Finite element analysis of the cervical spine: a material property sensitivity study

Srirangam Kumaresan; Narayan Yoganandan; Frank A. Pintar

OBJECTIVE The study determined the effect of variations in the material properties of the cervical spinal components on the output of the finite element analysis (external and internal responses of the cervical spine) under physiologic load vectors. DESIGN A three-dimensional (3D) anatomically accurate finite element model comprising of the C4-C5-C6 cervical spine unit including the three vertebrae, two interconnecting intervertebral discs, and the anterior and posterior ligament complex is used. BACKGROUND The effect of material property variations of spinal components on the human lumbar spine biomechanics is extensively studied. However, a similar investigation of the cervical spine is lacking. METHODS Parametric studies on the variations in the material properties of all the cervical spine components including the cortical shell, cancellous core, endplates, intervertebral disc, posterior elements and ligaments were conducted by exercising the 3D finite element model under flexion, extension, lateral bending and axial torsion loading modes. Low, basic and high material property cases for each of the six components under all the four physiologic loading modes were considered in the finite element analysis. A total of 432 results were evaluated to analyze the external angular rotation, and the internal stresses in the middle vertebral body, the superior and inferior endplates and the two intervertebral discs. RESULTS Variations in the material properties of the different cervical spinal components produced dissimilar changes in the external and internal responses. Variations in the material properties of the cancellous core, cortical shell, endplates and posterior element structures representing the hard tissues did not affect the external angular motion, and the internal stresses of the inferior and superior intervertebral discs under all four loading modes. In contrast, variations in the material properties of the intervertebral disc and ligament structures representing the soft tissues significantly altered the angular motion, and the stresses in the inferior and superior intervertebral discs of the cervical spine. CONCLUSION The material properties of the soft tissue structures have a preponderant effect on the external and internal responses of the cervical spine compared with the changes in the material properties of the hard tissue structures. RELEVANCE Bone remodeling (e.g., osteophyte) secondary to degeneration of the human cervical joints may be explained by a change in the material property of the soft tissues, coupled with an increase in stress (due to these material property variations) in the spinal components. Consequently, to accurately predict the biomedical effects of cervical spine degeneration, it is critical to accurately determine the material property of these components.


Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing | 1996

Finite-element models of the human head

Liming Voo; Srirangam Kumaresan; Frank A. Pintar; Narayan Yoganandan; A. SancesJr.

A review is presented of the existing finite-element (FE) models for the biomechanics of human head injury. Finite element analysis can be an important tool in describing the injury biomechanics of the human head. Complex geometric and material properties pose challenges to FE modelling. Various assumptions and simplifications are made in model development that require experimental validation. More recent models incorporate anatomic details with higher precision. The cervical vertebral column and spinal cord are included. Model results have been more qualitative than quantitative owing to the lack of adequate experimental validation. Advances include transient stress distribution in the brain tissue, frequency responses, effects of boundary conditions, pressure release mechanism of the foramen magnum and the spinal cord, verification of rotation and cavitation theories of brain injury, and protective effects of helmets. These theoretical results provide a basic understanding of the internal biomechanical responses of the head under various dynamic loading conditions. Basic experimental research is still needed to determine more accurate material properties and injury tolerance criteria, so that FE models can fully exercise their analytical and predictive power for the study and prevention of human head injury.

Collaboration


Dive into the Narayan Yoganandan's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Frank A. Pintar

United States Department of Veterans Affairs

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Dennis J. Maiman

Medical College of Wisconsin

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Brian D. Stemper

Medical College of Wisconsin

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Anthony Sances

Medical College of Wisconsin

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Thomas A. Gennarelli

Medical College of Wisconsin

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

John Reinartz

Medical College of Wisconsin

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Joseph F. Cusick

Medical College of Wisconsin

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Srirangam Kumaresan

Medical College of Wisconsin

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

John R. Humm

Medical College of Wisconsin

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge