Natalie Silliman
Johns Hopkins University
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Natalie Silliman.
Science | 2007
Laura D. Wood; D. Williams Parsons; Siân Jones; Jimmy Lin; Tobias Sjöblom; Rebecca J. Leary; Dong Shen; Simina M. Boca; Thomas D. Barber; Janine Ptak; Natalie Silliman; Steve Szabo; Zoltan Dezso; Vadim Ustyanksky; Tatiana Nikolskaya; Yuri Nikolsky; Rachel Karchin; Paul Wilson; Joshua S. Kaminker; Zemin Zhang; Randal Croshaw; Joseph Willis; Dawn Dawson; Michail Shipitsin; James K V Willson; Saraswati Sukumar; Kornelia Polyak; Ben Ho Park; Charit L. Pethiyagoda; P.V. Krishna Pant
Human cancer is caused by the accumulation of mutations in oncogenes and tumor suppressor genes. To catalog the genetic changes that occur during tumorigenesis, we isolated DNA from 11 breast and 11 colorectal tumors and determined the sequences of the genes in the Reference Sequence database in these samples. Based on analysis of exons representing 20,857 transcripts from 18,191 genes, we conclude that the genomic landscapes of breast and colorectal cancers are composed of a handful of commonly mutated gene “mountains” and a much larger number of gene “hills” that are mutated at low frequency. We describe statistical and bioinformatic tools that may help identify mutations with a role in tumorigenesis. These results have implications for understanding the nature and heterogeneity of human cancers and for using personal genomics for tumor diagnosis and therapy.
Cancer Biology & Therapy | 2004
Kurtis E. Bachman; Pedram Argani; Yardena Samuels; Natalie Silliman; Janine Ptak; Steve Szabo; Hiroyuki Konishi; Bedri Karakas; Brian G. Blair; Clarence Lin; Brock A. Peters; Victor E. Velculescu; Ben Ho Park
The phosphatidylinositol 3-kinases (PI3Ks) are known regulators of cellular growth and proliferation. It has recently been reported that somatic mutations within the PI3K subunit p110? (PIK3CA) are present in human colorectal and other cancers. Here we show that thirteen of fifty-three breast cancers (25%) contain somatic mutations in PIK3CA, with the majority of mutations located in the kinase domain. These results demonstrate that PIK3CA is the most mutated oncogene in breast cancer and support a role for PIK3CA in epithelial carcinogenesis.
Cancer Research | 2004
Zhenghe Wang; Jordan M. Cummins; Dong Shen; Daniel P. Cahill; Prasad V. Jallepalli; Tian Li Wang; D. Williams Parsons; Giovanni Traverso; Mark M. Awad; Natalie Silliman; Janine Ptak; Steve Szabo; James K V Willson; Sanford D. Markowitz; Michael L. Goldberg; Roger Karess; Kenneth W. Kinzler; Bert Vogelstein; Victor E. Velculescu; Christoph Lengauer
Although most colorectal cancers are chromosomally unstable, the basis for this instability has not been defined. To determine whether genes shown to cause chromosomal instability in model systems were mutated in colorectal cancers, we identified their human homologues and determined their sequence in a panel of colorectal cancers. We found 19 somatic mutations in five genes representing three distinct instability pathways. Seven mutations were found in MRE11, whose product is involved in double-strand break repair. Four mutations were found among hZw10, hZwilch/FLJ10036, and hRod/KNTC, whose products bind to one another in a complex that localizes to kinetochores and controls chromosome segregation. Eight mutations were found in Ding, a previously uncharacterized gene with sequence similarity to the Saccharomyces cerevisiae Pds1, whose product is essential for proper chromosome disjunction. This analysis buttresses the evidence that chromosomal instability has a genetic basis and provides clues to the mechanistic basis of instability in cancers.
Science Translational Medicine | 2016
Jeanne Tie; Yuxuan Wang; Cristian Tomasetti; Lu Li; Simeon Springer; Isaac Kinde; Natalie Silliman; Mark Tacey; Hui-Li Wong; Michael Christie; Suzanne Kosmider; Iain Skinner; Rachel Wong; Malcolm Steel; Ben Tran; Jayesh Desai; Ian Jones; Andrew Haydon; Theresa Hayes; Timothy Jay Price; Robert L. Strausberg; Luis A. Diaz; Nickolas Papadopoulos; Kenneth W. Kinzler; Bert Vogelstein; Peter Gibbs
Detection of circulating tumor DNA in patients with resected stage II colon cancer provides evidence of residual disease. Footprints of persistent cancer Stage II colon cancer, which has spread through the wall of the colon but has not metastasized to the lymph nodes, can present a therapeutic dilemma. On one hand, these tumors can usually be completely removed by surgery, and the majority does not recur even without chemotherapy. On the other hand, it is difficult to determine which of these tumors will recur and to identify patients who would benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy after surgery. Tie et al. show that the presence of circulating tumor DNA in a patient’s blood after surgery is a sign of persistent tumor and a greatly increased risk of relapse, suggesting that this group of patients may require chemotherapy to prevent recurrence. Detection of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) after resection of stage II colon cancer may identify patients at the highest risk of recurrence and help inform adjuvant treatment decisions. We used massively parallel sequencing–based assays to evaluate the ability of ctDNA to detect minimal residual disease in 1046 plasma samples from a prospective cohort of 230 patients with resected stage II colon cancer. In patients not treated with adjuvant chemotherapy, ctDNA was detected postoperatively in 14 of 178 (7.9%) patients, 11 (79%) of whom had recurred at a median follow-up of 27 months; recurrence occurred in only 16 (9.8 %) of 164 patients with negative ctDNA [hazard ratio (HR), 18; 95% confidence interval (CI), 7.9 to 40; P < 0.001]. In patients treated with chemotherapy, the presence of ctDNA after completion of chemotherapy was also associated with an inferior recurrence-free survival (HR, 11; 95% CI, 1.8 to 68; P = 0.001). ctDNA detection after stage II colon cancer resection provides direct evidence of residual disease and identifies patients at very high risk of recurrence.
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America | 2002
Tian Li Wang; Carlo Rago; Natalie Silliman; Janine Ptak; Sanford D. Markowitz; James K V Willson; Giovanni Parmigiani; Kenneth W. Kinzler; Bert Vogelstein; Victor E. Velculescu
Although a small fraction of human cancers have increased rates of somatic mutation because of known deficiencies in DNA repair, little is known about the prevalence of somatic alterations in the vast majority of human cancers. To systematically assess nonsynonymous somatic alterations in colorectal neoplasia, we used DNA sequencing to analyze ≈3.2 Mb of coding tumor DNA comprising 1,811 exons from 470 genes. In total, we identified only three distinct somatic mutations, comprising two missense changes and one 14-bp deletion, each in a different gene. The accumulation of approximately one nonsynonymous somatic change per Mb of tumor DNA is consistent with a rate of mutation in tumor cells that is similar to that of normal cells. These data suggest that most sporadic colorectal cancers do not display a mutator phenotype at the nucleotide level. They also have significant implications for the interpretation of somatic mutations in candidate tumor-suppressor genes.
Science | 2018
Joshua D. Cohen; Lu Li; Yuxuan Wang; Christopher J. Thoburn; Bahman Afsari; Ludmila Danilova; Christopher Douville; Ammar A. Javed; Fay Wong; Austin Mattox; Ralph H. Hruban; Christopher L. Wolfgang; Michael Goggins; Marco Dal Molin; Tian Li Wang; Richard Roden; Alison P. Klein; Janine Ptak; Lisa Dobbyn; Joy Schaefer; Natalie Silliman; Maria Popoli; Joshua T. Vogelstein; James Browne; Robert E. Schoen; Randall E. Brand; Jeanne Tie; Peter Gibbs; Hui-Li Wong; Aaron S. Mansfield
SEEK and you may find cancer earlier Many cancers can be cured by surgery and/or systemic therapies when detected before they have metastasized. This clinical reality, coupled with the growing appreciation that cancers rapid genetic evolution limits its response to drugs, have fueled interest in methodologies for earlier detection of the disease. Cohen et al. developed a noninvasive blood test, called CancerSEEK that can detect eight common human cancer types (see the Perspective by Kalinich and Haber). The test assesses eight circulating protein biomarkers and tumor-specific mutations in circulating DNA. In a study of 1000 patients previously diagnosed with cancer and 850 healthy control individuals, CancerSEEK detected cancer with a sensitivity of 69 to 98% (depending on cancer type) and 99% specificity. Science, this issue p. 926; see also p. 866 A blood test that combines protein and DNA markers may allow earlier detection of eight common cancer types. Earlier detection is key to reducing cancer deaths. Here, we describe a blood test that can detect eight common cancer types through assessment of the levels of circulating proteins and mutations in cell-free DNA. We applied this test, called CancerSEEK, to 1005 patients with nonmetastatic, clinically detected cancers of the ovary, liver, stomach, pancreas, esophagus, colorectum, lung, or breast. CancerSEEK tests were positive in a median of 70% of the eight cancer types. The sensitivities ranged from 69 to 98% for the detection of five cancer types (ovary, liver, stomach, pancreas, and esophagus) for which there are no screening tests available for average-risk individuals. The specificity of CancerSEEK was greater than 99%: only 7 of 812 healthy controls scored positive. In addition, CancerSEEK localized the cancer to a small number of anatomic sites in a median of 83% of the patients.
Science Translational Medicine | 2015
Yuxuan Wang; Simeon Springer; Carolyn L. Mulvey; Natalie Silliman; Joy Schaefer; Mark Sausen; Nathan T. James; Eleni M. Rettig; Theresa Guo; Curtis R. Pickering; Justin A. Bishop; Christine H. Chung; Joseph A. Califano; David W. Eisele; Carole Fakhry; Christine G. Gourin; Patrick K. Ha; Hyunseok Kang; A.P. Kiess; Wayne M. Koch; Jeffrey N. Myers; Harry Quon; Jeremy D. Richmon; David Sidransky; Ralph P. Tufano; William H. Westra; Chetan Bettegowda; Luis A. Diaz; Nickolas Papadopoulos; Kenneth W. Kinzler
Tumor DNA in saliva and plasma can provide a noninvasive biomarker for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. A cancer test that’s worth a spit Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma is one of the most common cancers worldwide, and its incidence is increasing. This is a difficult-to-treat cancer for which few targeted agents are available, and there are no biomarkers for monitoring therapeutic progress. Wang et al. discovered that tumor DNA can be detected and analyzed in the blood of most patients with head and neck cancers, as well as in the saliva of those with cancers of the oral cavity. Moreover, they found preliminary evidence suggesting that tumor DNA may be detectable in saliva before clinical evidence of tumor recurrence, which may be useful for patient monitoring if this result is confirmed in larger studies. To explore the potential of tumor-specific DNA as a biomarker for head and neck squamous cell carcinomas (HNSCC), we queried DNA from saliva or plasma of 93 HNSCC patients. We searched for somatic mutations or human papillomavirus genes, collectively referred to as tumor DNA. When both plasma and saliva were tested, tumor DNA was detected in 96% of 47 patients. The fractions of patients with detectable tumor DNA in early- and late-stage disease were 100% (n = 10) and 95% (n = 37), respectively. When segregated by site, tumor DNA was detected in 100% (n = 15), 91% (n = 22), 100% (n = 7), and 100% (n = 3) of patients with tumors of the oral cavity, oropharynx, larynx, and hypopharynx, respectively. In saliva, tumor DNA was found in 100% of patients with oral cavity cancers and in 47 to 70% of patients with cancers of the other sites. In plasma, tumor DNA was found in 80% of patients with oral cavity cancers, and in 86 to 100% of patients with cancers of the other sites. Thus, saliva is preferentially enriched for tumor DNA from the oral cavity, whereas plasma is preferentially enriched for tumor DNA from the other sites. Tumor DNA in saliva was found postsurgically in three patients before clinical diagnosis of recurrence, but in none of the five patients without recurrence. Tumor DNA in the saliva and plasma appears to be a potentially valuable biomarker for detection of HNSCC.
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America | 2017
Joshua D. Cohen; Ammar A. Javed; Christopher J. Thoburn; Fay Wong; Jeanne Tie; Peter Gibbs; C. Max Schmidt; Michele T. Yip-Schneider; Peter J. Allen; Mark A. Schattner; Randall E. Brand; Aatur D. Singhi; Gloria M. Petersen; Seung-Mo Hong; Song Cheol Kim; Massimo Falconi; Claudio Doglioni; Matthew J. Weiss; Nita Ahuja; Jin He; Martin A. Makary; Anirban Maitra; Samir M. Hanash; Marco Dal Molin; Yuxuan Wang; Lu Li; Janine Ptak; Lisa Dobbyn; Joy Schaefer; Natalie Silliman
Significance Few patients with pancreatic cancer survive longer than 5 y, in part because most patients are identified only after their disease has progressed to an advanced stage. In this study, we show how combining mutations in circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) with protein markers can result in a screening test with improved sensitivity while retaining specificity. The combination of the ctDNA and protein markers was superior to any single marker. Moreover, the combination detected nearly two-thirds of pancreatic cancers that had no evidence of distant metastasis at the time of surgical resection. The strategy may represent an approach to detect cancers of many types at an earlier stage. The earlier diagnosis of cancer is one of the keys to reducing cancer deaths in the future. Here we describe our efforts to develop a noninvasive blood test for the detection of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. We combined blood tests for KRAS gene mutations with carefully thresholded protein biomarkers to determine whether the combination of these markers was superior to any single marker. The cohort tested included 221 patients with resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas and 182 control patients without known cancer. KRAS mutations were detected in the plasma of 66 patients (30%), and every mutation found in the plasma was identical to that subsequently found in the patient’s primary tumor (100% concordance). The use of KRAS in conjunction with four thresholded protein biomarkers increased the sensitivity to 64%. Only one of the 182 plasma samples from the control cohort was positive for any of the DNA or protein biomarkers (99.5% specificity). This combinatorial approach may prove useful for the earlier detection of many cancer types.
Science Translational Medicine | 2018
Yuxuan Wang; Lu Li; Christopher Douville; Joshua D. Cohen; Ting Tai Yen; Isaac Kinde; Karin Sundfelt; Susanne K. Kjaer; Ralph H. Hruban; Ie Ming Shih; Tian Li Wang; Robert J. Kurman; Simeon Springer; Janine Ptak; Maria Popoli; Joy Schaefer; Natalie Silliman; Lisa Dobbyn; Edward J. Tanner; Ana Angarita; Maria Lycke; Kirsten Marie Jochumsen; Bahman Afsari; Ludmila Danilova; Douglas A. Levine; Kris Jardon; Xing Zeng; Jocelyne Arseneau; Lili Fu; Luis A. Diaz
Endometrial and ovarian cancers can be detected through the analysis of DNA from Pap test fluids, intrauterine samples, and plasma. Brushing up on early cancer detection Despite the many recent advances in cancer diagnosis and treatment, ovarian cancer remains one of the most lethal malignancies, in part because there are no accurate screening methods for this disease and it is often diagnosed at a late stage. To develop a screening tool for ovarian and endometrial cancers, Wang et al. combined genetic analysis of fluids obtained through routine Papanicolau testing, normally done for cervical cancer, with analysis of tumor DNA circulating in the blood. The authors also used intrauterine sampling with Tao brushes to further increase the sensitivity of detection for the less accessible tumors. We report the detection of endometrial and ovarian cancers based on genetic analyses of DNA recovered from the fluids obtained during a routine Papanicolaou (Pap) test. The new test, called PapSEEK, incorporates assays for mutations in 18 genes as well as an assay for aneuploidy. In Pap brush samples from 382 endometrial cancer patients, 81% [95% confidence interval (CI), 77 to 85%] were positive, including 78% of patients with early-stage disease. The sensitivity in 245 ovarian cancer patients was 33% (95% CI, 27 to 39%), including 34% of patients with early-stage disease. In contrast, only 1.4% of 714 women without cancer had positive Pap brush samples (specificity, ~99%). Next, we showed that intrauterine sampling with a Tao brush increased the detection of malignancy over endocervical sampling with a Pap brush: 93% of 123 (95% CI, 87 to 97%) patients with endometrial cancer and 45% of 51 (95% CI, 31 to 60%) patients with ovarian cancer were positive, whereas none of the samples from 125 women without cancer were positive (specificity, 100%). Finally, in 83 ovarian cancer patients in whom plasma was available, circulating tumor DNA was found in 43% of patients (95% CI, 33 to 55%). When plasma and Pap brush samples were both tested, the sensitivity for ovarian cancer increased to 63% (95% CI, 51 to 73%). These results demonstrate the potential of mutation-based diagnostics to detect gynecologic cancers at a stage when they are more likely to be curable.
eLife | 2018
Simeon Springer; Chung-Hsin Chen; Maria Del Carmen Rodriguez Pena; Lu Li; Christopher Douville; Yuxuan Wang; Joshua D. Cohen; Diana Taheri; Natalie Silliman; Joy Schaefer; Janine Ptak; Lisa Dobbyn; Maria Papoli; Isaac Kinde; Bahman Afsari; Aline C. Tregnago; Stephania M. Bezerra; Christopher VandenBussche; Kazutoshi Fujita; Dilek Ertoy; Isabela Cunha; Lijia Yu; Trinity J. Bivalacqua; Arthur P. Grollman; Luis A. Diaz; Rachel Karchin; Ludmila Danilova; Chao-Yuan Huang; Chia-Tung Shun; Robert J. Turesky
Current non-invasive approaches for detection of urothelial cancers are suboptimal. We developed a test to detect urothelial neoplasms using DNA recovered from cells shed into urine. UroSEEK incorporates massive parallel sequencing assays for mutations in 11 genes and copy number changes on 39 chromosome arms. In 570 patients at risk for bladder cancer (BC), UroSEEK was positive in 83% of those who developed BC. Combined with cytology, UroSEEK detected 95% of patients who developed BC. Of 56 patients with upper tract urothelial cancer, 75% tested positive by UroSEEK, including 79% of those with non-invasive tumors. UroSEEK detected genetic abnormalities in 68% of urines obtained from BC patients under surveillance who demonstrated clinical evidence of recurrence. The advantages of UroSEEK over cytology were evident in low-grade BCs; UroSEEK detected 67% of cases whereas cytology detected none. These results establish the foundation for a new non-invasive approach for detection of urothelial cancer.