Natasha Purington

Anti-IgE treatment with oral immunotherapy in multifood allergic participants: a double-blind, randomised, controlled trial

Summary BACKGROUND Despite progress in single food oral immunotherapy (OIT), there is little evidence concerning the safety and efficacy of treating individuals with multiple food (multifood) allergies. We conducted a pilot study testing whether anti-IgE (omalizumab) combined with multifood OIT benefitted multifood allergic patients. METHODS In this blinded, phase 2 clinical trial conducted at Stanford University, 48 participants, aged 4-15 years, with multifood allergies validated by double-blind, placebo-controlled food challenges (DBPCFCs) to their offending foods were block randomized (3:1) to receive multifood OIT to 2-5 foods, together with omalizumab (n=36) or placebo (n=12). Omalizumab or placebo was administered subcutaneously for 16 weeks with OIT starting at week 8; omalizumab or placebo was stopped 20 weeks before exit DBPCFCs (week 36) to determine the primary endpoint: the proportion of participants who passed DBPCFCs to at least 2 of their offending foods. This completed trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, . FINDINGS At week 36, a significantly greater proportion of the omalizumab (30/36, 83%) vs. placebo (4/12, 33%) participants passed DBPCFCs to 2 g protein for ≥ 2 of their offending foods (odds ratio (OR): 10, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1·8, 58·3, P=0·004). The same individuals also tolerated 4 g protein of ≥ 2 foods (secondary endpoint, P=0·004). A greater proportion of omalizumab (13/17, 77%) vs. placebo (0/5, 0%) participants passed a DBPCFC to 2 g protein for ≥ 4 of their offending foods (OR: 33, 95% CI: 1·9, ∞, P=0·01). All participants completed the study. There were no serious or severe (≥ grade 3) adverse events. INTERPRETATION In multifood allergic patients, omalizumab improves the efficacy of multifood OIT and enables safe and rapid desensitization. FUNDING NIH U19 AADCRC and Opportunity Fund, Sean N. Parker Center for Allergy and Asthma Research at Stanford University, Simons Foundation, Myra Reinhard Foundation, FARE Center of Excellence, Department of Pathology, and Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University.

Development of a tool predicting severity of allergic reaction during peanut challenge

BACKGROUND Reliable prognostic markers for predicting severity of allergic reactions during oral food challenges (OFCs) have not been established. OBJECTIVE To develop a predictive algorithm of a food challenge severity score (CSS) to identify those at higher risk for severe reactions to a standardized peanut OFC. METHODS Medical history and allergy test results were obtained for 120 peanut allergic participants who underwent double-blind, placebo-controlled food challenges. Reactions were assigned a CSS between 1 and 6 based on cumulative tolerated dose and a severity clinical indicator. Demographic characteristics, clinical features, peanut component IgE values, and a basophil activation marker were considered in a multistep analysis to derive a flexible decision rule to understand risk during peanut of OFC. RESULTS A total of 18.3% participants had a severe reaction (CSS >4). The decision rule identified the following 3 variables (in order of importance) as predictors of reaction severity: ratio of percentage of CD63hi stimulation with peanut to percentage of CD63hi anti-IgE (CD63 ratio), history of exercise-induced asthma, and ratio of forced expiratory volume in 1 second to forced vital capacity (FEV1/FVC) ratio. The CD63 ratio alone was a strong predictor of CSS (P < .001). CONCLUSION The CSS is a novel tool that combines dose thresholds and allergic reactions to understand risks associated with peanut OFCs. Laboratory values (CD63 ratio), along with clinical variables (exercise-induced asthma and FEV1/FVC ratio) contribute to the predictive ability of the severity of reaction to peanut OFCs. Further testing of this decision rule is needed in a larger external data source before it can be considered outside research settings. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02103270.

Bone marrow histomorphological criteria can accurately diagnose hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis

Hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis is a rare multi-system inflammatory disorder with diagnostic criteria based on the HLH-2004 trial. Hemophagocytosis is the only histomorphologic criterion, but in isolation is neither specific nor sensitive for the diagnosis of hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis. While objective thresholds for clinical and laboratory criteria have been established, specific criteria for histomorphologic evidence of hemophagocytosis in hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis have not been rigorously evaluated or established. We sought to determine if numerical and objective criteria for morphologic hemophagocytosis could be identified, and if such criteria would aid in the diagnosis of hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis. We analyzed the morphologic features of hemophagocytosis in 78 patients presenting with clinical features suspicious for hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis: 40 patients with hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis and 38 patients without hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis. We demonstrate that non-nucleated erythrophagocytosis alone is a non-specific finding, while hemophagocytosis of granulocytes (1 per 1000 cells, area under the curve: 0.92, 95% confidence interval: 0.86, 0.99), nucleated erythrocytes (4 per 1000 cells, area under the curve: 0.92, 95% confidence interval: 0.87, 0.98), and at least one hemophagocyte containing multiple nucleated cells (area under the curve: 0.91, 95% confidence interval: 0.85, 0.95) are strongly associated with hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis. Joint modeling of hemophagocytes containing engulfed granulocytes, nucleated erythrocytes, and lymphocytes effectively distinguished between hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis and non-hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (cross-validated area under curve: 0.90, 95% confidence interval: 0.83, 0.97).

Eliciting Dose and Safety Outcomes From a Large Dataset of Standardized Multiple Food Challenges

Background: Food allergy prevalence has continued to rise over the past decade. While studies have reported threshold doses for multiple foods, large-scale multi-food allergen studies are lacking. Our goal was to identify threshold dose distributions and predictors of severe reactions during blinded oral food challenges (OFCs) in multi-food allergic patients. Methods: A retrospective chart review was performed on all Stanford-initiated clinical protocols involving standardized screening OFCs to any of 11 food allergens at 7 sites. Interval-censoring survival analysis was used to calculate eliciting dose (ED) curves for each food. Changes in severity and ED were also analyzed among participants who had repeated challenges to the same food. Results: Of 428 participants, 410 (96%) had at least one positive challenge (1445 standardized OFCs with 1054 total positive challenges). Participants undergoing peanut challenges had the highest ED50 (29.9 mg), while those challenged with egg or pistachio had the lowest (7.07 or 1.7 mg, respectively). The most common adverse event was skin related (54%), followed by gastrointestinal (GI) events (33%). A history of asthma was associated with a significantly higher risk of a severe reaction (hazard ratio [HR]: 2.37, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.36, 4.13). Higher values of allergen-specific IgE (sIgE) and sIgE to total IgE ratio (sIgEr) were also associated with higher risk of a severe reaction (1.49 [1.19, 1.85] and 1.84 [1.30, 2.59], respectively). Participants undergoing cashew, peanut, pecan, sesame, and walnut challenges had more severe reactions as ED increased. In participants who underwent repeat challenges, the ED did not change (p = 0.66), but reactions were more severe (p = 0.02). Conclusions: Participants with a history of asthma, high sIgEr, and/or high values of sIgE were found to be at higher risk for severe reactions during food challenges. These findings may help to optimize food challenge dosing schemes in multi-food allergic, atopic patients, specifically at lower doses where the majority of reactions occur. Trials Registration Number: ClinicalTrials. gov number NCT03539692; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03539692.

Higher Absolute Lymphocyte Counts Predict Lower Mortality from Early-Stage Triple-Negative Breast Cancer

Purpose: Tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL) in pretreatment biopsies are associated with improved survival in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). We investigated whether higher peripheral lymphocyte counts are associated with lower breast cancer–specific mortality (BCM) and overall mortality (OM) in TNBC. Experimental Design: Data on treatments and diagnostic tests from electronic medical records of two health care systems were linked with demographic, clinical, pathologic, and mortality data from the California Cancer Registry. Multivariable regression models adjusted for age, race/ethnicity, socioeconomic status, cancer stage, grade, neoadjuvant/adjuvant chemotherapy use, radiotherapy use, and germline BRCA1/2 mutations were used to evaluate associations between absolute lymphocyte count (ALC), BCM, and OM. For a subgroup with TIL data available, we explored the relationship between TILs and peripheral lymphocyte counts. Results: A total of 1,463 stage I–III TNBC patients were diagnosed from 2000 to 2014; 1,113 (76%) received neoadjuvant/adjuvant chemotherapy within 1 year of diagnosis. Of 759 patients with available ALC data, 481 (63.4%) were ever lymphopenic (minimum ALC <1.0 K/μL). On multivariable analysis, higher minimum ALC, but not absolute neutrophil count, predicted lower OM [HR = 0.23; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.16–0.35] and BCM (HR = 0.19; CI, 0.11–0.34). Five-year probability of BCM was 15% for patients who were ever lymphopenic versus 4% for those who were not. An exploratory analysis (n = 70) showed a significant association between TILs and higher peripheral lymphocyte counts during neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Conclusions: Higher peripheral lymphocyte counts predicted lower mortality from early-stage, potentially curable TNBC, suggesting that immune function may enhance the effectiveness of early TNBC treatment. Clin Cancer Res; 24(12); 2851–8. ©2018 AACR.