R. Sharon Chinthrajah

Omalizumab facilitates rapid oral desensitization for peanut allergy

Background: Peanut oral immunotherapy is a promising approach to peanut allergy, but reactions are frequent, and some patients cannot be desensitized. The anti‐IgE medication omalizumab (Xolair; Genentech, South San Francisco, Calif) might allow more rapid peanut updosing and decrease reactions. Objective: We sought to evaluate whether omalizumab facilitated rapid peanut desensitization in highly allergic patients. Methods: Thirty‐seven subjects were randomized to omalizumab (n = 29) or placebo (n = 8). After 12 weeks of treatment, subjects underwent a rapid 1‐day desensitization of up to 250 mg of peanut protein, followed by weekly increases up to 2000 mg. Omalizumab was then discontinued, and subjects continued on 2000 mg of peanut protein. Subjects underwent an open challenge to 4000 mg of peanut protein 12 weeks after stopping study drug. If tolerated, subjects continued on 4000 mg of peanut protein daily. Results: The median peanut dose tolerated on the initial desensitization day was 250 mg for omalizumab‐treated subjects versus 22.5 mg for placebo‐treated subject. Subsequently, 23 (79%) of 29 subjects randomized to omalizumab tolerated 2000 mg of peanut protein 6 weeks after stopping omalizumab versus 1 (12%) of 8 receiving placebo (P < .01). Twenty‐three subjects receiving omalizumab versus 1 subject receiving placebo passed the 4000‐mg food challenge. Overall reaction rates were not significantly lower in omalizumab‐treated versus placebo‐treated subjects (odds ratio, 0.57; P = .15), although omalizumab‐treated subjects were exposed to much higher peanut doses. Conclusion: Omalizumab allows subjects with peanut allergy to be rapidly desensitized over as little as 8 weeks of peanut oral immunotherapy. In the majority of subjects, this desensitization is sustained after omalizumab is discontinued. Additional studies will help clarify which patients would benefit most from this approach.

Successful immunotherapy induces previously unidentified allergen-specific CD4+ T-cell subsets

Significance The mechanisms through which successful immunotherapy induces possible deletion, replacement, or reprogramming of T cells are unknown. By evaluating the expression of T-cell–related genes, and using appropriate multivariate statistical approaches, our data show that successful immunotherapy can induce previously unidentified CD4+ T-cell subtypes during treatment that could help to predict an “immune-tolerant” clinical phenotype identified after cessation of treatment. The ability to use “anergic” transcriptional phenotypes in single T cells to predict successful “immune tolerance” induction in the clinic setting, as suggested by our findings, could lead to transformative impacts in the field of immunotherapy. Allergen immunotherapy can desensitize even subjects with potentially lethal allergies, but the changes induced in T cells that underpin successful immunotherapy remain poorly understood. In a cohort of peanut-allergic participants, we used allergen-specific T-cell sorting and single-cell gene expression to trace the transcriptional “roadmap” of individual CD4+ T cells throughout immunotherapy. We found that successful immunotherapy induces allergen-specific CD4+ T cells to expand and shift toward an “anergic” Th2 T-cell phenotype largely absent in both pretreatment participants and healthy controls. These findings show that sustained success, even after immunotherapy is withdrawn, is associated with the induction, expansion, and maintenance of immunotherapy-specific memory and naive T-cell phenotypes as early as 3 mo into immunotherapy. These results suggest an approach for immune monitoring participants undergoing immunotherapy to predict the success of future treatment and could have implications for immunotherapy targets in other diseases like cancer, autoimmune disease, and transplantation.

Oral immunotherapy for the treatment of food allergy

Oral immunotherapy (OIT) is an emerging new therapy for food allergy. With multiple small exploratory trials and some large randomized-controlled phase 2 trials recently published and under way, there is a clear progress and interest toward making this a treatment option for patients suffering from food allergies. However, there are still many questions to be answered and parameters to fine-tune before OIT becomes an accepted option outside of the research setting. This review covers the main milestones in the development of OIT for food allergy and further discusses important specific issues that will have direct impact on its clinical application. More specifically, previous publications showing evidence for the induction of tolerance are specifically reviewed and varying safety, tolerability and efficacy parameters from previous reports are also discussed.

Anti-IgE treatment with oral immunotherapy in multifood allergic participants: a double-blind, randomised, controlled trial

Summary BACKGROUND Despite progress in single food oral immunotherapy (OIT), there is little evidence concerning the safety and efficacy of treating individuals with multiple food (multifood) allergies. We conducted a pilot study testing whether anti-IgE (omalizumab) combined with multifood OIT benefitted multifood allergic patients. METHODS In this blinded, phase 2 clinical trial conducted at Stanford University, 48 participants, aged 4-15 years, with multifood allergies validated by double-blind, placebo-controlled food challenges (DBPCFCs) to their offending foods were block randomized (3:1) to receive multifood OIT to 2-5 foods, together with omalizumab (n=36) or placebo (n=12). Omalizumab or placebo was administered subcutaneously for 16 weeks with OIT starting at week 8; omalizumab or placebo was stopped 20 weeks before exit DBPCFCs (week 36) to determine the primary endpoint: the proportion of participants who passed DBPCFCs to at least 2 of their offending foods. This completed trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, . FINDINGS At week 36, a significantly greater proportion of the omalizumab (30/36, 83%) vs. placebo (4/12, 33%) participants passed DBPCFCs to 2 g protein for ≥ 2 of their offending foods (odds ratio (OR): 10, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1·8, 58·3, P=0·004). The same individuals also tolerated 4 g protein of ≥ 2 foods (secondary endpoint, P=0·004). A greater proportion of omalizumab (13/17, 77%) vs. placebo (0/5, 0%) participants passed a DBPCFC to 2 g protein for ≥ 4 of their offending foods (OR: 33, 95% CI: 1·9, ∞, P=0·01). All participants completed the study. There were no serious or severe (≥ grade 3) adverse events. INTERPRETATION In multifood allergic patients, omalizumab improves the efficacy of multifood OIT and enables safe and rapid desensitization. FUNDING NIH U19 AADCRC and Opportunity Fund, Sean N. Parker Center for Allergy and Asthma Research at Stanford University, Simons Foundation, Myra Reinhard Foundation, FARE Center of Excellence, Department of Pathology, and Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University.

Development of a tool predicting severity of allergic reaction during peanut challenge

BACKGROUND Reliable prognostic markers for predicting severity of allergic reactions during oral food challenges (OFCs) have not been established. OBJECTIVE To develop a predictive algorithm of a food challenge severity score (CSS) to identify those at higher risk for severe reactions to a standardized peanut OFC. METHODS Medical history and allergy test results were obtained for 120 peanut allergic participants who underwent double-blind, placebo-controlled food challenges. Reactions were assigned a CSS between 1 and 6 based on cumulative tolerated dose and a severity clinical indicator. Demographic characteristics, clinical features, peanut component IgE values, and a basophil activation marker were considered in a multistep analysis to derive a flexible decision rule to understand risk during peanut of OFC. RESULTS A total of 18.3% participants had a severe reaction (CSS >4). The decision rule identified the following 3 variables (in order of importance) as predictors of reaction severity: ratio of percentage of CD63hi stimulation with peanut to percentage of CD63hi anti-IgE (CD63 ratio), history of exercise-induced asthma, and ratio of forced expiratory volume in 1 second to forced vital capacity (FEV1/FVC) ratio. The CD63 ratio alone was a strong predictor of CSS (P < .001). CONCLUSION The CSS is a novel tool that combines dose thresholds and allergic reactions to understand risks associated with peanut OFCs. Laboratory values (CD63 ratio), along with clinical variables (exercise-induced asthma and FEV1/FVC ratio) contribute to the predictive ability of the severity of reaction to peanut OFCs. Further testing of this decision rule is needed in a larger external data source before it can be considered outside research settings. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02103270.

Determination of Immunophenotypic Changes by CyTOF, Epigenetics and Component Resolved Diagnostics During Successful Desensitization in Multi-food Oral Immunotherapy

Participants (n=44, age 4-15 yrs) with double-blind, placebo-controlled food challenge proven food allergy to multiple foods, were administered omalizumab (anti-IgE, n=40) or placebo (n=4) for 16 weeks with oral immunotherapy (OIT) for 2-5 foods, starting 8 weeks after the beginning of omalizumab or placebo (clinical outcomes of this trial in \citeANDORF2018 ). To better understand the immunophenotypical changes leading to successful desensitization, we interrogated changes in immune cell subtypes in PBMCs before and after successful OIT using mass cytometry (CyTOF) on unstimulated as well as PMA/Ionomycin stimulated samples. The first step in this analysis was an unsupervised clustering across the markers within the CyTOF panel used for cell type identification (lineage markers) of a pooled dataset of all cells of the samples of the two time points. This was done through FlowSOM \citeVanGassen2015, using self-organizing maps followed by hierarchical consensus meta-clustering. The immune cell subtype of each cluster was determined based on the expression level of the lineage markers of the cells within that cluster. The median level of various functional markers within each cluster were individually determined for each sample. Subsequently we tested whether the median level for each functional marker in each cell type (cluster) was significantly different between baseline and post-OIT. Further mechanistic experiments included epigenetics (pyrosequencing of bisulfite treated genomic DNA purified from participants PBMCs) and component resolved diagnostics (ThermoFisher). Our preliminary results indicated a significant decrease (FDR-adjusted P < 0.01) of CD28 and GPR15 levels in effector memory CD4+ T cells after successful OIT compared to baseline. A significant increase (FDR-adjusted P < 0.01) in IL-10 was detected in the Treg and gamma-delta T cell populations. Epigenetic data demonstrated hypermethylation of the -48 CpG site in the IL-4 promoter region post-OIT (FDR-adjusted P < 0.01). The IgG4/IgE ratio of antibodies to most of the whole foods in the participants OIT and to the corresponding storage proteins showed a significant increase (FDR-adjusted P < 0.01) between baseline and post-OIT. Our data thus imply that T cell anergy induced through OIT might contribute to successful desensitization.

Eliciting Dose and Safety Outcomes From a Large Dataset of Standardized Multiple Food Challenges

Background: Food allergy prevalence has continued to rise over the past decade. While studies have reported threshold doses for multiple foods, large-scale multi-food allergen studies are lacking. Our goal was to identify threshold dose distributions and predictors of severe reactions during blinded oral food challenges (OFCs) in multi-food allergic patients. Methods: A retrospective chart review was performed on all Stanford-initiated clinical protocols involving standardized screening OFCs to any of 11 food allergens at 7 sites. Interval-censoring survival analysis was used to calculate eliciting dose (ED) curves for each food. Changes in severity and ED were also analyzed among participants who had repeated challenges to the same food. Results: Of 428 participants, 410 (96%) had at least one positive challenge (1445 standardized OFCs with 1054 total positive challenges). Participants undergoing peanut challenges had the highest ED50 (29.9 mg), while those challenged with egg or pistachio had the lowest (7.07 or 1.7 mg, respectively). The most common adverse event was skin related (54%), followed by gastrointestinal (GI) events (33%). A history of asthma was associated with a significantly higher risk of a severe reaction (hazard ratio [HR]: 2.37, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.36, 4.13). Higher values of allergen-specific IgE (sIgE) and sIgE to total IgE ratio (sIgEr) were also associated with higher risk of a severe reaction (1.49 [1.19, 1.85] and 1.84 [1.30, 2.59], respectively). Participants undergoing cashew, peanut, pecan, sesame, and walnut challenges had more severe reactions as ED increased. In participants who underwent repeat challenges, the ED did not change (p = 0.66), but reactions were more severe (p = 0.02). Conclusions: Participants with a history of asthma, high sIgEr, and/or high values of sIgE were found to be at higher risk for severe reactions during food challenges. These findings may help to optimize food challenge dosing schemes in multi-food allergic, atopic patients, specifically at lower doses where the majority of reactions occur. Trials Registration Number: ClinicalTrials. gov number NCT03539692; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03539692.