Neil Buss

Durable efficacy of enfuvirtide over 48 weeks in heavily treatment-experienced HIV-1-infected patients in the T-20 versus optimized background regimen only 1 and 2 clinical trials.

Background:The T-20 Versus Optimized Background Regimen Only (TORO) 1 and TORO 2 clinical trials are open-label, controlled, parallel-group, phase 3 studies comparing enfuvirtide plus an optimized background (OB) of antiretrovirals (n = 661) with OB alone (n = 334) in treatment-experienced HIV-1-infected patients. Methods:The primary objective at week 48 was to investigate durability of efficacy, as measured by the percentage of patients maintaining their week 24 response or improving. Efficacy analyses used the intent-to-treat population. Results:A total of 73.7% of patients randomized to the enfuvirtide group remained on treatment through week 48 versus 21.3% originally randomized to the control group. At week 48, a higher proportion of week 24 responders maintained their response or were new responders in the enfuvirtide group than in the control group in each responder category: HIV-1 RNA level ≥1.0 log10 change from baseline, <400 copies/mL and <50 copies/mL (37.4%, 30.4%, and 18.3% in the enfuvirtide group vs. 17.1%, 12.0%, and 7.8% in the control group, respectively; P < 0.0001 for all comparisons). CD4 cell count increases from baseline were twice as great in the enfuvirtide group as in the control group. Conclusion:These data demonstrate durable efficacy of enfuvirtide plus OB over 48 weeks.

Relationships Between Exposure to Saquinavir Monotherapy and Antiviral Response in HIV-Positive Patients

ObjectiveThe aim of this study was to confirm the most appropriate dosage of a new soft gelatin capsule (SGC) formulation of the HIV protease inhibitor saquinavir by investigating the relationships between systemic (plasma) exposure to saquinavir and plasma HIV RNA and CD4+ cell counts using empirical mathematical modelling.Design and settingA randomised, non-blind, multicentre, dose-ranging 8-week study of monotherapy with 400, 800 or 1200mg of saquinavir-SGC or 600mg of the hard gelatin capsule (HGC) formulation, both administered 3 times daily, was carried out in protease inhibitor-naive, HIV-positive adults. Two surrogate markers of response, plasma HIV RNA level and CD4+ cell count, were fitted to 2 measures of systemic drug exposure, the area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) and trough plasma concentration (Cmin), using 6 exposure-response models of progressively increasing complexity. Akaike and Schwarz model selection criteria were applied to determine the most effective pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic relationship.ResultsA total of 88 patients were randomised; pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic data were available for 84 patients. In terms of plasma HIV RNA, pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic relationships were best described by a 2-parameter maximum effect (Emax) model, which predicted a typical maximum reduction in viral load of 1.94 log10 copies/ml [coefficient of variation (CV) 12%], with a half-maximal antiviral response occurring at a Cmin of 50 μ g/L (CV 40%). Saquinavir-SGC 1200mg administered 3 times daily produced a median AUC to 24 hours (AUC24) of approximately 20 000 μg/L · h, corresponding to 85% of the maximum achievable antiviral effect as defined by the model. None of the models yielded a satisfactory fit for CD4+ cell count.ConclusionEmpirical mathematical modelling confirmed that, when administered 3 times daily, the optimum dose of saquinavir-SGC is 1200mg, corresponding to 3600 mg/day.

Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics and Drug Interaction Potential of Enfuvirtide

AbstractEnfuvirtide, the first fusion inhibitor approved for the treatment of HIV-1 infection, is a synthetic peptide that binds to HIV-1 glycoprotein 41, blocking the fusion of viral and cellular membranes. When administered subcutaneously at the recommended dose of 90mg twice daily with optimised background antiretroviral therapy, enfuvirtide significantly reduces plasma HIV-1 RNA levels up to 48 weeks compared with optimised background therapy alone.Enfuvirtide exhibits a small volume of distribution (5.48L), low systemic clearance (1.4 L/h) and high plasma protein binding (92%). Less than 17% of enfuvirtide is converted to a minimally active deaminated form of the parent drug. Both enfuvirtide and its metabolite are primarily eliminated via catabolism to amino acid residues. Following subcutaneous administration, enfuvirtide is almost completely absorbed, and exposure increases almost linearly with dose over the range 45–180mg.When administered at the recommended dose in adults, subcutaneous absorption is slow and protracted, resulting in relatively flat steady-state plasma concentration-time profiles. Bioavailability is high (84.3%) and the elimination half-life (3.8 hours) supports twice-daily administration. Comparable absorption was observed from three different anatomical injection sites. The pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic relationship indicates that the recommended dose, in combination with other active antiretrovirals, is optimal. Enfuvirtide clearance is influenced to a small extent by sex and bodyweight but this does not necessitate dosage adjustment. In vitro and in vivo studies indicate that enfuvirtide has a low potential to interact with concomitantly administered drugs. Enfuvirtide did not influence concentrations of drugs metabolised by cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4, CYP2D6 or N-acetyltransferase, and had only minimal effects on those metabolised by CYP1A2, CYP2E1 or CYP2C19. Coadministration of ritonavir, ritonavir-boosted saquinavir or rifampicin (rifampin) did not result in clinically significant changes in enfuvirtide pharmacokinetics.In HIV-1-infected paediatric patients, subcutaneous dosages based on bodyweight (2 mg/kg twice daily) produce pharmacokinetics broadly similar to those observed in adults administered 90mg twice daily.

Lack of Enzyme‐Inducing Effect of Rifampicin on the Pharmacokinetics of Enfuvirtide

The primary objective was to determine whether rifampicin influences the pharmacokinetics of enfuvirtide in HIV‐1‐infected patients. In a single‐center, open‐label, one‐sequence crossover, clinical pharmacology study, 12 HIV‐1‐infected adults received enfuvirtide (90 mg, twice daily) on days 1 to 3 and days 11 to 13 (morning dose only on days 3 and 13) and rifampicin (600 mg, once daily) from days 4 to 13. Plasma concentrations were measured for enfuvirtide and its metabolite (days 3 and 13) and rifampicin (day 13 only). The ratios of least squares means (LSM) and 90% confidence intervals for enfuvirtide and enfuvirtide metabolite pharmacokinetic parameters (AUC12h, Cmax, Ctrough) were estimated in the presence and absence of rifampicin. Treatments were compared using an analysis of variance for natural log‐transformed variables, with factors patient and treatment. Efficacy and safety were also monitored. Steady‐state rifampicin had no appreciable effect on any of the pharmacokinetic parameters assessed for either enfuvirtide or its metabolite. The ratio of LSM for AUC12h, Cmax, and Ctrough for enfuvirtide was 97.5%, 103%, and 84.9%, respectively, and 108%, 112%, and 92.9%, for the enfuvirtide metabolite. Rifampicin did not affect the t1/2 of enfuvirtide or its metabolite. There were no unexpected effects of rifampicin on the short‐term antiviral effect or safety of the administered antiretroviral treatment. The pharmacokinetics of enfuvirtide are not induced by a 10‐day pretreatment with rifampicin.

Population Pharmacokinetics and Exposure‐response Relationship of Enfuvirtide in Treatment‐experienced Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1—infected Patients

Our objective was to characterize population pharmacokinetics of enfuvirtide, 90 mg twice daily injected subcutaneously, in treatment‐experienced human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV‐1)–infected patients, as well as the relationship between exposure and antiviral effect.

Lack of Interaction between Enfuvirtide and Ritonavir or Ritonavir‐Boosted Saquinavir in HIV‐1‐Infected Patients

Enfuvirtide (Fuzeon™) is an HIV fusion inhibitor, the first drug in a new class of antiretrovirals. The HIV protease inhibitors ritonavir and saquinavir both inhibit cytochrome P450 (CYP450) isoenzymes, and low‐dose ritonavir is often used to boost pharmacokinetic exposure to full‐dose protease inhibitors. These two studies were designed to assess whether ritonavir and ritonavir‐boosted saquinavir influence the steady‐state pharmacokinetics of enfuvirtide. Both studies were single‐center, open‐label, one‐sequence crossover clinical pharmacology studies in 12 HIV‐1‐infected patients each. Patients received enfuvirtide (90 mg twice daily [bid], subcutaneous injection) for 7 days and either ritonavir (200 mg bid, ritonavir study, orally) or saquinavir/ritonavir (1000/100 mg bid, saquinavir/ritonavir study, orally) for 4 days on days 4 to 7. Serial blood samples were collected up to 24 hours after the morning dose of enfuvirtide on days 3 and 7. Plasma concentrations for enfuvirtide, enfuvirtide metabolite, saquinavir, and ritonavir were measured using validated liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry methods. Efficacy and safety were also monitored. Bioequivalence criteria require the 90% confidence interval (CI) for the least squares means (LSM) of Cmax and AUC12h to be between 80% and 125%. In the present studies, analysis of variance showed that when coadministered with ritonavir, the ratio of LSM for enfuvirtide was 124% for Cmax (90% confidence interval [CI]: 109%‐141%), 122% for AUC12h (90% CI: 108%‐137%), and 114% for Ctrough (90% CI: 102%‐128%). Although the bioequivalence criteria were not met, the increase in enfuvirtide exposure was small (< 25%) and not clinically relevant. When administered with ritonavir‐boosted saquinavir, the ratio of LSM for enfuvirtide was 107% for Cmax (90% CI: 94.3%‐121%) and 114% for AUC12h (90% CI: 105%‐124%), which therefore met bioequivalence criteria, and 126% for Ctrough (90% CI: 117%‐135%). The pharmacokinetics of enfuvirtide are affected to a small extent when coadministered with ritonavir at a dose of 200 mg bid but not when coadministered with a saquinavir‐ritonavir combination (1000/100 mg bid). However, previous clinical studies have shown that such increases in enfuvirtide exposure are not clinically relevant. Thus, no dosage adjustments are warranted when enfuvirtide is coadministered with low‐dose ritonavir or saquinavir boosted with a low dose of ritonavir.

Combination therapy with saquinavir soft gelatin capsules in children with human immunodeficiency virus infection

OBJECTIVES To evaluate the pharmacokinetics, tolerance, safety and antiviral activity of the HIV protease inhibitor, saquinavir, formulated as soft gelatin capsules (SQV-SGC), given in combination with nucleoside antiretroviral agents (NRTIs) with or without nelfinavir in HIV-infected children. METHODS This was an open label study of HIV-infected children ages 3 to 16 years, conducted in two parts. In Part 1 of the study 14 children were treated orally with SQV-SGC (initially given in three 33-mg/kg doses daily; dosage adjusted to 50 mg/kg three times daily based on initial pharmacokinetics) and two NRTIs. Addition of nelfinavir was permitted for children who did not achieve a predetermined steady state target plasma saquinavir exposure. In Part 2 a new group of 13 children received SQV-SGC (33 mg/kg three times daily) in combination with nelfinavir and one or two NRTIs. Pharmacokinetics were assessed after the first dose and 4 weeks into treatment (steady state). Patients were treated for 72 and 48 weeks in Parts 1 and 2, respectively. RESULTS Most adverse events were mild; the most commonly reported were diarrhea, abdominal discomfort and headache. Two children were withdrawn from the study because of adverse events (one each of nausea and dysphagia) related to the study treatment. There were no deaths or serious adverse events attributed to the study medication. Steady state saquinavir area under the plasma concentration vs. time curves (AUC24) were 6,210 and 11,010 ng/h/ml for Parts 1 and 2, respectively. Compared with baseline measurements median changes in plasma HIV RNA concentrations were -2.12 log10 copies/ml [5 of 14 (36%) with HIV RNA <50 copies/ml) (Week 72)] and -2.58 log10 copies/ml [8 of 13 (62%) <50 copies/ml) (Week 48)] in Parts 1 and 2, respectively. The median changes in CD4+ lymphocyte count were +292 and +154 cells/microl for Parts 1 and 2, respectively. Genotypic resistance assays revealed a low frequency of saquinavir-associated resistance mutations after 48 weeks of therapy, with only 2 of 27 children having substitutions at positions 48V and/or 90M. CONCLUSIONS Combination therapy with SQV-SGC was well-tolerated and safe in HIV-infected children, and antiviral activity was observed. Saquinavir plasma concentrations were lower than expected, particularly for Part 1 (SQV-SGC plus NRTIs), but addition of nelfinavir increased saquinavir exposures.

Viral Decay Dynamics in HIV-Infected Patients Receiving Ritonavir-Boosted Saquinavir and Efavirenz With or Without Enfuvirtide: A Randomized, Controlled Trial (HIV-NAT 012)

The availability of enfuvirtide enables assessment of whether human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) decay can be enhanced by targeting reverse transcriptase, protease, and fusion. We performed a 12-week study of 22 patients randomized to receive ritonavir-boosted saquinavir and efavirenz with (the 3-target arm) or without (the 2-target arm) enfuvirtide. We observed no difference in the mean+/-SD elimination-rate constant for overall decay (0.142+/-0.040 per day and 0.128 +/- 0.033 per day in the 2- and 3-target arms, respectively; P>.1) or for modeled first-phase decay rate (-0.62+/-0.34 per day and -0.51+/-0.16 per day; P>.1). Antiretroviral therapy that inhibits HIV reverse transcriptase and protease exerts potent antiviral effects that might not be augmented by the addition of an HIV fusion inhibitor.