Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Nichola Johnson is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Nichola Johnson.


Nature Genetics | 2007

A common coding variant in CASP8 is associated with breast cancer risk

Angela Cox; Alison M. Dunning; Montserrat Garcia-Closas; Sabapathy P. Balasubramanian; Malcolm Reed; Karen A. Pooley; Serena Scollen; Caroline Baynes; Bruce A.J. Ponder; Stephen J. Chanock; Jolanta Lissowska; Louise A. Brinton; Beata Peplonska; Melissa C. Southey; John L. Hopper; Margaret McCredie; Graham G. Giles; Olivia Fletcher; Nichola Johnson; Isabel dos Santos Silva; Lorna Gibson; Stig E. Bojesen; Børge G. Nordestgaard; Christen K. Axelsson; Diana Torres; Ute Hamann; Christina Justenhoven; Hiltrud Brauch; Jenny Chang-Claude; Silke Kropp

The Breast Cancer Association Consortium (BCAC) has been established to conduct combined case-control analyses with augmented statistical power to try to confirm putative genetic associations with breast cancer. We genotyped nine SNPs for which there was some prior evidence of an association with breast cancer: CASP8 D302H (rs1045485), IGFBP3 −202 C → A (rs2854744), SOD2 V16A (rs1799725), TGFB1 L10P (rs1982073), ATM S49C (rs1800054), ADH1B 3′ UTR A → G (rs1042026), CDKN1A S31R (rs1801270), ICAM5 V301I (rs1056538) and NUMA1 A794G (rs3750913). We included data from 9–15 studies, comprising 11,391–18,290 cases and 14,753–22,670 controls. We found evidence of an association with breast cancer for CASP8 D302H (with odds ratios (OR) of 0.89 (95% confidence interval (c.i.): 0.85–0.94) and 0.74 (95% c.i.: 0.62–0.87) for heterozygotes and rare homozygotes, respectively, compared with common homozygotes; Ptrend = 1.1 × 10−7) and weaker evidence for TGFB1 L10P (OR = 1.07 (95% c.i.: 1.02–1.13) and 1.16 (95% c.i.: 1.08–1.25), respectively; Ptrend = 2.8 × 10−5). These results demonstrate that common breast cancer susceptibility alleles with small effects on risk can be identified, given sufficiently powerful studies.NOTE: In the version of this article initially published, there was an error that affected the calculations of the odds ratios, confidence intervals, between-study heterogeneity, trend test and test for association for SNP ICAM5 V301I in Table 1 (ICAM5 V301I); genotype counts in Supplementary Table 2 (ICAM5; ICR_FBCS and Kuopio studies) and minor allele frequencies, trend test and odds ratios for heterozygotes and rare homozygotes in Supplementary Table 3 (ICAM5; ICR_FBCS and Kuopio studies). The errors in Table 1 have been corrected in the PDF version of the article. The errors in supplementary information have been corrected online.


Journal of the National Cancer Institute | 2011

Novel Breast Cancer Susceptibility Locus at 9q31.2: Results of a Genome-Wide Association Study

Olivia Fletcher; Nichola Johnson; Nick Orr; Fay J. Hosking; Lorna Gibson; Kate Walker; Diana Zelenika; Ivo Gut; Simon Heath; Claire Palles; Ben Coupland; Peter Broderick; Minouk J. Schoemaker; Michael E. Jones; Jill Williamson; Sarah Chilcott-Burns; Katarzyna Tomczyk; Gemma Simpson; Kevin B. Jacobs; Stephen J. Chanock; David J. Hunter; Ian Tomlinson; Anthony J. Swerdlow; Alan Ashworth; Gillian Ross; Isabel dos Santos Silva; Mark Lathrop; Richard S. Houlston; Julian Peto

BACKGROUND Genome-wide association studies have identified several common genetic variants associated with breast cancer risk. It is likely, however, that a substantial proportion of such loci have not yet been discovered. METHODS We compared 296,114 tagging single-nucleotide polymorphisms in 1694 breast cancer case subjects (92% with two primary cancers or at least two affected first-degree relatives) and 2365 control subjects, with validation in three independent series totaling 11,880 case subjects and 12,487 control subjects. Odds ratios (ORs) and associated 95% confidence intervals (CIs) in each stage and all stages combined were calculated using unconditional logistic regression. Heterogeneity was evaluated with Cochran Q and I(2) statistics. All statistical tests were two-sided. RESULTS We identified a novel risk locus for breast cancer at 9q31.2 (rs865686: OR = 0.89, 95% CI = 0.85 to 0.92, P = 1.75 × 10(-10)). This single-nucleotide polymorphism maps to a gene desert, the nearest genes being Kruppel-like factor 4 (KLF4, 636 kb centromeric), RAD23 homolog B (RAD23B, 794 kb centromeric), and actin-like 7A (ACTL7A, 736 kb telomeric). We also identified two variants (rs3734805 and rs9383938) mapping to 6q25.1 estrogen receptor 1 (ESR1), which were associated with breast cancer in subjects of northern European ancestry (rs3734805: OR = 1.19, 95% CI = 1.11 to 1.27, P = 1.35 × 10(-7); rs9383938: OR = 1.18, 95% CI = 1.11 to 1.26, P = 1.41 × 10(-7)). A variant mapping to 10q26.13, approximately 300 kb telomeric to the established risk locus within the second intron of FGFR2, was also associated with breast cancer risk, although not at genome-wide statistical significance (rs10510102: OR = 1.12, 95% CI = 1.07 to 1.17, P = 1.58 × 10(-6)). CONCLUSIONS These findings provide further evidence on the role of genetic variation in the etiology of breast cancer. Fine mapping will be needed to identify causal variants and to determine their functional effects.


Human Molecular Genetics | 2009

Gene-body hypermethylation of ATM in peripheral blood DNA of bilateral breast cancer patients

James M. Flanagan; Marta Munoz-Alegre; Stephen Henderson; Thomas Tang; Ping Sun; Nichola Johnson; Olivia Fletcher; Isabel dos Santos Silva; Julian Peto; Chris Boshoff; Steven A. Narod; Arturas Petronis

Bilaterality of breast cancer is an indicator of constitutional cancer susceptibility; however, the molecular causes underlying this predisposition in the majority of cases is not known. We hypothesize that epigenetic misregulation of cancer-related genes could partially account for this predisposition. We have performed methylation microarray analysis of peripheral blood DNA from 14 women with bilateral breast cancer compared with 14 unaffected matched controls throughout 17 candidate breast cancer susceptibility genes including BRCA1, BRCA2, CHEK2, ATM, ESR1, SFN, CDKN2A, TP53, GSTP1, CDH1, CDH13, HIC1, PGR, SFRP1, MLH1, RARB and HSD17B4. We show that the majority of methylation variability is associated with intragenic repetitive elements. Detailed validation of the tiled region around ATM was performed by bisulphite modification and pyrosequencing of the same samples and in a second set of peripheral blood DNA from 190 bilateral breast cancer patients compared with 190 controls. We show significant hypermethylation of one intragenic repetitive element in breast cancer cases compared with controls (P = 0.0017), with the highest quartile of methylation associated with a 3-fold increased risk of breast cancer (OR 3.20, 95% CI 1.78–5.86, P = 0.000083). Increased methylation of this locus is associated with lower steady-state ATM mRNA level and correlates with age of cancer patients but not controls, suggesting a combined age–phenotype-related association. This research demonstrates the potential for gene-body epigenetic misregulation of ATM and other cancer-related genes in peripheral blood DNA that may be useful as a novel marker to estimate breast cancer risk. Accession numbers: The microarray data and associated .BED and .WIG files can be accessed through Gene Expression Omnibus accession number: GSE14603.


Journal of the National Cancer Institute | 2009

Risk of estrogen receptor-positive and -negative breast cancer and single-nucleotide polymorphism 2q35-rs13387042

Roger L. Milne; Javier Benitez; Heli Nevanlinna; Tuomas Heikkinen; Kristiina Aittomäki; Carl Blomqvist; José Ignacio Arias; M. Pilar Zamora; Barbara Burwinkel; Claus R. Bartram; Alfons Meindl; Rita K. Schmutzler; Angela Cox; Ian W. Brock; Graeme Elliott; Malcolm Reed; Melissa C. Southey; Letitia Smith; Amanda B. Spurdle; John L. Hopper; Fergus J. Couch; Janet E. Olson; Xianshu Wang; Zachary S. Fredericksen; Peter Schürmann; Michael Bremer; Peter Hillemanns; Thilo Dörk; Peter Devilee; Christie J. van Asperen

BACKGROUND A recent genome-wide association study identified single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) 2q35-rs13387042 as a marker of susceptibility to estrogen receptor (ER)-positive breast cancer. We attempted to confirm this association using the Breast Cancer Association Consortium. METHODS 2q35-rs13387042 SNP was genotyped for 31 510 women with invasive breast cancer, 1101 women with ductal carcinoma in situ, and 35 969 female control subjects from 25 studies. Odds ratios (ORs) were estimated by logistic regression, adjusted for study. Heterogeneity in odds ratios by each of age, ethnicity, and study was assessed by fitting interaction terms. Heterogeneity by each of invasiveness, family history, bilaterality, and hormone receptor status was assessed by subclassifying case patients and applying polytomous logistic regression. All statistical tests were two-sided. RESULTS We found strong evidence of association between rs13387042 and breast cancer in white women of European origin (per-allele OR = 1.12, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.09 to 1.15; P(trend) = 1.0 x 10(-19)). The odds ratio was lower than that previously reported (P = .02) and did not vary by age or ethnicity (all P > or = .2). However, it was higher when the analysis was restricted to case patients who were selected for a strong family history (P = .02). An association was observed for both ER-positive (OR = 1.14, 95% CI = 1.10 to 1.17; P = 10(-15)) and ER-negative disease (OR = 1.10, 95% CI = 1.04 to 1.15; P = .0003) and both progesterone receptor (PR)-positive (OR = 1.15, 95% CI = 1.11 to 1.19; P = 5 x 10(-14)) and PR-negative disease (OR = 1.10, 95% CI = 1.06 to 1.15; P = .00002). CONCLUSION The rs13387042 is associated with both ER-positive and ER-negative breast cancer in European women.


Breast Cancer Research | 2010

Assessing interactions between the associations of common genetic susceptibility variants, reproductive history and body mass index with breast cancer risk in the breast cancer association consortium: a combined case-control study.

Roger L. Milne; Mia M. Gaudet; Amanda B. Spurdle; Peter A. Fasching; Fergus J. Couch; Javier Benitez; Jose Ignacio Arias Perez; M. Pilar Zamora; Núria Malats; Isabel dos Santos Silva; Lorna Gibson; Olivia Fletcher; Nichola Johnson; Hoda Anton-Culver; Argyrios Ziogas; Jonine D. Figueroa; Louise A. Brinton; Mark E. Sherman; Jolanta Lissowska; John L. Hopper; Gillian S. Dite; Carmel Apicella; Melissa C. Southey; Alice J. Sigurdson; Martha S. Linet; Sara J. Schonfeld; D. Michal Freedman; Arto Mannermaa; Veli-Matti Kosma; Vesa Kataja

IntroductionSeveral common breast cancer genetic susceptibility variants have recently been identified. We aimed to determine how these variants combine with a subset of other known risk factors to influence breast cancer risk in white women of European ancestry using case-control studies participating in the Breast Cancer Association Consortium.MethodsWe evaluated two-way interactions between each of age at menarche, ever having had a live birth, number of live births, age at first birth and body mass index (BMI) and each of 12 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) (10q26-rs2981582 (FGFR2), 8q24-rs13281615, 11p15-rs3817198 (LSP1), 5q11-rs889312 (MAP3K1), 16q12-rs3803662 (TOX3), 2q35-rs13387042, 5p12-rs10941679 (MRPS30), 17q23-rs6504950 (COX11), 3p24-rs4973768 (SLC4A7), CASP8-rs17468277, TGFB1-rs1982073 and ESR1-rs3020314). Interactions were tested for by fitting logistic regression models including per-allele and linear trend main effects for SNPs and risk factors, respectively, and single-parameter interaction terms for linear departure from independent multiplicative effects.ResultsThese analyses were applied to data for up to 26,349 invasive breast cancer cases and up to 32,208 controls from 21 case-control studies. No statistical evidence of interaction was observed beyond that expected by chance. Analyses were repeated using data from 11 population-based studies, and results were very similar.ConclusionsThe relative risks for breast cancer associated with the common susceptibility variants identified to date do not appear to vary across women with different reproductive histories or body mass index (BMI). The assumption of multiplicative combined effects for these established genetic and other risk factors in risk prediction models appears justified.


Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention | 2012

Common Breast Cancer Susceptibility Variants in LSP1 and RAD51L1 Are Associated with Mammographic Density Measures that Predict Breast Cancer Risk

Celine M. Vachon; Christopher G. Scott; Peter A. Fasching; Per Hall; Rulla M. Tamimi; Jingmei Li; Jennifer Stone; Carmel Apicella; Fabrice Odefrey; Gretchen L. Gierach; Sebastian M. Jud; Katharina Heusinger; Matthias W. Beckmann; Marina Pollán; Pablo Fernández-Navarro; A Gonzalez-Neira; Javier Benitez; C. H. van Gils; M Lokate; N. C Onland-Moret; P.H.M. Peeters; J Brown; Jean Leyland; Jajini S. Varghese; D. F Easton; D. J Thompson; Robert Luben; R Warren; Nicholas J. Wareham; Ruth J. F. Loos

Background: Mammographic density adjusted for age and body mass index (BMI) is a heritable marker of breast cancer susceptibility. Little is known about the biologic mechanisms underlying the association between mammographic density and breast cancer risk. We examined whether common low-penetrance breast cancer susceptibility variants contribute to interindividual differences in mammographic density measures. Methods: We established an international consortium (DENSNP) of 19 studies from 10 countries, comprising 16,895 Caucasian women, to conduct a pooled cross-sectional analysis of common breast cancer susceptibility variants in 14 independent loci and mammographic density measures. Dense and nondense areas, and percent density, were measured using interactive-thresholding techniques. Mixed linear models were used to assess the association between genetic variants and the square roots of mammographic density measures adjusted for study, age, case status, BMI, and menopausal status. Results: Consistent with their breast cancer associations, the C-allele of rs3817198 in LSP1 was positively associated with both adjusted dense area (P = 0.00005) and adjusted percent density (P = 0.001), whereas the A-allele of rs10483813 in RAD51L1 was inversely associated with adjusted percent density (P = 0.003), but not with adjusted dense area (P = 0.07). Conclusion: We identified two common breast cancer susceptibility variants associated with mammographic measures of radiodense tissue in the breast gland. Impact: We examined the association of 14 established breast cancer susceptibility loci with mammographic density phenotypes within a large genetic consortium and identified two breast cancer susceptibility variants, LSP1-rs3817198 and RAD51L1-rs10483813, associated with mammographic measures and in the same direction as the breast cancer association. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 21(7); 1156–. ©2012 AACR.


The Lancet | 2005

Interaction between CHEK2*1100delC and other low-penetrance breast-cancer susceptibility genes: a familial study

Nichola Johnson; Olivia Fletcher; Cristina Naceur-Lombardelli; Isabel dos Santos Silva; Alan Ashworth; Julian Peto

BACKGROUND The allele CHEK2*1100delC doubles the risk of breast cancer in unselected women, but could confer a greater risk in women with a family history of the disease, particularly of bilateral breast cancer. Our aim was to measure the risk of breast cancer in relatives of women with bilateral breast cancer who were carriers of this allele. METHODS A population-based series of 469 bilateral breast cancer cases ascertained through English cancer registries were genotyped for CHEK2*1100delC. Standardised incidence ratios (SIRs) and cumulative risks were calculated for breast cancer, prostate cancer, and all other cancers in the first-degree relatives of carriers and non-carriers. FINDINGS The relatives of bilateral cases who were wild-type for CHEK2 had three times the population risk of female breast cancer (145 cases: SIR 3.48 (95% CI 2.96-4.09), twice the risk of prostate cancer (34 cases: SIR 2.41, 1.67-3.36) and a large excess of male breast cancer (five cases: SIR 15.06, 4.92-35.36). Relatives of those who were carriers of CHEK2*1100delC had a substantially higher risk of breast cancer (eight cases: SIR 12.11, 5.23-23.88) and possibly prostate cancer (two cases: SIR 9.87, 1.20-35.67). INTERPRETATION These data suggest a multiplicative interaction between CHEK2*1100delC and other unknown susceptibility genes. In women with a family history of bilateral disease, CHEK2*1100delC confers a high lifetime risk and might be useful for predictive testing. Bilateral breast cancer cases and their families are likely to provide an efficient basis for identification of additional low-penetrance breast-cancer genes.


Human Molecular Genetics | 2009

Association of ESR1 gene tagging SNPs with breast cancer risk

Alison M. Dunning; Catherine S. Healey; Caroline Baynes; Ana Teresa Maia; Serena Scollen; Ana Vega; Raquel Rodríguez; Nuno L. Barbosa-Morais; Bruce A.J. Ponder; Yen Ling Low; Sheila Bingham; Christopher A. Haiman; Loic Le Marchand; Annegien Broeks; Marjanka K. Schmidt; John L. Hopper; Melissa C. Southey; Matthias W. Beckmann; Peter A. Fasching; Julian Peto; Nichola Johnson; Stig E. Bojesen; Børge G. Nordestgaard; Roger L. Milne; Javier Benitez; Ute Hamann; Yon Ko; Rita K. Schmutzler; Barbara Burwinkel; Peter Schürmann

We have conducted a three-stage, comprehensive single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP)-tagging association study of ESR1 gene variants (SNPs) in more than 55,000 breast cancer cases and controls from studies within the Breast Cancer Association Consortium (BCAC). No large risks or highly significant associations were revealed. SNP rs3020314, tagging a region of ESR1 intron 4, is associated with an increase in breast cancer susceptibility with a dominant mode of action in European populations. Carriers of the c-allele have an odds ratio (OR) of 1.05 [95% Confidence Intervals (CI) 1.02-1.09] relative to t-allele homozygotes, P = 0.004. There is significant heterogeneity between studies, P = 0.002. The increased risk appears largely confined to oestrogen receptor-positive tumour risk. The region tagged by SNP rs3020314 contains sequence that is more highly conserved across mammalian species than the rest of intron 4, and it may subtly alter the ratio of two mRNA splice forms.


Cancer Research | 2007

Do MDM2 SNP309 and TP53 R72P interact in breast cancer susceptibility? A large pooled series from the breast cancer association consortium.

Marjanka K. Schmidt; Scarlett Reincke; Annegien Broeks; Linde M. Braaf; Frans B. L. Hogervorst; Rob A. E. M. Tollenaar; Nichola Johnson; Olivia Fletcher; Julian Peto; Johanna Tommiska; Carl Blomqvist; Heli Nevanlinna; Catherine S. Healey; Alison M. Dunning; Paul Pharoah; Douglas F. Easton; Thilo Dörk; Laura J. van't Veer

Association studies in large series of breast cancer patients can be used to identify single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) contributing to breast cancer susceptibility. Previous studies have suggested associations between variants in TP53 (R72P) and MDM2 (SNP309) and cancer risk. Data from molecular studies suggest a functional interaction between these genes. We therefore investigated the effect of TP53 R72P and MDM2 SNP309 on breast cancer risk and age at onset of breast cancer in a pooled series of 5,191 cases and 3,834 controls from the Breast Cancer Association Consortium (BCAC). Breast cancer risk was not found to be associated with the combined variant alleles [odds ratio (OR), 1.00; 95% confidence interval (95% CI), 0.81-1.23]. Estimated ORs were 1.01 (95% CI, 0.93-1.09) per MDM2 SNP309 allele and 0.98 (95% CI, 0.91-1.04) for TP53 R72P. Although we did find evidence for a 4-year earlier age at onset for carriers of both variant alleles in one of the breast cancer patient series of the BCAC (the German series), we were not able to confirm this effect in the pooled analysis. Even so, carriers of both variant alleles did not have different risk estimates for bilateral or estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer. In conclusion, in this large collaborative study, we did not find an association of MDM2 SNP309 and TP53 R72P, separately or in interaction, with breast cancer. This suggests that any effect of these two variants would be very small and possibly confined to subgroups that were not assessed in our present study.


Nature Genetics | 2012

Genome-wide association study identifies a common variant in RAD51B associated with male breast cancer risk

Nick Orr; Alina Lemnrau; Rosie Cooke; Olivia Fletcher; Katarzyna Tomczyk; Michael P. Jones; Nichola Johnson; Christopher J. Lord; Costas Mitsopoulos; Marketa Zvelebil; Simon S. McDade; Gemma Buck; Christine Blancher; Alison H. Trainer; Paul A. James; Stig E. Bojesen; Susanne Bokmand; Heli Nevanlinna; Johanna Mattson; Eitan Friedman; Yael Laitman; Domenico Palli; Giovanna Masala; Ines Zanna; Laura Ottini; Giuseppe Giannini; Antoinette Hollestelle; Ans van den Ouweland; Srdjan Novakovic; Mateja Krajc

We conducted a genome-wide association study of male breast cancer comprising 823 cases and 2,795 controls of European ancestry, with validation in independent sample sets totaling 438 cases and 474 controls. A SNP in RAD51B at 14q24.1 was significantly associated with male breast cancer risk (P = 3.02 × 10−13; odds ratio (OR) = 1.57). We also refine association at 16q12.1 to a SNP within TOX3 (P = 3.87 × 10−15; OR = 1.50).

Collaboration


Dive into the Nichola Johnson's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Olivia Fletcher

Institute of Cancer Research

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Nick Orr

Institute of Cancer Research

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Richard S. Houlston

Institute of Cancer Research

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Claire Palles

Wellcome Trust Centre for Human Genetics

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Elizabeth Folkerd

The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge