Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Nicholas J. Harding is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Nicholas J. Harding.


Nature Genetics | 2015

Spatial genomic heterogeneity within localized, multifocal prostate cancer

Paul C. Boutros; Michael Fraser; Nicholas J. Harding; Richard de Borja; Dominique Trudel; Emilie Lalonde; Alice Meng; Pablo H. Hennings-Yeomans; Andrew McPherson; Veronica Y. Sabelnykova; Amin Zia; Natalie S. Fox; Julie Livingstone; Yu Jia Shiah; Jianxin Wang; Timothy Beck; Cherry Have; Taryne Chong; Michelle Sam; Jeremy Johns; Lee Timms; Nicholas Buchner; Ada Wong; John D. Watson; Trent T. Simmons; Christine P'ng; Gaetano Zafarana; Francis Nguyen; Xuemei Luo; Kenneth C. Chu

Herein we provide a detailed molecular analysis of the spatial heterogeneity of clinically localized, multifocal prostate cancer to delineate new oncogenes or tumor suppressors. We initially determined the copy number aberration (CNA) profiles of 74 patients with index tumors of Gleason score 7. Of these, 5 patients were subjected to whole-genome sequencing using DNA quantities achievable in diagnostic biopsies, with detailed spatial sampling of 23 distinct tumor regions to assess intraprostatic heterogeneity in focal genomics. Multifocal tumors are highly heterogeneous for single-nucleotide variants (SNVs), CNAs and genomic rearrangements. We identified and validated a new recurrent amplification of MYCL, which is associated with TP53 deletion and unique profiles of DNA damage and transcriptional dysregulation. Moreover, we demonstrate divergent tumor evolution in multifocal cancer and, in some cases, tumors of independent clonal origin. These data represent the first systematic relation of intraprostatic genomic heterogeneity to predicted clinical outcome and inform the development of novel biomarkers that reflect individual prognosis.


Lancet Oncology | 2014

Tumour genomic and microenvironmental heterogeneity for integrated prediction of 5-year biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer: a retrospective cohort study

Emilie Lalonde; Adrian Ishkanian; Jenna Sykes; Michael Fraser; Helen Ross-Adams; Nicholas Erho; Mark J. Dunning; Silvia Halim; Alastair D. Lamb; Nathalie C Moon; Gaetano Zafarana; Anne Warren; Xianyue Meng; John Thoms; Michal R Grzadkowski; Alejandro Berlin; Cherry Have; Varune Rohan Ramnarine; Cindy Q. Yao; Chad A. Malloff; Lucia L. Lam; Honglei Xie; Nicholas J. Harding; Denise Y. F. Mak; Kenneth C. Chu; Lauren C. Chong; Dorota H Sendorek; Christine P'ng; Colin Collins; Jeremy A. Squire

BACKGROUND Clinical prognostic groupings for localised prostate cancers are imprecise, with 30-50% of patients recurring after image-guided radiotherapy or radical prostatectomy. We aimed to test combined genomic and microenvironmental indices in prostate cancer to improve risk stratification and complement clinical prognostic factors. METHODS We used DNA-based indices alone or in combination with intra-prostatic hypoxia measurements to develop four prognostic indices in 126 low-risk to intermediate-risk patients (Toronto cohort) who will receive image-guided radiotherapy. We validated these indices in two independent cohorts of 154 (Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center cohort [MSKCC] cohort) and 117 (Cambridge cohort) radical prostatectomy specimens from low-risk to high-risk patients. We applied unsupervised and supervised machine learning techniques to the copy-number profiles of 126 pre-image-guided radiotherapy diagnostic biopsies to develop prognostic signatures. Our primary endpoint was the development of a set of prognostic measures capable of stratifying patients for risk of biochemical relapse 5 years after primary treatment. FINDINGS Biochemical relapse was associated with indices of tumour hypoxia, genomic instability, and genomic subtypes based on multivariate analyses. We identified four genomic subtypes for prostate cancer, which had different 5-year biochemical relapse-free survival. Genomic instability is prognostic for relapse in both image-guided radiotherapy (multivariate analysis hazard ratio [HR] 4·5 [95% CI 2·1-9·8]; p=0·00013; area under the receiver operator curve [AUC] 0·70 [95% CI 0·65-0·76]) and radical prostatectomy (4·0 [1·6-9·7]; p=0·0024; AUC 0·57 [0·52-0·61]) patients with prostate cancer, and its effect is magnified by intratumoral hypoxia (3·8 [1·2-12]; p=0·019; AUC 0·67 [0·61-0·73]). A novel 100-loci DNA signature accurately classified treatment outcome in the MSKCC low-risk to intermediate-risk cohort (multivariate analysis HR 6·1 [95% CI 2·0-19]; p=0·0015; AUC 0·74 [95% CI 0·65-0·83]). In the independent MSKCC and Cambridge cohorts, this signature identified low-risk to high-risk patients who were most likely to fail treatment within 18 months (combined cohorts multivariate analysis HR 2·9 [95% CI 1·4-6·0]; p=0·0039; AUC 0·68 [95% CI 0·63-0·73]), and was better at predicting biochemical relapse than 23 previously published RNA signatures. INTERPRETATION This is the first study of cancer outcome to integrate DNA-based and microenvironment-based failure indices to predict patient outcome. Patients exhibiting these aggressive features after biopsy should be entered into treatment intensification trials. FUNDING Movember Foundation, Prostate Cancer Canada, Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Canadian Institute for Health Research, NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, The University of Cambridge, Cancer Research UK, Cambridge Cancer Charity, Prostate Cancer UK, Hutchison Whampoa Limited, Terry Fox Research Institute, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre Foundation, PMH-Radiation Medicine Program Academic Enrichment Fund, Motorcycle Ride for Dad (Durham), Canadian Cancer Society.


Nature Communications | 2015

A comprehensive assessment of somatic mutation detection in cancer using whole-genome sequencing

Tyler Alioto; Ivo Buchhalter; Sophia Derdak; Barbara Hutter; Matthew Eldridge; Eivind Hovig; Lawrence E. Heisler; Timothy Beck; Jared T. Simpson; Laurie Tonon; Anne Sophie Sertier; Ann Marie Patch; Natalie Jäger; Philip Ginsbach; Ruben M. Drews; Nagarajan Paramasivam; Rolf Kabbe; Sasithorn Chotewutmontri; Nicolle Diessl; Christopher Previti; Sabine Schmidt; Benedikt Brors; Lars Feuerbach; Michael Heinold; Susanne Gröbner; Andrey Korshunov; Patrick Tarpey; Adam Butler; Jonathan Hinton; David Jones

As whole-genome sequencing for cancer genome analysis becomes a clinical tool, a full understanding of the variables affecting sequencing analysis output is required. Here using tumour-normal sample pairs from two different types of cancer, chronic lymphocytic leukaemia and medulloblastoma, we conduct a benchmarking exercise within the context of the International Cancer Genome Consortium. We compare sequencing methods, analysis pipelines and validation methods. We show that using PCR-free methods and increasing sequencing depth to ∼100 × shows benefits, as long as the tumour:control coverage ratio remains balanced. We observe widely varying mutation call rates and low concordance among analysis pipelines, reflecting the artefact-prone nature of the raw data and lack of standards for dealing with the artefacts. However, we show that, using the benchmark mutation set we have created, many issues are in fact easy to remedy and have an immediate positive impact on mutation detection accuracy.


Nature Genetics | 2014

Hotspot activating PRKD1 somatic mutations in polymorphous low-grade adenocarcinomas of the salivary glands

Ilan Weinreb; Salvatore Piscuoglio; Luciano G. Martelotto; Daryl Waggott; Charlotte K.Y. Ng; Bayardo Perez-Ordonez; Nicholas J. Harding; Javier A. Alfaro; Kenneth C. Chu; Agnes Viale; Nicola Fusco; Arnaud Da Cruz Paula; Caterina Marchiò; Rita A. Sakr; Raymond S. Lim; Lester D R Thompson; Simion I. Chiosea; Raja R. Seethala; Alena Skalova; Edward B. Stelow; Isabel Fonseca; Adel Assaad; Christine How; Jianxin Wang; Richard de Borja; Michelle Chan-Seng-Yue; Christopher J. Howlett; Anthony C. Nichols; Y Hannah Wen; Nora Katabi

Polymorphous low-grade adenocarcinoma (PLGA) is the second most frequent type of malignant tumor of the minor salivary glands. We identified PRKD1 hotspot mutations encoding p.Glu710Asp in 72.9% of PLGAs but not in other salivary gland tumors. Functional studies demonstrated that this kinase-activating alteration likely constitutes a driver of PLGA.


Nature | 2017

Genomic hallmarks of localized, non-indolent prostate cancer

Michael Fraser; Veronica Y. Sabelnykova; Takafumi N. Yamaguchi; Lawrence E. Heisler; Julie Livingstone; Vincent Huang; Yu Jia Shiah; Fouad Yousif; Xihui Lin; Andre P. Masella; Natalie S. Fox; Michael Xie; Stephenie D. Prokopec; Alejandro Berlin; Emilie Lalonde; Musaddeque Ahmed; Dominique Trudel; Xuemei Luo; Timothy Beck; Alice Meng; Junyan Zhang; Alister D'Costa; Robert E. Denroche; Haiying Kong; Shadrielle Melijah G. Espiritu; Melvin Lee Kiang Chua; Ada Wong; Taryne Chong; Michelle Sam; Jeremy Johns

Prostate tumours are highly variable in their response to therapies, but clinically available prognostic factors can explain only a fraction of this heterogeneity. Here we analysed 200 whole-genome sequences and 277 additional whole-exome sequences from localized, non-indolent prostate tumours with similar clinical risk profiles, and carried out RNA and methylation analyses in a subset. These tumours had a paucity of clinically actionable single nucleotide variants, unlike those seen in metastatic disease. Rather, a significant proportion of tumours harboured recurrent non-coding aberrations, large-scale genomic rearrangements, and alterations in which an inversion repressed transcription within its boundaries. Local hypermutation events were frequent, and correlated with specific genomic profiles. Numerous molecular aberrations were prognostic for disease recurrence, including several DNA methylation events, and a signature comprised of these aberrations outperformed well-described prognostic biomarkers. We suggest that intensified treatment of genomically aggressive localized prostate cancer may improve cure rates.


Journal of Cell Biology | 2013

Two phases of disulfide bond formation have differing requirements for oxygen

Marianne Koritzinsky; Fiana Levitin; Twan van den Beucken; Ryan A. Rumantir; Nicholas J. Harding; Kenneth C. Chu; Paul C. Boutros; Ineke Braakman; Bradly G. Wouters

Disulfide bonds introduced during or shortly after protein synthesis can occur without oxygen, whereas those introduced during post-translational folding or isomerization are oxygen dependent.


Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology | 2012

Inter-strain heterogeneity in rat hepatic transcriptomic responses to 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD)

Cindy Q. Yao; Stephenie D. Prokopec; John D. Watson; Renee Pang; Christine P'ng; Lauren C. Chong; Nicholas J. Harding; Raimo Pohjanvirta; Allan B. Okey; Paul C. Boutros

The biochemical and toxic effects of 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD) have been the subject of intense study for decades. It is now clear that essentially all TCDD-induced toxicities are mediated by DNA-protein interactions involving the Aryl Hydrocarbon Receptor (AHR). Nevertheless, it remains unknown which AHR target genes cause TCDD toxicities. Several groups, including our own, have developed rodent model systems to probe these questions. mRNA expression profiling of these model systems has revealed significant inter-species heterogeneity in rodent hepatic responses to TCDD. It has remained unclear if this variability also exists within a species, amongst rodent strains. To resolve this question, we profiled the hepatic transcriptomic response to TCDD of diverse rat strains (L-E, H/W, F344 and Wistar rats) and two lines derived from L-E×H/W crosses, at consistent age, sex, and dosing (100 μg/kg TCDD for 19 h). Using this uniquely consistent dataset, we show that the majority of TCDD-induced alterations in mRNA abundance are strain/line-specific: only 11 genes were affected by TCDD across all strains, including well-known dioxin-responsive genes such as Cyp1a1 and Nqo1. Our analysis identified two novel universally dioxin-responsive genes as well as 4 genes induced by TCDD in dioxin-sensitive rats only. These 6 genes are strong candidates to explain TCDD-related toxicities, so we validated them using 152 animals in time-course (0 to 384 h) and dose-response (0 to 3000 μg/kg) experiments. This study reveals that different rat strains exhibit dramatic transcriptional heterogeneity in their hepatic responses to TCDD and that inter-strain comparisons can help identify candidate toxicity-related genes.


bioRxiv | 2014

A comprehensive multicenter comparison of whole genome sequencing pipelines using a uniform tumor-normal sample pair

Ivo Buchhalter; Barbara Hutter; Tyler Alioto; Timothy Beck; Paul C. Boutros; Benedikt Brors; Adam Butler; Sasithorn Chotewutmontri; Robert E. Denroche; Sophia Derdak; Nicolle Diessl; Lars Feuerbach; Akihiro Fujimoto; Susanne Gröbner; Marta Gut; Nicholas J. Harding; Michael Heinold; Lawrence E. Heisler; Jonathan Hinton; Natalie Jäger; David Jones; Rolf Kabbe; Andrey Korshunov; John D. McPherson; Andrew Menzies; Hidewaki Nakagawa; Christopher Previti; Keiran Raine; Paolo Ribeca; Sabine Schmidt

As next-generation sequencing becomes a clinical tool, a full understanding of the variables affecting sequencing analysis output is required. Through the International Cancer Genome Consortium (ICGC), we compared sequencing pipelines at five independent centers (CNAG, DKFZ, OICR, RIKEN and WTSI) using a single tumor-blood DNA pair. Analyses by each center and with one standardized algorithm revealed significant discrepancies. Although most pipelines performed well for coding mutations, library preparation methods and sequencing coverage metrics clearly influenced downstream results. PCR-free methods showed reduced GC-bias and more even coverage. Increasing sequencing depth to ∼100x (two- to three-fold higher than current standards) showed a benefit, as long as the tumor:control coverage ratio remained balanced. To become part of routine clinical care, high-throughput sequencing must be globally compatible and comparable. This benchmarking exercise has highlighted several fundamental parameters to consider in this regard, which will allow for better optimization and planning of both basic and translational studies.


bioRxiv | 2014

A Comprehensive Assessment of Somatic Mutation Calling in Cancer Genomes

Tyler Alioto; Sophia Derdak; Timothy Beck; Paul C. Boutros; Lawrence Bower; Ivo Buchhalter; Matthew Eldridge; Nicholas J. Harding; Lawrence E. Heisler; Eivind Hovig; David T. W. Jones; Andy G. Lynch; Sigve Nakken; Paolo Ribeca; Anne-Sophie Sertier; Jared T. Simpson; Paul T. Spellman; Patrick Tarpey; Laurie Tonon; Daniel Vodák; Takafumi N. Yamaguchi; Sergi Beltran Agullo; Marc Dabad; Robert E. Denroche; Philip Ginsbach; Simon Heath; Emanuele Raineri; Charlotte L Anderson; Benedikt Brors; Ruben M. Drews

The emergence of next generation DNA sequencing technology is enabling high-resolution cancer genome analysis. Large-scale projects like the International Cancer Genome Consortium (ICGC) are systematically scanning cancer genomes to identify recurrent somatic mutations. Second generation DNA sequencing, however, is still an evolving technology and procedures, both experimental and analytical, are constantly changing. Thus the research community is still defining a set of best practices for cancer genome data analysis, with no single protocol emerging to fulfil this role. Here we describe an extensive benchmark exercise to identify and resolve issues of somatic mutation calling. Whole genome sequence datasets comprising tumor-normal pairs from two different types of cancer, chronic lymphocytic leukaemia and medulloblastoma, were shared within the ICGC and submissions of somatic mutation calls were compared to verified mutations and to each other. Varying strategies to call mutations, incomplete awareness of sources of artefacts, and even lack of agreement on what constitutes an artefact or real mutation manifested in widely varying mutation call rates and somewhat low concordance among submissions. We conclude that somatic mutation calling remains an unsolved problem. However, we have identified many issues that are easy to remedy that are presented here. Our study highlights critical issues that need to be addressed before this valuable technology can be routinely used to inform clinical decision-making. Abbreviations and Definitions SSM Somatic Single-base Mutations or Simple Somatic Mutations, refers to a somatic single base change SIM Somatic Insertion/deletion Mutation CNV Copy Number Variant SV Structural Variant SNP Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms, refers to a single base variable position in the germline with a frequency of > 1% in the general population CLL Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia MB Medulloblastoma ICGC International Cancer Genome Consortium BM Benchmark aligner = mapper, these terms are used interchangeably


bioRxiv | 2017

BPG: Seamless, Automated and Interactive Visualization of Scientific Data

Christine P'ng; Jeffrey Green; Lauren C. Chong; Daryl Waggott; Stephenie D. Prokopec; Mehrdad Shamsi; Francis Nguyen; Denise Y. F. Mak; Felix Lam; Marco A. Albuquerque; Ying Wu; Esther Jung; Maud H. W. Starmans; Michelle Chan-Seng-Yue; Cindy Q. Yao; Bianca Liang; Emilie Lalonde; Syed Haider; Nicole A. Simone; Dorota H Sendorek; Kenneth C. Chu; Nathalie C Moon; Natalie S. Fox; Michal R Grzadkowski; Nicholas J. Harding; Clement Fung; Amanda R. Murdoch; Kathleen E. Houlahan; Jianxin Wang; David R. Garcia

We introduce BPG, an easy-to-use framework for generating publication-quality, highly-customizable plots in the R statistical environment. This open-source package includes novel methods of displaying high-dimensional datasets and facilitates generation of complex multi-panel figures, making it ideal for complex datasets. A web-based interactive tool allows online figure customization, from which R code can be downloaded for seamless integration with computational pipelines. BPG is available at http://labs.oicr.on.ca/boutros-lab/software/bpg

Collaboration


Dive into the Nicholas J. Harding's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Paul C. Boutros

Ontario Institute for Cancer Research

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Emilie Lalonde

Ontario Institute for Cancer Research

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Michael Fraser

Princess Margaret Cancer Centre

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Timothy Beck

Ontario Institute for Cancer Research

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Natalie S. Fox

Ontario Institute for Cancer Research

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Richard de Borja

Ontario Institute for Cancer Research

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Alice Meng

University Health Network

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Jeremy Johns

Ontario Institute for Cancer Research

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Jianxin Wang

Ontario Institute for Cancer Research

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge