Nick Spencer
Landcare Research
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Nick Spencer.
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America | 2014
Christine Lamanna; Benjamin Blonder; Cyrille Violle; Nathan J. B. Kraft; Brody Sandel; Irena Šímová; John C. Donoghue; Jens-Christian Svenning; Brian J. McGill; Brad Boyle; Vanessa Buzzard; Steven Dolins; Peter M. Jørgensen; Aaron Marcuse-Kubitza; Naia Morueta-Holme; Robert K. Peet; William H. Piel; James Regetz; Mark Schildhauer; Nick Spencer; Barbara M. Thiers; Susan K. Wiser; Brian J. Enquist
Significance We present a conceptual framework for testing theories for the latitudinal gradient of species richness in terms of variation in functional diversity at the alpha, beta, and gamma scales. We compared ecological community theory with large-scale observational data of tree species richness and functional diversity. We found that the patterns of functional trait diversity are not consistent with any one theory of species diversity. These conflicting results indicate that none of the broad classes of biodiversity theory considered here is alone able to explain the latitudinal gradient of species diversity in terms of functional trait space. The processes causing the latitudinal gradient in species richness remain elusive. Ecological theories for the origin of biodiversity gradients, such as competitive exclusion, neutral dynamics, and environmental filtering, make predictions for how functional diversity should vary at the alpha (within local assemblages), beta (among assemblages), and gamma (regional pool) scales. We test these predictions by quantifying hypervolumes constructed from functional traits representing major axes of plant strategy variation (specific leaf area, plant height, and seed mass) in tree assemblages spanning the temperate and tropical New World. Alpha-scale trait volume decreases with absolute latitude and is often lower than sampling expectation, consistent with environmental filtering theory. Beta-scale overlap decays with geographic distance fastest in the temperate zone, again consistent with environmental filtering theory. In contrast, gamma-scale trait space shows a hump-shaped relationship with absolute latitude, consistent with no theory. Furthermore, the overall temperate trait hypervolume was larger than the overall tropical hypervolume, indicating that the temperate zone permits a wider range of trait combinations or that niche packing is stronger in the tropical zone. Although there are limitations in the data, our analyses suggest that multiple processes have shaped trait diversity in trees, reflecting no consistent support for any one theory.
Wildlife Research | 2000
Murray Efford; Bruce Warburton; Nick Spencer
Common brushtail possums (Trichosurus vulpecula) are intractable pests in New Zealand. The effectiveness of local control can be limited by immigration, some of which has been attributed to a ‘vacuum effect’ – directed movements induced by the control itself. To characterise the vacuum effect we examined changes in the home ranges of trapped possums following control in a 6-ha block at one end of a 13-ha forest patch on farmland near Dunedin, New Zealand. We also monitored a sample of possums by radio-telemetry. After control, the density was 3 ha–1 inside the removal area and 16 ha–1 outside. During the year after the removal, 29% of possums within 100 m of the boundary of the removal area (n = 38) shifted their range centre at least 50 m towards it. The effect diminished rapidly with distance: only 1 of 28 animals moved more than 200 m from the boundary. The size of the previous range was a significant predictor of movement among males, but this may be partly a sampling artifact. We measured a net flux of 69 possums km–1 across the boundary in the 12 months after control, and possums settled on average 44 6.9 m inside the boundary. The vacuum effect in brushtail possums appears largely confined to home-range adjustments by individuals with ranges overlapping the area of reduced density. This limits its potential role in population recovery.
Ecology Letters | 2013
Naia Morueta-Holme; Brian J. Enquist; Brian J. McGill; Brad Boyle; Peter M. Jørgensen; Jeffrey E. Ott; Robert K. Peet; Irena Šímová; Lindsey L. Sloat; Barbara M. Thiers; Cyrille Violle; Susan K. Wiser; Steven Dolins; John C. Donoghue; Nathan J. B. Kraft; Jim Regetz; Mark Schildhauer; Nick Spencer; Jens-Christian Svenning
Despite being a fundamental aspect of biodiversity, little is known about what controls species range sizes. This is especially the case for hyperdiverse organisms such as plants. We use the largest botanical data set assembled to date to quantify geographical variation in range size for ∼ 85 000 plant species across the New World. We assess prominent hypothesised range-size controls, finding that plant range sizes are codetermined by habitat area and long- and short-term climate stability. Strong short- and long-term climate instability in large parts of North America, including past glaciations, are associated with broad-ranged species. In contrast, small habitat areas and a stable climate characterise areas with high concentrations of small-ranged species in the Andes, Central America and the Brazilian Atlantic Rainforest region. The joint roles of area and climate stability strengthen concerns over the potential effects of future climate change and habitat loss on biodiversity.
Ecography | 2015
Irena Šímová; Cyrille Violle; Nathan J. B. Kraft; David Storch; Jens-Christian Svenning; Brad Boyle; John C. Donoghue; Peter M. Jørgensen; Brian J. McGill; Naia Morueta-Holme; William H. Piel; Robert K. Peet; Jim Regetz; Mark Schildhauer; Nick Spencer; Barbara M. Thiers; Susan K. Wiser; Brian J. Enquist
One of the key hypothesized drivers of gradients in species richness is environmental filtering, where environmental stress limits which species from a larger species pool gain membership in a local community owing to their traits. Whereas most studies focus on small-scale variation in functional traits along environmental gradient, the effect of large-scale environmental filtering is less well understood. Furthermore, it has been rarely tested whether the factors that constrain the niche space limit the total number of coexisting species. We assessed the role of environmental filtering in shaping tree assemblages across North America north of Mexico by testing the hypothesis that colder, drier, or seasonal environments (stressful conditions for most plants) constrain tree trait diversity and thereby limit species richness. We assessed geographic patterns in trait filtering and their relationships to species richness pattern using a comprehensive set of tree range maps. We focused on four key plant functional traits reflecting major life history axes (maximum height, specific leaf area, seed mass, and wood density) and four climatic variables (annual mean and seasonality of temperature and precipitation). We tested for significant spatial shifts in trait means and variances using a null model approach. While we found significant shifts in mean species’ trait values at most grid cells, trait variances at most grid cells did not deviate from the null expectation. Measures of environmental harshness (cold, dry, seasonal climates) and lower species richness were weakly associated with a reduction in variance of seed mass and specific leaf area. The pattern in variance of height and wood density was, however, opposite. These findings do not support the hypothesis that more stressful conditions universally limit species and trait diversity in North America. Environmental filtering does, however, structure assemblage composition, by selecting for certain optimum trait values under a given set of conditions.
Ecology | 2016
Kristine Engemann; Brody Sandel; Brad Boyle; Brian J. Enquist; Peter M. Jørgensen; Jens Kattge; Brian J. McGill; Naia Morueta-Holme; Robert K. Peet; Nick Spencer; Cyrille Violle; Susan K. Wiser; Jens-Christian Svenning
This dataset provides growth form classifications for 67,413 vascular plant species from North, Central, and South America. The data used to determine growth form were compiled from five major integrated sources and two original publications: the Botanical Information and Ecology Network (BIEN), the Plant Trait Database (TRY), the SALVIAS database, the USDA PLANTS database, Missouri Botanical Gardens Tropicos database, Wright (2010), and Boyle (1996). We defined nine plant growth forms based on woodiness (woody or non-woody), shoot structure (self-supporting or not self-supporting), and root traits (rooted in soil, not rooted in soil, parasitic or aquatic): Epiphyte, Liana, Vine, Herb, Shrub, Tree, Parasite, or Aquatic. Species with multiple growth form classifications were assigned the growth form classification agreed upon by the majority (>2/3) of sources. Species with ambiguous or otherwise not interpretable growth form assignments were excluded from the final dataset but are made available with the original data. Comparisons with independent estimates of species richness for the Western hemisphere suggest that our final dataset includes the majority of New World vascular plant species. Coverage is likely more complete for temperate than for tropical species. In addition, aquatic species are likely under-represented. Nonetheless, this dataset represents the largest compilation of plant growth forms published to date, and should contribute to new insights across a broad range of research in systematics, ecology, biogeography, conservation, and global change science.
Journal of Vegetation Science | 2011
Jürgen Dengler; Florian Jansen; Falko Glöckler; Robert K. Peet; Miquel De Cáceres; Milan Chytrý; Jörg Ewald; Jens Oldeland; Gabriela Lopez-Gonzalez; Manfred Finckh; Ladislav Mucina; John Rodwell; J.H.J. Schaminée; Nick Spencer
Journal of Applied Ecology | 2002
Dave Ramsey; Nick Spencer; Peter Caley; Murray G. Efford; Keith Hansen; Mary Lam; Des W. Cooper
Wildlife Research | 1998
P. Caley; Nick Spencer; R. A. Cole; Murray G. Efford
Journal of Vegetation Science | 2011
Susan K. Wiser; Nick Spencer; Miquel De Cáceres; Martin Kleikamp; Brad Boyle; Robert K. Peet
Methods in Ecology and Evolution | 2016
Gregory R. Goldsmith; Naia Morueta-Holme; Brody Sandel; Eric D. Fitz; Samuel D. Fitz; Brad Boyle; Nathan Casler; Kristine Engemann; Peter M. Jørgensen; Nathan J. B. Kraft; Brian J. McGill; Robert K. Peet; William H. Piel; Nick Spencer; Jens-Christian Svenning; Barbara M. Thiers; Cyrille Violle; Susan K. Wiser; Brian J. Enquist