Nicolas Estoppey
University of Lausanne
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Nicolas Estoppey.
Science of The Total Environment | 2014
Nicolas Estoppey; Adrien Schopfer; Julien Omlin; Pierre Esseiva; Etienne Vermeirssen; Olivier Delémont; Luiz Felippe De Alencastro
One aim of this study is to determine the impact of water velocity on the uptake of indicator polychlorinated biphenyls (iPCBs) by silicone rubber (SR) and low-density polyethylene (LDPE) passive samplers. A second aim is to assess the efficiency of performance reference compounds (PRCs) to correct for the impact of water velocity. SR and LDPE samplers were spiked with 11 or 12 PRCs and exposed for 6 weeks to four different velocities (in the range of 1.6 to 37.7 cm s(-1)) in river-like flow conditions using a channel system supplied with river water. A relationship between velocity and the uptake was found for each iPCB and enables to determine expected changes in the uptake due to velocity variations. For both samplers, velocity increases from 2 to 10 cm s(-1), 30 cm s(-1) (interpolated data) and 100 cm s(-1) (extrapolated data) lead to increases of the uptake which do not exceed a factor of 2, 3 and 4.5, respectively. Results also showed that the influence of velocity decreased with increasing the octanol-water coefficient partition (log K(ow)) of iPCBs when SR is used whereas the opposite effect was observed for LDPE. Time-weighted average (TWA) concentrations of iPCBs in water were calculated from iPCB uptake and PRC release. These calculations were performed using either a single PRC or all the PRCs. The efficiency of PRCs to correct the impact of velocity was assessed by comparing the TWA concentrations obtained at the four tested velocities. For SR, a good agreement was found among the four TWA concentrations with both methods (average RSD<10%). Also for LDPE, PRCs offered a good correction of the impact of water velocity (average RSD of about 10 to 20%). These results contribute to the process of acceptance of passive sampling in routine regulatory monitoring programs.
Science of The Total Environment | 2016
Nicolas Estoppey; Adrien Schopfer; Camille Fong; Olivier Delémont; Luiz Felippe De Alencastro; Pierre Esseiva
This study firstly aims to assess the field performances of low density polyethylene (LDPE) and silicone rubber (SR) samplers for the monitoring of polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) in water regarding the uptake, the sampling rate (RS) estimated by using performance reference compounds (PRCs) and the time-weighted average (TWA) concentrations. The second aim is to evaluate the efficiency of these samplers to investigate PCB sources (localization and imputation steps) using methods with and without PRCs to correct for the impact of water velocity on the uptake. Samplers spiked with PRCs were deployed in the outfalls of two PCB sources and at 8 river sites situated upstream and downstream of the outfalls. After 6weeks, the uptake of PCBs in the linear phase was equivalent in LDPE and SR but 5 times lower in LDPE for PCBs approaching equilibrium. PRC-based RS and water velocity (0.08 to 1.21ms-1) were well correlated in river (LDPE: R2=0.91, SR: R2=0.96) but not in outfalls (higher turbulences and potential release of PRCs to air). TWA concentrations obtained with SR were slightly higher than those obtained with LDPE (factor 1.4 to 2.6 in river) likely because of uncertainty in sampler-water partition coefficient values. Concentrations obtained through filtration and extraction of water samples (203L) were 1.6 and 5.1 times higher than TWA concentrations obtained with SR and LDPE samplers, respectively. PCB sources could efficiently be localized when PRCs were used (increases of PCB loads in river) but the impact of high differences of water velocity was overcorrected (leading sometimes to false positives and negatives). Increases of PCB loads in the river could not be entirely imputed to the investigated sources (underestimation of PCBs contributing to the load increases). A method without PRCs (relationship between uptake and water velocity) appeared to be a good complementary method for LDPE.
Chimia | 2014
Adrien Schopfer; Nicolas Estoppey; Julien Omlin; Robin Udrisard; Pierre Esseiva; Luiz Felippe De Alencastro
This study shows the efficiency of passive sampling to reveal industrial and agricultural pollution trends. Two practical applications for nonpolar and polar contaminants are presented. Low-density polyethylene (LDPE) samplers were deployed for one year in the Venoge River (VD) to monitor indicator PCBs (iPCBs, IUPAC nos. 28, 52, 101, 138, 153 and 180). The results showed that the impact of PCB emissions into the river is higher in summer than in other seasons due to the low flow rate of the river during this period. Polar organic chemical integrative samplers (POCIS) were deployed for 4 months in the Sion-Riddes canal (VS) to investigate herbicides (terbuthylazine, diuron and linuron). Desisopropylatrazine-d5 (DIA-d5) was tested as a performance reference compound (PRC) to estimate aqueous concentration. The results showed an increase of water contamination due to the studied agricultural area. The maximal contamination was observed in April and corresponds to the period of herbicide application on the crops.
Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry | 2016
Inmaculada Carpinteiro; Adrien Schopfer; Nicolas Estoppey; Camille Fong; Dominique Grandjean; Luiz Felippe De Alencastro
Chemosphere | 2015
Nicolas Estoppey; Julien Omlin; Adrien Schopfer; Pierre Esseiva; Etienne Vermeirssen; Olivier Delémont; Luiz Felippe De Alencastro
Training Course on Passive Sampling, | 2018
Sylvain Coudret; Paul Koblan-Huberson; Yann Lavanchy; Dominique Grandjean; Nicolas Estoppey; Luiz Felippe De Alencastro
International Symposium for Sea-Dumped Munition and UXO | 2018
Nicolas Estoppey; J. Mathieu; E. Gascon Diez; S. Sapin; Olivier Delémont; Pierre Esseiva; Luiz Felippe De Alencastro; Sylvain Coudret; P. Folly
Archive | 2017
Luiz Felippe De Alencastro; Nicolas Estoppey; Adrien Schopfer; Dominique Grandjean; Sylvain Coudret
SETAC A/P Conference 2016 , | 2016
Tr-A. Nguyen; Q-T. Dinh; Th-K-L. Nguyen; T-B-T Le; T-Th-H Pham; P-B. Nguyen; Nicolas Estoppey; Clément Levasseur; Luiz Felippe De Alencastro
NORMAN Bulletin | 2016
Nicolas Estoppey; Adrien Schopfer; Pierre Esseiva; Olivier Delémont; Luiz Felippe De Alencastro
Collaboration
Dive into the Nicolas Estoppey's collaboration.
Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology
View shared research outputs