Nicolas Poujol

A stable prostatic bioluminescent cell line to investigate androgen and antiandrogen effects

We developed a new stable prostatic cell line expressing the human androgen receptor (AR) and the AR-responsive reporter gene to generate a powerful tool for investigating androgen action and for rapid screening of agonists and antagonists. The AR-deficient PC-3 cells were stably transfected with pSG(5)-puro-hAR and pMMTV-neo-Luc. After selection with puromycin and neomycin, one highly inducible clone was isolated and named PALM, for PC-3-Androgen receptor-Luciferase-MMTV. The expression of hAR was confirmed by western blot and steroid-binding assays on the whole cells. The transcriptional activity of the clone was measured after incubation of cells with increasing concentrations of synthetic R1881 or natural androgens (DHT and testosterone). The three agonists had the same maximal activity at 0.1 microM and the fold induction was equal to 20. The agonist and antagonist activities of the steroidal antiandrogens (cyproterone acetate and RU2956) and the non-steroidal antiandrogens (nilutamide, bicalutamide, inocoterone and hydroxyflutamide) measured with the PALM cells were in good correlation with the results obtained with transiently transfected cells. The selectivity in steroid transactivation was demonstrated with estradiol, progesterone, cortisol, dexamethasone and aldosterone. Spironolactone and RU486 showed partial agonist and antagonist activities, whereas R5020 presented only a partial antagonist activity. We here demonstrate that this stable transfectant provides an accurate tool for studying wild-type human AR activation and its regulation by androgens and antiandrogens in a human prostatic epithelial cell, which is routinely available and remains androgen-responsive in vitro.

Molecular action of androgens.

The androgen receptor (AR), which mediates androgen action in the cell, belongs to the superfamily of nuclear receptors, a large group of transcription factors. Recent studies have described how the AR acts on specific target genes. The receptors specificity of action depends on its regulation at different levels: expression in the cells, ligand binding and DNA-specific sequence recognition by structurally conserved domains and regulation by transcriptional factors in an integrated response. We propose, here, an overview of recent works on the molecular regulation of androgen-dependent genes by AR.

Specific recognition of androgens by their nuclear receptor: a structure-function study

Androgens, like progestins, are 3-ketosteroids with structural differences restricted to the 17β substituent in the steroid D-ring. To better understand the specific recognition of ligands by the human androgen receptor (hAR), a homology model of the ligand-binding domain (LBD) was constructed based on the progesterone receptor LBD crystal structure. Several mutants of residues potentially involved in the specific recognition of ligands in the hAR were constructed and tested for their ability to bind agonists. Their transactivation capacity in response to agonist (R1881) and antagonists (cyproterone acetate, hydroxyflutamide, and ICI 176344) was also measured. Substitution of His874 by alanine, only marginally impairs the ligand-binding and transactivation capacity of the hAR receptor. In contrast, mutations of Thr877 and, to a greater extent, Asn705 perturb ligand recognition, alter transactivation efficiency, and broaden receptor specificity. Interestingly, the N705A mutant acquires progesterone receptor (PR) properties for agonist ligands but, unlike wild type AR and PR, loses the capacity to repress transactivation with nonsteroidal antagonists. Models of the hAR·LBD complexes with several ligands are presented, which suggests new directions for drug design.

Mutations of androgen receptor gene in androgen insensitivity syndromes

The androgen receptor belongs to the family of steroid-thyroid hormone-retinoid nuclear receptors. It contains 3 major domains: a hormone-binding region, a DNA-binding region and an amino-terminal region. Cloning of the cDNA encoding the androgen receptor and elucidation of the androgen receptor gene structure enabled the characterization of the molecular defects associated with androgen insensitivity. Mutations of the androgen receptor in 46,XY individuals cause a spectrum of androgen insensitivity syndromes, ranging from female phenotype (testicular feminization) to minor degrees of undervirilization or infertility. Reports on androgen receptor gene structure in patients with complete or partial forms of androgen insensitivity demonstrate that gene deletions are very rare. Several categories of mutations have been reported and are reviewed in this paper. Nucleotide substitutions in the androgen-binding domain or the N-terminal region that cause insertion of premature termination codons result in failure to form a functional protein. Missense mutations within the androgen-binding domain are responsible for a decrease or absence of receptor-binding activity. Mutations within the DNA-binding domain are associated with a positive receptor-binding form of androgen insensitivity. Analysis of described mutations indicates that they are spread throughout the gene, either associated with partial or complete androgen insensitivity. Furthermore, the same point mutation was reported to be associated with variable phenotypic expression of androgen insensitivity syndrome. It is thus difficult to define a genotype/phenotype relationship. However, mutations causing androgen insensitivity will certainly yield important new insights into the molecular basis of androgen action.

Ligands Differentially Modulate the Protein Interactions of the Human Estrogen Receptors α and β

The interactions of human estrogen receptor subtypes ERalpha and ERbeta with DNA and a 210 amino acid residue fragment of the coactivator protein SRC-1 bearing three nuclear receptor interaction motifs were investigated quantitatively using fluorescence anisotropy in the presence of agonist and antagonist ligands. ERalpha and ERbeta were found to bind in a similar manner to DNA, and both salt and temperature affected the affinity and/or stoichiometry of these interactions. The agonist ligands estradiol, estrone and estriol did not modify the binding of ERalpha to the fluorescein-labeled target estrogen response element. However, in the case of ERbeta, these ligands led to the formation of some higher-order protein-DNA complexes and a small decrease in affinity. The partial agonist 4-hydroxytamoxifen had little effect on either ER subtype, whereas the pure antagonist ICI 182,780 led to the cooperative formation of protein-DNA complexes of higher order than dimer, as further demonstrated by competition experiments and gel mobility-shift assays. In addition to DNA binding, the interaction of both ER subtypes with the Alexa488-labeled SRC-1 coactivator fragment was investigated by fluorescence anisotropy. The agonist ligands estrone, estradiol, estriol, genistein and ethynyl estradiol exhibited distinct capacities for inducing the recruitment of SRC-1 that were not correlated with their affinity for the receptor. Moreover, estrone and genistein exhibited subtype specificity in that they induced SRC-1 recruitment to ERbeta with much higher efficiency than in the case of ERalpha. The differential coactivator recruitment capacities of the ER agonists and their receptor subtype coactivator recruitment specificity may be linked to the molecular structure of the agonists with respect to their interactions with a specific histidine residue located at the back of the ligand-binding pocket. Altogether, these quantitative in vitro studies of ER interactions reveal the complex energetic and stoichiometric consequences of changes in the chemical structures of these proteins and their ligands.

Quantitative characterization of the interaction between purified human estrogen receptor α and DNA using fluorescence anisotropy

In an effort to better define the molecular mechanisms of the functional specificity of human estrogen receptor alpha, we have carried out equilibrium binding assays to study the interaction of the receptor with a palindromic estrogen response element derived from the vitellogenin ERE. These assays are based on the observation of the fluorescence anisotropy of a fluorescein moiety covalently bound to the target oligonucleotide. The low anisotropy value due to the fast tumbling of the free oligonucleotide in solution increases substantially upon binding the receptor to the labeled ERE. The quality of our data are sufficient to ascertain that the binding is clearly cooperative in nature, ruling out a simple monomer interaction and implicating a dimerization energetically coupled to DNA binding in the nanomolar range. The salt concentration dependence of the affinity reveals formation of high stoichiometry, low specificity complexes at low salt concentration. Increasing the KCl concentration above 200 mM leads to specific binding of ER dimer. We interpret the lack of temperature dependence of the apparent affinity as indicative of an entropy driven interaction. Finally, binding assays using fluorescent target EREs bearing mutations of each of the base pairs in the palindromic ERE half-site indicate that the energy of interaction between ER and its target is relatively evenly distributed throughout the site.

Molecular modeling and in vitro investigations of the human androgen receptor DNA-binding domain: application for the study of two mutations ☆

In two families with complete androgen insensitivity, we have identified naturally occurring point mutations in the human androgen receptor gene that encode amino acid substitutions within the DNA-binding domain. The two amino acid substitutions, a valine to phenylalanine and a leucine to proline, occur at positions 581 and 616, respectively, of the androgen receptor. The mutations were recreated by site-directed mutagenesis. Expression of the mutants androgen receptors in COS 7 and CV 1 cells revealed a normal size 110-kDa receptor protein on Western blots, normal androgen binding capacities and affinities, but absence of binding to target DNA on electrophoretic mobility shift assays. In cotransfection assays, the mutant ARs failed to activate transcription of an androgen-responsive reporter gene. To study the possible structural impact of these mutations, three-dimensional models of the normal androgen receptor and of each mutant were built by homology with the glucocorticoid receptor. Analysis of the models predicts that mutation Val581Phe would affect interaction between the protein and DNA, whereas the Leu616Pro mutation would more likely be involved in destabilizing the protein structure or protein dimerization. Taken together, the experimental investigations and the molecular modeling studies of the mutant androgen receptors observed in families with complete androgen insensitivity syndrome, highlight the role of Val-581 and Leu-616 in receptor structure and function.

Functional and structural analysis of R607Q and R608K androgen receptor substitutions associated with male breast cancer

We previously described an androgen receptor (AR) point mutation located in the DNA-binding domain (DBD), adjacent to another AR substitution. Both were observed in two unrelated families with male breast cancer (MBC) and partial androgen insensitivity syndrome. This work was designed to determine the potential role of these two residues by in vitro study of the consequences of these two substitutions on biological functions and their structural impact at the atomic level. Mutant ARs revealed normal androgen-binding affinities and weaker DNA binding to an isolated androgen-responsive element. In cotransfection assays the mutant ARs displayed a reduced transactivation efficiency at 0.3 x 10(-10) M. Neither binding to an estrogen-responsive element nor transactivation efficiency of an ERE reporter gene was observed. Molecular modeling revealed that Arg607 and Arg608 were partially surface-exposed and located in adjacent areas in the AR-DBD complex with DNA. This is in favor of a protein-protein interaction. It is conceivable that such an interaction could be affected by mutation of one of these two arginines.

Complete androgen insensitivity syndrome due to a new frameshift deletion in exon 4 of the androgen receptor gene: functional analysis of the mutant receptor

We studied the androgen receptor gene in a large kindred with complete androgen insensitivity syndrome and negative receptor-binding activity, single-strand conformation polymorphism (SSCP) analysis and sequencing identified a 13 base pair deletion within exon 4. This was responsible for a predictive frameshift in the open reading frame and introduction of a premature stop codon at position 783 instead of 919. The deletion was reproduced in androgen receptor wildtype cDNA and transfected into mammalian cells. Western blot showed a smaller androgen receptor of 94 kDa for the transfected mutated cDNA instead of 110 kDa. Androgen-binding assay of the mutated transfected cells assessed the lack of androgen-binding. Gel retardation assay demonstrated the ability of the mutant to bind target DNA; however, the mutant was unable to transactivate a reporter gene. Although the role of the partial deletion in the lack of androgen action was expected, in vitro analyses highlight the role of the abnormal C-terminal portion in the inhibition of the receptor transregulatory activity of the protein causing androgen resistance in this family.

Disorders linked to insufficient androgen action in male children

Virilization of the external genitalia in the male fetus requires testosterone and dihydrotestosterone (DHT), which is formed from testosterone by the action of the enzyme, 5α‐reductase type 2 (5αR‐2). Mediation of the effects of both testosterone and DHT requires a functional androgen receptor (AR) located in the cytoplasmic compartment of target cells. DHT (or testosterone) binding induces a conformational change which facilitates AR nuclear transport, phosphorylation and dimerization, ultimately regulating of the rate of transcription of androgen‐dependent genes. Any event which impaire DHT formation (mutation within the 5αR‐2 gene or 5αR‐2 inhibitors) or normal function of the AR (mutation in the AR gene, antiandrogens) may result in insufficient androgen action in the male fetus and in subsequent undervirilization in the newborn. Hypospadias may be due to a defect in androgen action due to mutation of the 5αR‐2 or of the AR gene. Mutation of unidentified genes is likely to underlie this displacement of the urethral meatus from the tip to the ventral side of the phallus. An aetiological role for environmental chemical products has been postulated, since ethnic as well as geographical differences in the incidence of hypospadias have been noted. Increasing evidence has been gathered indicating that widely used industrial and agricultural chemicals have deleterious effects on normal male sexual differentiation. Cryptorchidism and micropenis may represent an intersex phenotype, even if they are isolated. Aetiological factors include 5αR‐2 gene mutation, AR gene mutation or environmental hormonal disruptors. In conclusion, several phenotypes have been attributed to insufficient androgen action during fetal life. Whereas mutations in the 5αR‐2 gene and AR gene are natural, attention should be focused on environmental endocrine disruptors that are able to mimic steroid 5α‐reductase deficiency or partial androgen insensitivity syndrome.