Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Nicole D. Fleming is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Nicole D. Fleming.


Gynecologic Oncology | 2014

Position-related injury is uncommon in robotic gynecologic surgery ☆ ☆☆

Michael A. Ulm; Nicole D. Fleming; Vijayashri Rallapali; Mark F. Munsell; Pedro T. Ramirez; Shannon N. Westin; Alpa M. Nick; Kathleen M. Schmeler; Pamela T. Soliman

OBJECTIVE To assess the rate and risk factors for position-related injury in robotic gynecologic surgery. METHODS A prospective database from 12/2006 to 1/2014 of all planned robotic gynecologic procedures was retrospectively reviewed for patients who experienced neurologic injury, musculoskeletal injury, or vascular compromise related to patient positioning in the operating room. Analysis was performed to determine risk-factors and incidence for position-related injury. RESULTS Of the 831 patients who underwent robotic surgery during the study time period, only 7 (0.8%) experienced positioning-related injury. The injuries included minor head contusions (n=3), two lower extremity neuropathies (n=2), brachial plexus injury (n=1) and one large subcutaneous ecchymosis on the left flank and thigh (n=1). There were no long term sequelae from the positioning-related injuries. The only statistically significant risk factor for positioning-related injury was prior abdominal surgery (P=0.05). There were no significant associations between position-related injuries and operative time (P=0.232), body mass index (P=0.847), age (P=0.152), smoking history (P=0.161), or medical comorbidities (P=0.229-0.999). CONCLUSIONS The incidence of position-related injury among women undergoing robotic surgery was extremely low (0.8%). Due to the low incidence we were unable to identify modifiable risk factors for position-related injury following robotic surgery. A standardized, team-oriented approach may significantly decrease position-related injuries following robotic gynecologic surgery.


Gynecologic Oncology | 2009

A multicenter evaluation of sequential multimodality therapy and clinical outcome for the treatment of advanced endometrial cancer.

Angeles Alvarez Secord; Laura J. Havrilesky; David M. O'Malley; Victoria L. Bae-Jump; Nicole D. Fleming; Gloria Broadwater; David E. Cohn; Paola A. Gehrig

OBJECTIVES The appropriate sequencing of chemotherapy and radiation for the treatment of advanced endometrial cancer has not yet been determined. We sought to evaluate the outcome and adverse effects in patients with advanced stage endometrial cancer treated with postoperative chemotherapy and radiation to determine whether there was an advantage to a particular sequencing modality. METHODS A multicenter retrospective analysis of patients with surgical stages III and IV endometrial cancer from 1993 to 2007 was conducted. Inclusion criteria were comprehensive staging procedure including hysterectomy, bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, +/- selective pelvic/aortic lymphadenectomy, and treatment with adjuvant chemotherapy and radiation. Differences in frequencies of adverse events were tested with Pearsons chi-square test for comparing proportions. OS and PFS rates were calculated using Kaplan-Meier estimates. Hazard Ratios (HR) were estimated from multivariate Cox proportional hazards models. RESULTS One hundred and nine patients with advanced stage endometrial cancer were identified who received postoperative adjuvant therapies; 41% (n=45) chemotherapy followed by radiation and then further chemotherapy (CRC), 17% (n=18) radiation followed by chemotherapy (RC), and 42% (n=46) chemotherapy followed by radiation (CR). The median age was 62 years (range: 35-83); 48% had endometrioid tumors; and 90% underwent optimal cytoreduction. There was no difference in the frequency of adverse effects due to either chemotherapy (p=0.35) or radiotherapy (p=0.14); dose modifications (p=0.055); or delays (p=0.80) between the various sequencing modalities. There was a significant difference between adjuvant treatment groups for both OS (log rank p=0.011) and PFS (log rank p=0.025), with those receiving CRC having a superior 3-year OS (88%) and PFS (69%) compared to RC (54% and 47%) or CR (57% and 52%). After adjusting for stage, age, grade, race, histology and cytoreduction status the OS HR for therapy was 5.74 (95% CI, 1.96 to 16.77) for RC and 2.60 (95% CI, 1.01 to 6.71) for CR, compared to CRC, p=0.003. When the analysis was restricted to optimally cytoreduced patients, those who were treated with RC were at higher risk for disease progression [HR=3.53 (95% CI, 1.29 to 9.71)], p=0.024, and death [HR=7.24 (95% CI, 2.25 to 23.37)], p=0.001, than patients who received sequential CRC. CONCLUSIONS Sequential CRC was associated with improved survival in women with advanced stage disease compared to other sequencing modalities with a similar adverse effect profile. Future clinical trials are needed to prospectively evaluate appropriate sequencing and types of adjuvant chemotherapy and radiotherapy for the treatment of advanced stage endometrial cancer.


Journal of Pain and Symptom Management | 2009

Indwelling Catheters for the Management of Refractory Malignant Ascites: A Systematic Literature Overview and Retrospective Chart Review

Nicole D. Fleming; A. Alvarez-Secord; Vivian E. von Gruenigen; Michael J. Miller; Amy P. Abernethy

The safety and efficacy of indwelling intraperitoneal (IP) catheters for the management of refractory malignant ascites is unclear. A systematic literature overview and retrospective chart review of patients with malignant refractory ascites who underwent indwelling IP catheter placement was performed. Standardized literature abstraction and chart review templates were used to ensure that consistent information was collected. Fifteen publications met literature search criteria, representing 221 patients. Tenckhoff (Quinton Instrument Company, Seattle, WA, USA), Pleurex (Denver Biomedical Inc., Golden, CO, USA), and peritoneal catheters were used, along with IP ports. A median 5.9% of cases (range: 2.5%-34%) had documented peritonitis. In the literature, untunneled catheters were most commonly associated with infections. Our chart review added 19 cases from two academic institutions to this literature (median age: 60 years [range: 31-85]; females: 17 [89%]; gynecological malignancies: 14 [73%]). Palliative management before catheter placement included diuretics (n=4 [21%]) and multiple paracenteses (n=11 [58%] had two or more taps [range: 2-8]). Median time from diagnosis to catheter placement was 25 months (range: 1-77). Interventions were: French pigtail catheters (n=16 [84%]), Tenckhoff catheter (n=1 [5%]), and Port-A-Caths (Smith Medical MD, St. Paul, MN, USA) (n=2; 11%). Four (21%) catheters were tunneled. Prophylactic antibiotics were prescribed in six cases (32%). Two cases (11%) had documented infections, seven catheters (37%) became occluded, and two leaked (11%). The median time from catheter until death was 36 days (range: 4-660). Nine patients (47%) were admitted to hospice. In these retrospective studies, indwelling IP catheters appear to be a safe and effective palliative strategy to manage refractory malignant ascites, without overwhelming infection rates.


Gynecologic Oncology | 2009

The role of lymphadenectomy in the management of preoperative grade 1 endometrial carcinoma

Nikki L. Neubauer; Laura J. Havrilesky; Brian Calingaert; Anuradha Bulusu; Marcus Q. Bernardini; Nicole D. Fleming; Amy E. Bland; Angeles Alvarez Secord

OBJECTIVE We sought to assess the accuracy of a preoperative grade 1 designation and role of lymphadenectomy in women with preoperative grade 1 endometrial cancer. METHODS A retrospective analysis of patients diagnosed with preoperative grade 1 endometrial cancer from 1970 to 2006 was conducted. Inclusion criteria were preoperative grade 1 disease and hysterectomy with or without surgical staging. RESULTS 581 patients who underwent surgery for preoperative grade 1 cancer were identified. Lymphadenectomy was performed in 46%. Pelvic and aortic node metastases were identified in 5.4% and 3.2% patients who underwent lymphadenectomy. 9.7% were upgraded intraoperatively and 25% were upgraded on final pathology with 22% having grade 2 and 3% grade 3 disease. 22.5% with grade 1 disease intraoperatively were upgraded on final pathology, with 21.1% having grade 2 and 1.4% grade 3 disease. 9% had advanced stage disease. 20% of patients with disease limited to the uterus had adverse features including high risk histologic variants, grade 3 disease, myometrial invasion >1/2, and/or cervical involvement. After adjusting for risk factors there was no significant difference in OS (HR 1.00, p=0.992) or PFS (HR 0.96, p=0.815) between the patients who did or did not undergo surgical staging. CONCLUSION A substantial number of patients with grade 1 endometrial cancer based on preoperative and intraoperative assessments have higher grade disease on final pathology. Although lymphadenectomy does not affect survival in this group it may identify patients with advanced disease and assist in tailoring adjuvant therapy for those with adverse risk factors.


Current Opinion in Oncology | 2012

Robotic Surgery in Gynecologic Oncology

Nicole D. Fleming; Pedro T. Ramirez

Purpose of review The objective of this article is to review the recently published literature on the use of robotic surgery in the management of gynecologic malignancies. Recent findings Retrospective data collected from many institutions support the use of robotic surgery in the management of cervical, endometrial, and early-stage ovarian cancer. Benefits to robotic surgery include decreased blood loss, fewer perioperative complications, and decreased length of hospital stay, especially when compared to an open cohort. Disadvantages include costs associated with the robotic system and disposable equipment, accessibility to robotic surgical systems, loss of haptic sensation with the device, and lack of prospective trials validating its use in gynecologic oncology. Summary Current evidence establishes a role for the use of robotic surgery in the treatment of gynecologic malignancies. Further research should be implemented to validate the use of robotic surgery in gynecologic malignancies and to compare its outcomes to those of open and laparoscopic surgery.


Gynecologic Oncology | 2014

Uterine adenosarcoma: an analysis on management, outcomes, and risk factors for recurrence

Amy R. Carroll; Pedro T. Ramirez; Shannon N. Westin; Pamela T. Soliman; Mark F. Munsell; Alpa M. Nick; Kathleen M. Schmeler; Ann H. Klopp; Nicole D. Fleming

OBJECTIVES Uterine adenosarcoma is a rare malignancy with little data on optimal management. We aimed to clarify the impact of adjuvant therapy in patients with uterine adenosarcoma and identify risk factors for recurrence and death. METHODS We performed a retrospective review of patients undergoing primary evaluation and treatment for uterine adenosarcoma at a single institution from July 1982 through December 2011. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to identify prognostic factors for progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). RESULTS We identified 100 patients with uterine adenosarcoma, and 74 patients met the inclusion criteria. On multivariate analysis, sarcomatous overgrowth (SO) and lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI) were predictors of worse PFS and OS. Median PFS and OS were 29.4 and 55.4 months for patients with SO, compared to 105.9 and 112.4 months for patients without SO (PFS HR 2.58, 95% CI 1.37-4.84, p=0.003; OS HR 2.45, 95% CI 1.26-4.76, p=0.008). Among patients with stage I disease, 17 of 22 patients (77%) with SO and 8 of 37 patients (22%) without SO had a recurrence (p<0.001). Among patients with stage I disease with SO, adjuvant therapy appeared to be associated with longer PFS and OS, but these differences were not statistically significant (PFS, 46.7 vs. 29.4 months, p=0.28; OS, 97.3 vs. 55.4 months, p=0.18). CONCLUSION In patients with uterine adenosarcoma, the presence of SO or LVSI confers a higher risk of recurrence. We did not identify an optimal treatment strategy for patients with SO, but adjuvant therapy may be associated with prolonged PFS.


Gynecologic Oncology | 2010

Is older age a poor prognostic factor in stage I and II endometrioid endometrial adenocarcinoma

Nicole D. Fleming; Scott E. Lentz; Ilana Cass; Andrew J. Li; Beth Y. Karlan; C. Walsh

OBJECTIVE Prior studies have shown that age ≥70 years is associated with more aggressive non-endometrioid histology and worse survival in endometrial cancer. The purpose of this study is to assess if age is an independent poor prognostic factor in endometrioid histologies. METHODS Under an IRB-approved protocol, we identified patients with surgical stage I to II endometrioid endometrial adenocarcinoma from 1995 to 2008 at two institutions. Patients were divided into two groups based on age at diagnosis: Group A (age 50-69 years) and Group B (age≥70 years). All patients underwent hysterectomy, bilateral salpingoophorectomy, +/-pelvic/aortic lymphadenectomy and adjuvant therapy. Prognostic factors were evaluated by univariate and multivariate analyses. RESULTS We identified 338 patients with stage IA to IIB endometrioid endometrial adenocarcinoma. The median age in Group A was 59 years (range 50-69) and Group B was 75 years (range 70-92). Patients in Group B were more likely to have hypertension (51% vs. 68%, p=0.006) and coronary artery disease (9% vs. 18%, p=0.03). There were no differences in progression-free or disease-specific survival, however, Group B had a worse overall survival (OS) (50.1 vs. 62.6 months, p=0.03). On univariate analysis, age (p=0.04), grade (p=0.006), and coronary artery disease (p=0.01) were associated with worse OS. After adjusting for grade and coronary artery disease, age was no longer a significant variable for OS (p=0.17). CONCLUSIONS After adjusting for other poor prognostic factors, age ≥70 years alone may not be a significant variable affecting overall survival in patients with early stage endometrioid endometrial adenocarcinoma.


American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology | 2011

Adverse events associated with laparoscopy vs laparotomy in the treatment of endometrial cancer.

Jason C. Barnett; Laura J. Havrilesky; Amy E. Bondurant; Nicole D. Fleming; Paula S. Lee; Angeles Alvarez Secord; Andrew Berchuck; Fidel A. Valea

OBJECTIVE The objective of the study was to compare adverse event rates between laparoscopic vs open surgery for endometrial cancer. STUDY DESIGN This was a retrospective cohort study comparing 107 women who underwent laparoscopy with 269 age- and body mass index-matched women who underwent laparotomy for treatment of endometrial cancer. RESULTS Adverse event rates were similar between cohorts (37% laparoscopy vs 43% laparotomy, P=.248). Laparotomies had higher rates of cellulitis (16% vs 7%, P=.018) and open wound infection (9% vs 2%, P=.02), whereas laparoscopy had higher rates of sensory peripheral nerve deficit (5% vs 0%, P=.008) and lymphedema (7% vs 1%, P=.003). Laparoscopy was associated with longer mean operating room times but with shorter hospital stays and lower mean blood loss. CONCLUSION Laparoscopy was associated with decreased rates of surgical site infections but had an increased risk of peripheral sensory nerve deficits and lymphedema when compared with laparotomy.


Gynecologic Oncology | 2017

A prospective validation study of sentinel lymph node mapping for high-risk endometrial cancer

Pamela T. Soliman; Shannon N. Westin; Shayan M. Dioun; Charlotte C. Sun; Elizabeth D. Euscher; Mark F. Munsell; Nicole D. Fleming; Charles Levenback; Michael Frumovitz; Pedro T. Ramirez; Karen H. Lu

OBJECTIVE Sentinel lymph node (SLN) mapping continues to evolve in the surgical staging of endometrial cancer (EC). The purpose of this trial was to identify the sensitivity, false negative rate (FNR) and FN predictive value (FNPV) of SLN compared to complete pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy (LAD) in women with high-risk EC. METHODS Women with high-risk EC (grade 3, serous, clear cell, carcinosarcoma) were enrolled in this prospective surgical trial. All patients underwent preoperative PET/CT and intraoperative SLN biopsy followed by LAD. Patients with peritoneal disease on imaging or at the time of surgery were excluded. Patients were evaluable if SLN was attempted and complete LAD was performed. RESULTS 123 patients were enrolled between 4/13 and 5/16; 101 were evaluable. At least 1 SLN was identified in 89% (90); bilateral detection 58%, unilateral pelvic 40%, para-aortic only 2%. Indocyanine green was used in 61%, blue dye in 28%, and blue dye and technetium in 11%. Twenty-three pts. (23%) had ≥1 positive node. In 20/23, ≥1 SLN was identified and in 19/20 the SLN was positive. Only 1 patient had bilateral negative SLN and positive non-SLNs on final pathology. Overall, sensitivity of SLN was 95% (19/20), FNR was 5% (1/20) and FNPV was 1.4% (1/71). If side-specific LAD was performed when a SLN was not detected, the FNR decreased to 4.3% (1/23). CONCLUSION This prospective trial demonstrated that SLN biopsy plus side-specific LAD, when SLN is not detected, is a reasonable alternative to a complete LAD in high-risk endometrial cancer.


Cancer | 2012

Xeroderma pigmentosum complementation group C single-nucleotide polymorphisms in the nucleotide excision repair pathway correlate with prolonged progression-free survival in advanced ovarian cancer.

Nicole D. Fleming; Hasmik Agadjanian; H. Nassanian; Carl W. Miller; Sandra Orsulic; Beth Y. Karlan; C. Walsh

The nucleotide excision repair (NER) pathway is the principal DNA repair pathway for removing bulky platinum DNA adducts. Suboptimal DNA repair may lead to improved response to platinum agents. The objective of this study was to determine whether single‐nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in NER pathway genes could be markers of platinum response in ovarian cancer.

Collaboration


Dive into the Nicole D. Fleming's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Pamela T. Soliman

University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Shannon N. Westin

University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Pedro T. Ramirez

University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Mark F. Munsell

University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Alpa M. Nick

University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Karen H. Lu

University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Kathleen M. Schmeler

University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Michael Frumovitz

University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Ann H. Klopp

University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Larissa A. Meyer

University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge