Niels Ketelhöhn
INCAE Business School
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Niels Ketelhöhn.
Academia-revista Latinoamericana De Administracion | 2013
Niels Ketelhöhn; Enrique Ogliastri
Purpose The purpose of this article is to summarize the basic literature and concepts of innovation and entrepreneurship, emphasizing the relevant studies for Latin America. The authors aim to assess the role of Latin America in the world innovative activity utilizing the production of USPTO patents. Design/methodology/approac To achieve the first objective, the authors review and summarize the relevant literature for innovation and entrepreneurship in Latin America. They also introduce each of the papers included in the current special issue of Academia. To achieve the second objective, the authors use the production of USPTO patents by Latin American residents, and examine those levels to the rest of the world. Findings The authors find Latin America to be a marginal contributor to the world innovative activity. Although the region represented 8.7 per cent of world GDP in 2011, it only generated 0.19 per cent of the world patents registered at the USPTO between 2008 and 2012, and only 0.17 per cent of a...
Competitiveness Review | 2015
Niels Ketelhöhn; Roberto Artavia; Ronald Arce; Victor Umaña
Purpose – This paper is a historical account of the process by which Michael Porter and INCAE Business School put together a regional competitiveness strategy for Central America that was officially adopted by the governments of five participating countries, and implemented through a series of Presidential Summits that occurred between 1995 and 1999. The paper provides a unique case study on the adoption of the concepts put forth by Porter in his book “The Competitive Advantage of Nations” (1990) at the highest level of government. The study arrives at a series of practical implications for policy makers that are particularly relevant for the implementation of supra-national regional strategies. Design/methodology/approach – The authors conduct an extensive literature review of 190 policy papers produced by INCAE Business School, that are used to recreate the historical evolution of the regional competitiveness strategy. The effect of Porter’s intervention is also assessed by comparing the main economic indicators of each participating country with those of 2005-2010. One of the authors was the main protagonist in the successful implementation of the strategy, and the paper relies partially on his accounts of events. Findings – This study describes how economic policy in Central America was profoundly influenced by Michael Porter’s thinking in the second half of the 1990s. These policy changes promoted international competition of Central American clusters and firms, and opened the region for international investment and tourism. The region experienced important increases in its economic integration, its international trade, foreign direct investment and tourist arrivals. Gross domestic product growth was accelerated in Honduras and Nicaragua. Research limitations/implications – Like all case studies, this study has limits related to the generalizability of its conclusions. Additionally, it is not possible to determine the precise nature of the relation between the implementation of the regional economic strategy, and the impact on economic growth, integration, FDI attraction and exports. Practical implications – The paper has several practical implications that relate to the design of regional economic strategies. First, it identifies policy areas that are more effective as part of regional strategies, and distinguishes them from those that should be resolved at the national level. Second, it suggests a process that can facilitate execution. Finally, it provides an example of the coordinating role that can be assumed by an academic institution such as INCAE. Originality/value – The Central American Competitiveness Initiative provides a unique setting to study the implementation of competitiveness policy for several reasons. First, in all countries in Central America, Michael Porter’s diamond framework (1990) and cluster theory were officially adopted at the highest level of government. Second, in addition to their individual competitiveness strategies, all countries adopted a regional strategy for cooperation and economic integration. Finally, the Central American Competitiveness Initiative was founded on one of the first competitiveness think tanks of the world.
Harvard Deusto Business Research | 2018
Niels Ketelhöhn; Octavio Martínez Argüello
Law firms that grow intensively can experience problems with maintaining a strategic focus, structural alignment and a balanced staff. This article proposes a process through which management can plan a law firm’s future, by defining a strategy and choosing an avenue for growth. We use a sample of 150 Latin American law firms to describe the differentiation strategies that have been demonstrated in practice. We find that the strategies of “Efficiency,” “Grey Hair” and “Brains” are used by 15.3%, 61.3% and 23.3% of our sample, respectively. Additionally, we describe four growth strategies for law firms.
Journal of Economic Geography | 2006
Niels Ketelhöhn
Journal of Economics and Management Strategy | 2003
Charles King; Alvin J. Silk; Niels Ketelhöhn
Journal of Business Research | 2012
Niels Ketelhöhn; Carlos Quintanilla
Archive | 2002
Michael E. Porter; Niels Ketelhöhn
Social Science Research Network | 2002
Charles E. King; Alvin J. Silk; Niels Ketelhöhn
Journal of Business Research | 2016
Niels Ketelhöhn; Luis J. Sanz
Archive | 2013
Niels Ketelhöhn; Enrique Ogliastri