Nikita Cobetto
École Polytechnique de Montréal
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Nikita Cobetto.
Spine deformity | 2014
Nikita Cobetto; Carl-Eric Aubin; Julien Clin; Sylvie Le May; Frederique Desbiens-Blais; Hubert Labelle; Stefan Parent
STUDY DESIGN Feasibility study to compare the effectiveness of 2 brace design and fabrication methods for treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a standard plaster-cast method and a computational method combining computer-aided design and fabrication and finite element simulation. OBJECTIVES To improve brace design using a new brace design method. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA Initial in-brace correction and patients compliance to treatment are important factors for brace efficiency. Negative cosmetic appearance and functional discomfort resulting from pressure points, humidity, and restriction of movement can cause poor compliance with the prescribed wearing schedule. METHODS A total of 15 consecutive patients with brace prescription were recruited. Two braces were designed and fabricated for each patient: a standard thoracolumbo-sacral orthosis brace fabricated using plaster-cast method and an improved brace for comfort (NewBrace) fabricated using a computational method combining computer-aided design and fabrication software (Rodin4D) and a simulation platform. Three-dimensional reconstructions of the torso and the trunk skeleton were used to create a personalized finite element model, which was used for brace design and predict correction. Simulated pressures on the torso and distance between the brace and patients skin were used to remove ineffective brace material situated at more than 6 mm from the patients skin. Biplanar radiographs of the patient wearing each brace were taken to compare their effectiveness. Patients filled out a questionnaire to compare their comfort. RESULTS NewBraces were 61% thinner and had 32% less material than standard braces with equivalent correction. NewBraces were more comfortable (11 of 15 patients) or equivalent to (4 of 15 cases) standard braces. Simulated correction was simulated within 5° compared with in-brace results. CONCLUSIONS This study demonstrates the feasibility of designing lighter and more comfortable braces with correction equivalent to standard braces. This design platform has the potential to further improve brace correction efficiency and its compliance.
Spine deformity | 2016
Amjad Sattout; Julien Clin; Nikita Cobetto; Hubert Labelle; Carl-Eric Aubin
STUDY DESIGN Biomechanical study of the Providence brace for the treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). OBJECTIVES To model and assess the effectiveness of Providence nighttime brace. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA Providence nighttime brace is an alternative to traditional daytime thoracolumbosacral orthosis for the treatment of moderate scoliotic deformities. It applies three-point pressure to reduce scoliotic curves. The biomechanics of the supine position and Providence brace is still poorly understood. METHODS Eighteen patients with AIS were recruited at our institution. For each patient, a personalized finite element model (FEM) of the trunk was created. The spine, rib cage, and pelvis geometry was acquired using simultaneous biplanar low-dose radiographs (EOS). The trunk surface was acquired using a three-dimensional surface topography scanner. The interior surface of each patients Providence brace was digitized and used to generate an FEM of the brace. Pressures at the brace/skin interface were measured using pressure sensors, and the average pressure distribution was computed. The standing to supine transition and brace installation were computationally simulated. RESULTS Simulated standing to supine position induced an average curve correction of 45% and 48% for thoracic and lumbar curves, while adding the brace resulted in an average correction of 62% and 64% (vs. real in-brace correction of 65% and 70%). Simulated pressures had the same distribution as measured ones. Bending moments on apical vertebrae were mostly annulled by the positioning in the supine position, and further overcorrected on average by 10% to 13%, but in the opposite direction. CONCLUSIONS The supine position is responsible for the major part of coronal curve correction, while the brace itself plays a complementary role. Bending moments induced by the brace generated a rebalancing of pressure on the growth plates, which could help reduce the asymmetric growth of the vertebrae. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Level II.
Scoliosis | 2015
Carl-Eric Aubin; Nikita Cobetto; Julien Clin; Frederique Desbiens-Blais; Hubert Labelle; Sylvie Le May; Stefan Parent
Polytechnique Montreal, Montreal, Canada Full list of author information is available at the end of the article Figure 1 A) Acquisition of the internal geometry using the calibrated bi-planar radiographic 3D reconstruction technique; B) Acquisition of the external geometry using a surface topography system or a scan system; C) Internal 3D geometry; D) External 3D geometry E) Geometric registration F) Finite element model of the trunk Aubin et al. Scoliosis 2015, 10(Suppl 1):O59 http://www.scoliosisjournal.com/content/10/S1/O59
Spine deformity | 2018
Nikita Cobetto; Carl-Eric Aubin; Stefan Parent
STUDY DESIGN Computational simulation of lateral decubitus and anterior vertebral body growth modulation (AVBGM). OBJECTIVES To biomechanically evaluate lateral decubitus and cable tensioning contributions on intra- and postoperative correction. AVBGM is a compression-based fusionless procedure to treat progressive pediatric scoliosis. During surgery, the patient is positioned in lateral decubitus, which reduces spinal curves. The deformity is further corrected with the application of compression by cable tensioning. Predicting postoperative correction following AVBGM installation remains difficult. METHODS Twenty pediatric scoliotic patients instrumented with AVBGM were recruited. Three-dimensional (3D) reconstructions obtained from calibrated biplanar radiographs were used to generate a personalized finite element model. Intraoperative lateral decubitus position and installation of AVBGM were simulated to evaluate the intraoperative positioning and cable tensioning (100 / 150 / 200 N) relative contribution on intra- and postoperative correction. RESULTS Average Cobb angles prior to surgery were 56° ± 10° (thoracic) and 38° ± 8° (lumbar). Simulated presenting growth plates stresses were of 0.86 MPa (concave side) and 0.02 MPa (convex side). The simulated lateral decubitus reduced Cobb angles on average by 30% (thoracic) and 18% (lumbar). Cable tensioning supplementary contribution on intraoperative spinal correction was of 15%, 18%, and 24% (thoracic) for 100, 150, and 200 N, respectively. Simulated Cobb angles for the postoperative standing position were 39°, 37°, and 33° (thoracic) and 30°, 29°, and 28° (lumbar), respectively, whereas growth plates stresses were of 0.54, 0.53, and 0.51 MPa (concave side) and 0.36, 0.53, and 0.68 MPa (convex side) for the three tensions. CONCLUSION The majority of curve correction was achieved by lateral decubitus positioning. The main role of the cable was to apply supplemental periapical correction and secure the intraoperative positioning correction. Increases in cable tensioning furthermore rebalanced initially asymmetric compressive stresses. This study could help improve the design of AVBGM by understanding the contributions of the surgical procedure components to the overall correction achieved. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Level III.STUDY DESIGN Computational simulation of lateral decubitus and anterior vertebral body growth modulation (AVBGM). OBJECTIVES To biomechanically evaluate lateral decubitus and cable tensioning contributions on intra- and postoperative correction. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA AVBGM is a compression-based fusionless procedure to treat progressive pediatric scoliosis. During surgery, the patient is positioned in lateral decubitus, which reduces spinal curves. The deformity is further corrected with the application of compression by cable tensioning. Predicting postoperative correction following AVBGM installation remains difficult. METHODS Twenty pediatric scoliotic patients instrumented with AVBGM were recruited. Three-dimensional (3D) reconstructions obtained from calibrated biplanar radiographs were used to generate a personalized finite element model. Intraoperative lateral decubitus position and installation of AVBGM were simulated to evaluate the intraoperative positioning and cable tensioning (100 / 150 / 200 N) relative contribution on intra- and postoperative correction. RESULTS Average Cobb angles prior to surgery were 56° ± 10° (thoracic) and 38° ± 8° (lumbar). Simulated presenting growth plates stresses were of 0.86 MPa (concave side) and 0.02 MPa (convex side). The simulated lateral decubitus reduced Cobb angles on average by 30% (thoracic) and 18% (lumbar). Cable tensioning supplementary contribution on intraoperative spinal correction was of 15%, 18%, and 24% (thoracic) for 100, 150, and 200 N, respectively. Simulated Cobb angles for the postoperative standing position were 39°, 37°, and 33° (thoracic) and 30°, 29°, and 28° (lumbar), respectively, whereas growth plates stresses were of 0.54, 0.53, and 0.51 MPa (concave side) and 0.36, 0.53, and 0.68 MPa (convex side) for the three tensions. CONCLUSION The majority of curve correction was achieved by lateral decubitus positioning. The main role of the cable was to apply supplemental periapical correction and secure the intraoperative positioning correction. Increases in cable tensioning furthermore rebalanced initially asymmetric compressive stresses. This study could help improve the design of AVBGM by understanding the contributions of the surgical procedure components to the overall correction achieved. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Level III.
Scoliosis and Spinal Disorders | 2017
Nikita Cobetto; Carl-Eric Aubin; S. Parent; Soraya Barchi; Isabelle Turgeon; Hubert Labelle
BackgroundRecent studies showed that finite element model (FEM) combined to CAD/CAM improves the design of braces for the conservative treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS), using 2D measurements from in-brace radiographs. We aim to assess the immediate effectiveness on curve correction in all three planes of braces designed using CAD/CAM and numerical simulation compared to braces designed with CAD/CAM only.MethodsSRS standardized criteria for bracing were followed to recruit 48 AIS patients who were randomized into two groups. For both groups, 3D reconstructions of the spine and patient’s torso, respectively built from bi-planar radiographs and surface topography, were obtained and braces were designed using the CAD/CAM approach. For the test group, 3D reconstructions of the spine and patient’s torso were additionally used to generate a personalized FEM to simulate and iteratively improve the brace design with the objective of curve correction maximization in three planes and brace material minimization.ResultsFor the control group (CtrlBraces), average Cobb angle prior to bracing was 29° (thoracic, T) and 25° (lumbar, L) with the planes of maximal curvature (PMC) respectively oriented at 63° and 57° on average with respect to the sagittal plane. Average apical axial rotation prior to bracing was 7° (T) and 9° (L). For the test group (FEMBraces), initial Cobb angles were 33° (T) and 28° (L) with the PMC at 68° (T) and 56° (L) and average apical axial rotation prior to bracing at 9° (T and L). On average, FEMBraces were 50% thinner and had 20% less covering surface than CtrlBraces while reducing T and L curves by 47 and 48%, respectively, compared to 25 and 26% for CtrlBraces. FEMBraces corrected apical axial rotation by 46% compared to 30% for CtrlBraces.ConclusionThe combination of numerical simulation and CAD/CAM approach allowed designing more efficient braces in all three planes, with the advantages of being lighter than standard CAD/CAM braces. Bracing in AIS may be improved in 3D by the use of this simulation platform. This study is ongoing to recruit more cases and to analyze the long-term effect of bracing.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02285621
Clinical Biomechanics | 2018
Rany Pea; J. Dansereau; Christiane Caouette; Nikita Cobetto; Carl-Eric Aubin
Background: Orthopedic braces made by Computer‐Aided Design and Manufacturing and numerical simulation were shown to improve spinal deformities correction in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis while using less material. Simulations with BraceSim (Rodin4D, Groupe Lagarrigue, Bordeaux, France) require a sagittal radiograph, not always available. The objective was to develop an innovative modeling method based on a single coronal radiograph and surface topography, and assess the effectiveness of braces designed with this approach. Methods: With a patient coronal radiograph and a surface topography, the developed method allowed the 3D reconstruction of the spine, rib cage and pelvis using geometric models from a database and a free form deformation technique. The resulting 3D reconstruction converted into a finite element model was used to design and simulate the correction of a brace. The developed method was tested with data from ten scoliosis cases. The simulated correction was compared to analogous simulations performed with a 3D reconstruction built using two radiographs and surface topography (validated gold standard reference). Findings: There was an average difference of 1.4°/1.7° for the thoracic/lumbar Cobb angle, and 2.6°/5.5° for the kyphosis/lordosis between the developed reconstruction method and the reference. The average difference of the simulated correction was 2.8°/2.4° for the thoracic/lumbar Cobb angles and 3.5°/5.4° the kyphosis/lordosis. Interpretation: This study showed the feasibility to design and simulate brace corrections based on a new modeling method with a single coronal radiograph and surface topography. This innovative method could be used to improve brace designs, at a lesser radiation dose for the patient.
European Spine Journal | 2016
Nikita Cobetto; Carl-Eric Aubin; Stefan Parent; Julien Clin; Soraya Barchi; Isabelle Turgeon; Hubert Labelle
Clinical Biomechanics | 2018
Nikita Cobetto; Stefan Parent; Carl-Eric Aubin
Spine deformity | 2018
Nikita Cobetto; Carl-Eric Aubin; Stefan Parent
Spine deformity | 2015
Nikita Cobetto; Carl-Eric Aubin; Stefan Parent