Soraya Barchi

Assessment of Breast Asymmetry in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Using an Automated 3D Body Surface Measurement Technique

STUDY DESIGN Cohort study. OBJECTIVES To assess breast asymmetry (BA) directly with 3D surface imaging and to validate it using MRI values from a cohort of 30 patients with significant adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). Also, to study the influence of posture (prone vs standing) on BA using the automated method on both modalities. BA is a common concern in young female patients with AIS. In a previous study using MRI, we found that the majority of patients with significant AIS experienced BA of up to 21% in addition to their chest wall deformity. MRI is costly and not always readily available. 3D surface topography, which offers fast and reliable breast acquisitions without radiation or distortion of the body surface, is an alternative method in the clinical setting. METHODS Thirty patients with AIS were enrolled in the study on the basis of their thoracic curvature, skeletal and breast maturity, without regard to their perception of their BA. Each patient underwent two imaging studies of their torso: a 3D trunk surface topography and a breast MRI. An automated breast volume measuring method was proposed using a program developed with Matlab programming. RESULTS Strong correlations were obtained when comparing the proposed method to the MRI on the left breast volumes (LBV) (r = 0.747), the right breast volumes (RBV) (r = 0.805) and the BA (r = 0.614). Using the same method on both imaging modalities also yielded strong correlation coefficients on the LBV (r = 0.896), the RBV (r = 0.939) and the BA (r = 0.709). CONCLUSIONS The proposed 3D body surface automated measurement technique is feasible clinically and correlates very well with breast volumes measured using MRI. Additionally, breast volumes remain comparable despite being measured in different body positions (standing and prone) in a young cohort of AIS patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Level IV.

The effectiveness of the SpineCor brace for the conservative treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Comparison with the Boston brace

BACKGROUND CONTEXT The Boston brace (Bb) is the most widely used brace design to treat adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). The dynamic SpineCor (SC) brace is prescribed in several scoliosis clinics worldwide, but its effectiveness remains controversial. PURPOSE The study aimed to compare the treatment effectiveness of SC in patients with AIS treated by the developers of the brace with that of the Bb at a single institution. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING This is a retrospective comparison between a cohort of AIS patients treated using the SC brace and a cohort treated using the Bb. PATIENT SAMPLE We assessed 243 patients treated with either Bb or SC brace to prevent the progression of AIS. OUTCOME MEASURES The primary outcome was the progression in main Cobb angle when reaching one of the following end point criteria: (1) progression in Cobb angle of ≥6°, (2) main Cobb angle of ≥45°, (3) surgery undertaken, or (4) reaching skeletal maturity (Risser sign of 5 or growth of <1 cm in the previous 6 months). METHODS Patients were identified at a single institution between 2000 and 2012 following the Scoliosis Research Society criteria for brace treatment: (1) diagnosis of AIS, (2) Risser sign of ≤2, (3) curve magnitude between 25° and 40°, and (4) age ≥10 years. A total of 97 patients treated with SC by the developers of the brace and 146 patients treated with Bb were identified. Data collection and radiograph measurements were performed by a single experienced nurse not involved in the decision-making for brace treatment or in the data analysis. Age and Risser sign at onset of treatment, initialmain Cobb angle, curve type, and duration of follow-up were similar in both cohorts. Statistical analysis was done using chi-square and logistic regression models, with a level of significance of .05. RESULTS The average progression was 14.7°±11.9° in the SC cohort compared with 9.6°±13.7° in the Bb cohort (p=.003). The average Cobb angle at the end point of the study reached 47°±13° in the SC cohort and 41.7°±14.2° in the Bb cohort (p=.005), whereas at the onset of bracing it was 32.2°±4.9° and 32.2°±4.4°, respectively, for the SC and Bb cohorts. The percentage of patients with a progression of ≥6° was 76% in the SC cohort and 55% in the Bb cohort (p=.001). The proportion of patients reaching 45° in the SC and Bb cohorts was, respectively, 51% and 37% (p=.03), whereas the proportion of patients referred to surgery was 39% and 30%, respectively, for the SC and Bb cohorts (p=.2). The odds of progressing ≥6° and of reaching ≥45° were 2.67 and 2.07 times greater, respectively, when using the SC brace. CONCLUSIONS The SC brace did not prevent curve progression as effectively as the Bb. Although it has the potential benefit of increasing mobility during brace wear, the SC brace was associated with increased curve progression in comparison with the Bb. There is also a trend for increased risk of requiring surgery when the SC brace is worn.

3D correction of AIS in braces designed using CAD/CAM and FEM: a randomized controlled trial

BackgroundRecent studies showed that finite element model (FEM) combined to CAD/CAM improves the design of braces for the conservative treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS), using 2D measurements from in-brace radiographs. We aim to assess the immediate effectiveness on curve correction in all three planes of braces designed using CAD/CAM and numerical simulation compared to braces designed with CAD/CAM only.MethodsSRS standardized criteria for bracing were followed to recruit 48 AIS patients who were randomized into two groups. For both groups, 3D reconstructions of the spine and patient’s torso, respectively built from bi-planar radiographs and surface topography, were obtained and braces were designed using the CAD/CAM approach. For the test group, 3D reconstructions of the spine and patient’s torso were additionally used to generate a personalized FEM to simulate and iteratively improve the brace design with the objective of curve correction maximization in three planes and brace material minimization.ResultsFor the control group (CtrlBraces), average Cobb angle prior to bracing was 29° (thoracic, T) and 25° (lumbar, L) with the planes of maximal curvature (PMC) respectively oriented at 63° and 57° on average with respect to the sagittal plane. Average apical axial rotation prior to bracing was 7° (T) and 9° (L). For the test group (FEMBraces), initial Cobb angles were 33° (T) and 28° (L) with the PMC at 68° (T) and 56° (L) and average apical axial rotation prior to bracing at 9° (T and L). On average, FEMBraces were 50% thinner and had 20% less covering surface than CtrlBraces while reducing T and L curves by 47 and 48%, respectively, compared to 25 and 26% for CtrlBraces. FEMBraces corrected apical axial rotation by 46% compared to 30% for CtrlBraces.ConclusionThe combination of numerical simulation and CAD/CAM approach allowed designing more efficient braces in all three planes, with the advantages of being lighter than standard CAD/CAM braces. Bracing in AIS may be improved in 3D by the use of this simulation platform. This study is ongoing to recruit more cases and to analyze the long-term effect of bracing.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02285621

Prevalence and natural history of scoliosis and associated congenital vertebral anomalies in patients operated for esophageal atresia with or without tracheoesophageal fistula

BACKGROUND Scoliosis has been reported after repair of esophageal atresia with or without tracheoesophageal fistula (EA-TEF). This study aims to investigate the prevalence and natural history of scoliosis and associated congenital vertebral anomalies in patients operated for EATEF. METHODS A retrospective review of patients operated for EA-TEF with radiological examination for the presence of scoliosis or associated spine congenital anomalies was done on 106 patients (ages 5-19 years). RESULTS Scoliosis was found in 53 patients (49%) for which 46 of these were in the thoracic region and 33 were right-thoracic curves. After a follow-up ranging from 5 to 14 years, four patients (3.7%) out of 106 were operated for scoliosis. Right-sided thoracotomy (RST) was the identifiable risk factor for scoliosis development; all patients with scoliosis had their EA repaired through RST. Congenital vertebral anomalies were found in 8 of those patients (7.5%). After a median follow-up of 6.5 years, no patients progressed enough to require operation. CONCLUSION Scoliosis affects one of every two patients operated for EA; it may progress to the indication of surgery. RST was the identifiable risk factor for scoliosis development.

Retrospective Analysis of Congenital Scoliosis: Associated Anomalies and Genetic Diagnoses.

Study Design. Retrospective study of a series of 286 patients with congenital scoliosis (CS). Objective. To describe a large cohort of patients with CS and to propose an algorithm for genetic investigations Summary of Background Data. CS is characterized by a spine curvature due to congenital malformations of the vertebrae and is frequently associated to other anomalies. The underlying causes remain unclear in most patients, although we know that genetics plays a role in the development of vertebral defects. Methods. Institutional review board approval was obtained. We performed a retrospective study by consulting the hospital charts of 286 patients with CS seen at the CHU Sainte-Justine, Montreal, from 2004 to 2015. We compile information on radiological findings, associated malformations, and genetic tests. Results. Results showed that 67.1% of patients had associated anomalies affecting different systems. Only a minority of patients had a syndromic diagnosis to explain their CS. Nevertheless, array comparative genomic hybridization performed in a minority of patients showed a high detection rate (31.3% had a chromosomal anomaly among 32 tested). Conclusion. We suggest that every patient with CS should have thorough investigations to rule out associated anomalies and that different genetic tests should be offered according to the associated clinical findings. Level of Evidence: 4

Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS): new gene, new variants

Many chromosomic locations have been linked with the AIS, however, no causative genes have been clearly identified. We recently identified two regions (3q12.1 and 5q13.3) containing possibly causative gene(S) of AIS (Edery et al. 2011). Our recent work identified disease-causing variants in a gene (that we called PFK2) in French AIS families (Patten et al. submitted 2014). We sought to expand on this study and to investigate for novel and rare variants in PFK2 in French Canadian AIS families.