Nina Burkhard

Accuracy of low-dose computed tomography coronary angiography using prospective electrocardiogram-triggering: first clinical experience

AIMS To evaluate the accuracy of low-dose computed tomography coronary angiography (CTCA) using prospective ECG-triggering for the assessment of coronary artery disease (CAD). METHODS AND RESULTS A total of 30 patients (19 males, 11 females, mean age 58.8 +/- 9.9 years) underwent low-dose CTCA and invasive coronary angiography (CA) [median 2 days (0, 41)]. Before CT scanning, intravenous beta-blocker was administered in 18 of 30 patients as heart rate (HR) was >65 b.p.m., achieving a mean HR of 55.7 +/- 7.9 b.p.m. CAD was defined as coronary artery narrowing > or =50%, using CA as standard of reference. The estimated mean effective radiation dose was 2.1 +/- 0.7 mSv (range: 1.0-3.3), yielding 96.0% (383/399) of evaluable segments. On an intention-to-diagnose-base, all non-evaluative segments were included in the analysis. Vessels with a non-evaluative segment and no further finding were censored as false positive. Patient-based analysis revealed sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of 100, 83.3, 90.0, and 100%, respectively. The respective values per vessel were 100, 88.9, 85.7, and 100%, respectively. CONCLUSION Prospective ECG-triggering allows low-dose CTCA and provides high diagnostic accuracy in the assessment of CAD in patients with stable sinus rhythm and a low heart rate.

Evaluation of a body mass index-adapted protocol for low-dose 64-MDCT coronary angiography with prospective ECG triggering

OBJECTIVE Because an increase in body mass index (weight in kilograms divided by height squared in meters) confers higher image noise at coronary CT angiography, we evaluated a body mass index-adapted scanning protocol for low-dose 64-MDCT coronary angiography with prospective ECG triggering. SUBJECTS AND METHODS One hundred one consecutively registered patients underwent coronary CTA with prospective ECG triggering with a fixed contrast protocol (80 mL of iodixanol, 50-mL saline chaser, flow rate of 5 mL/s). Tube voltage (range, 100-120 kV) and current (range, 450-700 mA) were adapted to body mass index. Attenuation was measured, and contrast-to-noise ratio was calculated for the proximal right coronary artery and left main coronary artery. Image noise was determined for each patient as the SD of attenuation in the ascending aorta. RESULTS Body mass index ranged from 18.2 to 38.8, and mean effective radiation dose from 1.0 to 3.2 mSv. There was no correlation between body mass index and image noise (r = 0.11, p = 0.284), supporting the validity of the body mass index-adapted scanning protocol. However, body mass index was inversely correlated with vessel attenuation (right coronary artery, r = -0.45, p < 0.001; left main coronary artery, r = -0.47, p < 0.001) and contrast-to-noise ratio (right coronary artery, r = -0.39, p < 0.001; left main coronary artery, r = -0.37, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION Use of the proposed body mass index-adapted scanning parameters results in similar image noise regardless of body mass index. Increased bolus dilution due to larger blood volume may account for the decrease in contrast-to-noise ratio and vessel attenuation in patients with higher body mass index, but the contrast bolus was not adapted to body mass index in this study.

Diagnostic accuracy of computed tomography coronary angiography and evaluation of stress-only single-photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography hybrid imaging : comparison of prospective electrocardiogram-triggering vs. retrospective gating

AIMS To determine diagnostic accuracy, effective radiation dose, and potential value of computed tomography coronary angiography (CTCA) for hybrid imaging with single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) comparing prospective electrocardiogram (ECG)-triggering vs. retrospective ECG-gating. METHODS AND RESULTS Two hundred patients underwent standard myocardial stress/rest- SPECT perfusion imaging, which served as standard of reference. One hundred consecutive patients underwent 64-slice CTCA using prospective ECG-gating, and were compared with 100 patients who had previously undergone CTCA using retrospective ECG-gating. For predicting ischaemia, CTCA with prospective ECG-triggering and a stenosis cut-off >50% had a per-vessel sensitivity, specificity, negative, and positive predictive value of 100, 84, 100, and 30%; respective values for CTCA with retrospective ECG-gating were similar (P = n.s.): 86, 83, 98, and 33%. Combining CTCA with stress-only SPECT revealed 100% clinical agreement with regard to perfusion defects, and provided additional information in half the patients on preclinical coronary findings. Effective radiation dose was 2.2 +/- 0.7 mSv for CTCA with prospective ECG-triggering, and 19.7 +/- 4.2 mSv with retrospective ECG-gating (P < 0.001) (5.4 +/- 0.8 vs. 24.1 +/- 4.3 mSv for hybrid imaging). CONCLUSION Prospective ECG-triggering for CTCA reduces radiation dose by almost 90% without affecting diagnostic performance. Combined imaging with stress-only SPECT is an attractive alternative to standard stress/rest-SPECT for evaluation of coronary artery disease, offering additional information on preclinical atherosclerosis.

Low-dose CT coronary angiography using prospective ECG-triggering: impact of mean heart rate and heart rate variability on image quality.

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of mean heart rate (HR) and HR variability on image quality in low-dose computed tomographic coronary angiography (CTCA) using prospective electrocardiographic (ECG) triggering. MATERIALS AND METHODS One hundred thirty-six consecutive patients were scheduled for low-dose CTCA using prospective ECG triggering. The image quality of all coronary segments was rated on a 5-point scale by two independent readers (scores of 1-3 were considered diagnostic, and scores of 4 and 5 were considered nondiagnostic). Intravenous beta blockers were administered targeting HR < 65 beats/min before scanning, but not if HR increased during scanning. RESULTS After the exclusion of seven patients because of arrhythmia (n = 4) or mean HRs > 65 beats/min despite using beta blockers (n = 3), 129 patients underwent computed tomographic scanning. The estimated mean effective radiation dose was 2.2 +/- 0.7 mSv (range, 1.1-3.5). The mean HR during scanning was 58.4 +/- 6.6 beats/min (range, 44.2-80.1), with a variability of 1.6 +/- 1.0 beats/min (range, 0.2-5.3). Mean HR (r = 0.49, P < .001) but not mean HR variability (r = 0.14) was related to image quality. Nondiagnostic image quality on CTCA was found in 5% of the coronary segments in 21 of 129 patients. However, on receiver-operating characteristic analysis, a cutoff HR of 62 beats/min was determined, below which nondiagnostic segments were significantly less frequent (2% vs 14%, P < .001). CONCLUSION Prospective triggering allows low-dose CTCA but requires a low HR. Because a low HR offers a prolonged diastole, widening the optimal phase for scanning, HR variability seems to have a negligible impact on image quality.

Low-Dose Coronary CT Angiography With Prospective ECG Triggering: Validation of a Contrast Material Protocol Adapted to Body Mass Index

OBJECTIVE The aim of the study was to validate a body mass index (BMI)-adapted contrast material protocol to compensate for the effect of BMI on coronary attenuation during low-dose coronary CT angiography with prospective ECG triggering. MATERIALS AND METHODS One hundred forty patients underwent prospectively ECG-triggered coronary CT angiography for clinical indications. The following BMI-adapted contrast material protocol was used for imaging of 70 consecutively registered patients: BMI < 17.5, 50 mL contrast material at 4.0 mL/s; 17.5-22.4, 55 mL at 4.0 mL/s; 22.5-24.9, 65 mL at 4.0 mL/s; 25.0-27.4, 80 mL at 4.5 mL/s; 27.5-29.9, 80 mL at 5.0 mL/s; 30.0-34.9, 85 mL at 5.0 mL/s; 35.0-40.0, 95 mL at 5.0 mL/s; > 40, 105 mL at 5.0 mL/s. Seventy patients matched for BMI who had previously undergone routine coronary CT angiography with a fixed contrast material dosage of 80 mL at 5 mL/s served as the reference group. Vessel attenuation in the left main and proximal right coronary arteries was measured and correlated with BMI, and the results in the two protocol groups were compared. RESULTS The groups were well matched for BMI. The mean BMI in the nonadapted protocol group was 26.5 +/- 4.0 (standard deviation) (range, 18.9-36.5), and that in the BMI-adapted protocol group was 26.7 +/- 4.2 (range, 18.2-37.2) (p not significant). The mean amount of contrast material used was smaller in the BMI-adapted group (73.9 +/- 11.2 vs 80.0 +/- 0 mL; p < 0.01). Mean coronary artery attenuation did not differ significantly between the two groups (386 +/- 102 HU vs 385 +/- 64 HU; p not significant). Without BMI adaptation, coronary attenuation correlated strongly with BMI (r = -0.63; p < 0.001). With the BMI-adapted protocol, however, there was no correlation between BMI and coronary attenuation (r = -0.24; p not significant). CONCLUSION We validated a BMI-adapted contrast material protocol that results in adequate coronary vessel attenuation independent of individual BMI despite a significant reduction in overall amount of contrast material used.

Coronary artery ectasia causing ischemia

A 46-year-old male smoker (70 kg, 175 cm) with no other cardiovascular risk factors presented with recurrent episodes of chest discomfort and breathing distress at physical exercise. Cardiac stress testing on a treadmill ergometer was clinically pathologic at 100 W, and the patient was subsequently referred to non-invasive hybrid cardiac imaging. 99mTc-Tetrofosmin single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) images were acquired using a 1-day adenosine-stress/rest protocol and fused with a low-dose, prospectively gated computed tomography coronary angiography (effective radiation dose 1.6 mSv) [1, 2]. The latter revealed ectasia in the left anterior descending, the circumflex, and the right coronary artery (LAD, CX, RCA in panel B), but no relevant coronary artery stenosis. However, a reversible perfusion defect (ischemia) in the anterior myocardium was demonstrated by adenosine-stress SPECT (bluish colors in panel A; rest scan not shown). Both ectasia and the absence of significant coronary artery stenosis were confirmed by invasive coronary angiography, suggesting conservative treatment [3].