Ning-Yi Shao
Stanford University
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Ning-Yi Shao.
JCI insight | 2016
Shijun Hu; Ming-Tao Zhao; Fereshteh Jahanbani; Ning-Yi Shao; Won Hee Lee; Haodong Chen; Michael Snyder; Joseph C. Wu
Human induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) can be derived from various types of somatic cells by transient overexpression of 4 Yamanaka factors (OCT4, SOX2, C-MYC, and KLF4). Patient-specific iPSC derivatives (e.g., neuronal, cardiac, hepatic, muscular, and endothelial cells [ECs]) hold great promise in drug discovery and regenerative medicine. In this study, we aimed to evaluate whether the cellular origin can affect the differentiation, in vivo behavior, and single-cell gene expression signatures of human iPSC-derived ECs. We derived human iPSCs from 3 types of somatic cells of the same individuals: fibroblasts (FB-iPSCs), ECs (EC-iPSCs), and cardiac progenitor cells (CPC-iPSCs). We then differentiated them into ECs by sequential administration of Activin, BMP4, bFGF, and VEGF. EC-iPSCs at early passage (10 < P < 20) showed higher EC differentiation propensity and gene expression of EC-specific markers (PECAM1 and NOS3) than FB-iPSCs and CPC-iPSCs. In vivo transplanted EC-iPSC-ECs were recovered with a higher percentage of CD31+ population and expressed higher EC-specific gene expression markers (PECAM1, KDR, and ICAM) as revealed by microfluidic single-cell quantitative PCR (qPCR). In vitro EC-iPSC-ECs maintained a higher CD31+ population than FB-iPSC-ECs and CPC-iPSC-ECs with long-term culturing and passaging. These results indicate that cellular origin may influence lineage differentiation propensity of human iPSCs; hence, the somatic memory carried by early passage iPSCs should be carefully considered before clinical translation.
American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine | 2017
Silin Sa; Mingxia Gu; James D. Chappell; Ning-Yi Shao; Mohamed Ameen; Kathryn A. T. Elliott; Dan Li; Fabian Grubert; Caiyun G. Li; Shalina Taylor; Aiqin Cao; Yu Ma; Ryan Fong; Long Nguyen; Joseph C. Wu; Michael Snyder; Marlene Rabinovitch
Rationale: Idiopathic or heritable pulmonary arterial hypertension is characterized by loss and obliteration of lung vasculature. Endothelial cell dysfunction is pivotal to the pathophysiology, but different causal mechanisms may reflect a need for patient‐tailored therapies. Objectives: Endothelial cells differentiated from induced pluripotent stem cells were compared with pulmonary arterial endothelial cells from the same patients with idiopathic or heritable pulmonary arterial hypertension, to determine whether they shared functional abnormalities and altered gene expression patterns that differed from those in unused donor cells. We then investigated whether endothelial cells differentiated from pluripotent cells could serve as surrogates to test emerging therapies. Methods: Functional changes assessed included adhesion, migration, tube formation, and propensity to apoptosis. Expression of bone morphogenetic protein receptor type 2 (BMPR2) and its target, collagen IV, signaling of the phosphorylated form of the mothers against decapentaplegic proteins (pSMAD1/5), and transcriptomic profiles were also analyzed. Measurements and Main Results: Native pulmonary arterial and induced pluripotent stem cell‐derived endothelial cells from patients with idiopathic and heritable pulmonary arterial hypertension compared with control subjects showed a similar reduction in adhesion, migration, survival, and tube formation, and decreased BMPR2 and downstream signaling and collagen IV expression. Transcriptomic profiling revealed high kisspeptin 1 (KISS1) related to reduced migration and low carboxylesterase 1 (CES1), to impaired survival in patient cells. A beneficial angiogenic response to potential therapies, FK506 and Elafin, was related to reduced slit guidance ligand 3 (SLIT3), an antimigratory factor. Conclusions: Despite the site of disease in the lung, our study indicates that induced pluripotent stem cell‐derived endothelial cells are useful surrogates to uncover novel features related to disease mechanisms and to better match patients to therapies.
Circulation Research | 2017
Ioannis Karakikes; Vittavat Termglinchan; Diana Cepeda; Jaecheol Lee; Sebastian Diecke; Ayal Hendel; Ilanit Itzhaki; Mohamed Ameen; Rajani Shrestha; Haodi Wu; Ning Ma; Ning-Yi Shao; Timon Seeger; Nicole A. Woo; Kitchener D. Wilson; Elena Matsa; Matthew H. Porteus; Vittorio Sebastiano; Joseph C. Wu
Rationale: Targeted genetic engineering using programmable nucleases such as transcription activator–like effector nucleases (TALENs) is a valuable tool for precise, site-specific genetic modification in the human genome. Objective: The emergence of novel technologies such as human induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) and nuclease-mediated genome editing represent a unique opportunity for studying cardiovascular diseases in vitro. Methods and Results: By incorporating extensive literature and database searches, we designed a collection of TALEN constructs to knockout 88 human genes that are associated with cardiomyopathies and congenital heart diseases. The TALEN pairs were designed to induce double-strand DNA break near the starting codon of each gene that either disrupted the start codon or introduced a frameshift mutation in the early coding region, ensuring faithful gene knockout. We observed that all the constructs were active and disrupted the target locus at high frequencies. To illustrate the utility of the TALEN–mediated knockout technique, 6 individual genes (TNNT2, LMNA/C, TBX5, MYH7, ANKRD1, and NKX2.5) were knocked out with high efficiency and specificity in human iPSCs. By selectively targeting a pathogenic mutation (TNNT2 p.R173W) in patient-specific iPSC-derived cardiac myocytes, we demonstrated that the knockout strategy ameliorates the dilated cardiomyopathy phenotype in vitro. In addition, we modeled the Holt–Oram syndrome in iPSC-cardiac myocytes in vitro and uncovered novel pathways regulated by TBX5 in human cardiac myocyte development. Conclusions: Collectively, our study illustrates the powerful combination of iPSCs and genome editing technologies for understanding the biological function of genes, and the pathological significance of genetic variants in human cardiovascular diseases. The methods, strategies, constructs, and iPSC lines developed in this study provide a validated, readily available resource for cardiovascular research.
Cell Reports | 2017
Nigel G. Kooreman; Patricia E. de Almeida; Jonathan P. Stack; Raman V. Nelakanti; Sebastian Diecke; Ning-Yi Shao; Rutger-Jan Swijnenburg; Veronica Sanchez-Freire; Elena Matsa; Chun Liu; Andrew J. Connolly; Jaap F. Hamming; Paul H.A. Quax; Michael A. Brehm; Dale L. Greiner; Leonard D. Shultz; Joseph C. Wu
Summary There is growing interest in using embryonic stem cell (ESC) and induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC) derivatives for tissue regeneration. However, an increased understanding of human immune responses to stem cell-derived allografts is necessary for maintaining long-term graft persistence. To model this alloimmunity, humanized mice engrafted with human hematopoietic and immune cells could prove to be useful. In this study, an in-depth analysis of graft-infiltrating human lymphocytes and splenocytes revealed that humanized mice incompletely model human immune responses toward allogeneic stem cells and their derivatives. Furthermore, using an “allogenized” mouse model, we show the feasibility of reconstituting immunodeficient mice with a functional mouse immune system and describe a key role of innate immune cells in the rejection of mouse stem cell allografts.
Circulation Research | 2017
Ming-Tao Zhao; Ning-Yi Shao; Shijun Hu; Ning Ma; Rajini Srinivasan; Fereshteh Jahanbani; Jaecheol Lee; Sophia L. Zhang; Michael Snyder; Joseph C. Wu
Rationale: Regulatory DNA elements in the human genome play important roles in determining the transcriptional abundance and spatiotemporal gene expression during embryonic heart development and somatic cell reprogramming. It is not well known how chromatin marks in regulatory DNA elements are modulated to establish cell type–specific gene expression in the human heart. Objective: We aimed to decipher the cell type–specific epigenetic signatures in regulatory DNA elements and how they modulate heart-specific gene expression. Methods and Results: We profiled genome-wide transcriptional activity and a variety of epigenetic marks in the regulatory DNA elements using massive RNA-seq (n=12) and ChIP-seq (chromatin immunoprecipitation combined with high-throughput sequencing; n=84) in human endothelial cells (CD31+CD144+), cardiac progenitor cells (Sca-1+), fibroblasts (DDR2+), and their respective induced pluripotent stem cells. We uncovered 2 classes of regulatory DNA elements: class I was identified with ubiquitous enhancer (H3K4me1) and promoter (H3K4me3) marks in all cell types, whereas class II was enriched with H3K4me1 and H3K4me3 in a cell type–specific manner. Both class I and class II regulatory elements exhibited stimulatory roles in nearby gene expression in a given cell type. However, class I promoters displayed more dominant regulatory effects on transcriptional abundance regardless of distal enhancers. Transcription factor network analysis indicated that human induced pluripotent stem cells and somatic cells from the heart selected their preferential regulatory elements to maintain cell type–specific gene expression. In addition, we validated the function of these enhancer elements in transgenic mouse embryos and human cells and identified a few enhancers that could possibly regulate the cardiac-specific gene expression. Conclusions: Given that a large number of genetic variants associated with human diseases are located in regulatory DNA elements, our study provides valuable resources for deciphering the epigenetic modulation of regulatory DNA elements that fine-tune spatiotemporal gene expression in human cardiac development and diseases.
Cell Stem Cell | 2016
Elena Matsa; Paul W. Burridge; Kun-Hsing Yu; John H. Ahrens; Vittavat Termglinchan; Haodi Wu; Chun Liu; Praveen Shukla; Nazish Sayed; Jared M. Churko; Ning-Yi Shao; Nicole A. Woo; Alexander S. Chao; Joseph D. Gold; Ioannis Karakikes; Michael Snyder; Joseph C. Wu
Cell Stem Cell | 2017
Mingxia Gu; Ning-Yi Shao; Silin Sa; Dan Li; Vittavat Termglinchan; Mohamed Ameen; Ioannis Karakikes; Gustavo Sosa; Fabian Grubert; Jaecheol Lee; Aiqin Cao; Shalina Taylor; Yu Ma; Zhixin Zhao; James Chappell; Rizwan Hamid; Eric D. Austin; Joseph D. Gold; Joseph C. Wu; Michael Snyder; Marlene Rabinovitch
Cell Stem Cell | 2018
Nigel G. Kooreman; Youngkyun Kim; Patricia E. de Almeida; Vittavat Termglinchan; Sebastian Diecke; Ning-Yi Shao; Tzu-Tang Wei; Hyoju Yi; Devaveena Dey; Raman V. Nelakanti; Thomas P. Brouwer; David T. Paik; Idit Sagiv-Barfi; Arnold Han; Paul H.A. Quax; Jaap F. Hamming; Ronald Levy; Mark M. Davis; Joseph C. Wu
American Journal of Pathology | 2016
Ke Yuan; Ning-Yi Shao; Jan K. Hennigs; Marielle Discipulo; Mark Orcholski; Elya Shamskhou; Alice Richter; Xinqian Hu; Joseph C. Wu; Vinicio de Jesus Perez
Cell Stem Cell | 2018
Jaecheol Lee; Ning-Yi Shao; David T. Paik; Haodi Wu; Hongchao Guo; Vittavat Termglinchan; Jared M. Churko; Youngkyun Kim; Tomoya Kitani; Ming-Tao Zhao; Yue Zhang; Kitchener D. Wilson; Ioannis Karakikes; Michael Snyder; Joseph C. Wu