Nita Matzen
Appalachian State University
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Nita Matzen.
Evaluation and Program Planning | 2012
Jenifer O. Corn; Elizabeth Byrom; Kirk Knestis; Nita Matzen; Beth Thrift
Schools, districts, and state-level educational organizations are experiencing a great shift in the way they do the business of education. This shift focuses on accountability, specifically through the expectation of the effective utilization of evaluative-focused efforts to guide and support decisions about educational program implementation. In as much, education leaders need specific guidance and training on how to plan, implement, and use evaluation to critically examine district and school-level initiatives. One specific effort intended to address this need is through the Capacity for Applying Project Evaluation (CAPE) framework. The CAPE framework is composed of three crucial components: a collection of evaluation resources; a professional development model; and a conceptual framework that guides the work to support evaluation planning and implementation in schools and districts. School and district teams serve as active participants in the professional development and ultimately as formative evaluators of their own school or district-level programs by working collaboratively with evaluation experts. The CAPE framework involves the school and district staff in planning and implementing their evaluation. They are the ones deciding what evaluation questions to ask, which instruments to use, what data to collect, and how and to whom results should be reported. Initially this work is done through careful scaffolding by evaluation experts, where supports are slowly pulled away as the educators gain experience and confidence in their knowledge and skills as evaluators. Since CAPE engages all stakeholders in all stages of the evaluation, the philosophical intentions of these efforts to build capacity for formative evaluation strictly aligns with the collaborative evaluation approach.
The International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education | 2008
Stephen Bronack; Robert Sanders; Amelia W. Cheney; Richard Riedl; John Tashner; Nita Matzen
Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference | 2008
Amelia W. Cheney; Nita Matzen; Robert Sanders; Stephen Bronack; Richard Riedl; John Tashner
Archive | 2013
Nita Matzen; Kim Becnel; Geraldine Purpur
Journal of Education and Learning (EduLearn) | 2013
William Edward Roberts; Nita Matzen
Themes in Science and Technology Education | 2009
Amelia W. Cheney; Robert Sanders; Nita Matzen; Stephen Bronack; Richard Riedl; John Tashner
Archive | 2012
Nita Matzen; William Edward Roberts; Penny Barker; Julie Marklin
Archive | 2011
Barbara Howard; Nita Matzen; John Tashner
Archive | 2011
Nita Matzen; Geraldine Purpur
Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference | 2010
Sean D. Williams; Nita Matzen; Rob Sanders; Edward Roberts; Penny Barker; Allyson McFalls; Amy Cheney