Noa Lavi

Eradication of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae gastrointestinal colonization with nonabsorbable oral antibiotic treatment: A prospective controlled trial

BACKGROUND Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) are emerging. In attempt to eradicate CRE colonization, we conducted a semirandomized, prospective, controlled trial using oral nonabsorbable antibiotics. METHODS Consecutive hospitalized CRE carriers were studied. Patients whose rectal isolates were gentamicin sensitive but colistin resistant were treated with gentamicin. Patients whose isolates were colistin sensitive but gentamicin resistant were treated with colistin. Patients whose isolates were sensitive to both drugs were randomized to 3 groups of oral antibiotic treatment: gentamicin, colistin, or both. Patients whose isolates were resistant to both drugs, and those who did not consent, were followed for spontaneous eradication. RESULTS One hundred fifty-two patients were included; 102 were followed for spontaneous eradication for a median duration of 140 days (controls), and 50 received 1 of the 3 drug regimens: gentamicin, 26; colistin, 16; both drugs, 8, followed for a median duration of 33 days. Eradication rates in the 3 treatment groups were 42%, 50%, and 37.5%, respectively, each significantly higher than the 7% spontaneous eradication rate in the control group (P < .001, P < .001, and P = .004, respectively) with no difference between the regimens. No significant adverse effects were observed. CONCLUSION Oral antibiotic treatment with nonabsorbable drugs to which CRE is susceptible appears to be an effective and safe for eradication of CRE colonization and, thereby, may reduce patient-to-patient transmission and incidence of clinical infection with this difficult-to-treat organism.

Treatment of thromboembolic events coincident with the diagnosis of myeloproliferative neoplasms: A physician survey

The BCR-ABL1 negative myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) are associated with an increased risk of both venous and arterial thromboembolic events. Thromboses may be the presenting clinical feature of an MPN or may occur during the course of the disease. Treatment comprises anticoagulant and antiaggregant agents as in non- MPN thromboses, and treatment of the particular MPN. The duration of anticoagulant treatment that is required for MPN thrombosis is unknown. This study was performed to survey the opinion of hematologists who treat patients with MPN regarding the duration of anticoagulation or antiaggregant therapy in patients in whom thrombosis is the presenting feature of MPN. Five clinical scenarios in which thromboembolism (cerebral vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, cerebrovascular accident, splanchnic vein thrombosis, portal vein thrombosis) was a presenting feature of MPN were created using a web-based tool and were sent by email to hematologists in Israel, Italy and England and to hematologists identified as key opinion leaders in the field of MPN. Physicians were asked to recommend duration of anticoagulation and/or aspirin use choosing from 4 alternatives provided. Seventy-three physicians responded to the survey. 42 physicians considered MPNs to be their main area of clinical interest, and 31 did not. 21 physicians saw more than 20 MPN patients per week, and 50 physicians had been in hematology practice for more than 10years. Responses regarding the duration of anticoagulation and/or the use of aspirin varied for all of the clinical vignettes. Neither physician area-of-interest, volume of MPN patients treated nor years in practice were related to the responses obtained. This study demonstrates that hematologists, including those specializing in MPNs, lack consensus in their approach to the long-term treatment of thromboses as the presenting feature of an MPN. Controlled clinical studies are needed to inform appropriate decision making in this area.

Efficacy and safety of salvage therapy using Carfilzomib for relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma patients: a multicentre retrospective observational study

Carfilzomib has been established in previous years as a treatment for patients with relapsed and/or refractory multiple myeloma (RR‐MM). A retrospective multicentre study to evaluate the clinical use of carfilzomib for RR‐MM outside of a clinical trial setting was conducted by our group. One hundred and thirty‐five patients were included. All patients had been previously exposed to bortezomib and 93% had also been treated with lenalidomide. The vast majority of patients received carfilzomib as part of a two‐ or three‐drug combination. The overall response rate was 47·2%. Multivariate analysis revealed bortezomib resistance, lenalidomide resistance and albumin <35 g/l to negatively impact the likelihood of achieving response. The median duration of response was 8·4 months, and was significantly higher in patients receiving three‐drug combination and patients presenting without extramedullary disease. The median progression‐free survival and overall survival for the entire cohort was 4·9 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 3·8–6·4) and 12·2 months (95% CI 9‐not reached), respectively. Toxicity was manageable, although treatment‐related death was seen in 5% of patients. In the setting of progressive multiple myeloma, carfilzomib in a combination regimens yields effective results with a manageable toxicity.

Management of pregnant women with myeloproliferative neoplasms.

Myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) are generally considered to be diseases of elderly population; however, 20% of subjects diagnosed with ET are younger than 40 years. Increase in gestational age in the Western world and improved diagnostic tools raise MPN incidence during pregnancy. MPNs are associated with a remarkable risk for thrombosis and the hypercoagulability milieu associated with pregnancy increases that risk even further. Pregnancies of women diagnosed with MPNs may be complicated with placental thrombosis, fetal growth restriction or loss, and increased risk for maternal thrombosis. The live birth rate in ET and PV is as low as 60 %, with first-trimester loss occurring in 20-30% of pregnancies and an increase in late placenta-mediated complications. Major maternal complications (thromboembolic events and bleeding) are more frequent in PV compared with ET. Therapeutic options range from no therapy, aspirin alone, low-molecular weight heparin (LMWH) to cytoreductive therapy, tailored according to patient-specific risk factors.

Haematological malignancies in pregnancy: An overview with an emphasis on thrombotic risks

With increase of maternal age, the incidence of haematological malignancies during pregnancy is rising and posing diagnostic and treatment challenges. Lymphoma is the fourth most common malignancy diagnosed in pregnancy; Hodgkin lymphoma is more frequent in pregnant women than non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL). The proportion of highly aggressive lymphomas in pregnant women is significantly higher than in non-pregnant women of reproductive age. Reproductive organ involvement is observed in almost half of pregnant women with NHL. The association of acute leukaemia and pregnancy is infrequent and it is assumed that pregnancy does not accelerate the disease course. Both cancer and pregnancy induce a procoagulant state which can lead to maternal venous thromboembolism (VTE) and placental occlusion. Pregnancy in woman with myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN) promotes thrombotic environment, associating with an augmented risk of placental thrombosis, intrauterine growth retardation or loss and maternal thrombotic events.Haematological malignancies during pregnancy often require urgent diagnosis and management and are associated with potential adverse fetal outcomes. Most chemotherapeutic agents are teratogenic and should be avoided during the first trimester. Their use during the second and third trimesters may cause intrauterine growth restriction, premature birth and intrauterine fetal death. All chemotherapeutic drugs should be administered only after a detailed discussion with the patient and with close fetal monitoring. Chemotherapy and biological agents might also augment thrombotic risk. Guidelines for VTE prophylaxis in pregnant women with hematologic malignancies, apart from MPN, are currently unavailable, and therefore, clinical judgment should be made in each case.

Ruxolitinib treatment for myelofibrosis: Efficacy and tolerability in routine practice

Ruxolitinib has been shown in two randomized clinical trials to be effective in alleviating systemic symptoms and reducing spleen size in patients with myelofibrosis (MF). We retrospectively evaluated efficacy and tolerability of ruxolitinib in a cohort of unselected MF patients treated in routine clinical practice. One hundred and two patients who began ruxolitinib therapy were identified in 13 participating centers. Ninety three of the patients receiving ruxolitinib for at least 3 months were evaluated for treatment efficacy and toxicity. Median age at ruxolitinib initiation was 67 years. Indications for treatment were constitutional symptoms (15%), symptomatic splenomegaly (6%) or both (76%). Two patients received ruxolitinib for other indications. The median initial ruxolitinib dose was 30mg/day. Median duration of therapy was 11 months. Eighty two patients (88.2%) responded to therapy, 76 (84.4%) patients had improvement in constitutional symptoms and 60 patients (70.6%) had reduction in spleen length. While on ruxolitinib, 30% of patients had grade 3-4 anemia and 12.9% of patients had grade 3-4 thrombocytopenia. Thirteen patients (14%) discontinued therapy. This analysis of a cohort of MF patients treated with ruxolitinib in routine clinical practice demonstrates the efficacy and tolerability of this drug outside of a highly monitored clinical trial setting.

Prospective comparison of early bone marrow evaluation on day 5 versus day 14 of the “3 + 7” induction regimen for acute myeloid leukemia

Evaluation of early response during induction therapy for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is used for prognostication and re‐induction strategy, yet the optimal evaluation time point is unknown. Clearance of bone marrow (BM) blasts by day 14 of therapy does not ensure remission; thus, some patients requiring re‐induction are neglected. This study aimed to examine the role of earlier BM evaluation during induction for predicting remission and overall survival. Results of BM testing on the 5th and 14th day of intensive induction were prospectively compared in 127 adult patients with AML. Re‐induction was given, based on Day 14 results, to 25 patients. Reduction of the BM blast count to <5% as early as by the fifth day of induction was more specifically associated with the achievement of remission compared to Day 14 (88.2% vs. 60%, respectively). Rapid responders have a better 3‐year overall survival (OS). Day 5 results are a stronger predictor of OS by multivariate analysis and better segregate long‐term survivors than the Day 14th BM count (66% vs. 30%, P = 0.0001 and 48% vs. 37%, respectively, P = 0.04). The Day 5 evaluation of BM carries significant clinical information. The benefit of prescribing re‐induction based on such early evaluation should be prospectively studied. Am. J. Hematol. 90:1159–1164, 2015.

Group G streptococcal endocarditis-associated hemophagocytic syndrome

We report the case of a 28-year-old previously healthy male who presented with a 1-week history of fever, headache, vomiting, and jaundice. Blood cultures were positive for group G streptococci and transesophageal echocardiography demonstrated vegetations on the aortic valve, leading to a definitive diagnosis of infective endocarditis. The combination of fever, splenomegaly, anemia, thrombocytopenia, hypertriglyceridemia, elevated ferritin level, low natural killer (NK) cell activity, and hemophagocytosis in bone marrow aspirate confirmed the diagnosis of hemophagocytic syndrome (hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis). Antibiotic treatment and intravenous immunoglobulins were administered and the patient made a full recovery.

New Rising Infection: Human Herpesvirus 6 Is Frequent in Myeloma Patients Undergoing Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation after Induction Therapy with Bortezomib

Herpesvirus 6 (HHV-6) infection is a common complication during immunosuppression. Its significance for multiple myeloma (MM) patients undergoing autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) after treatment with novel agents affecting immune system remains undetermined. Data on 62 consecutive MM patients receiving bortezomib-dexamethasone (VD) (n = 41; 66%) or thalidomide-dexamethasone (TD) (n = 21, 34%) induction, together with melphalan 200 mg/m2 autograft between 01.2005 and 09.2010, were reviewed. HHV-6 reactivation was diagnosed in patients experiencing postengraftment unexplained fever (PEUF) in the presence of any level of HHHV-6 DNA in blood. There were no statistically significant differences in patient characteristics between the groups, excluding dexamethasone dosage, which was significantly higher in patients receiving TD. Eight patients in TD and 18 in VD cohorts underwent viral screening for PEUF. HHV-6 reactivation was diagnosed in 10 patients of the entire series (16%), accounting for 35% of those screened; its incidence was 19.5% (n = 8) in the VD group versus 9.5% (n = 2) in the TD group. All patients recovered without sequelae. In conclusion, HHV-6 reactivation is relatively common after ASCT, accounting for at least a third of PEUF episodes. Further studies are warranted to investigate whether bortezomib has an impact on HHV-6 reactivation development.

Allogeneic stem-cell transplantation for myelofibrosis

Purpose of review Allogeneic hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (HSCT) remains the only curative therapy for myelofibrosis. The number of HSCTs performed for this indication has been steadily increasing over the past years, even after the approval of the Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor, ruxolitinib. This increase may be attributed to improved patient selection based on new prognostic molecular markers, more frequent use of matched unrelated donors, secondary to better (high-resolution) human leukocyte antigen typing and supportive care. Ruxolitinib approval raises new questions regarding the role of JAK inhibitors in the transplant setting. Recent findings The current review summarizes recent updates on HSCT in myelofibrosis. Predictors for transplant outcomes, and specific considerations related to myelofibrosis patient selection for HSCT (e.g. molecular risk stratification) are reviewed. In addition, this review will consider management of myelofibrosis patients in the peritransplant period, including the role of ruxolitinib in the pretransplant period, pre and posttransplant splenomegaly, transplant protocols, posttransplant follow-up of minimal residual disease and interventions in the event of poor engraftment. Summary HSCT remains a highly relevant treatment option for myelofibrosis in the era of JAK inhibitors. Recent advances may contribute to a refined definition of HSCT eligibility and identification of the optimal transplantation time, conditioning protocols and posttransplant management.