Nobuyuki Moribe

Dosimetric properties of radiophotoluminescent glass rod detector in high-energy photon beams from a linear accelerator and Cyber-Knife

A fully automatic radiophotoluminescent glass rod dosimeter (GRD) system has recently become commercially available. This article discusses the dosimetric properties of the GRD including uniformity and reproducibility of signal, dose linearity, and energy and directional dependence in high-energy photon beams. In addition, energy response is measured in electron beams. The uniformity and reproducibility of the signal from 50 GRDs using a 60Co beam are both +/- 1.1% (one standard deviation). Good dose linearity of the GRD is maintained for doses ranging from 0.5 to 30 Gy, the lower and upper limits of this study, respectively. The GRD response is found to show little energy dependence in photon energies of a 60Co beam, 4 MV (TPR20(10)=0.617) and 10 MV (TPR(20)10=0.744) x-ray beams. However, the GRD responses for 9 MeV (mean energy, Ez = 3.6 MeV) and 16 MeV (Ez = 10.4 MeV) electron beams are 4%-5% lower than that for a 60Co beam in the beam quality dependence. The measured angular dependence of GRD, ranging from 0 degrees (along the long axis of GRD) to 120 degrees is within 1.5% for a 4 MV x-ray beam. As applications, a linear accelerator-based radiosurgery system and Cyber-Knife output factors are measured by a GRD and compared with those from various detectors including a p-type silicon diode detector, a diamond detector, and an ion chamber. It is found that the GRD is a very useful detector for small field dosimetry, in particular, below 10 mm circular fields.

Application of a radiophotoluminescent glass plate dosimeter for small field dosimetry

We have recently developed a prototypical radiophotoluminescent glass plate dosimeter (GPD) system as a device for small field dosimetry. The purpose of this study is to examine the usefulness of the GPD system for small field dosimetry. The profiles measured with the GPD were evaluated by comparing them to those from Kodak X-Omat V and GAFCROMIC XR type R film dosimeters for 2, 5, 9, and 15mm circular collimators created by a linear accelerator-based radiosurgery system. The GPD output factors were compared with those of various detectors including an ion chamber, a p-type silicon diode detector, a glass rod dosimeter (GRD), and a diamond detector. The results measured with the GPD were also confirmed by comparing them to those from Monte Carlo simulations. The accuracy of a simulated beam is validated by the excellent agreement between Monte Carlo calculated and measured central axis depth-dose curves for 9- and 15mm circular collimators using 4- and 10MV photon beams. The GPD profiles show almost the same full width at half maximum as those of film dosimeters and Monte Carlo simulations at 4- and 10MV photon beams, but a little narrower penumbrae than the film dosimeters and Monte Carlo simulations. The output factors measured with the GPD are in good agreement with those from a diode detector, a diamond detector, and the GRD with a small active volume and Monte Carlo simulations, except for a very small 2mm circular collimator. It was found that the GPD is a very useful detector for small field dosimetry.

Computed radiography utilizing laser-stimulated luminescence: Detectability of simulated low-contrast radiographic objects

Threshold contrasts of low-contrast objects with computed radiography (CR) images were compared with those of blue and green emitting screen-film systems by employing the 18-alternative forced choice (18-AFC) procedure. The dependence of the threshold contrast on the incident X-ray exposure and also the object size was studied. The results indicated that the threshold contrasts of CR system were comparable to those of blue and green screen-film systems and decreased with increasing object size, and increased with decreasing incident X-ray exposure. The increase in threshold contrasts was small when the relative incident exposure decreased from 1 to 1/4, and was large when incident exposure was decreased further.

Dose calculation for asymmetric photon fields with independent jaws and multileaf collimators

We have developed a simple method for dose calculation in dual asymmetric open and irregular fields with four independent jaws and multileaf collimators. Our calculation method extends the scatter correction method of Kwa et al. [Med. Phys. 21, 1599-1604 (1994)] based on the principle of Days equivalent-field calculation. The scatter correction factor was determined by the ratio of the derived doses of a smaller asymmetric open field or irregular field to a larger symmetric field. The algorithm with the scatter correction method can be calculated from output factors, tissue maximum ratios, and off-axis ratios for conventional symmetric fields. The doses calculated by this method were compared with the measured doses for various asymmetric open and irregular fields. The agreement between the calculated and measured doses for 4 and 10 MV photon beams was within 0.5% at the geometric center of the asymmetric open fields. For the asymmetric irregular fields with the same geometrical center, agreement within 1% was found in most cases.

Basic imaging properties of a new screen-film system for chest radiography.

To evaluate the potential clinical usefulness of a new screen-film system (advanced screen-film system; AD system) for chest radiography, its fundamental imaging properties compared with a conventional screen-film system (HR-4/HR-S) were investigated. The basic imaging properties were evaluated by measuring characteristic (H&D) curves, relative speeds, MTFs (modulation transfer functions), WS (Wiener spectra), and x-ray attenuations of screens. The detail visibilities and pathological details of various diseases in chest radiographs of patients were evaluated subjectively. The film gradient of the AD system was slightly lower at low radiographic density, and higher at high density, as compared with a conventional screen-film system. The screen speed of the AD system was 212% greater than that of the conventional system, and the film speed was 53% that of the conventional film. As the result, the total speed of the AD system was slightly higher compared with the conventional system. The spatial resolution of the AD system was comparable to or slightly lower than that of the conventional system. The noise level of the AD system was considerably lower than that of the conventional system at low (D = 0.5) and middle (D = 1.0) radiographic density levels. However, it was high at high radiographic density (D = 1.8). The radiographic densities in the underpenetrated areas with the AD system were greater than those of the conventional system when the lung densities are matched comparable. Improvement in noise level with the AD system at low and middle density levels may be useful for detection of various diseases in chest radiographs.

Wall correction factors for calibration of plane-parallel ionization chambers with high-energy photon beams

Most dosimetry protocols recommend that calibration of plane-parallel ionization chambers be performed in an electron beam of sufficiently high energy by comparison with cylindrical chambers. For various plane-parallel chambers, the 1997 IAEA TRS-381 protocol includes an overall perturbation factor pQ for electron beams, a wall correction factor p(wall) for a 60Co beam and the product of two wall corrections k(att)k(m) for 60Co in-air calibration. The recommended values of p(wall) for plane-parallel chambers, however, are limited to certain phantom materials and a 60Co beam, and are not given for other phantom materials and x-ray beams. In this work, the p(wall) values of the commercially available NACP, PTW/Markus and PTW/Roos plane-parallel chambers in a solid water phantom have been determined with 60Co and 4 and 10 MV photon beams. The k(att)k(m) values for the NACP and PTW/Markus chambers have also been obtained. The wall correction factors p(wall) and k(att)k(m) have been determined by intercomparison with a calibrated Farmer chamber. The average value of p(wall) for these plane-parallel chambers was 1.005 +/- 0.1% (1 SD) for 60Co beams and 1.007 +/- 0.2% (1 SD) for both 4 MV and 10 MV photons. The k(att)k(m) values for the NACP and PTW/Markus chambers were about 1.5% lower than other published data.