Takao Takada

Physical and clinical evaluation of a 2,048 × 2,048-matrix image intensifier TV digital imaging system in bone radiography

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES To evaluate the potential utility of a 2,048 x 2,048-matrix image intensifier television digital radiography (DR) system versus a conventional screen-film (S-F) system for bone radiography. METHODS Basic imaging properties were evaluated including resolution properties, Wiener spectra, and detectabilities of low-contrast signals. DR images were obtained with the same exposure (iso-dose) or one-third the exposure (low-dose) used with the S-F system. The visibility of pathologic details of metastatic disease on bone radiographs of 27 patients was evaluated subjectively by six radiologists. RESULTS Resolution properties of the DR system were slightly superior to those of the S-F system at low-frequency range, but the S-F system showed considerably higher resolution properties at the high-frequency range. The noise levels for iso-dose DR were slightly greater than those for S-F imaging at low spatial frequency; however, low-dose digital radiographs showed higher noise levels. Visibility of details of diagnostic features on bone radiographs was similar with both systems, but the low-dose digital radiographs were slightly inferior. CONCLUSION High-resolution image intensifier television DR systems may be clinically useful for bone radiography.

Dose calculation for asymmetric photon fields with independent jaws and multileaf collimators

We have developed a simple method for dose calculation in dual asymmetric open and irregular fields with four independent jaws and multileaf collimators. Our calculation method extends the scatter correction method of Kwa et al. [Med. Phys. 21, 1599-1604 (1994)] based on the principle of Days equivalent-field calculation. The scatter correction factor was determined by the ratio of the derived doses of a smaller asymmetric open field or irregular field to a larger symmetric field. The algorithm with the scatter correction method can be calculated from output factors, tissue maximum ratios, and off-axis ratios for conventional symmetric fields. The doses calculated by this method were compared with the measured doses for various asymmetric open and irregular fields. The agreement between the calculated and measured doses for 4 and 10 MV photon beams was within 0.5% at the geometric center of the asymmetric open fields. For the asymmetric irregular fields with the same geometrical center, agreement within 1% was found in most cases.

Wall correction factors for calibration of plane-parallel ionization chambers with high-energy photon beams

Most dosimetry protocols recommend that calibration of plane-parallel ionization chambers be performed in an electron beam of sufficiently high energy by comparison with cylindrical chambers. For various plane-parallel chambers, the 1997 IAEA TRS-381 protocol includes an overall perturbation factor pQ for electron beams, a wall correction factor p(wall) for a 60Co beam and the product of two wall corrections k(att)k(m) for 60Co in-air calibration. The recommended values of p(wall) for plane-parallel chambers, however, are limited to certain phantom materials and a 60Co beam, and are not given for other phantom materials and x-ray beams. In this work, the p(wall) values of the commercially available NACP, PTW/Markus and PTW/Roos plane-parallel chambers in a solid water phantom have been determined with 60Co and 4 and 10 MV photon beams. The k(att)k(m) values for the NACP and PTW/Markus chambers have also been obtained. The wall correction factors p(wall) and k(att)k(m) have been determined by intercomparison with a calibrated Farmer chamber. The average value of p(wall) for these plane-parallel chambers was 1.005 +/- 0.1% (1 SD) for 60Co beams and 1.007 +/- 0.2% (1 SD) for both 4 MV and 10 MV photons. The k(att)k(m) values for the NACP and PTW/Markus chambers were about 1.5% lower than other published data.