Nona Arneson

Comparison of HER2/neu Status Assessed by Quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction and Immunohistochemistry

We prospectively evaluated a series of 254 breast cancers by quantitative polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and immunohistochemistry using 3 antibodies: HercepTest, CB11, and TAB250. DNA was extracted from a 10-micron tumor section for PCR, and 4-micron serial sections were taken from the same block for immunohistochemistry. The immunohistochemical results were scored using a semiquantitative immunohistochemical system. A positive tumor by immunohistochemistry had a score of 5 or more. The manufacturers recommended scoring system was used for the HercepTest. Tumors were positive for gene amplification if the ratio of the HER2/neu gene to control gene after normalization was 2 or more. Of 254 cases, 61 showed gene amplification. For immunohistochemistry, 23% of tumors were positive with CB11, 27% with TAB250, and 37% with the HercepTest. Results for each antibody were compared with PCR results. The overall concordance for the HercepTest was 82%, which was significantly lower than that for CB11 (88%) or TAB250 (87%). The specificity for the HercepTest was 80% compared with 90% for TAB250 and 93% for CB11, while the positive predictive value for the HercepTest was 57% compared with 71% and 76% for TAB250 and CB11, respectively.

Genomic Differences Between Pure Ductal Carcinoma In Situ of the Breast and that Associated with Invasive Disease: a Calibrated aCGH Study

Purpose: In the quest for new targets, genomes of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) and infiltrating duct carcinoma (IDC) have been compared previously; however, genomic alterations associated with cancer progression were difficult to identify. We hypothesized that significant events can be detected by comparing lesions with a broader range of behavior: from pure DCIS to IDC associated with lymph node metastasis. Experimental Design: Array comparative genomic hybridization, calibrated by self-self hybridization tests, was used to study 6 cases of pure DCIS and 17 cases of DCIS paired with IDC where 8 tumors had spread to the local lymph nodes. Results: Pure DCIS exhibited a marginally higher degree of genomic complexity than DCIS and IDC components of invasive tumors. The latter two showed similarity between tumors and between components of the same tumor with several regions detected preferentially compared with pure DCIS. IDC associated with lymph node metastases showed similarity of genomic profiles as a group. Gain on 17q22-24.2 was associated with higher histologic grade, large IDC size, lymphatic/vascular invasion, and lymph node metastasis (P < 0.05). Conclusions: Our findings suggest that DCIS and IDC are associated with specific genomic events. DCIS associated with IDC is genomically similar to the invasive component and therefore may represent either a clone with high invasive potential or invasive cancer spreading through the ducts. Specifically, gain on 17q22-24.2 is a candidate region for further testing as a predictor of invasion when detected in DCIS and predictor of nodal metastasis when detected in DCIS or IDC.

Genomic alterations in primary breast cancers compared with their sentinel and more distal lymph node metastases: An aCGH study

Metastatic potential of breast cancer may be associated with specific genomic alterations and the earliest metastases are likely to be found in the sentinel lymph nodes (SLN). Using array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH), we compared the genomes of primary breast invasive duct carcinomas (IDCs), their sentinel and more distal lymph node metastases, and IDCs without nodal metastasis. Thirty‐three samples from 22 patients with IDC were subjected to aCGH: 8 IDC samples from patients without lymph node metastasis, 11 IDCs associated with SLN metastases out of which 7 had paired samples of metastases, and 14 samples of lymph node metastases out of which 8 were sentinel‐distal pairs from 4 patients. aCGH data were analyzed by correlation of genomic profiles, cluster analysis, segmentation, and peak identification. Quantitative real‐time PCR was used for data validation. We observed high genomic similarity between primary tumors and their nodal metastases as well as between metastases to the sentinel and distal lymph nodes. Several recurrent alterations were detected preferentially in IDC associated with SLN metastases compared to IDCs without metastasis. Amplification within the 17q24.1‐24.2(59.96–62.76 Mb) region was associated with presence of sentinel or distal lymph node metastases; larger tumor size and higher histological grade. In our samples, there were genomic events associated with metastatic progression, which could be detected in both primary tumors and LN metastases. Gain on 17q24.1‐24.2 is a candidate region for further testing as a predictor of nodal metastasis.

GenomePlex Whole-Genome Amplification

INTRODUCTIONPCR-based whole-genome amplification (WGA) has the goal of generating microgram quantities of genome-representative DNA from picogram or nanogram amounts of starting material. This amplification should introduce little, or ideally no, representational bias. In contrast to other techniques for WGA, PCR-based methods are generally less affected by DNA quality and are more applicable to DNA extracted from various sources (fixed and fresh tissues). GenomePlex WGA, described in this protocol, is a proprietary amplification technology based on nonenzymatic random fragmentation of genomic DNA. The protocol involves conversion of the genome into an in vitro molecular library of DNA fragments, followed by incubation at various temperatures to add adaptor sequences with specific PCR priming sites to both ends of every fragment. The fragment library can then be amplified several 1000-fold to generate milligram quantities of DNA starting with as little as 10-100 ng.

Comparison of whole genome amplification methods for analysis of DNA extracted from microdissected early breast lesions in formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue.

To understand cancer progression, it is desirable to study the earliest stages of its development, which are often microscopic lesions. Array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) is a valuable high-throughput molecular approach for discovering DNA copy number changes; however, it requires a relatively large amount of DNA, which is difficult to obtain from microdissected lesions. Whole genome amplification (WGA) methods were developed to increase DNA quantity; however their reproducibility, fidelity, and suitability for formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) samples are questioned. Using aCGH analysis, we compared two widely used approaches for WGA: single cell comparative genomic hybridization protocol (SCOMP) and degenerate oligonucleotide primed PCR (DOP-PCR). Cancer cell line and microdissected FFPE breast cancer DNA samples were amplified by the two WGA methods and subjected to aCGH. The genomic profiles of amplified DNA were compared with those of non-amplified controls by four analytic methods and validated by quantitative PCR (Q-PCR). We found that SCOMP-amplified samples had close similarity to non-amplified controls with concordance rates close to those of reference tests, while DOP-amplified samples had a statistically significant amount of changes. SCOMP is able to amplify small amounts of DNA extracted from FFPE samples and provides quality of aCGH data similar to non-amplified samples.