Nora Hernandez

Sociodemographic disparities in epilepsy care: Results from the Houston/New York City health care use and outcomes study

Purpose:  The purpose of this study was to identify sociodemographic disparities in health care use among epilepsy patients receiving care at different sites and the extent to which the disparities persisted after adjusting for patient characteristics and site of care.

Jaw tremor: Prevalence and clinical correlates in three essential tremor case samples

The spectrum of involuntary movements seen in essential tremor (ET) is limited. Jaw tremor is one such movement. The prevalence and clinical correlates of jaw tremor have not been studied in detail. The objective of this study was to estimate the prevalence and examine the clinical correlates of jaw tremor in ET using ET cases from three distinct settings (population, tertiary‐referral center, brain repository). All ET cases underwent a videotaped tremor examination in which tremors (including limb, head, voice, and jaw) were assessed. The prevalence [95% confidence interval (CI)] of jaw tremor was lowest in the population sample (7.5%; 3.9%–14.2%), intermediate in the tertiary‐referral center (10.1%; 6.8%–14.7%), and highest in the brain repository (18.0%; 12.3%–25.5%; P = 0.03). Jaw tremor was associated with older age (P < 0.001), more severe action tremor of the arms (P < 0.001), and presence of head and voice tremor (P < 0.001). Jaw tremor was present in 4/14 (28.6%) ET cases with consistent rest tremor vs. 15/193 (7.8%) cases without rest tremor (odds ratio = 4.8; 95% CI = 1.3–7.0; P = 0.009). The prevalence of jaw tremor was 7.5% to 18.0% and was dependent on the mode of ascertainment, being least prevalent in a population‐based sample. ET cases with jaw tremor had a more clinically severe and more topographically widespread disorder. The association in our study between jaw tremor and rest tremor, along with the published observation that jaw tremor can occur in Parkinsons disease (PD), raises the question whether jaw tremor in ET is a marker for subsequent conversion to PD.

Prevalence and correlates of rest tremor in essential tremor: cross-sectional survey of 831 patients across four distinct cohorts

Essential tremor (ET) is amongst the most commonly encountered neurological disorders. Its hallmark feature is kinetic tremor. However, other tremors may also occur in ET patients, creating considerable diagnostic confusion amongst treating physicians. Hence, characterizing the prevalence and clinical accompaniments of these other tremors is of value. Surprisingly, there are few data on the prevalence of rest tremor in ET patients, and even fewer data on the clinical correlates of such tremor.

Does rate of progression run in essential tremor families? Slower vs. faster progressors

BACKGROUND Essential tremor (ET) is a progressive disorder, worsening gradually with time in most patients. Yet there are few data on the factors that influence rate of progression. ET is a highly familial disorder, and physicians often care for patients who have other affected family members. Do ET families differ from one another with respect to rate of progression? Are some families slower progressors and other families faster progressors? We are unaware of published data. METHODS ET probands and relatives were enrolled in a cross-sectional genetic study at Columbia University. Rate of progression was calculated as total tremor score ÷ log disease duration. RESULTS There were 100 enrollees (28 probands, 72 relatives). Data from 78 enrollees (23 probands, 55 relatives) were selected for final analysis. The mean familial rate of progression ranged from as little as 8.4 to as much as 34.3, a > 4-fold difference. In an analysis of variance, we found significant evidence of heterogeneity in the log rate of progression across families (p < 0.001), with more than one-half (i.e., 55.4%) of the total variance in the log rate of progression explained by the family grouping. CONCLUSIONS Familial factors seem to affect rate of tremor progression in ET. There was a 4-fold difference across families in observed mean rate of progression; thus, some families seemed to be more rapid progressors than others. We hope these data may be used by clinicians to provide basic prognostic and family guidance information to their patients and families with ET.

Identification of candidate genes for familial early-onset essential tremor

Essential tremor (ET) is one of the most common causes of tremor in humans. Despite its high heritability and prevalence, few susceptibility genes for ET have been identified. To identify ET genes, whole-exome sequencing was performed in 37 early-onset ET families with an autosomal-dominant inheritance pattern. We identified candidate genes for follow-up functional studies in five ET families. In two independent families, we identified variants predicted to affect function in the nitric oxide (NO) synthase 3 gene (NOS3) that cosegregated with disease. NOS3 is highly expressed in the central nervous system (including cerebellum), neurons and endothelial cells, and is one of three enzymes that converts l-arginine to the neurotransmitter NO. In one family, a heterozygous variant, c.46G>A (p.(Gly16Ser)), in NOS3, was identified in three affected ET cases and was absent in an unaffected family member; and in a second family, a heterozygous variant, c.164C>T (p.(Pro55Leu)), was identified in three affected ET cases (dizygotic twins and their mother). Both variants result in amino-acid substitutions of highly conserved amino-acid residues that are predicted to be deleterious and damaging by in silico analysis. In three independent families, variants predicted to affect function were also identified in other genes, including KCNS2 (KV9.2), HAPLN4 (BRAL2) and USP46. These genes are highly expressed in the cerebellum and Purkinje cells, and influence function of the gamma-amino butyric acid (GABA)-ergic system. This is in concordance with recent evidence that the pathophysiological process in ET involves cerebellar dysfunction and possibly cerebellar degeneration with a reduction in Purkinje cells, and a decrease in GABA-ergic tone.

Predicting age of onset in familial essential tremor: how much does age of onset run in families?

Background: The extent to which age of onset of essential tremor (ET) aggregates in families is unknown; hence, it is unclear whether information about the age of onset in one family member can be used to predict the age of onset in others. Methods: ET probands and relatives were enrolled in a genetic study at Columbia University. Results: Data from 26 probands and 52 relatives were analyzed. The probands’ age of onset correlated significantly with their relatives’ age of onset (r = 0.50, p = 0.001). In 57.7% of cases, the relative’s age of onset was within 10 years of the proband’s onset (i.e. a 20-year age range). The proportion of affected relatives with age at onset <20 years was 64.7% in the families of probands with onset younger than 20 years, but only 7.7% in the families of probands with onset ≥20 years (p < 0.001). There was little evidence for genetic anticipation; 9/18 (50.0%) children reported a younger age of onset than the proband. Conclusions: In families containing multiple individuals with ET, the age at onset of probands and relatives was significantly correlated. Age of onset may be most tightly linked in families in which the proband had a young age of onset.

The microtubule associated protein tau H1 haplotype and risk of essential tremor

Two recent studies investigated the association of the microtubule associated protein tau (MAPT) H1 haplotype, a known risk factor for neurodegenerative disease including progressive supranuclear palsy and Parkinsons disease (PD), with essential tremor (ET).

Early Head Tremor in Essential Tremor: A Case Series and Commentary

Background Classically, the onset of head tremor in essential tremor (ET) patients follows that of hand tremor, such that there is a somatotopic spread of involved areas. Here we present a series of seven self‐reportedly “unaffected” relatives of ET cases. These seven were clinically asymptomatic and had normal levels of arm tremor on examination, yet each evidenced a transient head wobble on examination. We estimate the prevalence of this phenotype within the two studies from which cases were ascertained. Methods ET cases and their self‐reportedly affected and unaffected relatives, enrolled in two family studies, underwent a medical history and videotaped neurological examination. Results In seven self‐reportedly “unaffected” relatives, a transient and subtle head wobble was seen, always during sustained phonation, speech, or reading aloud. Total tremor score (a measure of arm tremor) ranged from 5 to 12 (i.e., mild tremor within the range of normal). The prevalence of this phenotype of early head tremor was 3.7% in one study and 23.1% in the other. Discussion We present a series of seven individuals who had early head tremor in an evolving transition state from normal to ET. These cases raise a number of broad clinical, phenotypic, and pathophysiological issues about ET.

Effect of Primidone on Dentate Nucleus γ-Aminobutyric Acid Concentration in Patients With Essential Tremor.

ObjectivesIt is not known whether current use of the medication primidone affects brain &ggr;-aminobutyric acid (GABA) concentrations. This is an important potential confound in studies of the pathophysiology of essential tremor (ET), one of the most common neurological diseases. We compared GABA concentrations in the dentate nucleus in 6 ET patients taking primidone versus 26 ET patients not taking primidone. Methods1H magnetic resonance spectroscopy was performed using a 3.0-T Siemens Tim Trio scanner. The MEGA-PRESS J-editing sequence was used for GABA detection in 2 cerebellar volumes of interest (left and right) that included the dentate nucleus. ResultsThe right dentate GABA concentration was similar in the 2 groups (2.21 ± 0.46 [on primidone] vs 1.93 ± 0.39 [not on primidone], P = 0.15), as was the left dentate GABA concentration (1.61 ± 0.35 [on primidone] vs 1.67 ± 0.34 [not on primidone], P = 0.72). The daily primidone dose was not associated with either right or left dentate GABA concentrations (P = 0.89 and 0.76, respectively). ConclusionsWe did not find a difference in dentate GABA concentrations between 6 ET patients taking daily primidone and 26 ET patients not taking primidone. Furthermore, there was no association between daily primidone dose and dentate GABA concentration. These data suggest that it is not necessary to exclude ET patients on primidone from magnetic resonance spectroscopy studies of dentate GABA concentration, and if assessment of these concentrations was to be developed as a biomarker for ET, primidone usage would not confound interpretation of the results.

Familial Aggregation of Cranial Tremor in Familial Essential Tremor

Background: Essential tremor (ET) is often familial and phenotypic features may be shared within families. Cranial (neck, voice, and jaw) tremor is an important feature of ET. We examined whether cranial tremor aggregates in ET families, after controlling for other factors (age, tremor severity, and duration). Methods: Among ET probands and relatives enrolled in a genetic study at Columbia University (95 subjects in 28 families), we assessed the degree to which occurrence of cranial tremor in the proband predicted occurrence of cranial tremor in affected relatives. Results: Forty-five (47.4%) subjects had cranial tremor on neurological examination (probands 66.7%, relatives 39.7%). Among 28 families, 23 (82.1%) contained individuals with and individuals without cranial tremor, indicating a high degree of within-family heterogeneity. In comparison to subjects without cranial tremor, those with cranial tremor had higher total tremor scores (p < 0.001), were older (p = 0.003), and had tremor of longer duration (p = 0.01). In logistic regression models, the odds of cranial tremor in a relative were not related to occurrence of cranial tremor in the proband (p > 0.24). Conclusions: Cranial tremor did not aggregate in families with ET; the major predictor of this disease feature was tremor severity rather than presence of cranial tremor in another family member.