Oğuzhan Demirel

DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY OF CONE-BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY IN DETECTING SECONDARY CARIES UNDER COMPOSITE FILLINGS: AN IN VITRO STUDY

Purpose: The aim of this in vitro study was to assess the diagnostic performance of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) in the detection of secondary carious lesions under composite resin fillings applied to different types of cavities. Materials and Methods: Occlusal cavities (O) (n=18), occlusal cavities with mesial or distal component (MO/DO) (n=30), and mesial–occlusal–distal cavities (MOD) (n=30) were prepared in seventy eight extracted human posterior teeth. In half of the cavities in each group, artificial secondary caries lesions were simulated. All cavities were restored by using composite resin. All specimens were embedded in silicone and they were positioned to have approximal contacts. CBCT imaging was done and data were evaluated two times with two week interval by two observers, using a five-point confidence scale. Intra- and inter-observer agreements were calculated with Kappa statistics (κ). The area under (Az) the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy. Results: Intra- (κ =0.89) and inter-observer (κ = 0.79) agreements were found to be excellent. Az values were highest for the O restorations which is followed by the MOD and DO/MO restorations. Az values for MOD and DO/MO restorations were very low and no statistically significant difference was found. Sensitivity for DO/MO restorations and specificity for MOD restorations were found to be the lowest values. Conclusion: Diagnostic performance of CBCT was higher in O composite restorations than MOD and DO/MO restorations for secondary caries detection. The use of alternative imaging methods rather than CBCT may be useful for evaluating secondary caries under composite MOD and DO/MO restorations.

Idiopathic antral exostoses: Two rare cases in maxillary sinus

During routine panoramic radiographic examinations, a series of incidental findings may be observed in maxillary sinuses. One of these findings may be exostoses which are the outgrowths of compact and cancellous bone. In this case report, we represent two cases of exostosis of the maxillary sinus evaluated using cone-beam computed tomography. Although antral exostoses have no clinical importance, except if they cause obstruction of sinus ostium, their differential diagnosis must be achieved from other pathologies with similar radiographic properties such as anthroliths and osteomas.

The prevalence of antral exostoses in the maxillary sinuses, evaluated by cone-beam computed tomography

Background/purpose Exostoses are outgrowths of normal compact and cancellous bone and may occur in different locations of the jaw. Exostoses are a rare anatomic variation in the maxillary sinuses. The purpose of this study was to investigate retrospectively the prevalence of location, size, shape, and symmetry of exostoses in the maxillary sinus, and to assess the relationship between demographic variables (i.e., age and sex) via cone-beam computed tomography images. Materials and methods Cone-beam computed tomography images of 1000 patients [521 (52.1%) females and 479 (47.9%) males], aged 10–85 years (mean age, 44 years), were examined. Two investigators examined the exostoses for location (i.e., inferior wall, medial wall, lateral wall, or posterior wall of the maxillary sinuses), size, shape (i.e., broad-based or mushroom-like), and symmetry (i.e., unilateral or bilateral). The age of the patients was categorized into three groups: 10–30 years, 31–50 years, and 51+ years. The data were statistically analyzed by using chi-square test, Fishers exact test, and the t test. Results In total, 52 exostoses from 48 patients (4.8%) were identified. Exostoses were more common in females (n = 28, 58.3%) than in males (n = 20, 41.7%); however, there was no statistically significant difference between the sexes (P > 0.05). The presence of exostoses was very similar for all age groups with no statistically significant differences (P > 0.05). Conclusion Most exostoses were unilateral and on the inferior wall of the maxillary sinus. No statistically significant difference existed between the frequency and location of exostoses for sex or age groups (P > 0.05).