Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Olesya Ajnakina is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Olesya Ajnakina.


Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology | 2014

The emerging molecular architecture of schizophrenia, polygenic risk scores and the clinical implications for GxE research

Conrad Iyegbe; Desmond D. Campbell; Amy W. Butler; Olesya Ajnakina; Pak Sham

Abstract Schizophrenia is a devastating mental disorder. The level of risk in the general population is sustained by the persistence of social, environmental and biological factors, as well as their interactions. Socio-environmental risk factors for schizophrenia are well established and robust. The same can belatedly be said of genetic risk factors for the disorder. Recent progress in schizophrenia genetics is primarily fuelled by genome-wide association, which is able to leverage substantial proportions of additional explained variance previously classified as ‘missing’. Here, we provide an outline of the emerging genetic landscape of schizophrenia and demonstrate how this knowledge can be turned into a simple empirical measure of genetic risk, known as a polygenic risk score. We highlight the statistical framework used to assess the clinical potential of the new score and finally, draw relevance to and discuss the clinical implications for the study of gene–environment interaction.


Psychological Medicine | 2016

Two distinct patterns of treatment resistance: clinical predictors of treatment resistance in first-episode schizophrenia spectrum psychoses.

John Lally; Olesya Ajnakina; Marta Di Forti; Antonella Trotta; Arsime Demjaha; Anna Kolliakou; Valeria Mondelli; Tiago Reis Marques; Carmine M. Pariante; Paola Dazzan; Sukhwinder S Shergil; Oliver Howes; Athony S David; James H. MacCabe; Fiona Gaughran; Robin M. Murray

BACKGROUND Clozapine remains the only evidence-based antipsychotic for treatment-resistant schizophrenia (TRS). The ability to predict which patients with their first onset of schizophrenia would subsequently meet criteria for treatment resistance (TR) could help to diminish the severe functional disability which may ensue if TR is not recognized and correctly treated. METHOD This is a 5-year longitudinal assessment of clinical outcomes in a cohort of 246 first-episode schizophrenia spectrum patients recruited as part of the NIHR Genetics and Psychosis (GAP) study conducted in South London from 2005 to 2010. We examined the relationship between baseline demographic and clinical measures and the emergence of TR. TR status was determined from a review of electronic case records. We assessed for associations with early-, and late-onset TR, and non-TR, and differences between those TR patients treated with clozapine and those who were not. RESULTS Seventy per cent (n = 56) of TR patients, and 23% of the total study population (n = 246) were treatment resistant from illness onset. Those who met criteria for TR during the first 5 years of illness were more likely to have an early age of first contact for psychosis (<20 years) [odds ratio (OR) 2.49, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.25-4.94] compared to those with non-TR. The relationship between an early age of first contact (<20 years) and TR was significant in patients of Black ethnicity (OR 3.71, 95% CI 1.44-9.56); and patients of male gender (OR 3.13 95% CI 1.35-7.23). CONCLUSIONS For the majority of the TR group, antipsychotic TR is present from illness onset, necessitating increased consideration for the earlier use of clozapine.


Biological Psychiatry | 2017

An Examination of Polygenic Score Risk Prediction in Individuals With First-Episode Psychosis

Evangelos Vassos; Marta Di Forti; Jonathan R. I. Coleman; Conrad Iyegbe; Diana Prata; Jack Euesden; Paul F. O’Reilly; Charles Curtis; Anna Kolliakou; Hamel Patel; Stephen Newhouse; Matthew Traylor; Olesya Ajnakina; Valeria Mondelli; Tiago Reis Marques; Poonam Gardner-Sood; Katherine J. Aitchison; John Powell; Zerrin Atakan; Kathryn Greenwood; Shubulade Smith; Khalida Ismail; Carmine M. Pariante; Fiona Gaughran; Paola Dazzan; Hugh S. Markus; Anthony S. David; Cathryn M. Lewis; Robin M. Murray; Gerome Breen

BACKGROUND Polygenic risk scores (PRSs) have successfully summarized genome-wide effects of genetic variants in schizophrenia with significant predictive power. In a clinical sample of first-episode psychosis (FEP) patients, we estimated the ability of PRSs to discriminate case-control status and to predict the development of schizophrenia as opposed to other psychoses. METHODS The sample (445 case and 265 control subjects) was genotyped on the Illumina HumanCore Exome BeadChip with an additional 828 control subjects of African ancestry genotyped on the Illumina Multi-Ethnic Genotyping Array. To calculate PRSs, we used the results from the latest Psychiatric Genomics Consortium schizophrenia meta-analysis. We examined the association of PRSs with case-control status and with schizophrenia versus other psychoses in European and African ancestry FEP patients and in a second sample of 248 case subjects with chronic psychosis. RESULTS PRS had good discriminative ability of case-control status in FEP European ancestry individuals (9.4% of the variance explained, p < 10-6), but lower in individuals of African ancestry (R2 = 1.1%, p = .004). Furthermore, PRS distinguished European ancestry case subjects who went on to acquire a schizophrenia diagnosis from those who developed other psychotic disorders (R2 = 9.2%, p = .002). CONCLUSIONS PRS was a powerful predictor of case-control status in a European sample of patients with FEP, even though a large proportion did not have an established diagnosis of schizophrenia at the time of assessment. PRS was significantly different between those case subjects who developed schizophrenia from those who did not, although the discriminative accuracy may not yet be sufficient for clinical utility in FEP.


The Lancet Psychiatry | 2016

Effects of continuation, frequency, and type of cannabis use on relapse in the first 2 years after onset of psychosis: an observational study

Tabea Schoeler; Natalia Petros; Marta Di Forti; Ewa Klamerus; Enrico Foglia; Olesya Ajnakina; Charlotte Gayer-Anderson; Marco Colizzi; Diego Quattrone; Irena Behlke; Sachin Shetty; Philip McGuire; Anthony S. David; Robin M. Murray; Sagnik Bhattacharyya

BACKGROUND Although cannabis use after a first episode of psychosis has been associated with relapse, little is known about the determinants of this most preventable risk factor for relapse of psychosis. Here we aimed to study whether the effects on outcome vary depending on the type of cannabis consumed and usage pattern. METHODS In this observational study, we prospectively recruited and followed up patients aged 18-65 years who presented with their first episode of psychosis to psychiatric services in south London, London, UK. Relapse of psychosis within 2 years after onset of psychosis was defined as risk of subsequent admission to hospital. We classified patients into different patterns of cannabis use based on continuity of use after onset of psychosis, potency of cannabis consumed, and frequency of use after the onset of their illness. We used multiple regression analyses (logistic or binominal) to compare the different cannabis use groups and propensity score analysis to validate the results. FINDINGS Between April 12, 2002, and July 26, 2013, 256 patients presented with a first episode of psychosis. We did follow-up assessments for these patients until September, 2015. Simple analyses showed that former regular users of cannabis who stopped after the onset of psychosis had the most favourable illness course with regards to relapse. In multiple analysis, continued high-frequency users (ie, daily use in all 24 months) of high-potency (skunk-like) cannabis had the worst outcome, indexed as an increased risk for a subsequent relapse (odds ratio [OR] 3·28; 95% CI 1·22-9·18), more relapses (incidence rate ratio 1·77; 95% CI 0·96-3·25), fewer months until a relapse occurred (b -0·22; 95% CI -0·40 to -0·04), and more intense psychiatric care (OR 3·16; 95% CI 1·26-8·09) after the onset of psychosis. INTERPRETATION Adverse effects associated with continued use of cannabis after the onset of a first episode of psychosis depend on the specific patterns of use. Possible interventions could focus on persuading cannabis-using patients with psychosis to reduce use or shift to less potent forms of cannabis. FUNDING National Institute for Health Research (NIHR).


British Journal of Psychiatry | 2017

Remission and recovery from first-episode psychosis in adults: systematic review and meta-analysis of long-term outcome studies

John Lally; Olesya Ajnakina; Brendon Stubbs; Michael Cullinane; Kieran C. Murphy; Fiona Gaughran; Robin M. Murray

BackgroundRemission and recovery rates for people with first-episode psychosis (FEP) remain uncertain.AimsTo assess pooled prevalence rates of remission and recovery in FEP and to investigate potential moderators.MethodWe conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess pooled prevalence rates of remission and recovery in FEP in longitudinal studies with more than 1 year of follow-up data, and conducted meta-regression analyses to investigate potential moderators.ResultsSeventy-nine studies were included representing 19072 patients with FEP. The pooled rate of remission among 12301 individuals with FEP was 58% (60 studies, mean follow-up 5.5 years). Higher remission rates were moderated by studies from more recent years. The pooled prevalence of recovery among 9642 individuals with FEP was 38% (35 studies, mean follow-up 7.2 years). Recovery rates were higher in North America than in other regions.ConclusionsRemission and recovery rates in FEP may be more favourable than previously thought. We observed stability of recovery rates after the first 2 years, suggesting that a progressive deteriorating course of illness is not typical. Although remission rates have improved over time recovery rates have not, raising questions about the effectiveness of services in achieving improved recovery.


Schizophrenia Research | 2016

Substance use, medication adherence and outcome one year following a first episode of psychosis

Marco Colizzi; Elena Carra; Sara Fraietta; John Lally; Diego Quattrone; Stefania Bonaccorso; Valeria Mondelli; Olesya Ajnakina; Paola Dazzan; Antonella Trotta; Lucia Sideli; Anna Kolliakou; Fiona Gaughran; Mizanur Khondoker; Anthony S. David; Robin M. Murray; James H. MacCabe; Marta Di Forti

Both substance use and poor medication adherence are associated with poor outcome in psychosis. To clarify the contributions of substance use and poor medication adherence to poor outcome in the year following a first episode of psychosis, 205 patients were evaluated for use of tobacco, alcohol, cannabis and stimulants at their psychosis onset, and in a 1-year follow-up. Data on medication adherence and symptom remission were also collected. Patients had high rates of overall substance use before (37-65%) and after psychosis onset (45-66%). 44% showed poor medication adherence and 55% did not reach remission from psychosis. Nicotine dependence and cannabis use after psychosis onset significantly predicted both poor medication adherence and non-remission, and poor medication adherence mediated the effects of these substances on non-remission. In conclusion, medication adherence lies on the causal pathway between nicotine dependence and cannabis on the one hand and non-remission on the other.


Frontiers in Psychiatry | 2014

Role of Environmental Confounding in the Association between FKBP5 and First-Episode Psychosis.

Olesya Ajnakina; Susana Borges; Marta Di Forti; Yogen Patel; Xiaohui Xu; Priscilla Green; Simona A. Stilo; Anna Kolliakou; Poonam Sood; Tiago Reis Marques; Anthony S. David; Diana Prata; Paola Dazzan; John Powell; Carmine M. Pariante; Valeria Mondelli; Craig Morgan; Robin M. Murray; Helen L. Fisher; Conrad Iyegbe

Background: Failure to account for the etiological diversity that typically occurs in psychiatric cohorts may increase the potential for confounding as a proportion of genetic variance will be specific to exposures that have varying distributions in cases. This study investigated whether minimizing the potential for such confounding strengthened the evidence for a genetic candidate currently unsupported at the genome-wide level. Methods: Two hundred and ninety-one first-episode psychosis cases from South London, UK and 218 unaffected controls were evaluated for a functional polymorphism at the rs1360780 locus in FKBP5. The relationship between FKBP5 and psychosis was modeled using logistic regression. Cannabis use (Cannabis Experiences Questionnaire) and parental separation (Childhood Experience of Care and Abuse Questionnaire) were included as confounders in the analysis. Results: Association at rs1360780 was not detected until the effects of the two environmental factors had been adjusted for in the model (OR = 2.81, 95% CI 1.23–6.43, p = 0.02). A statistical interaction between rs1360780 and parental separation was confirmed by stratified tests (OR = 2.8, p = 0.02 vs. OR = 0.89, p = 0.80). The genetic main effect was directionally consistent with findings in other (stress-related) clinical phenotypes. Moreover, the variation in effect magnitude was explained by the level of power associated with different cannabis constructs used in the model (r = 0.95). Conclusion: Our results suggest that the extent to which genetic variants in FKBP5 can influence susceptibility to psychosis may depend on other etiological factors. This finding requires further validation in large independent cohorts. Potentially this work could have translational implications; the ability to discriminate between genetic etiologies based on a case-by-case understanding of previous environmental exposures would confer an important clinical advantage that would benefit the delivery of personalizable treatment strategies.


Schizophrenia Research | 2017

Hyperprolactinaemia in first episode psychosis - A longitudinal assessment

John Lally; Olesya Ajnakina; Brendon Stubbs; Hugh R. Williams; Marco Colizzi; Elena Carra; Sara Fraietta; Poonam Gardner-Sood; Kathryn Greenwood; Zerrin Atakan; Valeria Mondelli; Khalida Ismail; Oliver Howes; David Taylor; S. Smith; David Hopkins; Robin M. Murray; Fiona Gaughran

Little is known about hyperprolactinaemia (HPL) in first episode psychosis (FEP) patients. We investigated longitudinal changes in serum prolactin in FEP, and the relationship between HPL, and antipsychotic medication and stress. Serum prolactin was recorded in FEP patients at recruitment and again, 3 and 12months later. HPL was defined as a serum prolactin level >410mIU/L (~19.3ng/ml) for males, and a serum prolactin level >510mIU/L (~24.1ng/ml) for females. From a total of 174 people with serum prolactin measurements at study recruitment, 43% (n=74) had HPL, whilst 27% (n=21/78) and 27% (n=26/95) had HPL at 3 and 12months respectively. We observed higher serum prolactin levels in females versus males (p<0.001), and in antipsychotic treated (n=68) versus antipsychotic naïve patients (p<0.0001). Prolactin levels were consistently raised in FEP patients taking risperidone, amisulpride and FGAs compared to other antipsychotics. No significant relationship was observed between perceived stress scores (β=7.13, t=0.21, df=11, p=0.0.84 95% CI -72.91-87.16), or objective life stressors (β=-21.74, t=-0.31, df=8, p=0.77 95% CI -218.57-175.09) and serum prolactin. Our study found elevated rates of HPL over the course of the first 12months of illness. We found no evidence to support the notion that stress is related to elevated serum prolactin at the onset of psychosis.


Psychosomatic Medicine | 2017

Acetyl-l-carnitine Supplementation and the Treatment for Depressive Symptoms: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Nicola Veronese; Brendon Stubbs; Marco Solmi; Olesya Ajnakina; André F. Carvalho; Stefania Maggi

Objective Deficiency of acetyl-L-carnitine (ALC) seems to play a role in the risk of developing depression, indicating a dysregulation of fatty acid transport across the inner membrane of mitochondria. However, data about ALC supplementation in humans are limited. We thus conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis investigating the effect of ALC on depressive symptoms across randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Methods A literature search in major databases, without language restriction, was undertaken from inception until 30 December 2016. Eligible studies were RCTs of ALC alone or in combination with antidepressant medications, with a control group taking placebo/no intervention or antidepressants. Standardized mean differences (SMDs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used for summarizing outcomes with a random-effect model. Results Twelve RCTs (11 of which were ALC monotherapy) with a total of 791 participants (mean age = 54 years, % female = 65%) were included. Pooled data across nine RCTs (231 treated with ALC versus 216 treated with placebo and 20 no intervention) showed that ALC significantly reduced depressive symptoms (SMD = −1.10, 95% CI = −1.65 to −0.56, I2 = 86%). In three RCTs comparing ALC versus antidepressants (162 for each group), ALC demonstrated similar effectiveness compared with established antidepressants in reducing depressive symptoms (SMD = 0.06, 95% CI = −0.22 to 0.34, I2 = 31%). In these latter RCTs, the incidence of adverse effects was significantly lower in the ALC group than in the antidepressant group. Subgroup analyses suggested that ALC was most efficacious in older adults. Conclusions ALC supplementation significantly decreases depressive symptoms compared with placebo/no intervention, while offering a comparable effect with that of established antidepressant agents with fewer adverse effects. Future large scale trials are required to confirm/refute these findings.


BMC Psychiatry | 2017

Can cognitive insight predict symptom remission in a first episode psychosis cohort

Jennifer O’Connor; Lyn Ellett; Olesya Ajnakina; Tabea Schoeler; Anna Kollliakou; Antonella Trotta; Benjamin Wiffen; Marta Di Forti; Robin M. Murray; Sagnik Bhattacharyya; Anthony S. David

BackgroundThe outcome of first episode psychosis (FEP) is highly variable and difficult to predict. Cognitive insight measured at illness onset has previously been found to predict psychopathology 12-months later. The aims of this study were to examine whether the prospective relationship between cognitive insight and symptom severity is evident at four-years following FEP and to examine some psychological correlates of cognitive insight.MethodsFEP participants (n = 90) completed the Beck Cognitive Insight Scale (BCIS) at illness onset, and associations between BCIS scores with symptom severity outcomes (4-years after FEP) were assessed. The BCIS scales (self-reflectiveness and self-certainty) were examined as a composite score, and individually compared to other cognitive measures (IQ and jumping to conclusions (JTC) bias).ResultsRegression analyses revealed that the cognitive insight composite did not predict 4-year symptom remission in this study while the self-reflection subscale of the BCIS predicted severity of symptoms at 4-years. Self-certainty items of the BCIS were not associated with symptom severity. Significant correlations between the JTC bias, self-certainty and IQ were found, but self-reflection did not correlate with these other cognitive measures.ConclusionsSelf-reflective capacity is a more relevant and independent cognitive construct than self-certainty for predicting prospective symptom severity in psychosis. Improving self-reflection may be a useful target for early intervention research.

Collaboration


Dive into the Olesya Ajnakina's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge