Oliver Vonend

Renal sympathetic denervation in patients with treatment-resistant hypertension (The Symplicity HTN-2 Trial): a randomised controlled trial.

BACKGROUND Activation of renal sympathetic nerves is key to pathogenesis of essential hypertension. We aimed to assess effectiveness and safety of catheter-based renal denervation for reduction of blood pressure in patients with treatment-resistant hypertension. METHODS In this multicentre, prospective, randomised trial, patients who had a baseline systolic blood pressure of 160 mm Hg or more (≥150 mm Hg for patients with type 2 diabetes), despite taking three or more antihypertensive drugs, were randomly allocated in a one-to-one ratio to undergo renal denervation with previous treatment or to maintain previous treatment alone (control group) at 24 participating centres. Randomisation was done with sealed envelopes. Data analysers were not masked to treatment assignment. The primary effectiveness endpoint was change in seated office-based measurement of systolic blood pressure at 6 months. Primary analysis included all patients remaining in follow-up at 6 months. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00888433. FINDINGS 106 (56%) of 190 patients screened for eligibility were randomly allocated to renal denervation (n=52) or control (n=54) groups between June 9, 2009, and Jan 15, 2010. 49 (94%) of 52 patients who underwent renal denervation and 51 (94%) of 54 controls were assessed for the primary endpoint at 6 months. Office-based blood pressure measurements in the renal denervation group reduced by 32/12 mm Hg (SD 23/11, baseline of 178/96 mm Hg, p<0·0001), whereas they did not differ from baseline in the control group (change of 1/0 mm Hg [21/10], baseline of 178/97 mm Hg, p=0·77 systolic and p=0·83 diastolic). Between-group differences in blood pressure at 6 months were 33/11 mm Hg (p<0·0001). At 6 months, 41 (84%) of 49 patients who underwent renal denervation had a reduction in systolic blood pressure of 10 mm Hg or more, compared with 18 (35%) of 51 controls (p<0·0001). We noted no serious procedure-related or device-related complications and occurrence of adverse events did not differ between groups; one patient who had renal denervation had possible progression of an underlying atherosclerotic lesion, but required no treatment. INTERPRETATION Catheter-based renal denervation can safely be used to substantially reduce blood pressure in treatment-resistant hypertensive patients. FUNDING Ardian.

Effect of Renal Sympathetic Denervation on Glucose Metabolism in Patients With Resistant Hypertension A Pilot Study

Background— Hypertension is associated with impaired glucose metabolism and insulin resistance. Chronic activation of the sympathetic nervous system may contribute to either condition. We investigated the effect of catheter-based renal sympathetic denervation on glucose metabolism and blood pressure control in patients with resistant hypertension. Methods and Results— We enrolled 50 patients with therapy-resistant hypertension. Thirty-seven patients underwent bilateral catheter-based renal denervation, and 13 patients were assigned to a control group. Systolic and diastolic blood pressures, fasting glucose, insulin, C peptide, hemoglobin A1c, calculated insulin sensitivity (homeostasis model assessment–insulin resistance), and glucose levels during oral glucose tolerance test were measured before and 1 and 3 months after treatment. Mean office blood pressure at baseline was 178/96±3/2 mm Hg. At 1 and 3 months, office blood pressure was reduced by −28/−10 mm Hg (P<0.001) and −32/−12 mm Hg (P<0.001), respectively, in the treatment group, without changes in concurrent antihypertensive treatment. Three months after renal denervation, fasting glucose was reduced from 118±3.4 to 108±3.8 mg/dL (P=0.039). Insulin levels were decreased from 20.8±3.0 to 9.3±2.5 &mgr;IU/mL (P=0.006) and C-peptide levels from 5.3±0.6 to 3.0±0.9 ng/mL (P=0.002). After 3 months, homeostasis model assessment–insulin resistance decreased from 6.0±0.9 to 2.4±0.8 (P=0.001). Additionally, mean 2-hour glucose levels during oral glucose tolerance test were reduced significantly by 27 mg/dL (P=0.012). There were no significant changes in blood pressure or metabolic markers in the control group. Conclusions— Renal denervation improves glucose metabolism and insulin sensitivity in addition to a significantly reducing blood pressure. However, this improvement appeared to be unrelated to changes in drug treatment. This novel procedure may therefore provide protection in patients with resistant hypertension and metabolic disorders at high cardiovascular risk. Clinical Trial Registration— URL: http://www.ClinicalTrials.gov. Unique identifiers: NCT00664638 and NCT00888433.

Renal Hemodynamics and Renal Function After Catheter-Based Renal Sympathetic Denervation in Patients With Resistant Hypertension

Increased renal resistive index and urinary albumin excretion are markers of hypertensive end-organ damage and renal vasoconstriction involving increased sympathetic activity. Catheter-based sympathetic renal denervation (RD) offers a new approach to reduce renal sympathetic activity and blood pressure in resistant hypertension. The influence of RD on renal hemodynamics, renal function, and urinary albumin excretion has not been studied. One hundred consecutive patients with resistant hypertension were included in the study; 88 underwent interventional RD and 12 served as controls. Systolic, diastolic, and pulse pressure, as well renal resistive index in interlobar arteries, renal function, and urinary albumin excretion, were measured before and at 3 and 6 months of follow-up. RD reduced systolic, diastolic, and pulse pressure at 3 and 6 months by 22.7/26.6 mm Hg, 7.7/9.7 mm Hg, and 15.1/17.5 mm Hg (P for all <0.001), respectively, without significant changes in the control group. SBP reduction after 6 months correlated with SBP baseline values (r=−0.46; P<0.001). There were no renal artery stenoses, dissections, or aneurysms during 6 months of follow-up. Renal resistive index decreased from 0.691±0.01 at baseline to 0.674±0.01 and 0.670±0.01 (P=0.037/0.017) at 3- and 6-month follow-up. Mean cystatin C glomerular filtration rate and urinary albumin excretion remained unchanged after RD; however, the number of patients with microalbuminuria or macroalbuminuria decreased. RD reduced blood pressure, renal resistive index, and incidence of albuminuria without adversely affecting glomerular filtration rate or renal artery structure within 6 months and appears to be a safe and effective therapeutic approach to lower blood pressure in patients with resistant hypertension.

Ambulatory Blood Pressure Changes after Renal Sympathetic Denervation in Patients with Resistant Hypertension

Background— Catheter-based renal sympathetic denervation (RDN) reduces office blood pressure (BP) in patients with resistant hypertension according to office BP. Less is known about the effect of RDN on 24-hour BP measured by ambulatory BP monitoring and correlates of response in individuals with true or pseudoresistant hypertension. Methods and Results— A total of 346 uncontrolled hypertensive patients, separated according to daytime ambulatory BP monitoring into 303 with true resistant (office systolic BP [SBP] 172.2±22 mm Hg; 24-hour SBP 154±16.2 mm Hg) and 43 with pseudoresistant hypertension (office SBP 161.2±20.3 mm Hg; 24-hour SBP 121.1±19.6 mm Hg), from 10 centers were studied. At 3, 6, and 12 months follow-up, office SBP was reduced by 21.5/23.7/27.3 mm Hg, office diastolic BP by 8.9/9.5/11.7 mm Hg, and pulse pressure by 13.4/14.2/14.9 mm Hg (n=245/236/90; P for all <0.001), respectively. In patients with true treatment resistance there was a significant reduction with RDN in 24-hour SBP (−10.1/−10.2/−11.7 mm Hg, P<0.001), diastolic BP (−4.8/−4.9/−7.4 mm Hg, P<0.001), maximum SBP (−11.7/−10.0/−6.1 mm Hg, P<0.001) and minimum SBP (−6.0/−9.4/−13.1 mm Hg, P<0.001) at 3, 6, and 12 months, respectively. There was no effect on ambulatory BP monitoring in pseudoresistant patients, whereas office BP was reduced to a similar extent. RDN was equally effective in reducing BP in different subgroups of patients. Office SBP at baseline was the only independent correlate of BP response. Conclusions— RDN reduced office BP and improved relevant aspects of ambulatory BP monitoring, commonly linked to high cardiovascular risk, in patients with true-treatment resistant hypertension, whereas it only affected office BP in pseudoresistant hypertension. Clinical Trial Registration— URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifiers: NCT00664638 and NCT00888433.

The Adrenal Vein Sampling International Study (AVIS) for Identifying the Major Subtypes of Primary Aldosteronism

CONTEXT In patients who seek surgical cure of primary aldosteronism (PA), The Endocrine Society Guidelines recommend the use of adrenal vein sampling (AVS), which is invasive, technically challenging, difficult to interpret, and commonly held to be risky. OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to determine the complication rate of AVS and the ways in which it is performed and interpreted at major referral centers. DESIGN AND SETTINGS The Adrenal Vein Sampling International Study is an observational, retrospective, multicenter study conducted at major referral centers for endocrine hypertension worldwide. PARTICIPANTS Eligible centers were identified from those that had published on PA and/or AVS in the last decade. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE The protocols, interpretation, and costs of AVS were measured, as well as the rate of adrenal vein rupture and the rate of use of AVS. RESULTS Twenty of 24 eligible centers from Asia, Australia, North America, and Europe participated and provided information on 2604 AVS studies over a 6-yr period. The percentage of PA patients systematically submitted to AVS was 77% (median; 19-100%, range). Thirteen of the 20 centers used sequential catheterization, and seven used bilaterally simultaneous catheterization; cosyntropin stimulation was used in 11 centers. The overall rate of adrenal vein rupture was 0.61%. It correlated directly with the number of AVS performed at a particular center (P = 0.002) and inversely with the number of AVS performed by each radiologist (P = 0.007). CONCLUSIONS Despite carrying a minimal risk of adrenal vein rupture and at variance with the guidelines, AVS is not used systematically at major referral centers worldwide. These findings represent an argument for defining guidelines for this clinically important but technically demanding procedure.

Secondary rise in blood pressure after renal denervation.

In July, 2011, a 58-year-old man with type II diabetes and hypertension resistant to treatment was referred to our hospital for renal denervation. He had had hypertension for 30 years and his antihypertensive medication dose had been increased over several years. In 2001, he had a minor stroke, and in 2009, a carotid artery stent was implanted. On examination, his blood pressure was 170/90 mm Hg despite treatment with seven antihypertensive drugs (appendix). Resistant hypertension was confi rmed by 24 h ambulatory blood pressure measurement. He also had sleep apnoea which was treated with continuous positive airway pressure therapy. Aldosteronism, phaeochromocytoma, and renal artery stenosis were ruled out. Renal resistive indices (RI) on both sides were similar. Normal renal function with microalbuminuria was present. Magnetic resonance angiography (appendix) done before renal denervation showed early ramifi cation but no relevant stenosis on either side. In August, 2011, six ablations were applied on the left side (three in each branch) and six on the right side, including two at proximal superior positions 4 mm and 9 mm distal to the ostium (fi gure). Ablations were applied in a spiral pattern at a minimum distance of 5 mm. Renal artery alterations were not visible im mediately after denervation. Duplex sonography the next day did not show any abnormalities. 3 months later his blood pressure had decreased to 140/70 mm Hg. A routine follow-up duplex sonography showed turbulences and increased renal blood fl ow velocity on the right side. At this time no diff erences in RI were detectable, excluding

International expert consensus statement: Percutaneous transluminal renal denervation for the treatment of resistant hypertension.

Catheter-based radiofrequency ablation technology to disrupt both efferent and afferent renal nerves has recently been introduced to clinical medicine after the demonstration of significant systolic and diastolic blood pressure reductions. Clinical trial data available thus far have been obtained primarily in patients with resistant hypertension, defined as standardized systolic clinic blood pressure ≥ 160 mm Hg (or ≥ 150 mm Hg in patients with type 2 diabetes) despite appropriate pharmacologic treatment with at least 3 antihypertensive drugs, including a diuretic agent. Accordingly, these criteria and blood pressure thresholds should be borne in mind when selecting patients for renal nerve ablation. Secondary forms of hypertension and pseudoresistance, such as nonadherence to medication, intolerance of medication, and white coat hypertension, should have been ruled out, and 24-h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring is mandatory in this context. Because there are theoretical concerns with regard to renal safety, selected patients should have preserved renal function, with an estimated glomerular filtration rate ≥ 45 ml/min/1.73 m(2). Optimal periprocedural management of volume status and medication regimens at specialized and experienced centers equipped with adequate infrastructure to cope with potential procedural complications will minimize potential patient risks. Long-term safety and efficacy data are limited to 3 years of follow-up in small patient cohorts, so efforts to monitor treated patients are crucial to define the long-term performance of the procedure. Although renal nerve ablation could have beneficial effects in other conditions characterized by elevated renal sympathetic nerve activity, its potential use for such indications should currently be limited to formal research studies of its safety and efficacy.

Adrenal Venous Sampling Evaluation of the German Conn's Registry

In patients with primary aldosteronism, adrenal venous sampling is helpful to distinguish between unilateral and bilateral adrenal diseases. However, the procedure is technically challenging, and selective bilateral catheterization often fails. The aim of this analysis was to evaluate success rate in a retrospective analysis and compare data with procedures done prospectively after introduction of measures designed to improve rates of successful cannulation. Patients were derived from a cross-sectional study involving 5 German centers (German Conns registry). In the retrospective phase, 569 patients with primary aldosteronism were registered between 1990 and 2007, of whom 230 received adrenal venous sampling. In 200 patients there were sufficient data to evaluate the procedure. In 2008 and 2009, primary aldosteronism was diagnosed in 156 patients, and adrenal venous sampling was done in 106 and evaluated prospectively. Retrospective evaluation revealed that 31% were bilaterally selective when a selectivity index (cortisol adrenal vein/cortisol inferior vena cava) of ≥2.0 was applied. Centers completing <20 procedures had success rates between 8% and 10%. Overall success rate increased in the prospective phase from 31% to 61%. Retrospective data demonstrated the pitfalls of performing adrenal venous sampling. Even in specialized centers, success rates were poor. Marked improvements could be observed in the prospective phase. Selected centers that implemented specific measures to increase accuracy, such as rapid-cortisol-assay and introduction of standard operating procedures, reached success rates of >70%. These data demonstrate the importance of throughput, expertise, and various potentially beneficial measures to improve adrenal vein sampling.

β-Arrestin2 mediates nephrin endocytosis and impairs slit diaphragm integrity

β-Arrestins mediate internalization of plasma membrane receptors. Nephrin, a structural component of the glomerular slit diaphragm, is a single transmembrane spanning receptor and belongs to the family of adhesion molecules. Its mutation causes a hereditary nephrotic syndrome. We report the previously undescribed interaction of β-arrestin2 with the nephrin C terminus. The phosphorylation status of nephrin Y1193 regulates inversely the binding of β-arrestin2 and podocin. The Src-family member Yes, known to enhance podocin–nephrin interaction by nephrin phosphorylation, diminishes β-arrestin2–nephrin interaction. β-Arrestin2 induces nephrin endocytosis and attenuates nephrin signaling. This finding suggests that nephrin Y1193 serves as a molecular switch that determines the integrity of the slit diaphragm by functional competition between β-arrestin2 and podocin. This concept offers a molecular pathomechanism of slit diaphragm distortion and opens therapeutic avenues for glomerular diseases.

PKCα Mediates β-Arrestin2-dependent Nephrin Endocytosis in Hyperglycemia

Nephrin, the key molecule of the glomerular slit diaphragm, is expressed on the surface of podocytes and is critical in preventing albuminuria. In diabetes, hyperglycemia leads to the loss of surface expression of nephrin and causes albuminuria. Here, we report a mechanism that can explain this phenomenon: hyperglycemia directly enhances the rate of nephrin endocytosis via regulation of the β-arrestin2-nephrin interaction by PKCα. We identified PKCα and protein interacting with c kinase-1 (PICK1) as nephrin-binding proteins. Hyperglycemia induced up-regulation of PKCα and led to the formation of a complex of nephrin, PKCα, PICK1, and β-arrestin2 in vitro and in vivo. Binding of β-arrestin2 to the nephrin intracellular domain depended on phosphorylation of nephrin threonine residues 1120 and 1125 by PKCα. Further, cellular knockdown of PKCα and/or PICK1 attenuated the nephrin–β-arrestin2 interaction and abrogated the amplifying effect of high blood glucose on nephrin endocytosis. In C57BL/6 mice, hyperglycemia over 24 h caused a significant increase in urinary albumin excretion, supporting the concept of the rapid impact of hyperglycemia on glomerular permselectivity. In summary, we have provided a molecular model of hyperglycemia-induced nephrin endocytosis and subsequent proteinuria and highlighted PKCα and PICK1 as promising therapeutic targets for diabetic nephropathy.