Olivier Guipponi
Claude Bernard University Lyon 1
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Olivier Guipponi.
Neuropsychologia | 2015
Justine Cléry; Olivier Guipponi; Claire Wardak; Suliann Ben Hamed
While space is perceived as unitary, experimental evidence indicates that the brain actually contains a modular representation of space, specific cortical regions being involved in the processing of extra-personal space, that is the space that is far away from the subject and that cannot be directly acted upon by the body, while other cortical regions process peripersonal space, that is the space that directly surrounds us and which we can act upon. In the present review, we focus on non-human primate research and we review the single cells, areal and cortical functional network mechanisms that are proposed to underlie extrapersonal and peripersonal space representations. Importantly, the current dominant framework for the study of peripersonal space is centered on the key notion that actions and specifically arm and hand-related actions, shape cortical peripersonal space representations. In the present review, we propose to enlarge this framework to include other variables that have the potential to shape peripersonal space representations, namely emotional and social information. In the initial section of the manuscript, we thus first provide an extensive up-to-date review of the low level sensory and oculomotor signals that contribute to the construction of a core cortical far and near space representation, in key parietal, premotor and prefrontal periarcuate cortical regions. We then highlight the key functional properties that are needed to encode peripersonal space and we narrow down our discussion to the specific parietal and periarcuate areas that share these properties: the parieto-premotor peripersonal space network and the parieto-premotor network for grasping. Last, we review evidence for a changing peripersonal space representation. While plastic changes in peripersonal space representation have been described during tool use and their underlying neural bases have been well characterized, the description of dynamical changes in peripersonal space representation as a function of the emotional or social context is quite novel and relies on behavioral human studies. The neural bases of such a dynamic adjustments of peripersonal space coding are yet unknown. We thus review these novel observations and we discuss their putative underlying neural bases.
The Journal of Neuroscience | 2013
Olivier Guipponi; Claire Wardak; Danielle Ibarrola; Jean-Christophe Comte; Dominique Sappey-Marinier; Serge Pinède; Suliann Ben Hamed
The parietal cortex is highly multimodal and plays a key role in the processing of objects and actions in space, both in human and nonhuman primates. Despite the accumulated knowledge in both species, we lack the following: (1) a general description of the multisensory convergence in this cortical region to situate sparser lesion and electrophysiological recording studies; and (2) a way to compare and extrapolate monkey data to human results. Here, we use functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) in the monkey to provide a bridge between human and monkey studies. We focus on the intraparietal sulcus (IPS) and specifically probe its involvement in the processing of visual, tactile, and auditory moving stimuli around and toward the face. We describe three major findings: (1) the visual and tactile modalities are strongly represented and activate mostly nonoverlapping sectors within the IPS. The visual domain occupies its posterior two-thirds and the tactile modality its anterior one-third. The auditory modality is much less represented, mostly on the medial IPS bank. (2) Processing of the movement component of sensory stimuli is specific to the fundus of the IPS and coincides with the anatomical definition of monkey ventral intraparietal area (VIP). (3) A cortical sector within VIP processes movement around and toward the face independently of the sensory modality. This amodal representation of movement may be a key component in the construction of peripersonal space. Overall, our observations highlight strong homologies between macaque and human VIP organization.
Cerebral Cortex | 2015
Olivier Guipponi; Soline Odouard; Serge Pinède; Claire Wardak; Suliann Ben Hamed
Eyeblinks are defined as a rapid closing and opening of the eyelid. Three types of blinks are defined: spontaneous, reflexive, and voluntary. Here, we focus on the cortical correlates of spontaneous blinks, using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) in the nonhuman primate. Our observations reveal an ensemble of cortical regions processing the somatosensory, proprioceptive, peripheral visual, and possibly nociceptive consequences of blinks. These observations indicate that spontaneous blinks have consequences on the brain beyond the visual cortex, possibly contaminating fMRI protocols that generate in the participants heterogeneous blink behaviors. This is especially the case when these protocols induce (nonunusual) eye fatigue and corneal dryness due to demanding fixation requirements, as is the case here. Importantly, no blink related activations were observed in the prefrontal and parietal blinks motor command areas nor in the prefrontal, parietal, and medial temporal blink suppression areas. This indicates that the absence of activation in these areas is not a signature of the absence of blink contamination in the data. While these observations increase our understanding of the neural bases of spontaneous blinks, they also strongly call for new criteria to identify whether fMRI recordings are contaminated by a heterogeneous blink behavior or not.
NeuroImage | 2015
Olivier Guipponi; Justine Cléry; Soline Odouard; Claire Wardak; Suliann Ben Hamed
The proposal that sensory processing is achieved in segregated anatomical pathways has been profoundly revisited following the description of cross-modal anatomical connections both at higher and at lower processing levels. However, an understanding of the cortical extent of these long range cross-modal functional influences has been missing. Here, we use functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to map, in the non-human primate brain, the cortical regions which are activated by both visual and tactile stimulations. We describe an unprecedented pattern of functional visuo-tactile convergence, encompassing both low-level visual and somatosensory areas and multiple higher-order associative areas. We also show that the profile of this convergence depends on the physical properties of the mapping stimuli, indicating that visuo-tactile convergence is most probably even more prevailing than what we actually describe. Overall, these observations substantiate the view that the brain is massively multisensory.
European Journal of Neuroscience | 2012
Claire Wardak; Stephen Ramanoël; Olivier Guipponi; Philippe Boulinguez; Suliann Ben Hamed
The goal of executive control is to adjust our behaviour to the environment. It involves not only the continuous planning and adaptation of actions but also the inhibition of inappropriate movements. Recently, a proactive form of inhibitory control has been shown, demonstrating that actions can be withheld, in an uncertain environment, thanks to the proactive locking of the mechanism by which motor commands are triggered (e.g. while waiting at traffic lights in a dense pedestrian zone, one will refrain in anticipation of a brisk acceleration when the green light comes on). However, little is known about this executive function and it remains unclear whether the overall amount of inhibitory control can be modulated as a function of the context. Here, we show that the level of this control varies parametrically as a function of the exogenous and endogenous factors setting the task context. We also show that the level of implemented proactive inhibitory control is dynamically readjusted to match the implicit temporal structure of the environment. These observations are discussed in relation to possible underlying functional substrates and related neurological and psychiatric pathologies.
The Journal of Neuroscience | 2017
Justine Cléry; Olivier Guipponi; Soline Odouard; Serge Pinède; Claire Wardak; Suliann Ben Hamed
In the jungle, survival is highly correlated with the ability to detect and distinguish between an approaching predator and a putative prey. From an ecological perspective, a predator rapidly approaching its prey is a stronger cue for flight than a slowly moving predator. In the present study, we use functional magnetic resonance imaging in the nonhuman primate, to investigate the neural bases of the prediction of an impact to the body by a looming stimulus, i.e., the neural bases of the interaction between a dynamic visual stimulus approaching the body and its expected consequences onto an independent sensory modality, namely, touch. We identify a core cortical network of occipital, parietal, premotor, and prefrontal areas maximally activated by tactile stimulations presented at the predicted time and location of impact of the looming stimulus on the faces compared with the activations observed for spatially or temporally incongruent tactile and dynamic visual cues. These activations reflect both an active integration of visual and tactile information and of spatial and temporal prediction information. The identified cortical network coincides with a well described multisensory visuotactile convergence and integration network suggested to play a key role in the definition of peripersonal space. These observations are discussed in the context of multisensory integration and spatial, temporal prediction and Bayesian causal inference. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT Looming stimuli have a particular ecological relevance as they are expected to come into contact with the body, evoking touch or pain sensations and possibly triggering an approach or escape behavior depending on their identity. Here, we identify the nonhuman primate functional network that is maximally activated by tactile stimulations presented at the predicted time and location of impact of the looming stimulus. Our findings suggest that the integration of spatial and temporal predictive cues possibly rely on the same neural mechanisms that are involved in multisensory integration.
NeuroImage | 2018
Justine Cléry; Olivier Guipponi; Soline Odouard; Claire Wardak; Suliann Ben Hamed
ABSTRACT While extra‐personal space is often erroneously considered as a unique entity, early neuropsychological studies report a dissociation between near and far space processing both in humans and in monkeys. Here, we use functional MRI in a naturalistic 3D environment to describe the non‐human primate near and far space cortical networks. We describe the co‐occurrence of two extended functional networks respectively dedicated to near and far space processing. Specifically, far space processing involves occipital, temporal, parietal, posterior cingulate as well as orbitofrontal regions not activated by near space, possibly subserving the processing of the shape and identity of objects. In contrast, near space processing involves temporal, parietal, prefrontal and premotor regions not activated by far space, possibly subserving the preparation of an arm/hand mediated action in this proximal space. Interestingly, this network also involves somatosensory regions, suggesting a cross‐modal anticipation of touch by a nearby object. Last, we also describe cortical regions that process both far and near space with a preference for one or the other. This suggests a continuous encoding of relative distance to the body, in the form of a far‐to‐near gradient. We propose that these cortical gradients in space representation subserve the physically delineable peripersonal spaces described in numerous psychology and psychophysics studies. HIGHLIGHTSNear space processing involves temporal, parietal, prefrontal & premotor regions.Far space activates occipital, temporal, parietal, cingulate & orbitofrontal areas.Most regions process both far & near space, with a preference for one or the other.Far‐to‐near gradient may subserve behavioral changes in peripersonal space size.
Journal of Neurophysiology | 2018
Justine Cléry; Céline Amiez; Olivier Guipponi; Claire Wardak; Emmanuel Procyk; Suliann Ben Hamed
Several premotor areas have been identified within primate cingulate cortex; however their function is yet to be uncovered. Recent brain imaging work in humans revealed a topographic anatomofunctional overlap between feedback processing during exploratory behaviors and the corresponding body fields in the rostral cingulate motor area (RCZa), suggesting an embodied representation of feedback. In particular, a face field in RCZa processes juice feedback. Here we tested an extension of the embodied principle in which unexpected or relevant information obtained through the eye or the face would be processed by face fields in cingulate motor areas, and whether this applied to monkey cingulate cortex. We show that activations for juice reward, eye movement, eye blink, and tactile stimulation on the face overlap over two subfields within the cingulate sulcus likely corresponding to the rostral and caudal cingulate motor areas. This suggests that in monkeys as is the case in humans, behaviorally relevant information is processed through multiple cingulate body/effector maps. NEW & NOTEWORTHY What is the role of cingulate motor areas? In this study we observed in monkeys that, as in humans, neural responses to face-related events, juice reward, eye movement, eye blink, and tactile stimulations, clustered redundantly in two separate cingulate subfields. This suggests that behaviorally relevant information is processed by multiple cingulate effector maps. Importantly, this overlap supports the principle that the cingulate cortex processes feedback based on where it is experienced on the body.
The Journal of Neuroscience | 2015
Justine Cléry; Olivier Guipponi; Soline Odouard; Claire Wardak; Suliann Ben Hamed
Archive | 2015
Olivier Guipponi; Soline Odouard; Serge Pinède; Claire Wardak; Suliann Ben Hamed; Ben Hamed