Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Ondřej Májek is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Ondřej Májek.


Human Reproduction Update | 2011

Tubal ligation and the risk of ovarian cancer: review and meta-analysis

David Cibula; Martin Widschwendter; Ondřej Májek; Ladislav Dušek

BACKGROUND The reduction of ovarian cancer (OC) risk in women with a history of tubal ligation (TL) has been reported repeatedly, mostly on small populations. We have aimed to provide a critical overview of the studies available to date and to conduct a meta-analysis. METHODS There were 40 relevant studies identified. The studies were divided into two groups for strict and extended meta-analysis, respectively. Subgroup analysis was performed for age, time dependency since TL, histological types of OC and BReast CAncer (BRCA) mutation. RESULTS Meta-analysis of 13 strictly selected studies showed a reduced risk of epithelial OC by 34%. The protective effect of TL was confirmed even in a subgroup of women 10-14 years after the procedure. The risk reduction was confirmed for the endometrioid (RR = 0.40) and serous (RR = 0.73) cancers but not for mucinous. CONCLUSIONS The review of relevant articles, as well as the meta-analysis of selected studies, yields consistent data on a significant reduction of OC risk in women who had undergone TL. The results of this meta-analysis should provide an impulse for further research on the etiology of ovarian epithelial cancers, focusing particularly on the importance of retrograde transport of endometrial cells.


PLOS ONE | 2010

Increasing Incidence of Geomyces destructans Fungus in Bats from the Czech Republic and Slovakia

Natália Martínková; Peter Bačkor; Tomáš Bartonička; Pavla Blažková; Jaroslav Červený; Lukáš Falteisek; Jiří Gaisler; Vladimír Hanzal; Daniel Horáček; Zdeněk Hubálek; Helena Jahelková; Miroslav Kolařík; L'uboš Korytár; Alena Kubátová; Blanka Lehotská; Roman Lehotský; Radek Lučan; Ondřej Májek; Jan Matějů; Zdeněk Řehák; Jiří Šafář; Přemysl Tájek; Emil Tkadlec; Marcel Uhrin; Josef Wagner; Dita Weinfurtová; Jan Zima; Jan Zukal; Ivan Horáček

Background White-nose syndrome is a disease of hibernating insectivorous bats associated with the fungus Geomyces destructans. It first appeared in North America in 2006, where over a million bats died since then. In Europe, G. destructans was first identified in France in 2009. Its distribution, infection dynamics, and effects on hibernating bats in Europe are largely unknown. Methodology/Principal Findings We screened hibernacula in the Czech Republic and Slovakia for the presence of the fungus during the winter seasons of 2008/2009 and 2009/2010. In winter 2009/2010, we found infected bats in 76 out of 98 surveyed sites, in which the majority had been previously negative. A photographic record of over 6000 hibernating bats, taken since 1994, revealed bats with fungal growths since 1995; however, the incidence of such bats increased in Myotis myotis from 2% in 2007 to 14% by 2010. Microscopic, cultivation and molecular genetic evaluations confirmed the identity of the recently sampled fungus as G. destructans, and demonstrated its continuous distribution in the studied area. At the end of the hibernation season we recorded pathologic changes in the skin of the affected bats, from which the fungus was isolated. We registered no mass mortality caused by the fungus, and the recorded population decline in the last two years of the most affected species, M. myotis, is within the population trend prediction interval. Conclusions/Significance G. destructans was found to be widespread in the Czech Republic and Slovakia, with an epizootic incidence in bats during the most recent years. Further development of the situation urgently requires a detailed pan-European monitoring scheme.


British Journal of Cancer | 2012

Survival from colorectal cancer in Germany in the early 21st century

Ondřej Májek; A. Gondos; Lina Jansen; K. Emrich; B. Holleczek; A. Katalinic; A. Nennecke; A. Eberle; H Brenner

Background:Colorectal cancer is the most common cancer in Germany and the second most common cause of cancer-related deaths in both men and women. The aim of this study is to provide detailed analysis of recent developments in survival of colorectal cancer patients using newly available data on a national basis.Methods:We included data from 11 German cancer registries covering a population of 33 million inhabitants. Period analysis and modelled period analysis were used to provide most up-to-date estimates of 5-year relative survival in 2002–2006.Results:The analysis was based on records of 164 996 colorectal cancer patients. Five-year relative survival was 63.0% overall, decreased with age and was significantly higher among women than among men in patients under 75 years. Overall age-adjusted 5-year relative survival increased from 60.6 to 65.0% over the period 2002–2006. Significant increase in survival was only observed in patients with localised or regional disease. Highest subsite-specific survival was observed in patients with cancer in descending (67.7%) and ascending (66.5%) colon.Conclusion:Survival of patients with colorectal cancer continued to increase in the early 21st century in Germany, with 5-year relative survival reaching 65% in 2006. However, lack of progress still persisted in patients with advanced disease.


European Journal of Cancer | 2014

Variation in detection of ductal carcinoma in situ during screening mammography: a survey within the International Cancer Screening Network

Elsebeth Lynge; Antonio Ponti; Ted A. James; Ondřej Májek; My von Euler-Chelpin; Ahti Anttila; Patricia Fitzpatrick; Alfonso Frigerio; Masaaki Kawai; Astrid Scharpantgen; Mireille J. M. Broeders; Solveig Hofvind; Carmen Vidal; María Ederra; Dolores Salas; Jean-Luc Bulliard; Mariano Tomatis; Karla Kerlikowske; Stephen H. Taplin

BACKGROUND There is concern about detection of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) in screening mammography. DCIS accounts for a substantial proportion of screen-detected lesions but its effect on breast cancer mortality is debated. The International Cancer Screening Network conducted a comparative analysis to determine variation in DCIS detection. PATIENTS AND METHODS Data were collected during 2004-2008 on number of screening examinations, detected breast cancers, DCIS cases and Globocan 2008 breast cancer incidence rates derived from national or regional cancer registers. We calculated screen-detection rates for breast cancers and DCIS. RESULTS Data were obtained from 15 screening settings in 12 countries; 7,176,050 screening examinations; 29,605 breast cancers and 5324 DCIS cases. The ratio between highest and lowest breast cancer incidence was 2.88 (95% confidence interval (CI) 2.76-3.00); 2.97 (95% CI 2.51-3.51) for detection of breast cancer; and 3.49 (95% CI 2.70-4.51) for detection of DCIS. CONCLUSIONS Considerable international variation was found in DCIS detection. This variation could not be fully explained by variation in incidence nor in breast cancer detection rates. It suggests the potential for wide discrepancies in management of DCIS resulting in overtreatment of indolent DCIS or undertreatment of potentially curable disease. Comprehensive cancer registration is needed to monitor DCIS detection. Efforts to understand discrepancies and standardise management may improve care.


European Journal of Cancer | 2014

International variation in management of screen-detected ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast

Antonio Ponti; Elsebeth Lynge; Ted A. James; Ondřej Májek; My von Euler-Chelpin; Ahti Anttila; Patricia Fitzpatrick; Maria Piera Mano; Masaaki Kawai; Astrid Scharpantgen; Jacques Fracheboud; Solveig Hofvind; Carmen Vidal; Nieves Ascunce; Dolores Salas; Jean-Luc Bulliard; Nereo Segnan; Karla Kerlikowske; Stephen H. Taplin

BACKGROUND Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) incidence has grown with the implementation of screening and its detection varies across International Cancer Screening Network (ICSN) countries. The aim of this survey is to describe the management of screen-detected DCIS in ICSN countries and to evaluate the potential for treatment related morbidity. METHODS We sought screen-detected DCIS data from the ICSN countries identified during 2004-2008. We adopted standardised data collection forms and analysis and explored DCIS diagnosis and treatment processes ranging from pre-operative diagnosis to type of surgery and radiotherapy. RESULTS Twelve countries contributed data from a total of 15 screening programmes, all from Europe except the United States of America and Japan. Among women aged 50-69 years, 7,176,050 screening tests and 5324 screen-detected DCIS were reported. From 21% to 93% of DCIS had a pre-operative diagnosis (PO); 67-90% of DCIS received breast conservation surgery (BCS), and in 41-100% of the cases this was followed by radiotherapy; 6.4-59% received sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) only and 0.8-49% axillary dissection (ALND) with 0.6% (range by programmes 0-8.1%) being node positive. Among BCS patients 35% received SLNB only and 4.8% received ALND. Starting in 2006, PO and SLNB use increased while ALND remained stable. SLNB and ALND were associated with larger size and higher grade DCIS lesions. CONCLUSIONS Variation in DCIS management among screened women is wide and includes lymph node surgery beyond what is currently recommended. This indicates the presence of varying levels of overtreatment and the potential for its reduction.


Cancer Epidemiology | 2014

Trends in stage-specific population-based survival of cancer patients in the Czech Republic in the period 2000-2008

Tomáš Pavlík; Ondřej Májek; Tomáš Büchler; Rostislav Vyzula; Jiří Petera; Miroslav Ryska; Aleš Ryška; David Cibula; Marko Babjuk; Jitka Abrahámová; Jiří Vorlíček; Jan Mužík; Ladislav Dušek

BACKGROUND The objective of this study was to assess trends in overall and in stage-specific 5-year relative survival rates of the Czech cancer patients between periods 2000-2004 and 2005-2008. METHODS All Czech cancer patients diagnosed between 1995 and 2008 were included in the analysis. Period analysis was employed to calculate 5-year relative survival for 21 cancers. RESULTS Significant improvements in crude 5-year relative survival for 14 of 21 assessed types of cancer, including the most frequent diagnoses, such as, colorectal, prostate, breast, lung, kidney, pancreatic, and bladder cancer and melanoma, were identified. Moreover, in case of colorectal, lung, and prostate cancer, improvement in stage-specific 5-year relative survival was confirmed as statistically significant for all clinical stages. No diagnosis showed significant decrease in the 5-year relative survival. However, the 5-year relative survival remained poor in patients with metastatic cancers at diagnosis, particularly in case of liver, pancreatic, lung, and oesophageal cancer. CONCLUSIONS The cancer-specific outcomes in the Czech Republic are improving. Nevertheless, despite the overall significant improvement in 5-year relative survival of most of the cancer diagnoses, the high proportion of patients primarily diagnosed with metastatic cancer still represents a substantial challenge for prevention and early detection.


BMC Public Health | 2012

Estimating the number of colorectal cancer patients treated with anti-tumour therapy in 2015: the analysis of the Czech National Cancer Registry

Tomáš Pavlík; Ondřej Májek; Jan Mužík; Jana Koptíková; Lubomír Slavíček; Jindřich Fínek; David Feltl; Rostislav Vyzula; Ladislav Dušek

BackgroundColorectal cancer (CRC) represents a serious health care problem in the Czech Republic, introducing a need for a prospective modelling of the incidence and prevalence rates. The prevalence of patients requiring anti-tumour therapy is also of great importance, as it is directly associated with planning of health care resources.MethodsThis work proposes a population-based model for the estimation of stage-specific prevalence of CRC patients who will require active anti-tumour therapy in a given year. Its applicability is documented on records of the Czech National Cancer Registry (CNCR), which is used to estimate the number of patients potentially treated with anti-tumour therapy in the Czech Republic in 2015.ResultsSeveral scenarios are adopted to cover the plausible development of the incidence and survival rates, and the probability of an anti-tumour therapy initiation. Based on the scenarios, the model predicts an increase in CRC prevalence from 13% to 30% in comparison with the situation in 2008. Moreover, the model predicts that 10,074 to 11,440 CRC patients will be indicated for anti-tumour therapy in the Czech Republic in 2015. Considering all patients with terminal cancer recurrence and all patients primarily diagnosed in stage IV, it is predicted that 3,485 to 4,469 CRC patients will be treated for the metastatic disease in 2015, which accounts for more than one third (34-40%) of all CRC patients treated this year.ConclusionsA new model for the estimation of the number of CRC patients requiring active anti-tumour therapy is proposed in this paper. The model respects the clinical stage as the primary stratification factor and utilizes solely the population-based cancer registry data. Thus, no specific hospital data records are needed in the proposed approach. Regarding the short-term prediction of the CRC burden in the Czech Republic, the model confirms a continuous increase in the burden that must be accounted for in the future planning of health care in the Czech Republic.


European Journal of Public Health | 2018

The legal framework for European cervical cancer screening programmes

Ondřej Májek; Ahti Anttila; Marc Arbyn; Evert-Ben van Veen; Birgit Engesæter; Stefan Lönnberg

BACKGROUND A comprehensive legal framework needs to be developed to run the health services and to regulate the information systems required to manage and to ensure the quality of cancer screening programmes. The aim of our study was to document and to compare the status of legal basis for cervical screening registration in European countries. METHODS An electronic questionnaire including questions on governance, decision-making structures and legal framework was developed. The primary responses were collected by September 2016. RESULTS We sent the questionnaire to representatives of 35 European countries (28 countries of the EU, with the United Kingdom included as 4 countries; 4 EFTA member countries: Iceland, Liechtenstein, Norway, and Switzerland); responses were collected from 33 countries. The legal framework makes it possible to personally invite individuals in 29 countries (88%). Systematic screening registration in an electronic registry is legally enshrined in 23 countries (70%). Individual linkage of records between screening and cancer registries is allowed in 19 of those countries. Linkage studies involving cancer and screening registries have been conducted in 15 countries. CONCLUSION Although the majority of EU/EFTA countries have implemented population-based screening, only half of them have successfully performed record linkage studies, which are nevertheless a key recommendation for quality assurance of the entire screening process. The European legislation is open to the possibility of using health data for these purposes; however, member states themselves must recognize the public interest to create a legal basis, which would enable all the necessary functions for high-quality cancer screening programmes.


European Journal of Cancer Prevention | 2017

Performance indicators in a newly established organized cervical screening programme: registry-based analysis in the Czech Republic

Ondřej Májek; Jaroslava Dušková; Vladimír Dvořák; Alena Beková; Daniel Klimeš; Milan Blaha; Ahti Anttila; Ladislav Dušek

In 2008, the organized Czech National Cervical Cancer Screening Programme (CNCCSP) was initiated by transformation of the existing opportunistic efforts. The aim of our study was to examine recent cervical cancer burden trends and to assess the quality of the Czech National Cervical Cancer Screening Programme using a set of standard performance indicators. Our study utilized data from the national Cervical Cancer Screening Registry and the Czech National Cancer Registry. We computed internationally accepted indicators and assessed time trends and variability among screening centres. Between 1995 and 2011, the incidence of age-standardized cervical cancer decreased by 21% (1023 cases in 2011), and the mortality decreased by 35% (399 deaths in 2011). The annual coverage of the target population by cervical screening increased to 56% in 2013 (as compared with 35% in 2001). If we consider a 2-year interval (2012–2013), the estimated coverage was 77%. Over two million women underwent screening in 2013; 96% of them had a negative result. About 0.2% of smears showed cytological signs of a high-grade intraepithelial lesion or a malignancy, and the estimated positive predictive value for advanced intraepithelial neoplasia (cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2+) was 79.6%. However, performance indicators show considerable heterogeneity between screening centres. The reported values of performance indicators are in line with the results of programmes that have previously been shown to be successful in terms of decreasing the cervical cancer burden, and are promising with respect to an even more pronounced decrease in cervical cancer mortality in the near future, provided that continuous quality improvement can be maintained. Linkage studies between screening, cancer and cause-of-death registers can provide further information on screening effectiveness and validity issues.


Value in Health | 2009

PCN160 MODELLING NUMBER OF CANCER PATIENTS POTENTIALLY TREATED WITH TARGETED PHARMACOTHERAPY IN THE CZECH REPUBLIC

Tomáš Pavlík; Ladislav Dušek; Ondřej Májek; Jana Koptíková; Rostislav Vyzula; Jindřich Fínek

other countries. RESULTS: In terms of price cuts, the new PPRS is a continuation of previous schemes encompassing a 6–7% reduction. Price modulation and profit controls remained unchanged. However, flexible pricing, which encourages companies to initially set lower prices to gain approval and increases prices as more evidence of effectiveness emerges, has been introduced. The most important difference concerns the introduction of PASs, which build on the idea of risk-sharing. Velcade and Lucentis provide useful examples of different approaches: the former defining risk in terms of “patient response” (outcomes-based) and the latter according to treatment utilisation (financial-based). Both schemes continue to be active. CONCLUSIONS: The new PPRS signifies an important shift in the UK policy framework. The introduction of PASs raises issues about scheme implementation and how risk should be measured and tracked overtime. The progress of this initiative will shape the renegotiation of the next PPRS and the setting of future priorities. However, it is likely that “value-based pricing”—however defined and understood—will continue to gain momentum.

Collaboration


Dive into the Ondřej Májek's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Štěpán Suchánek

Charles University in Prague

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Miroslav Zavoral

Charles University in Prague

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Jan Daneš

Charles University in Prague

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Bohumil Seifert

Charles University in Prague

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge