Otto Hudecz

Systematic Analysis of Human Protein Complexes Identifies Chromosome Segregation Proteins

Division Machinery Tagged An international consortium of labs has been testing the feasibility of large-scale screening for insights into the function of mammalian proteins by expressing a tagged version of proteins from bacterial artificial chromosomes harbored in mammalian cells. Depending on the tag used, Hutchins et al. (p. 593, published online 1 April) were able to monitor localization of tagged proteins by microscopy or to isolate interacting proteins and subsequently identify the binding partners by mass spectrometry. Applying the technology to proteins implicated in control of cell division revealed about 100 protein machines required for mitosis. A strategy designed to decipher the function of proteins identified in RNA interference screens reveals new insights into mitosis. Chromosome segregation and cell division are essential, highly ordered processes that depend on numerous protein complexes. Results from recent RNA interference screens indicate that the identity and composition of these protein complexes is incompletely understood. Using gene tagging on bacterial artificial chromosomes, protein localization, and tandem-affinity purification–mass spectrometry, the MitoCheck consortium has analyzed about 100 human protein complexes, many of which had not or had only incompletely been characterized. This work has led to the discovery of previously unknown, evolutionarily conserved subunits of the anaphase-promoting complex and the γ-tubulin ring complex—large complexes that are essential for spindle assembly and chromosome segregation. The approaches we describe here are generally applicable to high-throughput follow-up analyses of phenotypic screens in mammalian cells.

Systematic Localization and Purification of Human Protein Complexes Identifies Chromosome Segregation Proteins

Division Machinery Tagged An international consortium of labs has been testing the feasibility of large-scale screening for insights into the function of mammalian proteins by expressing a tagged version of proteins from bacterial artificial chromosomes harbored in mammalian cells. Depending on the tag used, Hutchins et al. (p. 593, published online 1 April) were able to monitor localization of tagged proteins by microscopy or to isolate interacting proteins and subsequently identify the binding partners by mass spectrometry. Applying the technology to proteins implicated in control of cell division revealed about 100 protein machines required for mitosis. A strategy designed to decipher the function of proteins identified in RNA interference screens reveals new insights into mitosis. Chromosome segregation and cell division are essential, highly ordered processes that depend on numerous protein complexes. Results from recent RNA interference screens indicate that the identity and composition of these protein complexes is incompletely understood. Using gene tagging on bacterial artificial chromosomes, protein localization, and tandem-affinity purification–mass spectrometry, the MitoCheck consortium has analyzed about 100 human protein complexes, many of which had not or had only incompletely been characterized. This work has led to the discovery of previously unknown, evolutionarily conserved subunits of the anaphase-promoting complex and the γ-tubulin ring complex—large complexes that are essential for spindle assembly and chromosome segregation. The approaches we describe here are generally applicable to high-throughput follow-up analyses of phenotypic screens in mammalian cells.

Live-cell imaging RNAi screen identifies PP2A–B55α and importin-β1 as key mitotic exit regulators in human cells

When vertebrate cells exit mitosis various cellular structures are re-organized to build functional interphase cells. This depends on Cdk1 (cyclin dependent kinase 1) inactivation and subsequent dephosphorylation of its substrates. Members of the protein phosphatase 1 and 2A (PP1 and PP2A) families can dephosphorylate Cdk1 substrates in biochemical extracts during mitotic exit, but how this relates to postmitotic reassembly of interphase structures in intact cells is not known. Here, we use a live-cell imaging assay and RNAi knockdown to screen a genome-wide library of protein phosphatases for mitotic exit functions in human cells. We identify a trimeric PP2A–B55α complex as a key factor in mitotic spindle breakdown and postmitotic reassembly of the nuclear envelope, Golgi apparatus and decondensed chromatin. Using a chemically induced mitotic exit assay, we find that PP2A–B55α functions downstream of Cdk1 inactivation. PP2A–B55α isolated from mitotic cells had reduced phosphatase activity towards the Cdk1 substrate, histone H1, and was hyper-phosphorylated on all subunits. Mitotic PP2A complexes co-purified with the nuclear transport factor importin-β1, and RNAi depletion of importin-β1 delayed mitotic exit synergistically with PP2A–B55α. This demonstrates that PP2A–B55α and importin-β1 cooperate in the regulation of postmitotic assembly mechanisms in human cells.

Spatial Exclusivity Combined with Positive and Negative Selection of Phosphorylation Motifs Is the Basis for Context-Dependent Mitotic Signaling

Mitotic kinases that localize to the same compartment show negative selectivity for residues in each other’s recognition motifs. Motifs and Antimotifs Mitosis is a complex process controlled by multiple kinases, such as the cyclin-dependent kinase Cdk1/cyclin B, the Aurora kinases Aurora A and B, the kinase Nek2, and the Polo-like kinases, especially Plk1 (Polo-like kinase 1). Alexander et al. used in vitro assays and a peptide library screening method to refine the phosphorylation site selectivity of each of these kinases and found that those that were located in similar compartments within the cell during mitosis showed a strong negative selection for residues that were positively selected by other kinases in the same compartment. In contrast, those that were located in distinct compartments tended to recognize similar phosphorylation site motifs. These results led the authors to propose that mitotic kinase selectivity is determined by two factors—spatial exclusivity and “antimotif” specificity. The timing and localization of events during mitosis are controlled by the regulated phosphorylation of proteins by the mitotic kinases, which include Aurora A, Aurora B, Nek2 (never in mitosis kinase 2), Plk1 (Polo-like kinase 1), and the cyclin-dependent kinase complex Cdk1/cyclin B. Although mitotic kinases can have overlapping subcellular localizations, each kinase appears to phosphorylate its substrates on distinct sites. To gain insight into the relative importance of local sequence context in kinase selectivity, identify previously unknown substrates of these five mitotic kinases, and explore potential mechanisms for substrate discrimination, we determined the optimal substrate motifs of these major mitotic kinases by positional scanning oriented peptide library screening (PS-OPLS). We verified individual motifs with in vitro peptide kinetic studies and used structural modeling to rationalize the kinase-specific selection of key motif-determining residues at the molecular level. Cross comparisons among the phosphorylation site selectivity motifs of these kinases revealed an evolutionarily conserved mutual exclusion mechanism in which the positively and negatively selected portions of the phosphorylation motifs of mitotic kinases, together with their subcellular localizations, result in proper substrate targeting in a coordinated manner during mitosis.

Systematic Phosphorylation Analysis of Human Mitotic Protein Complexes

Analysis of the phosphorylation of mitotic protein complexes suggests that specific members of the complexes relay regulatory signals to these molecular machines. Regulating Mitotic Machines Most proteins do not function in isolation; they are part of large macromolecular complexes. Hegemann et al. used information available about the protein complexes involved in mitosis and then performed mass spectrometry to determine the phosphoproteome of these mitotic machines. Certain proteins in each complex were phosphorylated at many more sites than other proteins in the complex and thus may represent master regulators of the activities of these mitotic machines. Experiments with specific inhibitors of Polo-like kinase 1 and Aurora kinase B enabled the identification of specific targets of these mitotic kinases, providing insight into the mechanism by which these two kinases regulate the activity of mitotic complexes to control progression through the complicated process of cell division. Progression through mitosis depends on a large number of protein complexes that regulate the major structural and physiological changes necessary for faithful chromosome segregation. Most, if not all, of the mitotic processes are regulated by a set of mitotic protein kinases that control protein activity by phosphorylation. Although many mitotic phosphorylation events have been identified in proteome-scale mass spectrometry studies, information on how these phosphorylation sites are distributed within mitotic protein complexes and which kinases generate these phosphorylation sites is largely lacking. We used systematic protein-affinity purification combined with mass spectrometry to identify 1818 phosphorylation sites in more than 100 mitotic protein complexes. In many complexes, the phosphorylation sites were concentrated on a few subunits, suggesting that these subunits serve as “switchboards” to relay the kinase-regulatory signals within the complexes. Consequent bioinformatic analyses identified potential kinase-substrate relationships for most of these sites. In a subsequent in-depth analysis of key mitotic regulatory complexes with the Aurora kinase B (AURKB) inhibitor Hesperadin and a new Polo-like kinase (PLK1) inhibitor, BI 4834, we determined the kinase dependency for 172 phosphorylation sites on 41 proteins. Combination of the results of the cellular studies with Scansite motif prediction enabled us to identify 14 sites on six proteins as direct candidate substrates of AURKB or PLK1.

Preventing carryover of peptides and proteins in nano LC-MS separations.

Sample carryover is a significant problem that occurs in high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) analysis. Carryover effects cannot be tolerated in any high-performance liquid chromatography-mass spectroscopy (HPLC-MS) separation system, and proteomics analysis must be performed in a separation system with virtually no carryover. Several procedures have been tested for effective and fast removal of interfering peptides and proteins originating from previous analyses in the HPLC system. We have developed and optimized a cleaning method for eliminating carryover caused by the autosampler and the trap column. The new washing method uses an injection of trifluoroethanol into the injection path and onto the trap column to remove strongly bound peptides and proteins, and it includes trifluoroethanol as an additional solvent in the chromatographic mobile phase for enhanced cleaning of the separation column. By application of this method, a significant reduction in carryover was achieved without any loss in the amount of proteins and peptides identified by MS.

Probing the phosphoproteome of HeLa cells using nanocast metal oxide microspheres for phosphopeptide enrichment.

Metal oxide affinity chromatography (MOAC) has become a prominent method to enrich phosphopeptides prior to their analysis by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry. To overcome limitations in material design, we have previously reported the use of nanocasting as a means to generate metal oxide spheres with tailored properties. Here, we report on the application of two oxides, tin dioxide (stannia) and titanium dioxide (titania), for the analysis of the HeLa phosphoproteome. In combination with nanoflow LC-MS/MS analysis on a linear ion trap-Fourier transform ion cyclotron resonance instrument, we identified 619 phosphopeptides using the new stannia material, and 896 phosphopeptides using titania prepared in house. We also compared the newly developed materials to commercial titania material using an established enrichment protocol. Both titania materials yielded a comparable total number of phosphopeptides, but the overlap of the two data sets was less than one-third. Although fewer peptides were identified using stannia, the complementarity of SnO(2)-based MOAC could be shown as more than 140 phosphopeptides were exclusively identified by this material.

Quantitative Phospho-proteomics to Investigate the Polo-like Kinase 1-Dependent Phospho-proteome

Polo-like kinase 1 (PLK1) is a key regulator of mitotic progression and cell division, and small molecule inhibitors of PLK1 are undergoing clinical trials to evaluate their utility in cancer therapy. Despite this importance, current knowledge about the identity of PLK1 substrates is limited. Here we present the results of a proteome-wide analysis of PLK1-regulated phosphorylation sites in mitotic human cells. We compared phosphorylation sites in HeLa cells that were or were not treated with the PLK1-inhibitor BI 4834, by labeling peptides via methyl esterification, fractionation of peptides by strong cation exchange chromatography, and phosphopeptide enrichment via immobilized metal affinity chromatography. Analysis by quantitative mass spectrometry identified 4070 unique mitotic phosphorylation sites on 2069 proteins. Of these, 401 proteins contained one or multiple phosphorylation sites whose abundance was decreased by PLK1 inhibition. These include proteins implicated in PLK1-regulated processes such as DNA damage, mitotic spindle formation, spindle assembly checkpoint signaling, and chromosome segregation, but also numerous proteins that were not suspected to be regulated by PLK1. Analysis of amino acid sequence motifs among phosphorylation sites down-regulated under PLK1 inhibition in this data set identified two potential novel variants of the PLK1 consensus motif.

Anion-Exchange Chromatography of Phosphopeptides: Weak Anion Exchange versus Strong Anion Exchange and Anion-Exchange Chromatography versus Electrostatic Repulsion–Hydrophilic Interaction Chromatography

Most phosphoproteomics experiments rely on prefractionation of tryptic digests before online liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry. This study compares the potential and limitations of electrostatic repulsion–hydrophilic interaction chromatography (ERLIC) and anion-exchange chromatography (AEX). At a pH higher than 5, phosphopeptides have two negative charges per residue and are well-retained in AEX. However, peptides with one or two phosphate groups are not separated from peptides with multiple Asp or Glu residues, interfering with the identification of phosphopeptides. At a pH of 2, phosphate residues have just a single negative charge but Asp and Glu are uncharged. This facilitates the separation of phosphopeptides from unmodified acidic peptides. Singly phosphorylated peptides are retained weakly under these conditions, due to electrostatic repulsion, unless hydrophilic interaction is superimposed in the ERLIC mode. Weak anion-exchange (WAX) and strong anion-exchange (SAX) columns were compared, with both peptide standards and a HeLa cell tryptic digest. The SAX column exhibited greater retention at pH 6 than did the WAX column. However, only about 60% as many phosphopeptides were identified with SAX at pH 6 than via ERLIC at pH 2. In one ERLIC run, 12 467 phosphopeptides were identified, including 4233 with more than one phosphate. We conclude that chromatography of phosphopeptides is best performed at low pH in the ERLIC mode. Under those conditions, the performances of the SAX and WAX materials were comparable. The data have been deposited with the ProteomeXchange with identifier PXD001333.

QIKS – Quantitative identification of kinase substrates

Signaling networks regulate cellular responses to external stimuli through post‐translational modifications such as protein phosphorylation. Phosphoproteomics facilitate the large‐scale identification of kinase substrates. Yet, the characterization of critical connections within these networks and the identification of respective kinases remain the major analytical challenge. To address this problem, we present a novel approach for the identification of direct kinase substrates using chemical genetics in combination with quantitative phosphoproteomics. Quantitative identification of kinase substrates (QIKS) is a novel‐screening platform developed for the proteome‐wide substrate‐analysis of specific kinases. Here, we aimed to identify substrates of mitogen‐activated protein kinase/Erk kinase (Mek1), an essential kinase in the mitogen‐activated protein kinase cascade. An ATP analog‐sensitive mutant of Mek1 (Mek1‐as) was incubated with a cell extract from Mek1 deficient cells. Phosphorylated proteins were analyzed by LC‐MS/MS of IMAC‐enriched phosphopeptides, labeled differentially for relative quantification. The identification of extracellular regulated kinase 1/2 as the sole cytoplasmic substrates of MEK1 validates the applicability of this approach and suggests that QIKS could be used to identify substrates of a wide variety of kinases.