P. Bonnevialle

Trochanteric locking nail versus arthroplasty in unstable intertrochanteric fracture in patients aged over 75 years.

INTRODUCTION In trochanteric fracture, whatever its anatomic type, internal fixation is currently the standard attitude, with arthroplasty as a relatively unusual option. HYPOTHESIS Hip implants are an excellent alternative to osteosynthesis in unstable trochanteric fracture in patients aged over 75 years. PATIENTS AND METHODS A non-randomised prospective multicenter study compared osteosynthesis by trochanteric nailing (n=113) to hip arthroplasty (n=134) in unstable trochanteric fracture (AO types 31 A2.2 and 3 and A3.3) in 247 patients over the age of 75 years. The series was recruited during 2007 in seven centres, four of which included only arthroplasties, two only osteosyntheses and one both. The two groups were comparable in age, sex, preoperative Parker score, pre-fracture place of residence, fracture type, time to surgery and preoperative comorbidity. The sole difference was in operators, with more senior surgeons in arthroplasty (62% versus 27%). RESULTS Three-month mortality was identical in the two groups (21.2% versus 21%). General complications did not differ, although mechanical complications were more frequent in the nailing group (12.5% versus 2.8%). Functional results (Parker and PMA scores) were better in the implant than in the nail group. DISCUSSION The present study validated hip arthroplasty in these indications. Cemented stems associated to a dual-mobility acetabular component gave the best results. TYPE OF STUDY Prospective, level of evidence III.

Is femoral head fracture-dislocation management improvable: A retrospective study in 110 cases

INTRODUCTION There is no established consensus on the diagnosis and treatment of traumatic fracture-dislocation of the femoral head --largely due to the rarity of this injury. HYPOTHESIS Analysis of a large series of fracture-dislocations of the femoral head using a single coherent classification should enable the means of diagnosis and treatment of fracture-dislocations of the femoral head to be specified. OBJECTIVES The hypothesis was tested by analyzing a retrospective series of 110 patients charts admitted between 1972 and 2008, using Pipkins classification and an alternative new one, Chirons classification. MATERIAL AND METHODS The series comprised 21 women and 89 men; mean age: 37.1 years. Dislocation was posterior in 102 cases and anterior in eight. Associated lesions comprised 46 fractures of the acetabulum and four of the femoral neck. Classification following Pipkin and Chiron was based on double reading of radiology documents from 102 patients. Treatment was exclusively conservative in 32 cases, and surgical in 78, with 51 posterior, 19 anterior and four medial approaches and four arthroscopic procedures. Surgery comprised osteosynthesis of the femoral head in 30 cases and of the acetabulum in 16, removal of fragments in 40 cases and total hip replacement (THR) in five cases as a primary treatment. RESULTS Mean follow-up was 37 months. THR was performed in 25 cases: five as a primary treatment and 20 secondarily, 15 of which were performed within the first 6 months. Significant predictive factors for THR were: old age, Chiron grade 3, and femoral neck fracture. The THR and non-THR groups differed on the Chiron but not on the Pipkin classification at the time of the injury. Specific treatments were not predictive of evolution. Fragment removal was more often by a posterior than an anterior or medial approach. CONCLUSION The Chiron classification showed prognostic value for evolution to THR; to be reproducible, it needs to be based on CT data. No particular mode of treatment emerged as preferable. Better initial lesion analysis should enable prognosis and target indications. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Level IV Retrospective study.

Primary total knee arthroplasty in the management of epiphyseal fracture around the knee

INTRODUCTION Over the past few years the use of arthroplasty was broadened to treating complex epiphyseal fractures at the shoulder and elbow joints. Similar trends to treat this type of fractures at the knee are less documented. Based on a multicenter retrospective series study, the aims of this work is to evaluate the short term clinical results of total knee prostheses in the management of comminuted epiphyseal fractures around the knee, to identify the technical issues and fine tune the indications. MATERIAL AND METHODS Following the initiative of the French Hip and Knee Society (SFHG) and the Traumatology Study Group (GETRAUM), 26 charts from eight different centers in France were included in this multicenter retrospective series. Inclusion criteria were: primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in the management of complex articular fractures involving the proximal end of the tibia or distal end of the femur. Surgical features were identified and complications were analyzed. The assessment protocol at last follow-up was standardized and included patient demographic data, analysis of the Parker and IKS scores. RESULTS During the immediate postoperative period, six patients (23%) reported a general complication and four patients (15%) a local arthroplasty-related complication. At last follow-up (mean 16.2 months), the overall final Parker score was 6.3 (a mean decrease of 1.7) and the mean IKS knee score was 82 points for a mean function score of 54 points. DISCUSSION Primary TKA is a suitable management option for complex fractures in autonomous elderly patients suffering from knee osteoarthritis. The key technical details of this procedure should be respected and meticulously planned to achieve optimal results and limit the risk of complications. This risk in these acute complex fractures remains higher than after conventional TKA but comparable to that observed after TKA for post-traumatic arthritis. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV; retrospective cohort study.

Ten-year survival and complications of total knee arthroplasty for osteoarthritis secondary to trauma or surgery: A French multicentre study of 263 patients

BACKGROUND Previous surgical procedures raise technical challenges in performing total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and may affect TKA outcomes. Survival rates of TKA done after trauma or surgery to the knee have not been accurately determined in large populations. The objectives of this retrospective study in 263 patients with TKA after knee trauma or surgery and a follow-up of 10 years were to assess survival, functional outcomes, and the nature and frequency of complications. HYPOTHESIS Knee trauma or surgery before TKA increases the risk of complications and decreases implant survival. MATERIAL AND METHODS Two hundred and sixty-three patients (122 [47%] females and 141 [53%] males) underwent TKA between 2005 and 2009 at nine centres in France. Mean age at surgery was 61 years. The patients had knee osteoarthritis secondary to a fracture (n=66), osteotomy (n=131), or ligament injury (n=66). Mean time from trauma or surgery to TKA was 145 months (range, 72-219 months). RESULTS Major complications were infection (n=12, 4.5%), skin problems (n=8, 3%), and stiffness (n=8, 3%). Ten-year survival to implant exchange for any reason was 89%±2.8%. Flexion range increased by 2.5°±17° (p=0.02) to a mean of 110° (range, 30° to 140°); extension range increased by 4°±7° (p<0.001) to a mean of -1.19 (range, -20° to 0°). Of the 263 patients, 157 (60%) reported little or no pain at last follow-up. Mean postoperative hip-knee-ankle angle was 179°±3.2° (range, 171°-188°). CONCLUSION TKA performed after knee injury or surgery carries a risk of specific complications (infection, skin problems, and stiffness) and may have a lower survival rate compared to primary TKA. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV, retrospective cohort study.