P. J. Popp

Nitric Acid Uptake on Subtropical Cirrus Cloud Particles

The redistribution of HNO 3 via uptake and sedimentation by cirrus cloud particles is considered an important term in the upper tropospheric budget of reactive nitrogen. Numerous cirrus cloud encounters by the NASA WB-57F high-altitude research aircraft during the Cirrus Regional Study of Tropical Anvils and Cirrus Layers-Florida Area Cirrus Experiment (CRYSTAL-FACE) were accompanied by the observation of condensed-phase HNO 3 with the NOAA chemical ionization mass spectrometer. The instrument measures HNO 3 with two independent channels of detection connected to separate forward and downward facing inlets that allow a determination of the amount of HNO 3 condensed on ice particles. Subtropical cirrus clouds, as indicated by the presence of ice particles, were observed coincident with condensed-phase HNO 3 at temperatures of 197-224 K and pressures of 122-224 hPa. Maximum levels of condensed-phase HNO 3 approached the gas-phase equivalent of 0.8 ppbv. Ice particle surface coverages as high as 1.4 x 10 14 molecules cm -2 were observed. A dissociative Langmuir adsorption model, when using an empirically derived HNO 3 adsorption enthalpy of -11.0 kcal mol -1 , electively describes the observed molecular coverages to within a factor of 5. The percentage of total HNO 3 in the condensed phase ranged from near zero to 100% in the observed cirrus clouds. With volume-weighted mean particle diameters up to 700 μm and particle fall velocities up to 10 m s -1 , some observed clouds have significant potential to redistribute HNO 3 in the upper troposphere.

An analysis of large HNO3‐containing particles sampled in the Arctic stratosphere during the winter of 1999/2000

Large (>2 μm diameter) HNO_3-containing polar stratospheric cloud (PSC) particles were measured in situ by the NOAA NO_y instrument on board the NASA ER-2 aircraft during seven flights in the 1999/2000 Arctic winter vortex. Here we discuss the detection of these large PSC particles, their spatial distribution, the ambient conditions under which they were detected, and our methods for interpreting NO_y time series with respect to particle sizes and number concentrations. The particles were observed through the use of two NO_y inlets on a particle separator extending below the ER-2 aircraft. The particle phase is assumed to be nitric acid trihydrate (NAT) or nitric acid dihydrate (NAD). Over a 48-day period, particles were sampled in the Arctic vortex over a broad range of latitudes (60–85°N) and altitudes (15–21 km). Typically, regions of the atmosphere up to 4 km above the observed large particle clouds were saturated with respect to NAT. Occasionally, large particles were measured in air subsaturated with respect to NAT, suggesting ongoing particle evaporation. Vortex minimum temperatures in the observation period suggest that synoptic-scale ice saturation conditions are not required for the formation of this type of particle. Three analytical methods are used to estimate size and number concentrations from the NO_y time series. Results indicate particle sizes between 5 and 20 μm diameter and concentrations from 10^(−5) to 10^(−3) cm^(−3). These low number concentrations imply a selective nucleation mechanism. Particle sizes and number concentrations were greater during the midwinter flights than the late winter flights. Knowledge of the geographical extent of large particles, actual sampling conditions, and particle size distributions offers multiple constraints for atmospheric models of PSC formation, which will lead to a better understanding of the process of denitrification and improvements in modeling future ozone loss.

Large‐scale chemical evolution of the Arctic vortex during the 1999/2000 winter: HALOE/POAM III Lagrangian photochemical modeling for the SAGE III—Ozone Loss and Validation Experiment (SOLVE) campaign

Abstract : The LaRC Lagrangian Chemical Transport Model (LaRC LCTM) is used to simulate the kinematic and chemical evolution of an ensemble of trajectories initialized from Halogen Occultation Experiment (HALOE) and Polar Ozone and Aerosol Measurement (POAM) III atmospheric soundings over the SAGE III-Ozone Loss and Validation Experiment (SOLVE) campaign period. Initial mixing ratios of species which are not measured by HALOE or POAM III are specified using sunrise and sunset constituent CH(4) and constituent PV regressions obtained from the LaRC IMPACT model, a global three dimensional general circulation and photochemical model. Ensemble averaging of the trajectory chemical characteristics provides a vortex-average perspective of the photochemical state of the Arctic vortex. The vortex-averaged evolution of ozone, chlorine, nitrogen species, and ozone photochemical loss rates is presented. Enhanced chlorine catalyzed ozone loss begins in mid-January above 500 K, and the altitude of the peak loss gradually descends during the rest of the simulation. Peak vortex averaged loss rates of over 60 ppbv/day occur in early March at 450 K. Vortex averaged loss rates decline after mid- March. The accumulated photochemical ozone loss during the period from 1 December 1999 to 30 March 2000 peaks at 450 K with net losses of near 2.2 ppmv. The predicted distributions of CH4, O(3), denitrification, and chlorine activation are compared to the distributions obtained from in situ measurements to evaluate the accuracy of the simulations. The comparisons show best agreement when diffusive tendencies are included in the model calculations, highlighting the importance of this process in the Arctic vortex. Sensitivity tests examining the large-scale influence of orographically generated gravity wave temperature anomalies are also presented. Results from this sensitivity study show that mountain-wave temperature perturbations contribute an additional 2-8% O(3) loss during the 1999/2000 winter.

Correction to “Nitric acid uptake on subtropical cirrus cloud particles”

Aeronomy Laboratory, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Boulder, Colorado, USA. Also at Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences, University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado, USA. Institut fur Physik der Atmosphare, Deutsches Zentrum fur Luftand Raumfahrt Oberpfaffenhofen, Wessling, Germany. Atmospheric Chemistry Division, National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, Colorado, USA. Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico, Centro de Ciencias de la Atmosfera, Ciudad Universitaria, Mexico City, Mexico. Department of Meteorology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA. Atmospheric Research Project, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA. Division of Geology and Planetary Sciences, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California, USA. Now at Department of Mechanical and Aeronautical Engineering, Clarkson University, Potsdam, New York, USA. NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, California, USA. Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California, USA. JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH, VOL. 109, D08306, doi:10.1029/2004JD004781, 2004