P. Richaud

Addition of Radiotherapy to Long-Term Androgen Deprivation in Locally Advanced Prostate Cancer: An Open Randomised Phase 3 Trial

BACKGROUND Radiotherapy combined with androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT) is superior to radiotherapy alone in localised prostate cancer; however, data comparing ADT alone are somewhat limited. OBJECTIVE To compare 3-yr ADT plus radiotherapy with ADT alone in locally advanced prostate cancer patients. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS A multicentre randomised open controlled phase 3 trial in 264 histologically confirmed T3-4 or pT3N0M0 prostate cancer patients randomised from March 2000 to December 2003. INTERVENTION ADT (11.25mg subcutaneous depot injection of leuprorelin every 3 mo for 3 yr) plus external-beam radiotherapy or ADT alone. Flutamide (750 g/d) was administered for 1 mo. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS The primary objective was 5 yr progression-free survival (PFS) according to clinical or biologic criteria, using the American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology (ASTRO) and the newer (Phoenix) definition (nadir plus 2 ng/ml), by intention to treat. Secondary objectives included time to locoregional recurrence and distant metastases, and overall and disease-specific survival. Our Analyses: intent-to-treat analysis, multivariate analyses using a Cox model with a 5% threshold from univariate analysis, and Kaplan-Meier estimates. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS ADT alone was administered to 130 patients and combined therapy to 133. With a median follow-up of 67 mo, 5-yr PFS was 60.9% for combined therapy versus 8.5% with ADT alone (ASTRO; p<0.0001), and 64.7% versus 15.4%, respectively, for Phoenix (p<0.0011). Locoregional progression was reported in 9.8% of combined-therapy patients versus 29.2% with ADT alone (p<0.0001) and metastatic progression in 3.0% versus 10.8%, respectively (p<0.018). Overall survival was 71.4% with combined therapy versus 71.5% with ADT alone; disease-specific survival was 93.2% versus 86.2%. Limitations included the relatively small population and a relatively short follow-up period. CONCLUSIONS Combined therapy strongly favoured improved PFS, locoregional control, and metastasis-free survival. Longer follow-up is needed to assess the potential survival impact.

Cancer de la prostate

Mutations “ciblables” dans les cancers de la prostate métastatiques Fruit de la collaboration entre de grandes institutions américaines et européennes, un groupe de chercheurs international (1) a analysé, par séquençage systémique de l’exome entier et du transcriptome, les échantillons de 150 patients atteints d’un cancer de la prostate résistant à la castration métastatique (CPRCm). Près de 90 % des hommes testés présentaient au moins 1 mutation permettant de prédire une réponse ou une résistance à des thérapies connues. Des mutations au niveau du récepteur des androgènes (RA) ont été notées chez près du tiers des patients (63 %). Les autres anomalies génomiques retrouvées le plus fréquemment concernaient les gènes de fusion ETS, TP53 et PTEN (40 à 60 % des cas) avec, par rapport aux cancers de la prostate primaires, un enrichissement des altérations du RA et de TP53. De nouvelles altérations ont été identifiées : PI3K3CA/B, R-spondin , BRAF/RAF1, APC, β-caténine, ZBTB16/PLZF. Mais la découverte sans doute la plus importante est le fait, encore une fois par rapport aux tumeurs primaires, que de nombreux patients (23 %) présentaient des mutations des gènes de la réparation de l’ADN, comme BRCA2, BRCA1 et ATM, ouvrant des perspectives thérapeutiques particulières. Ces patients pourraient répondre à des inhibiteurs de PARP, comme l’olaparib (2) .

Surgical resection and radiotherapy for primary retroperitoneal soft tissue sarcoma

METHODS AND MATERIALS Forty-five patients were consecutively treated for primary retroperitoneal soft tissue sarcoma with surgery in combination with radiation therapy in the same institution. The median follow-up time was 53 months (7-108). RESULTS Seventeen (38%) patients had clear microscopic margins (R0 resection), 26 patients (58%) had gross complete surgical excision (R1 resection) and two patients (4%) had a macroscopic residual disease (R2 resection). External radiotherapy doses ranged from 40.8 to 59.4 Gy (mean and median: 49 Gy). Seventeen patients underwent intraoperative radiation therapy (IORT). Moreover, 11 patients received chemotherapy. The overall 1-, 2-, and 5-year survival for all 45 patients were 93, 85 and 60%, respectively. The 1-, 2-, and 5-year locoregional relapse-free rate for the whole group was 91, 70 and 40%, respectively. In univariate analysis, quality of surgery was the only variable to show a significant effect for overall survival (P=0.0386) and for local control (P=0.0059). Tumor size and tumor grade had no statistically significant effect. For the patients receiving IORT+external beam radiation therapy, no difference was observed for survival or locoregional control. The most frequent acute side effects treatment complications were radiation-induced nausea or vomiting (42%) and moderate enteritis (30%). Significant late morbidity was observed for two patients. CONCLUSIONS This study confirms the feasibility of external postoperative radiotherapy with an acceptable level of toxicity. However, the high rate of local relapses (especially in field of radiation) does not demonstrate the usefulness of radiotherapy at the level of dose used and further preferably randomized studies should be planned.

[CCAFU Recommendations 2013: Prostate cancer].

INTRODUCTION The sub Comittee prostate of the CCAFU established guidelines for diagnostic, treatment, evaluation and standart of care of prostate cancer. METHODS Guidelines 2010 were updated based on systematic literature search performed by the sub-Comittee in Medline and PubMed databases to evaluate references, levels of evidence and grade of recommandation. RESULTS Pathological examination of the tissue specimens was defined specifically for Gleason score according to ISP 2005 recommandations. Prostate and pelvis RMN became the reference in terms of radiological exam. Individual and early diagnosis of prostate cancer was defined and role of PSA was precised. Active surveillance became one of the standart of care of low-risk tumors, radical prostatectomy remained one of the options for all risk group tumors, length of hormonotherapy in association with radiotherapy was precised according to the risk group. Side effects of hormonotherapy treament needed specific supervision ; hormonotherapy had no indication in case of non metastatic tumors and intermittent hormonotherapy in metastatic tumors. New hormonal drugs in pre and post chemotherapy and bone target drugs opened new therapeutics pathways. CONCLUSION From 2010 to 2013, standarts of care of prostate cancer were modified because of results of prospective studies and new therapeutics. They allowed precise treatments for each specific clinical situation. In the future, multidisciplinary treatments for high risk tumors, time of adjuvant treatment and sequencies of new hormonal treatment had to be defined.

Low-grade follicular lymphomas: Analysis of prognosis in a series of 281 patients

From 1963 to 1988, 281 patients with newly diagnosed follicular lymphomas were treated and followed at the Foundation Bergonié. Distribution of stages was: 72 I, 61 II, 83 III and 65 IV. Within stage III, two subgroups were retrospectively defined: stages III1 (32 cases) included patients with less than 8 involved sites, only 1 or 2 above diaphragm, and no spleen or mediastinal enlargement. Stage III2 (51 cases) included the remaining stage III cases. Median follow-up was 9 years. Complete remission (CR) rate was 82%. 10-year overall survival (OS) and time to treatment failure (TTF) rates were, respectively 38% and 29.5%. 10-year time to relapse (TTR) rate was 36%. Statistical analyses showed concordant results with two main prognostic factors: age (less than 60/greater than 60) and stage (I to III1/III2 and IV). Age was the most important factor for OS analysis and stage for CR and TTR analysis. This leads to only three prognostic groups with different outcome. The first includes younger patients (less than 60 years) with limited stages (less than or equal to III1); the second, patients either older than 60 or with advanced stages; the last, elderly patients with advanced stages. CR rates of these three groups were, respectively 97%, 75% and 57%. 10-year OS were, respectively 73.5%, 27% and 0%; 10-year TTR were 54%, 22% and 0%. These results have lead to data which are easy to handle and which can help to establish a rationale for further prospective trials.

Projection de l’incidence et de la mortalité par cancer urologique en France en 2012

OBJECTIVES: Present national estimations of the incidence and mortality trends in urological cancers in France between 1980 and 2012. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Francim database and French Register of Cancers. RESULTS: Analysis of the current data shows a regular increase of the incidence of renal cancer in men and women (7,781 cases in men and 3,792 in women in 2012). For bladder cancer, trends are divergent. There is a small reduction in incidence for men and an increase for women (9,549 cases in men and 2,416 in women in 2012). Testicular cancer is still increasing slightly (2,317 incidental cases in 2012). The incidence of prostate cancer experienced a huge increase up until 2005, and thereafter it decreased sharply, though it is difficult to discern whether this drop (which was observed up until 2008) continued at the same rate after that point (56,841 incidences in 2012 based on the rates calculated for 2009). CONCLUSION: The analyses by organ database show that there are significant variations in the incidence of urological cancers, particularly for prostate cancer, which shows that both the natural history of urological tumours and the methods of detection have an impact on incidence.OBJECTIVES Present national estimations of the incidence and mortality trends in urological cancers in France between 1980 and 2012. MATERIAL AND METHODS Francim database and French Register of Cancers. RESULTS Analysis of the current data shows a regular increase of the incidence of renal cancer in men and women (7,781 cases in men and 3,792 in women in 2012). For bladder cancer, trends are divergent. There is a small reduction in incidence for men and an increase for women (9,549 cases in men and 2,416 in women in 2012). Testicular cancer is still increasing slightly (2,317 incidental cases in 2012). The incidence of prostate cancer experienced a huge increase up until 2005, and thereafter it decreased sharply, though it is difficult to discern whether this drop (which was observed up until 2008) continued at the same rate after that point (56,841 incidences in 2012 based on the rates calculated for 2009). CONCLUSION The analyses by organ database show that there are significant variations in the incidence of urological cancers, particularly for prostate cancer, which shows that both the natural history of urological tumours and the methods of detection have an impact on incidence.

Recommandations en onco-urologie 2013 du CCAFU : Cancer de la prostate

OBJECTIVES The purpose of the guidelines national committee CCAFU was to propose updated french guidelines for localized and metastatic prostate cancer (PCa). METHODS A Medline search was achieved between 2013 and 2016, as regards diagnosis, options of treatment and follow-up of PCa, to evaluate different references with levels of evidence. RESULTS Epidemiology, classification, staging systems, diagnostic evaluation are reported. Disease management options are detailed. Recommandations are reported according to the different clinical situations. Active surveillance is a major option in low risk PCa. Radical prostatectomy remains a standard of care of localized PCa. The three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy is the technical standard. A dose of > 74Gy is recommended. Moderate hypofractionation provides short-term biochemical control comparable to conventional fractionation. In case of intermediate risk PCa, radiotherapy can be combined with short-term androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). In case of high risk disease, long-term ADT remains the standard of care. ADT is the backbone therapy of metastatic disease. In men with metastases at first presentation, upfront chemotherapy combined with ADT should be considered as a new standard. In case of metastatic castration-resistant PCa (mCRPC), new hormonal treatments and chemotherapy provide a better control of tumor progression and increase survival. CONCLUSIONS These updated french guidelines will contribute to increase the level of urological care for the diagnosis and treatment for prostate cancer.

Salvage Radiotherapy After High-Intensity Focussed Ultrasound for Recurrent Localised Prostate Cancer

BACKGROUND Radiotherapy is a treatment option in the case of local failure following treatment for localised prostate cancer with high-intensity focussed ultrasound (HIFU). OBJECTIVE Our aim was to evaluate tolerance and oncologic control with salvage radiotherapy (SRT) after HIFU failure and to identify predictive factors of success. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS From March 1995 to March 2008, all patients who presented with histologically proven persistent local disease following HIFU and were treated with curative intent SRT (with or without hormonal treatment) were included in this single-centre retrospective study. INTERVENTION Patients underwent conformal radiotherapy. The median dose of conformal treatment was 72 Gy (65-78 Gy). MEASUREMENTS The primary outcome measure was progression-free survival (PFS) defined as no biochemical relapse (three consecutive rises in prostate-specific antigen [PSA] with a velocity >0.4 ng/ml per year or PSA >1.5 ng/ml) and no additional treatment. Predictive factors of failure were examined in univariate and multivariate analyses. Adverse events in terms of urinary and digestive toxicity, urine incontinence, and erectile dysfunction (ED) were reported. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS The median (range) and mean (standard deviation) follow-up of the 100 patients analysed was 33 mo (5-164 mo) and 37.2 mo (23.6 mo), respectively. Eighty-three patients received SRT alone, and 17 received SRT and androgen-deprivation therapy. For the 83 patients treated with exclusive radiation therapy, PFS was 72.5% at 5 yr and 93%, 67%, and 55% for the low-, intermediate-, and high-risk groups, respectively. In the univariate analysis, PSA level prior to SRT, risk status, PSA nadir after SRT, PSA nadir after SRT >0.2 ng/ml, and time to achieve this nadir were all predictive of failure. In the multivariate analysis, PSA nadir post-SRT with a threshold at 0.2 ng/ml and time to achieve this nadir were the significant predictive factors of failure. Gastrointestinal toxicity was low; urinary toxicity grade < or =2 was 34.5%. Four were grade 3 (4.7%), one was grade 4 (1.2%), and one was grade 5 (1.2%). The incidence of severe ED (International Index of Erectile Dysfunction-5 score 5-10) was 14% pre-HIFU, and 51.9% and 82.3% pre- and post-SRT, respectively. Because our study was retrospective, results have to be interpreted cautiously. CONCLUSIONS SRT provides satisfactory oncologic control after HIFU failure with little (or mild) additional toxicity. These results warrant further investigation.

Fractionated or single-dose total body irradiation in 171 acute myeloblastic leukemias in first complete remission : is there a best choice ?

PURPOSE To evaluate the importance of fractionating total body irradiation (TBI) in patients receiving an allogenic bone marrow transplant (BMT) for an acute myeloblastic leukemia (AML) in first complete remission (CR1). METHODS AND MATERIALS Between 1983 and 1990, 171 consecutive patients received either single dose TBI (STBI) (n = 65) or fractionated TBI (FTBI) (n = 106) after being conditioned with cyclophosphamide and before receiving a non-T-depleted Human Leucocyte Antigen (HLA)-identical marrow. Both groups were comparable except for date of BMT and diagnosis-to-BMT interval (D-BMT). RESULTS After 63 months median follow-up, transplant-related mortality (TRM), probability of relapse, and 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) were 0.38 and 0.27 (p = 0.04), 0.29 and 0.26 (p = 0.22), 0.43 and 0.56 (p = 0.06), respectively, for STBI and FTBI. The supposed influence of the schedule of TBI disappeared in the multivariate analysis: TRM was enhanced by severe acute graft vs. host disease (p = 0.0002), early years of transplant (before January 1, 1987) (p = 0.0003), and longer D-BMT intervals (p = 0.038). Relapse was linked to early years of transplant (p < 0.00001), and the absence of chronic GVHD (p = 0.007). Longer DFSs were observed for later years of transplant (after January 1, 1987 and later) (p = 0.001), milder acute GVHD (p = 0.005), and shorter D-BMT intervals (p = 0.045). Important improvements of the results were made during the 7-year observation period: TRM, probability of relapse, and DFS were, respectively, 0.36, 0.28, and 0.46 for patients transplanted before January 1, 1987 vs. 0.21, 0.15, and 0.67 after that date. CONCLUSION Our data strongly suggest that allogenic BMT is the best postremission treatment for AML in CR1, and the results are better when BMT shortly follows the achievement of remission. The schedule of TBI was of little importance compared with the improvements made in the management of patients undergoing BMT during the 1980s, and, therefore, reports concerning data prior to 1985 should be interpreted cautiously.

PSA et suivi après traitement du cancer de la prostate

A first serum total PSA assay is recommended during the first three months after treatment. When PSA is detectable, PSA assay should be repeated three months later to confirm this elevation and to estimate the PSA doubling time (PSADT). In the absence of residual cancer, PSA becomes undetectable by the first month after total prostatectomy: less than 0.1 ng/ml (or less than 0.07 ng/ml) for the ultrasensitive assay method and less than 0.2 ng/ml for the other methods. In the presence of residual cancer, PSA either does not become undetectable or increases after an initial undetectable period. A consensus has been reached to define recurrence as PSA greater than 0.2 ng/ml confirmed on two successive assays. After external beam radiotherapy, PSA can decrease after a mean interval of one to two years to a value less than 1 ng/ml (predictive of recurrence-free survival). Biochemical recurrence after radiotherapy is defined by an increase of PSA by 2 ng or more above the PSA nadir, whether or not it is associated with endocrine therapy. After endocrine therapy, the PSA nadir is correlated with recurrence-free survival. PSA is decreased for a mean of 18 to 24 months followed by a rise in PSA, corresponding to hormone-independence. The time to recurrence or the time to reach the nadir and the PSA doubling time after local therapy with surgery or radiotherapy have a diagnostic value in terms of the site of recurrence, local or metastatic and a prognostic value for survival and response to complementary radiotherapy or endocrine therapy. A PSADT less than eight to 12 months is correlated with a high risk of metastatic recurrence and 10-year mortality. The histological and biochemical characteristics in favour of local recurrence are Gleason score less or equal to seven (3+4), elevation of PSA after a period greater than 12 months and PSADT greater than 10 months. In other cases, recurrence is predominantly metastatic. The risk of demonstrating metastasis in the case of biochemical recurrence after total prostatectomy and before endocrine therapy depends on the PSA level and the PSADT. No consensus has been reached concerning the indication for complementary investigations by bone scan and abdominopelvic CT in patients with biochemical recurrence after treatment of localized cancer without endocrine therapy. However, when PSADT greater than six months, the risk of metastasis is less than 3% even for PSA greater than 30 ng/ml. When PSADT less than six months and PSA greater than 10 ng/ml, the risk of metastasis is close to 50%.