Pablo Calvín
University of Burgos
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Pablo Calvín.
Computers & Geosciences | 2017
Pablo Calvín; Juan J. Villalaín; Antonio M. Casas-Sainz; Lisa Tauxe; S. Torres-López
Abstract The Small Circle (SC) methods are founded upon two main starting hypotheses: (i) the analyzed sites were remagnetized contemporarily, acquiring the same paleomagnetic direction. (ii) The deviation of the acquired paleomagnetic signal from its original direction is only due to tilting around the bedding strike and therefore the remagnetization direction must be located on a small circle (SC) whose axis is the strike of bedding and contains the in situ paleomagnetic direction. Therefore, if we analyze several sites (with different bedding strikes) their SCs will intersect in the remagnetization direction. The SC methods have two applications: (1) the Small Circle Intersection (SCI) method is capable of providing adequate approximations to the expected paleomagnetic direction when dealing with synfolding remagnetizations. By comparing the SCI direction with that predicted from an apparent polar wander path, the (re)magnetization can be dated. (2) Once the remagnetization direction is known, the attitude of the beds (at each site) can be restored to the moment of the acquisition of the remagnetization, showing a palinspastic reconstructuion of the structure. Some caveats are necessary under more complex tectonic scenarios, in which SC-based methods can lead to erroneous interpretations. However, the graphical output of the methods tries to avoid ‘black-box’ effects and can minimize misleading interpretations or even help, for example, to identify local or regional vertical axis rotations. In any case, the methods must be used with caution and always considering the knowledge of the tectonic frame. In this paper, some utilities for SCs analysis are automatized by means of a new Python code and a new technique for defining the uncertainty of the solution is proposed. With pySCu the SCs methods can be easily and quickly applied, obtaining firstly a set of text files containing all calculated information and subsequently generating a graphical output on the fly.
Tectonics | 2017
Pablo Calvín; V. C. Ruiz-Martínez; Juan J. Villalaín; Antonio M. Casas-Sainz; B. Moussaid
A paleomagnetic and magnetic fabric study is performed in Upper Jurassic gabbros of the central High Atlas (Morocco). These gabbros were emplaced in the core of preexisting structures developed during the extensional stage and linked to basement faults. These structures were reactivated as anticlines during the Cenozoic compressional inversion. Gabbros from 19 out of the 33 sampled sites show a stable characteristic magnetization, carried by magnetite, which has been interpreted as a primary component. This component shows an important dispersion due to postemplacement tectonic movements. The absence of paleoposition markers in these igneous rocks precludes direct restorations. A novel approach analyzing the orientation of the primary magnetization is used here to restore the magmatic bodies and to understand the deformational history recorded by these rocks. Paleomagnetic vectors are distributed along small circles with horizontal axes, indicating horizontal axis rotations of the gabbro bodies. These rotations are higher when the ratio between shales and gabbros in the core of the anticlines increases. Due to the uncertainties inherent to this work (the igneous bodies recording strong rotations), interpretations must be qualitative. The magnetic fabric is carried by ferromagnetic (s.s.) minerals mimicking the magmatic fabric. Anisotropy of magnetic susceptibility (AMS) axes, using the rotation routine inferred from paleomagnetic results, result in more tightly clustered magnetic lineations, which also become horizontal and are considered in terms of magma flow trend during its emplacement: NW-SE (parallel to the general extensional direction) in the western sector and NE-SW (parallel to the main faults) in the easternmost structures.
Journal of Structural Geology | 2017
Pablo Calvín; Antonio M. Casas-Sainz; Juan J. Villalaín; B. Moussaid
Tectonics | 2017
Pablo Calvín; V. C. Ruiz-Martínez; Juan J. Villalaín; Antonio M. Casas-Sainz; B. Moussaid
Journal of Maps | 2016
Emilio L. Pueyo; Esther Izquierdo-Llavall; Adriana Rodríguez-Pintó; Carmen Rey-Moral; B. Oliva-Urcia; Antonio M. Casas; Pablo Calvín; C. Ayala; Javier Ramajo; Pedro del Río; F.M. Rubio; José Luis García-Lobón
Tectonophysics | 2018
Pablo Calvín; Antonio M. Casas-Sainz; Juan J. Villalaín; B. Moussaid
Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors | 2018
Pablo Calvín; Juan J. Villalaín; Antonio M. Casas-Sainz
Computers & Geosciences | 2014
Pablo Calvín; Pablo Santolaria; Pablo Tierz; Alicia Muñoz; Antonio M. Casas; L. E. Arlegui; María Antonia Zapata
Tectonophysics | 2018
Cristina García-Lasanta; B. Oliva-Urcia; Antonio M. Casas-Sainz; T. Román-Berdiel; E. Izquierdo-Llavall; Ruth Soto; Pablo Calvín; Bennacer Moussaid; H. El Ouardi; J.C. Kullberg; Juan J. Villalaín
Geology | 2018
Pablo Calvín; Juan J. Villalaín; Antonio M. Casas-Sainz