Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Pamela E Lithgow is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Pamela E Lithgow.


BMC Genomics | 2014

Reconstruction of gross avian genome structure, organization and evolution suggests that the chicken lineage most closely resembles the dinosaur avian ancestor

Michael N Romanov; Marta Farré; Pamela E Lithgow; Katie E Fowler; Benjamin M. Skinner; Rebecca O'Connor; Gothami Fonseka; Niclas Backström; Yoichi Matsuda; Chizuko Nishida; Peter Houde; Erich D. Jarvis; Hans Ellegren; David W. Burt; Denis M. Larkin; Darren K. Griffin

BackgroundThe availability of multiple avian genome sequence assemblies greatly improves our ability to define overall genome organization and reconstruct evolutionary changes. In birds, this has previously been impeded by a near intractable karyotype and relied almost exclusively on comparative molecular cytogenetics of only the largest chromosomes. Here, novel whole genome sequence information from 21 avian genome sequences (most newly assembled) made available on an interactive browser (Evolution Highway) was analyzed.ResultsFocusing on the six best-assembled genomes allowed us to assemble a putative karyotype of the dinosaur ancestor for each chromosome. Reconstructing evolutionary events that led to each species’ genome organization, we determined that the fastest rate of change occurred in the zebra finch and budgerigar, consistent with rapid speciation events in the Passeriformes and Psittaciformes. Intra- and interchromosomal changes were explained most parsimoniously by a series of inversions and translocations respectively, with breakpoint reuse being commonplace. Analyzing chicken and zebra finch, we found little evidence to support the hypothesis of an association of evolutionary breakpoint regions with recombination hotspots but some evidence to support the hypothesis that microchromosomes largely represent conserved blocks of synteny in the majority of the 21 species analyzed. All but one species showed the expected number of microchromosomal rearrangements predicted by the haploid chromosome count. Ostrich, however, appeared to retain an overall karyotype structure of 2n = 80 despite undergoing a large number (26) of hitherto un-described interchromosomal changes.ConclusionsResults suggest that mechanisms exist to preserve a static overall avian karyotype/genomic structure, including the microchromosomes, with widespread interchromosomal change occurring rarely (e.g., in ostrich and budgerigar lineages). Of the species analyzed, the chicken lineage appeared to have undergone the fewest changes compared to the dinosaur ancestor.


Chromosome Research | 2014

Novel tools for characterising inter and intra chromosomal rearrangements in avian microchromosomes

Pamela E Lithgow; Rebecca O’Connor; Deborah L. Smith; Gothami Fonseka; Abdullah Al Mutery; Claudia Rathje; Richard Frodsham; Patricia C. M. O’Brien; Fumio Kasai; Malcolm A. Ferguson-Smith; Benjamin M. Skinner; Darren K. Griffin

Avian genome organisation is characterised, in part, by a set of microchromosomes that are unusually small in size and unusually large in number. Although containing about a quarter of the genome, they contain around half the genes and three quarters of the total chromosome number. Nonetheless, they continue to belie analysis by cytogenetic means. Chromosomal rearrangements play a key role in genome evolution, fertility and genetic disease and thus tools for analysis of the microchromosomes are essential to analyse such phenomena in birds. Here, we report the development of chicken microchromosomal paint pools, generation of pairs of specific microchromosome BAC clones in chicken, and computational tools for in silico comparison of the genomes of microchromosomes. We demonstrate the use of these molecular and computational tools across species, suggesting their use to generate a clear picture of microchromosomal rearrangements between avian species. With increasing numbers of avian genome sequences that are emerging, tools such as these will find great utility in assembling genomes de novo and for asking fundamental questions about genome evolution from a chromosomal perspective.


Archive | 2014

Avian cytogenetics goes functional

Darren K. Griffin; Marta Farré; Pamela E Lithgow; Rebecca O'Connor; Katie E Fowler; Michael N Romanov; Denis M. Larkin

Chromosomal abnormalities in secondary bovine oocytes matured in vitro up to 48 hours Abstract Chromosomal abnormalities in secondary bovine oocytes matured in vitro up to 48 hours. 21st International Colloquium on Animal Cytogenetics and Gene Mapping Rubessa M., Pauciullo A., Peretti V., Iannuzzi L., Ramunno L., Di Berardino D.Edited by: L. Iannuzzi, A. Perucatti, A. Iannuzzi, A. Pauciullo, V. Genualdo, D. Incarnato, L. Keller (CNRISPAAM, Naples, Italy)Sister Chromatid exchange (SCE) test in river buffalo cells treated with Furocoumarins. / Iannuzzi A.; Perucatti A.; Genualdo V.; Pauciullo A.; Pucciarelli L.; Incarnato D.; Melis R.; Porqueddu C.; Marchetti M.; Iannuzzi L.. In: CHROMOSOME RESEARCH. ISSN 0967-3849. 22(2014), pp. 421-421. Original Citation: Sister Chromatid exchange (SCE) test in river buffalo cells treated with Furocoumarins.Comparative FISH-mapping of TNF, STAT5A and MNTR1A fecundity genes on river buffalo, cattle, sheep and goat. / Iannuzzi A.; Perucatti A.; Pauciullo A.; Genualdo V.; Incarnato D.; Pucciarelli L.; De Lorenzi L.; Parma P.; Iannuzzi L.. In: CHROMOSOME RESEARCH. ISSN 0967-3849. 22(2014), pp. 418-418. Original Citation: Comparative FISH-mapping of TNF, STAT5A and MNTR1A fecundity genes on river buffalo, cattle, sheep and goat.Multicolor FISH with 10 specific painting probes for the rapid identification of the sub-metacentric river buffalo autosomes (Bubalus bubalis, 2n=50) / Pauciullo A.; Perucatti A.; Iannuzzi A.; Incarnato D.; Genualdo V.; Pucciarelli L.; Di Berardino D.; Iannuzzi L.. In: CHROMOSOME RESEARCH. ISSN 0967-3849. 22(2014), pp. 410-410. Original Citation: Multicolor FISH with 10 specific painting probes for the rapid identification of the sub-metacentric river buffalo autosomes (Bubalus bubalis, 2n=50)


PLOS ONE | 2017

Acquired resistance to oxaliplatin is not directly associated with increased resistance to DNA damage in SK-N-ASrOXALI4000, a newly established oxaliplatin-resistant sub-line of the neuroblastoma cell line SK-N-AS

Emily Saintas; Liam Abrahams; Gulshan T. Ahmad; Anu-Oluwa M. Ajakaiye; Abdulaziz S. H. A. M. AlHumaid; Candice Ashmore-Harris; Iain Clark; Usha K. Dura; Carine N. Fixmer; Chinedu Ike-Morris; Mireia Mato Prado; Danielle Mccullough; Shishir Mishra; Katia M. U. Schöler; Husne Timur; Maxwell D. C. Williamson; Markella J. Alatsatianos; Basma Bahsoun; Edith Blackburn; Catherine E.M. Hogwood; Pamela E Lithgow; Michelle L. Rowe; Lyto Yiangou; Florian Rothweiler; Jindrich Cinatl; Richard Zehner; Anthony J. Baines; Michelle D. Garrett; Campbell W. Gourlay; Darren K. Griffin

The formation of acquired drug resistance is a major reason for the failure of anti-cancer therapies after initial response. Here, we introduce a novel model of acquired oxaliplatin resistance, a sub-line of the non-MYCN-amplified neuroblastoma cell line SK-N-AS that was adapted to growth in the presence of 4000 ng/mL oxaliplatin (SK-N-ASrOXALI4000). SK-N-ASrOXALI4000 cells displayed enhanced chromosomal aberrations compared to SK-N-AS, as indicated by 24-chromosome fluorescence in situ hybridisation. Moreover, SK-N-ASrOXALI4000 cells were resistant not only to oxaliplatin but also to the two other commonly used anti-cancer platinum agents cisplatin and carboplatin. SK-N-ASrOXALI4000 cells exhibited a stable resistance phenotype that was not affected by culturing the cells for 10 weeks in the absence of oxaliplatin. Interestingly, SK-N-ASrOXALI4000 cells showed no cross resistance to gemcitabine and increased sensitivity to doxorubicin and UVC radiation, alternative treatments that like platinum drugs target DNA integrity. Notably, UVC-induced DNA damage is thought to be predominantly repaired by nucleotide excision repair and nucleotide excision repair has been described as the main oxaliplatin-induced DNA damage repair system. SK-N-ASrOXALI4000 cells were also more sensitive to lysis by influenza A virus, a candidate for oncolytic therapy, than SK-N-AS cells. In conclusion, we introduce a novel oxaliplatin resistance model. The oxaliplatin resistance mechanisms in SK-N-ASrOXALI4000 cells appear to be complex and not to directly depend on enhanced DNA repair capacity. Models of oxaliplatin resistance are of particular relevance since research on platinum drugs has so far predominantly focused on cisplatin and carboplatin.


Archive | 2015

Towards the construction of avian chromosome assemblies

Joana Damas; Marta Farré; Pamela E Lithgow; Michael N Romanov; Cai Li; Darren K. Griffin; Denis M. Larkin

Universidade Estadual Paulista Julio de Mesquita Filho, Instituto de Biociencias, Rio Claro, BrasilThe advent of the next generation sequencing (NGS) made sequencing and scaffolding of an entire animal genome a routine procedure. As the result we face a fast increase in the number of animal genomes available due to the activities of large international genome sequencing initiatives e.g., Genome 10K (G10K) or smaller projects. However, the full informative power of a sequenced genome could only be achieved when it is assembled into chromosomes. Usually, a draft or nearly complete animal chromosome assembly is achieved through three steps: (i) constructing contigs based on read overlaps, (ii) merging contigs into scaffolds using pair-end reads, and (iii) mapping scaffolds on chromosomes with the use of physical or genetic maps. As the cost of mapping techniques is still much higher than sequencing, the genetic and physical maps are not available for the majority of the de novo sequenced genomes. To overcome this problem for assemblies that employ long-insert libraries (5 – 40 Kbp) we recently developed the reference-assisted chromosome assembly (RACA) algorithm (Kim et al., 2013). This method relies on both the raw sequencing data (reads) and comparative information; the latter is obtained from alignments between the target (de novo sequenced), a closely related (reference) and more distantly related (outgroup) genomes. Using RACA followed by the manual FISH or PCR verification steps we are reconstructing the chromosome organisation of 19 bird species sequenced by the G10K community. We use the publically available chicken (Gallus gallus) and zebra finch (Taeniopygia guttata) chromosome assemblies as either reference or outgroup for each reconstruction depending on their phylogenetic relationships with each target species. Initially, we established the optimal RACA parameters for a bird chromosome assembly reconstruction using the duck (Anas platyrhynchos) and budgerigar (Melopsittacus undulatus) super-scaffolds assembled with the support from physical maps. This step allowed us to test the reliability of RACA reconstructions for bird genomes. Due to a higher evolutionary conservation of the bird karyotype compared to the mammalian one, we have achieved ~97% accuracy of scaffold adjacencies in our predicted chromosome fragments compared to the ~93-96% accuracies reported for mammals (Kim et al., 2013). We detected ~4-28% of scaffolds in different target bird genomes that are either chimeric or containing genuine lineage-specific evolutionary breakpoint regions. Some of these scaffolds will be selected for follow up PCR or FISH verifications. All RACA reconstructions will become publicly available from our Evolution Highway comparative chromosome browser http://evolutionhighway.ncsa.uiuc.edu/birds/ and will be further utilised to study connections between the chromosome evolution, adaptation and phenotypic diversity in birds and other vertebrates.Universidade Estadual Paulista, Nucleo de Pesquisa e Conservacao de Cervideos, Faculdade de Ciencias Agrarias e Veterinarias, Jaboticabal, Brasil• Invited speaker abstracts have the prefix “S” • Selected Oral presentations have the prefix “O” • Poster abstracts have the prefix “P” S1: 50th Anniversary of the first Oxford Chromosome Conference and some reflections on chromosome synapsis Malcolm A Ferguson-Smith Department of Veterinary Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK. Cyril Darlington, who organised the first Oxford Chromosome Conference 50 years ago, was one of the great pioneers of cytogenetics. He brought new understanding to the mechanisms of mitosis and meiosis and the uniformity of chromosome behaviour in all plants and animals with its implications for evolution. His major conclusions relate to the origin of chiasmata and the properties of sex chromosomes and were based on light microscopy before the era of molecular cytogenetics in the 1970s. Since his day the field has been transformed by electron microscopy, FISH, immunofluorescence of chromosomal proteins, meiotic mutants in yeast and mice and by DNA mapping and sequencing. Progress in understanding chromosome structure and synapsis in meiotic and somatic cells since Darlington will be briefly summarised with emphasis on the unknown. Genome conservation and the nature of non-coding DNA at synapsis sites, and the threedimensional structure of chromosomal proteins (eg, those of axial filaments), should be among the topics for discussion at this and future Chromosome Conferences. 20th International Chromosome Conference (ICCXX) 35120th International Chromosome Conference (ICCXX). 50th Anniversary, University of Kent, Canterbury, 1st–4th September 2014.Dinosaurs hold a unique place both in the history of the earth and the imagination of many. They dominated the terrestrial environment for around 170 million years during which time they diversified into at least 1000 different species. Reptilia, within which they are placed is one of the most remarkable vertebrate groups, consisting of two structurally and physiologically distinct lineages – the birds and the non-avian reptiles, of which there are 10,000 and 7,500 extant species respectively. The dinosaurs are without doubt the most successful group of vertebrate to have existed. They survived several mass extinction events before finally non-avian dinosaurs were defeated 66 million years ago in the Cretaceous-Paleogene extinction event, leaving the neornithes (modern birds) as their living descendants. Aside from the huge phenotypic diversity seen in this group, the birds and non-avian reptiles interestingly display similar karyotypic patterns (with the exception of crocodilians); with the characteristic pattern of macro and micro chromosomes, small genome size and few repetitive elements, suggesting that these were features exhibited in their common ancestor. In this study, the availability of multiple reptile genome sequences (including birds) on an interactive browser (Evolution Highway) allowed us to identify multi species homologous synteny blocks (msHSBs) between the putative avian ancestor (derived from six species of extant birds), the Lizard (Anolis carolensis) and the Snake (Boa constrictor). From these msHSBs we were able to produce a series of contiguous ancestral regions (CARs) representing the most likely ancestral karyotype of the Saurian (ancestor of archosaurs and lepidosaurs) that diverged from the mammalian lineage 280 mya. From this we have hypothesised the series of inter and intra-chromosomal rearrangements that have occurred along the dinosaur (archosaur) lineage to the ancestor of modern birds (100 mya) and along the lepidosaur lineage to the modern snake and lizard using the model of maximum parsimony. Our study shows that relatively few chromosomal rearrangements took place over this period with an average of one inter or intra-chromosomal (translocations and inversions respectively) rearrangement occurring approximately every 2 million years. The majority of these rearrangements appear to be intra-chromosomal suggesting an overall karyotypic stability, which is consistent with that of that of modern birds. Our results support the hypothesis that the characteristically avian genome was present in the saurian ancestor and that it has remained remarkably stable in the 280 million years since. It is credible therefore to suggest that this ‘avian-style’ genome may be one of the key factors in the success of this extraordinarily diverse animal group.


Archive | 2015

AVIAN ANCESTRAL KARYOTYPE RECONSTRUCTION AND DIFFERENTIAL RATES OF INTER-AND INTRA-CHROMOSOMAL CHANGE IN DIFFERENT LINEAGES

Michael N Romanov; Marta Farré; Pamela E Lithgow; Rebecca O'Connor; Katie E Fowler; Benjamin M. Skinner; Denis M. Larkin; Darren K. Griffin

Universidade Estadual Paulista Julio de Mesquita Filho, Instituto de Biociencias, Rio Claro, BrasilThe advent of the next generation sequencing (NGS) made sequencing and scaffolding of an entire animal genome a routine procedure. As the result we face a fast increase in the number of animal genomes available due to the activities of large international genome sequencing initiatives e.g., Genome 10K (G10K) or smaller projects. However, the full informative power of a sequenced genome could only be achieved when it is assembled into chromosomes. Usually, a draft or nearly complete animal chromosome assembly is achieved through three steps: (i) constructing contigs based on read overlaps, (ii) merging contigs into scaffolds using pair-end reads, and (iii) mapping scaffolds on chromosomes with the use of physical or genetic maps. As the cost of mapping techniques is still much higher than sequencing, the genetic and physical maps are not available for the majority of the de novo sequenced genomes. To overcome this problem for assemblies that employ long-insert libraries (5 – 40 Kbp) we recently developed the reference-assisted chromosome assembly (RACA) algorithm (Kim et al., 2013). This method relies on both the raw sequencing data (reads) and comparative information; the latter is obtained from alignments between the target (de novo sequenced), a closely related (reference) and more distantly related (outgroup) genomes. Using RACA followed by the manual FISH or PCR verification steps we are reconstructing the chromosome organisation of 19 bird species sequenced by the G10K community. We use the publically available chicken (Gallus gallus) and zebra finch (Taeniopygia guttata) chromosome assemblies as either reference or outgroup for each reconstruction depending on their phylogenetic relationships with each target species. Initially, we established the optimal RACA parameters for a bird chromosome assembly reconstruction using the duck (Anas platyrhynchos) and budgerigar (Melopsittacus undulatus) super-scaffolds assembled with the support from physical maps. This step allowed us to test the reliability of RACA reconstructions for bird genomes. Due to a higher evolutionary conservation of the bird karyotype compared to the mammalian one, we have achieved ~97% accuracy of scaffold adjacencies in our predicted chromosome fragments compared to the ~93-96% accuracies reported for mammals (Kim et al., 2013). We detected ~4-28% of scaffolds in different target bird genomes that are either chimeric or containing genuine lineage-specific evolutionary breakpoint regions. Some of these scaffolds will be selected for follow up PCR or FISH verifications. All RACA reconstructions will become publicly available from our Evolution Highway comparative chromosome browser http://evolutionhighway.ncsa.uiuc.edu/birds/ and will be further utilised to study connections between the chromosome evolution, adaptation and phenotypic diversity in birds and other vertebrates.Universidade Estadual Paulista, Nucleo de Pesquisa e Conservacao de Cervideos, Faculdade de Ciencias Agrarias e Veterinarias, Jaboticabal, Brasil• Invited speaker abstracts have the prefix “S” • Selected Oral presentations have the prefix “O” • Poster abstracts have the prefix “P” S1: 50th Anniversary of the first Oxford Chromosome Conference and some reflections on chromosome synapsis Malcolm A Ferguson-Smith Department of Veterinary Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK. Cyril Darlington, who organised the first Oxford Chromosome Conference 50 years ago, was one of the great pioneers of cytogenetics. He brought new understanding to the mechanisms of mitosis and meiosis and the uniformity of chromosome behaviour in all plants and animals with its implications for evolution. His major conclusions relate to the origin of chiasmata and the properties of sex chromosomes and were based on light microscopy before the era of molecular cytogenetics in the 1970s. Since his day the field has been transformed by electron microscopy, FISH, immunofluorescence of chromosomal proteins, meiotic mutants in yeast and mice and by DNA mapping and sequencing. Progress in understanding chromosome structure and synapsis in meiotic and somatic cells since Darlington will be briefly summarised with emphasis on the unknown. Genome conservation and the nature of non-coding DNA at synapsis sites, and the threedimensional structure of chromosomal proteins (eg, those of axial filaments), should be among the topics for discussion at this and future Chromosome Conferences. 20th International Chromosome Conference (ICCXX) 35120th International Chromosome Conference (ICCXX). 50th Anniversary, University of Kent, Canterbury, 1st–4th September 2014.Dinosaurs hold a unique place both in the history of the earth and the imagination of many. They dominated the terrestrial environment for around 170 million years during which time they diversified into at least 1000 different species. Reptilia, within which they are placed is one of the most remarkable vertebrate groups, consisting of two structurally and physiologically distinct lineages – the birds and the non-avian reptiles, of which there are 10,000 and 7,500 extant species respectively. The dinosaurs are without doubt the most successful group of vertebrate to have existed. They survived several mass extinction events before finally non-avian dinosaurs were defeated 66 million years ago in the Cretaceous-Paleogene extinction event, leaving the neornithes (modern birds) as their living descendants. Aside from the huge phenotypic diversity seen in this group, the birds and non-avian reptiles interestingly display similar karyotypic patterns (with the exception of crocodilians); with the characteristic pattern of macro and micro chromosomes, small genome size and few repetitive elements, suggesting that these were features exhibited in their common ancestor. In this study, the availability of multiple reptile genome sequences (including birds) on an interactive browser (Evolution Highway) allowed us to identify multi species homologous synteny blocks (msHSBs) between the putative avian ancestor (derived from six species of extant birds), the Lizard (Anolis carolensis) and the Snake (Boa constrictor). From these msHSBs we were able to produce a series of contiguous ancestral regions (CARs) representing the most likely ancestral karyotype of the Saurian (ancestor of archosaurs and lepidosaurs) that diverged from the mammalian lineage 280 mya. From this we have hypothesised the series of inter and intra-chromosomal rearrangements that have occurred along the dinosaur (archosaur) lineage to the ancestor of modern birds (100 mya) and along the lepidosaur lineage to the modern snake and lizard using the model of maximum parsimony. Our study shows that relatively few chromosomal rearrangements took place over this period with an average of one inter or intra-chromosomal (translocations and inversions respectively) rearrangement occurring approximately every 2 million years. The majority of these rearrangements appear to be intra-chromosomal suggesting an overall karyotypic stability, which is consistent with that of that of modern birds. Our results support the hypothesis that the characteristically avian genome was present in the saurian ancestor and that it has remained remarkably stable in the 280 million years since. It is credible therefore to suggest that this ‘avian-style’ genome may be one of the key factors in the success of this extraordinarily diverse animal group.


Archive | 2015

AVIAN CHROMONOMICS GOES FUNCTIONAL

Darren K. Griffin; Marta Farré; Pamela E Lithgow; Rebecca O'Connor; Katie E Fowler; Michael N Romanov; Denis M. Larkin

Universidade Estadual Paulista Julio de Mesquita Filho, Instituto de Biociencias, Rio Claro, BrasilThe advent of the next generation sequencing (NGS) made sequencing and scaffolding of an entire animal genome a routine procedure. As the result we face a fast increase in the number of animal genomes available due to the activities of large international genome sequencing initiatives e.g., Genome 10K (G10K) or smaller projects. However, the full informative power of a sequenced genome could only be achieved when it is assembled into chromosomes. Usually, a draft or nearly complete animal chromosome assembly is achieved through three steps: (i) constructing contigs based on read overlaps, (ii) merging contigs into scaffolds using pair-end reads, and (iii) mapping scaffolds on chromosomes with the use of physical or genetic maps. As the cost of mapping techniques is still much higher than sequencing, the genetic and physical maps are not available for the majority of the de novo sequenced genomes. To overcome this problem for assemblies that employ long-insert libraries (5 – 40 Kbp) we recently developed the reference-assisted chromosome assembly (RACA) algorithm (Kim et al., 2013). This method relies on both the raw sequencing data (reads) and comparative information; the latter is obtained from alignments between the target (de novo sequenced), a closely related (reference) and more distantly related (outgroup) genomes. Using RACA followed by the manual FISH or PCR verification steps we are reconstructing the chromosome organisation of 19 bird species sequenced by the G10K community. We use the publically available chicken (Gallus gallus) and zebra finch (Taeniopygia guttata) chromosome assemblies as either reference or outgroup for each reconstruction depending on their phylogenetic relationships with each target species. Initially, we established the optimal RACA parameters for a bird chromosome assembly reconstruction using the duck (Anas platyrhynchos) and budgerigar (Melopsittacus undulatus) super-scaffolds assembled with the support from physical maps. This step allowed us to test the reliability of RACA reconstructions for bird genomes. Due to a higher evolutionary conservation of the bird karyotype compared to the mammalian one, we have achieved ~97% accuracy of scaffold adjacencies in our predicted chromosome fragments compared to the ~93-96% accuracies reported for mammals (Kim et al., 2013). We detected ~4-28% of scaffolds in different target bird genomes that are either chimeric or containing genuine lineage-specific evolutionary breakpoint regions. Some of these scaffolds will be selected for follow up PCR or FISH verifications. All RACA reconstructions will become publicly available from our Evolution Highway comparative chromosome browser http://evolutionhighway.ncsa.uiuc.edu/birds/ and will be further utilised to study connections between the chromosome evolution, adaptation and phenotypic diversity in birds and other vertebrates.Universidade Estadual Paulista, Nucleo de Pesquisa e Conservacao de Cervideos, Faculdade de Ciencias Agrarias e Veterinarias, Jaboticabal, Brasil• Invited speaker abstracts have the prefix “S” • Selected Oral presentations have the prefix “O” • Poster abstracts have the prefix “P” S1: 50th Anniversary of the first Oxford Chromosome Conference and some reflections on chromosome synapsis Malcolm A Ferguson-Smith Department of Veterinary Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK. Cyril Darlington, who organised the first Oxford Chromosome Conference 50 years ago, was one of the great pioneers of cytogenetics. He brought new understanding to the mechanisms of mitosis and meiosis and the uniformity of chromosome behaviour in all plants and animals with its implications for evolution. His major conclusions relate to the origin of chiasmata and the properties of sex chromosomes and were based on light microscopy before the era of molecular cytogenetics in the 1970s. Since his day the field has been transformed by electron microscopy, FISH, immunofluorescence of chromosomal proteins, meiotic mutants in yeast and mice and by DNA mapping and sequencing. Progress in understanding chromosome structure and synapsis in meiotic and somatic cells since Darlington will be briefly summarised with emphasis on the unknown. Genome conservation and the nature of non-coding DNA at synapsis sites, and the threedimensional structure of chromosomal proteins (eg, those of axial filaments), should be among the topics for discussion at this and future Chromosome Conferences. 20th International Chromosome Conference (ICCXX) 35120th International Chromosome Conference (ICCXX). 50th Anniversary, University of Kent, Canterbury, 1st–4th September 2014.Dinosaurs hold a unique place both in the history of the earth and the imagination of many. They dominated the terrestrial environment for around 170 million years during which time they diversified into at least 1000 different species. Reptilia, within which they are placed is one of the most remarkable vertebrate groups, consisting of two structurally and physiologically distinct lineages – the birds and the non-avian reptiles, of which there are 10,000 and 7,500 extant species respectively. The dinosaurs are without doubt the most successful group of vertebrate to have existed. They survived several mass extinction events before finally non-avian dinosaurs were defeated 66 million years ago in the Cretaceous-Paleogene extinction event, leaving the neornithes (modern birds) as their living descendants. Aside from the huge phenotypic diversity seen in this group, the birds and non-avian reptiles interestingly display similar karyotypic patterns (with the exception of crocodilians); with the characteristic pattern of macro and micro chromosomes, small genome size and few repetitive elements, suggesting that these were features exhibited in their common ancestor. In this study, the availability of multiple reptile genome sequences (including birds) on an interactive browser (Evolution Highway) allowed us to identify multi species homologous synteny blocks (msHSBs) between the putative avian ancestor (derived from six species of extant birds), the Lizard (Anolis carolensis) and the Snake (Boa constrictor). From these msHSBs we were able to produce a series of contiguous ancestral regions (CARs) representing the most likely ancestral karyotype of the Saurian (ancestor of archosaurs and lepidosaurs) that diverged from the mammalian lineage 280 mya. From this we have hypothesised the series of inter and intra-chromosomal rearrangements that have occurred along the dinosaur (archosaur) lineage to the ancestor of modern birds (100 mya) and along the lepidosaur lineage to the modern snake and lizard using the model of maximum parsimony. Our study shows that relatively few chromosomal rearrangements took place over this period with an average of one inter or intra-chromosomal (translocations and inversions respectively) rearrangement occurring approximately every 2 million years. The majority of these rearrangements appear to be intra-chromosomal suggesting an overall karyotypic stability, which is consistent with that of that of modern birds. Our results support the hypothesis that the characteristically avian genome was present in the saurian ancestor and that it has remained remarkably stable in the 280 million years since. It is credible therefore to suggest that this ‘avian-style’ genome may be one of the key factors in the success of this extraordinarily diverse animal group.


Plant and Animal Genome XXII Conference | 2014

In silico reconstruction of chromosomal rearrangements and an avian ancestral karyotype

Michael N Romanov; Marta Farré-Belmonte; Pamela E Lithgow; Becky O'Connor; Katie E Fowler; Denis M. Larkin; Darren K. Griffin


Archive | 2015

Assembling and comparing avian genomes by molecular cytogenetics

Henry Martell; Rebecca O'Connor; Joana Damas; A.A. Mandawala; Katie E Fowler; Sunitha Joseph; Marta Farré; Michael N Romanov; Pamela E Lithgow; Denis M. Larkin; Darren K. Griffin


Archive | 2014

Interchromosomal rearrangements in avian microchromosomes.

Pamela E Lithgow; Rebecca O'Connor; Gothami Fonseka; Abdullah Al Mutery; Claudia Rathje; Richard Frodsham; Malcolm A. Ferguson-Smith; Benjamin M. Skinner; Darren K. Griffin

Collaboration


Dive into the Pamela E Lithgow's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Michael N Romanov

Zoological Society of San Diego

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Katie E Fowler

Canterbury Christ Church University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Marta Farré

Royal Veterinary College

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge