Paola Lanfiuti Baldi

Poker association of weekly alternating 5-fluorouracil, irinotecan, bevacizumab and oxaliplatin (FIr-B/FOx) in first line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer: a phase II study

BackgroundThis phase II study investigated efficacy and safety of weekly alternating Bevacizumab (BEV)/Irinotecan (CPT-11) or Oxaliplatin (OHP) associated to weekly 5-Fluorouracil (5-FU) in first line treatment of metastatic colorectal carcinoma (MCRC).MethodsSimon two-step design: delta 20% (p0 50%, p1 70%), power 80%, α 5%, β 20%. Projected objective responses (ORR): I step, 8/15 patients (pts); II step 26/43 pts. Schedule: weekly 12 h-timed-flat-infusion/5-FU 900 mg/m2, days 1-2, 8-9, 15-16, 22-23; CPT-11 160 mg/m2 plus BEV 5 mg/kg, days 1,15; OHP at three dose-levels, 60-70-80 mg/m2, days 8, 22; every 4 weeks.ResultsFifty consecutive, unselected pts < 75 years were enrolled: median age 63; young-elderly (yE) 24 (48%); liver metastases (LM) 33 pts, 66% Achieved OHP recommended dose, 80 mg/m2. ORR 82% intent-to-treat and 84% as-treated analysis. Median progression-free survival 12 months. Equivalent efficacy was obtained in yE pts. Liver metastasectomies were performed in 26% of all pts and in 39% of pts with LM. After a median follow-up of 21 months, median overall survival was 28 months. Cumulative G3-4 toxicities per patient: diarrhea 28%, mucositis 6%, neutropenia 10%, hypertension 2%. They were equivalent in yE pts. Limiting toxicity syndromes (LTS), consisting of the dose-limiting toxicity, associated or not to G2 or limiting toxicities: 44% overall, 46% in yE. Multiple versus single site LTS, respectively: overall, 24% versus 20%; yE pts, 37.5% versus 8%.ConclusionPoker combination shows high activity and efficacy in first line treatment of MCRC. It increases liver metastasectomies rate and can be safely administered.Trial registrationOsservatorio Nazionale sulla Sperimentazione Clinica dei Medicinali (OsSC) Agenzia Italiana del Farmaco (AIFA) Numero EudraCT 2007-004946-34

Effectiveness of Liver Metastasectomies in Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Treated With FIr-B/FOx Triplet Chemotherapy Plus Bevacizumab

BACKGROUND Intensive medical treatment increases resection rate of liver metastases in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (MCRC). The effectiveness of liver metastasectomies was evaluated in patients with MCRC who were treated with previously reported FIr-B/FOx (triplet chemotherapy plus bevacizumab). PATIENTS AND METHODS Fifty patients with MCRC enrolled in the reported phase II study were classified according to involved metastatic sites (liver-only metastatic site, multiple metastatic sites) and the extent of liver metastases (single, multiple). Surgical resectability of liver metastases was evaluated at baseline and every 3 cycles of FIr-B/FOx treatment. The resection rate of liver metastases, activity, and efficacy were evaluated; progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were compared by using the log-rank test. RESULTS Patients with liver MCRC were 33 of 50 consecutive unselected patients with MCRC: liver limited, 22 patients; multiple metastatic sites, 11 patients. Liver metastasectomies were performed in 13 patients: 26% of 50 patients with MCRC, 39% of 33 patients with liver MCRC. In patients with liver-only MCRC, a secondary liver surgery was performed in 54%: 6 of 9 single and 6 of 13 multiple liver metastases. Also, 1 liver and lung metastasectomy was performed. Pathologic complete responses were achieved in 2 patients (15%). The conversion rate of unresectable liver metastases was 83%. Objective response rate, PFS, OS were, respectively: 84%, 11 and 23 months in 33 liver MCRC; 86%, 17 and 44 months in 22 liver-limited patients. PFS and OS were significantly increased in patients with liver-limited metastases compared with multiple metastatic sites and single compared with multiple liver metastases. CONCLUSION The FIr-B/FOx regimen may increase the resection rate of liver metastases and improve clinical outcome of patients with liver-only MCRC.

Triplet Chemotherapy in Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: Toward the Best Way to Safely Administer a Highly Active Regimen in Clinical Practice

A major problem concerning the addition of more drugs in a chemotherapy combination is designing a proper schedule assuring the balance between dose intensity of each drug, efficacy of the combination, and tolerability lessening the burden of drug toxicity. We evaluated triplet chemotherapy-based intensive regimens proposed as first-line treatment in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Using a FOLFOXIRI (5-fluorouracil [5-FU], irinotecan, and oxaliplatin) combination regimen, patients with metastatic colorectal cancer now have the possibility of longer survival, but disappointingly, with increased toxicities. Triplet chemotherapy regimen according to 5-fluorouracil, irinotecan /5-fluorouracil, oxaliplatin, characterized by timed flat-infusion 5-FU administration, without leucovorin, obtained efficacy equivalent to other reported similar combination regimens (5-FU, irinotecan, and oxaliplatin), with increased received 5-FU dose intensity and lower grade 3 to 4 neutropenia. To guarantee the proper balance between dose intensities, efficacy, and toxicity, triplet chemotherapy schedules could be further improved by abrogation of folinic acid and bolus 5-FU, a new and easy modality of 5-FU administration, such as timed flat-infusion 5-FU, associated with alternating irinotecan and oxaliplatin; this could favor diffusion of this intensive treatment in clinical practice.

Bone targeted therapy for preventing skeletal-related events in metastatic breast cancer

Cancer cells can alter physiological mechanisms within bone resulting in high bone turnover, and consequently in skeletal-related events (SREs), causing severe morbidity in affected patients. The goals of bone targeted therapy, as bisphosphonates and denosumab, are the reduction of incidence and the delay in occurrence of the SREs, to improve quality of life and pain control. The toxicity profile is similar between bisphosphonates and denosumab, even if pyrexia, bone pain, arthralgia, renal failure and hypercalcemia are more common with bisphosphonates, while hypocalcemia and toothache are more frequently reported with denosumab. Osteonecrosis of the jaw (ONJ) occurred infrequently without statistically significant difference. The present review aims to provide an assessment on bone targeted therapies for preventing the occurrence of SREs in bone metastatic breast cancer patients, critically analyzing the evidence available so far on their effectiveness, in light of the different mechanisms of action. Thus, we try to provide tools for the most fitting treatment of bone metastatic breast cancer patients. We also provide an overview on the usefulness of bone turnover markers in clinical practice and new molecules currently under study for the treatment of bone metastatic disease.

Modulation of GemOx chemotherapy according to CIRS in elderly patients with advanced pancreatic cancer

The present study evaluated activity and toxicity of modulated doses of gemcitabine associated to oxaliplatin in patients with secondary CIRS and with locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma (LAPC) and metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma (MPC). Since January 2006, untreated LAPC and MPC patients have been assessed with ADL, IADL, CIRS to modulate chemotherapy dosages according to co-morbidity stage. Patiens aged<75 years, co-morbidity stage primary/intermediate, or ≥75 years and co-morbidity stage primary, received gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m² as a 10 mg/m²/min infusion on day 1 and oxaliplatin 70 mg/m² as a 2-h infusion on day 2 every 2 weeks. Patiens aged<75 years, co-morbidity stage secondary or ≥75 years and co-morbidity stage intermediate/secondary patients received gemcitabine 800 mg/m². Primary endpoint was the overall response rate (ORR). Secondary endpoints were disease control rate (DCR), PFS, OS and toxicity. Thirty-one patients were recruited: 26% (8/31) LAPC and 74% (23/31) MPC; median age 69 years. Co-morbidity stage primary/intermediate, 19; secondary, 12. Twenty-seven valuable patients: ORR 30% (CI±0.14); disease control rate 85% (CI±0.18). Median follow-up 13 months: median PFS and OS were 6 and 15 months, respectively. Valuable cycles 140. Grade 3/4 toxicity per patient: leukopenia, 18.5%; neutropenia, 55,5%; thrombocytopenia, 7.4%; SGOT/SGPT, 7.4%; gamma-GT, 7.4%; fever without neutropenia, 3.7%. Median received dose intensity: gemcitabine 400 mg/m2/w; oxaliplatin 35 mg/m2/w. Modulation of GemOx chemotherapy according, to CIRS stage in advanced pancreatic cancer confirms reported efficacy and tolerability.

Timed-flat infusion of 5-fluorouracil associated with docetaxel as first-line treatment of patients with metastatic breast cancer.

To the Editor: The combination of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and docetaxel (dTX) has demonstrated significant antitumor activity in anthracycline-pretreated patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) (1). In a previous study (2), we determined the optimal doses of dTX in combination with a 12-hour (10:00 p.m.–10:00 a.m.) timed-flat infusion of 5-FU (TFI ⁄ 5-FU) in MBC. TFI ⁄ 5-FU may reduce the frequency of mucositis (stomatitis and diarrhea) that appeared to be the dose-limiting toxicity of the 5-FU-dTX regimen. Thus, TFI ⁄ 5FU associated with docetaxel (dTX) was evaluated in a phase II study as a first-line treatment of patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Patients were recruited at the Unit of Medical Oncology (University of L’Aquila, Italy) between December 1999 and July 2004. The study was approved by the Local Ethics Committee and all patients provided written informed consent. Treatment was administered on an outpatient basis as follows: dTX (Taxotere ; Aventis Farma, Dagenaham, UK) was given over 1-hour infusion at 85 mg ⁄ m on day 1 associated with a 12-hour TFI ⁄ 5-FU (fluorouracil TEVA ; Pharmachemic B.V., Haarlem, the Netherlands) at 800 mg ⁄ m ⁄ day, over 5 days. Cycles were repeated every 3 weeks. An implanted venous access device was required for 5-FU administration by means of a portable pump (CADD Plus, SEVIT ; Deltec, Inc., St. Paul, MN, USA), programmed to infuse 5-FU at a constant rate over a period of 12 hours, starting at 10:00 p.m. Tumor response was assessed according to WHO response criteria (3) for every three cycles of treatment. Patients were considered assessable for response to therapy if they received at least 3 treatment cycles. For the evaluation of activity, data from the 14 patients enrolled in the previous dose-finding study (2) were considered together with data of the 18 patients enrolled in the present study and treated at the recommended dose, as the average dose intensity (rDI) received by the two groups were quite similar (5-FU 1321 mg ⁄ m ⁄ week and dTX 27.7 mg ⁄ m ⁄ week versus 5-FU 1333 mg ⁄ m ⁄ week and dTX 28.3 mg ⁄ m ⁄ week). Toxicity was graded according to the National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria. Granulocyte colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) was administered at the first occurrence of grade (G) 4 neutropenia and prophylactically given from then onwards. Among 31 evaluable patients out of 32 recruited, 4 complete responses (13%) and 14 partial responses (45%) were observed for an overall response rate (ORR) of 58% (a 0.05, CI ± 18%). Among the 19 patients pretreated with adjuvant anthracyclines, the ORR was of 47% (a 0.05, CI ± 23%), whereas, the ORR was of 75% (a 0.05, CI ± 23%) among the 12 patients non-receiving adjuvant anthracyclines. The median time to progression was 10 months (range 4– 28 months) and the median overall survival 25 months (range 4–46+ months). In the 18 patients enrolled in the present study at the recommended dose, a total of 141 cycles were administered with a median of 6 cycles per patient (range 3–12 cycles). The main non-hematologic toxicity was G3–4 stomatitis occurring in 22% of the patients and 2% of cycles. No G3–4 diarrhea was recorded. In the previous study using the same drugs with 5-FU administered in 24 hour-continuous infusion G3–4 stomatitis was equivalent and G3 diarrhea occurred in 7% of patients. It points out that TFI ⁄ 5-FU may reduce the incidence of gastrointestinal mucositis. G4 neutropenia, occurring in 72% of patients and requiring prophylactic G-CSF support, represented the main toxic event of the present regimen, but febrile neutropenia rarely occurred (one patient). The most common G1-2 non-hematologic toxicities were nausea (46% of patients and 13% of cycles), diarrhea (33% of patients and 4% of cycles), and stomatitis (33% of patients and 10% of cycles). Address correspondence and reprint requests to: Enrico Ricevuto, MD, Unit of Medical Oncology, S. Salvatore Hospital, University of L’Aquila, Via Vetoio, Coppito, 67100 L’Aquila, Italy, or e-mail: enrico.ricevuto@univaq.it

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer: a dose-dense schedule in real life and putative role of PIK3CA mutations

Background Dose-dense chemotherapy is one of the treatments of choice for neoadjuvant therapy in breast cancer (BC). Activating mutations in PIK3CA gene predict worse response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy for HER2-positive patients, while their role is less clearly defined for HER2-negative tumors. Methods We conducted a phase I/II study of neoadjuvant, sequential, dose-dense anthracycline/taxane chemotherapy, plus trastuzumab in HER2-positive patients and investigated the correlation of pre-treatment PIK3CA mutation status with pathologic complete response (pCR) and long-term outcome in a real-life setting. Results we established a dose-dense docetaxel recommended dose of 60 mg/m2 and 65 mg/m2, with or without trastuzumab, respectively, according to HER2-status, following dose-dense epirubicin-cyclophosphamide (90/600 mg/m2), every 2 weeks. The overall pCR rate was 21.4%; median disease-free survival (DFS) was 52 months and median overall survival (OS) was not yet reached. PIK3CA mutation status was not significantly associated with the pCR rate: 18% for both mutated and wild-type patients. The pCR rate was: 25% in the mutated and 24% in the wild-type (p 0.560) cohort of the HER2-positive subgroup; 33% both in the mutant and wild-type cohort of the triple-negative subgroup; no pCR neither in the mutant nor in the wild-type cohort of the HR-positive/HER2-negative subgroup. Among the HER2-positive population, a trend toward worse DFS was observed in case of mutation, as opposed to the triple negative population. Conclusions This study proposes an effective and safe neoadjuvant dose-dense anthracycline/taxane schedule and suggests that PIK3CA mutation analysis can be usefully performed in real-life clinical practice.

The possible different roles of denosumab in prevention and cure breast cancer bone metastases: A ‘hypothesis‑generator’ study from clinical practice

The most frequent site of recurrence in breast cancer (BC) is the bone, particularly in patients with ‘luminal-like’ disease. Denosumab has been shown to prevent aromatase inhibitors (AIs) induced bone resorption in postmenopausal early BC patients and reduce skeletal-related events (SREs) in bone metastatic breast cancer (BMBC). A ‘real life’ analysis of 90 BMBC patients treated with denosumab was performed. Eighty-six patients (95.6%) had ‘luminal-like’ disease, 72 (80%) had bone metastases at the time of first recurrence of disease. Among 50 patients with metachronous ‘luminal-like’ disease, 40 (80%) had first recurrence to the bone. Among these patients median time to skeletal recurrence (TSkR) was shorter for patients who were previously exposed to AIs compared to those who were not (53.0 vs. 102.0 months, respectively; P=0.0300) and longer for patients previously treated with tamoxifen compared to those who were not (102.0 vs. 59.0 months, respectively; P=0.0466). Both of them were not confirmed at multivariate analysis. In the overall population, 17 first SREs were observed (16 radiation therapy) and median time to first SRE was not reached. A statistically significant difference in the incidence of SREs was detected only between patients with exclusively osteolytic bone metastases vs. those without (P=0.013). The presence of exclusively-osteolytic bone metastases was the only factor significantly associated with a shorter time to first SRE (P=0.011). The only G3 toxicity reported was hypocalcemia in one patient. No osteonecrosis of the jaw events (ONJ) occurred. This study demonstrated that a pro-active attitude enables the treatment of the majority of patients with denosumab without significant class-related toxicities. The majority of SREs were from radiation therapy, so pain still remains the clinical hallmark of bone metastases, particularly for osteolytic ones. The suggestion that estrogen deprivation with AIs can favor a ‘bone-related’ risk conditions for developing bone metastases must be considered with caution and surely needs further validations.

Prognostic significance of clinicopathological factors in early breast cancer: 20 years of follow-up in a single-center analysis

Background To quantify the effect of traditional prognostic factors [nodal status, estrogen-receptor (ER), progesterone-receptor (PR), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)] on long-term outcome of patients with early breast cancer (EBC), treated in clinical practice over a period of about twenty years. Results 1198 consecutive patients were identified. Median DFS (disease-free survival): ER+/PR±/HER2−, 165 months (mo) if node-negative (N0) and 114mo if node-positive (N+) (p < 0.001); triple-negative (TN), 109mo if N0 and 65mo if N+ (p 0.144); ER+/PR±/HER2+ in patients not-treated with adjuvant trastuzumab (T−), not reached if N0 and 114mo if N+ (p 0.297); ER+/PR±/HER2+ in patients treated with trastuzumab (T+), 95mo if N0 and 85mo if N+ (p 0.615); ER−/PR−/HER2+ T−, not reached if N0 and 26mo if N+ (p 0.279); ER−/PR−/HER2+ T+, not reached if N0 and 66mo if N+ (p 0.014). Median OS (overall survival): ER+/ PR±/HER2−, 166mo if N0 and 144mo if N+ (p 0.028); TN, 158mo if N0 and 96mo if N+ (p 0.384); ER+/PR±/HER2+ T−, not reached if N0 and 157mo if N+ (p 0.475), ER+/PR±/HER2+ T+, not reached if N0 and 106mo if N+ (p 0.436); ER−/PR−/HER2+ T−, not reached if N0 and 34mo if N+ (p 0.273); ER−/PR−/HER2+ T+, not reached neither if N0 nor if N+ (p 0.094). Materials and Methods Disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were evaluated according to tumor characteristics, based on information retrospectively retrieved from patients’ medical records. Conclusions Pathological tumor characteristics and nodal status still represent useful tools in treatment selection and follow-up decision making of EBC patients in clinical practice.

New schedule of bevacizumab/paclitaxel as first‐line therapy for metastatic HER2‐negative breast cancer in a real‐life setting

Angiogenesis plays an essential role in the growth and progression of breast cancer. This observational single center study evaluated the efficacy and safety of a new weekly schedule of bevacizumab/paclitaxel combination in the first‐line treatment of unselected, HER2‐negative, metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients, in a real‐life setting. Thirty‐five patients (median age 56 years, range 40–81) with HER2‐negative MBC were treated with paclitaxel (70 mg/m2) dd 1,8,15 q21 (60 mg/m2 if ≥65 years or secondary Cumulative Illness Rating Scale) plus bevacizumab (10 mg/kg) every 2 weeks. Twenty‐two patients (63%) had ≥2 metastatic sites and 15 (43%) visceral disease. Eleven patients (31%) had a triple‐negative breast cancer (TNBC). A clinical complete response (cCR) was observed in 6 (17%) cases after a median of seven cycles, a partial response (PR) in 22 (63%), and a stable disease (SD) in 6 (17%) cases; the overall clinical benefit rate was 97%. In TNBC subgroup, cCR occurred in 1 (9%) case, PR in 8 (73%), and SD in 2 (18%). At a median follow‐up of 13 months (range 1–79 months), the median progression‐free survival was 11 months and the median overall survival was 36 months. No grade 4 adverse events occurred. The main grade 3 toxicities observed were neutropenia (11.4%), hypertension (5.7%), stomatitis (2.8%), diarrhea (2.8%), and vomiting (2.8%). The administration of weekly paclitaxel plus bevacizumab in this real‐life experience shows similar efficacy than previously reported schedules, with a comparable dose intensity and a good toxicity profile.