Valentina Cocciolone

Bone targeted therapy for preventing skeletal-related events in metastatic breast cancer

Cancer cells can alter physiological mechanisms within bone resulting in high bone turnover, and consequently in skeletal-related events (SREs), causing severe morbidity in affected patients. The goals of bone targeted therapy, as bisphosphonates and denosumab, are the reduction of incidence and the delay in occurrence of the SREs, to improve quality of life and pain control. The toxicity profile is similar between bisphosphonates and denosumab, even if pyrexia, bone pain, arthralgia, renal failure and hypercalcemia are more common with bisphosphonates, while hypocalcemia and toothache are more frequently reported with denosumab. Osteonecrosis of the jaw (ONJ) occurred infrequently without statistically significant difference. The present review aims to provide an assessment on bone targeted therapies for preventing the occurrence of SREs in bone metastatic breast cancer patients, critically analyzing the evidence available so far on their effectiveness, in light of the different mechanisms of action. Thus, we try to provide tools for the most fitting treatment of bone metastatic breast cancer patients. We also provide an overview on the usefulness of bone turnover markers in clinical practice and new molecules currently under study for the treatment of bone metastatic disease.

Dose-Dense Nonpegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin and Docetaxel Combination in Breast Cancer: Dose-Finding Study

BACKGROUND Anthracyclines and taxanes are effective drugs in breast cancer (BC), but their toxicity profiles limit their use in combination. A dose-finding study was performed to determine maximum tolerated doses (MTDs) of nonpegylated liposomal doxorubicin (TLC-D99) and docetaxel (DTX) as a dose-dense schedule, to maintain dose intensity, and to limit toxicity, particularly cardiac. METHODS Twenty-four patients were enrolled, 12 with metastatic BC, 5 with locally advanced BC, and 7 with early BC. An intra- and interpatient approach was planned in two sequential steps. In the first step, TLC-D99 was administered at dose levels of 40, 45, and 50 mg/m(2) plus DTX at a fixed dose of 50 mg/m(2). In the second step, TLC-D99 was administered at the dose established in the first step plus DTX at dose levels of 55, 60, and 65 mg/m(2). Every treatment cycle was delivered on day 1 every 14 days. Pegylated granulocyte colony-stimulating factor was scheduled on day 2. Dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) were defined as G4 hematological; G3 nonhematological; ≥10% or ≥20% left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) reduction if the final value was <50% or ≥50%, respectively; severe arrhythmia; and symptomatic heart failure. LVEF was evaluated by echocardiography every two cycles, and precursor brain natriuretic peptide (pBNP) and cardiac troponin I (cTnI) were monitored on days 1 and 2. RESULTS Five DLTs occurred (20.8%). No cardiac event of congestive heart failure was reported; 2 events of grade 3 cardiac dysfunction (8.3%), including a ≥20% LVEF reduction in 1 patient and symptomatic arrhythmia in another; 2 incidences of G4 neutropenia (8.3%); and 1 occurrence of G3 asthenia (4.2%) were reported. MTDs were not reached. The recommended doses were established as TLC-D99 50 mg/m(2) and DTX 65 mg/m(2). Cumulatively, mild (G1-G2) cardiac dysfunction was observed in 58.4% of patients: G1 cardiac arrhythmia was noted in 50%, G1-G2 general cardiac toxicity occurred in 25%, and concomitant toxicity was present in 17%. cTnI never increased. pBNP was increased in 25% and was associated with limiting arrhythmia in 4% and cardiac dysfunction in 16%. CONCLUSION Dose-dense TLC-D99 50 mg/m(2) and DTX 65 mg/m(2) can be safely administered in combination every 2 weeks for breast cancer, with the highest projected dose intensity for each drug at 25 and 32.5 mg/m(2) per week, respectively.

KRAS and 2 rare PI3KCA mutations coexisting in a metastatic colorectal cancer patient with aggressive and resistant disease

We describe a metastatic colorectal cancer patient, treated with first-line 5-fluorouracil, irinotecan, bevacizumab, and oxaliplatin (FIr-BFOx) therapy, with aggressive and resistant disease. KRAS, NRAS, BRAF, and PI3KCA were analyzed in primary tumor and liver metastasis. KRAS c.34G>A mutation was detected in primary tumor and liver metastasis, which additionally revealed 2 rare PI3KCA mutations (c.1633G>C and c.1645G>C). The c.1645G>C was never reported in colorectal cancer. Akt/p-AktSer473, phosphatase and tensin homolog, mismatch repair, and epidermal growth factor receptor expression was evaluated. Normal mismatch repair and epidermal growth factor receptor expression was detected. Akt was shown by primary tumor and liver metastasis, whereas p-AktSer473 was identified only in the latter, despite positive phosphatase and tensin homolog expression. Patient showed 7 months of progression-free survival and 15 months of overall survival, lower than median values reported in KRAS exon 2-mutant patients treated with the same therapy. Results lead to the hypothesis of a putative role of these mutations in worsening of the disease and are open to further confirmatory studies.

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer: a dose-dense schedule in real life and putative role of PIK3CA mutations

Background Dose-dense chemotherapy is one of the treatments of choice for neoadjuvant therapy in breast cancer (BC). Activating mutations in PIK3CA gene predict worse response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy for HER2-positive patients, while their role is less clearly defined for HER2-negative tumors. Methods We conducted a phase I/II study of neoadjuvant, sequential, dose-dense anthracycline/taxane chemotherapy, plus trastuzumab in HER2-positive patients and investigated the correlation of pre-treatment PIK3CA mutation status with pathologic complete response (pCR) and long-term outcome in a real-life setting. Results we established a dose-dense docetaxel recommended dose of 60 mg/m2 and 65 mg/m2, with or without trastuzumab, respectively, according to HER2-status, following dose-dense epirubicin-cyclophosphamide (90/600 mg/m2), every 2 weeks. The overall pCR rate was 21.4%; median disease-free survival (DFS) was 52 months and median overall survival (OS) was not yet reached. PIK3CA mutation status was not significantly associated with the pCR rate: 18% for both mutated and wild-type patients. The pCR rate was: 25% in the mutated and 24% in the wild-type (p 0.560) cohort of the HER2-positive subgroup; 33% both in the mutant and wild-type cohort of the triple-negative subgroup; no pCR neither in the mutant nor in the wild-type cohort of the HR-positive/HER2-negative subgroup. Among the HER2-positive population, a trend toward worse DFS was observed in case of mutation, as opposed to the triple negative population. Conclusions This study proposes an effective and safe neoadjuvant dose-dense anthracycline/taxane schedule and suggests that PIK3CA mutation analysis can be usefully performed in real-life clinical practice.

The possible different roles of denosumab in prevention and cure breast cancer bone metastases: A ‘hypothesis‑generator’ study from clinical practice

The most frequent site of recurrence in breast cancer (BC) is the bone, particularly in patients with ‘luminal-like’ disease. Denosumab has been shown to prevent aromatase inhibitors (AIs) induced bone resorption in postmenopausal early BC patients and reduce skeletal-related events (SREs) in bone metastatic breast cancer (BMBC). A ‘real life’ analysis of 90 BMBC patients treated with denosumab was performed. Eighty-six patients (95.6%) had ‘luminal-like’ disease, 72 (80%) had bone metastases at the time of first recurrence of disease. Among 50 patients with metachronous ‘luminal-like’ disease, 40 (80%) had first recurrence to the bone. Among these patients median time to skeletal recurrence (TSkR) was shorter for patients who were previously exposed to AIs compared to those who were not (53.0 vs. 102.0 months, respectively; P=0.0300) and longer for patients previously treated with tamoxifen compared to those who were not (102.0 vs. 59.0 months, respectively; P=0.0466). Both of them were not confirmed at multivariate analysis. In the overall population, 17 first SREs were observed (16 radiation therapy) and median time to first SRE was not reached. A statistically significant difference in the incidence of SREs was detected only between patients with exclusively osteolytic bone metastases vs. those without (P=0.013). The presence of exclusively-osteolytic bone metastases was the only factor significantly associated with a shorter time to first SRE (P=0.011). The only G3 toxicity reported was hypocalcemia in one patient. No osteonecrosis of the jaw events (ONJ) occurred. This study demonstrated that a pro-active attitude enables the treatment of the majority of patients with denosumab without significant class-related toxicities. The majority of SREs were from radiation therapy, so pain still remains the clinical hallmark of bone metastases, particularly for osteolytic ones. The suggestion that estrogen deprivation with AIs can favor a ‘bone-related’ risk conditions for developing bone metastases must be considered with caution and surely needs further validations.

Prognostic significance of clinicopathological factors in early breast cancer: 20 years of follow-up in a single-center analysis

Background To quantify the effect of traditional prognostic factors [nodal status, estrogen-receptor (ER), progesterone-receptor (PR), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)] on long-term outcome of patients with early breast cancer (EBC), treated in clinical practice over a period of about twenty years. Results 1198 consecutive patients were identified. Median DFS (disease-free survival): ER+/PR±/HER2−, 165 months (mo) if node-negative (N0) and 114mo if node-positive (N+) (p < 0.001); triple-negative (TN), 109mo if N0 and 65mo if N+ (p 0.144); ER+/PR±/HER2+ in patients not-treated with adjuvant trastuzumab (T−), not reached if N0 and 114mo if N+ (p 0.297); ER+/PR±/HER2+ in patients treated with trastuzumab (T+), 95mo if N0 and 85mo if N+ (p 0.615); ER−/PR−/HER2+ T−, not reached if N0 and 26mo if N+ (p 0.279); ER−/PR−/HER2+ T+, not reached if N0 and 66mo if N+ (p 0.014). Median OS (overall survival): ER+/ PR±/HER2−, 166mo if N0 and 144mo if N+ (p 0.028); TN, 158mo if N0 and 96mo if N+ (p 0.384); ER+/PR±/HER2+ T−, not reached if N0 and 157mo if N+ (p 0.475), ER+/PR±/HER2+ T+, not reached if N0 and 106mo if N+ (p 0.436); ER−/PR−/HER2+ T−, not reached if N0 and 34mo if N+ (p 0.273); ER−/PR−/HER2+ T+, not reached neither if N0 nor if N+ (p 0.094). Materials and Methods Disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were evaluated according to tumor characteristics, based on information retrospectively retrieved from patients’ medical records. Conclusions Pathological tumor characteristics and nodal status still represent useful tools in treatment selection and follow-up decision making of EBC patients in clinical practice.

New schedule of bevacizumab/paclitaxel as first‐line therapy for metastatic HER2‐negative breast cancer in a real‐life setting

Angiogenesis plays an essential role in the growth and progression of breast cancer. This observational single center study evaluated the efficacy and safety of a new weekly schedule of bevacizumab/paclitaxel combination in the first‐line treatment of unselected, HER2‐negative, metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients, in a real‐life setting. Thirty‐five patients (median age 56 years, range 40–81) with HER2‐negative MBC were treated with paclitaxel (70 mg/m2) dd 1,8,15 q21 (60 mg/m2 if ≥65 years or secondary Cumulative Illness Rating Scale) plus bevacizumab (10 mg/kg) every 2 weeks. Twenty‐two patients (63%) had ≥2 metastatic sites and 15 (43%) visceral disease. Eleven patients (31%) had a triple‐negative breast cancer (TNBC). A clinical complete response (cCR) was observed in 6 (17%) cases after a median of seven cycles, a partial response (PR) in 22 (63%), and a stable disease (SD) in 6 (17%) cases; the overall clinical benefit rate was 97%. In TNBC subgroup, cCR occurred in 1 (9%) case, PR in 8 (73%), and SD in 2 (18%). At a median follow‐up of 13 months (range 1–79 months), the median progression‐free survival was 11 months and the median overall survival was 36 months. No grade 4 adverse events occurred. The main grade 3 toxicities observed were neutropenia (11.4%), hypertension (5.7%), stomatitis (2.8%), diarrhea (2.8%), and vomiting (2.8%). The administration of weekly paclitaxel plus bevacizumab in this real‐life experience shows similar efficacy than previously reported schedules, with a comparable dose intensity and a good toxicity profile.

Role of Poly ADP-Ribose Polymerase (PARP) Inhibitors in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer (TNBC)

The treatment with poly ADP-ribose polymerase (PARP) inhibitors represents a peculiar targeted therapy specifically destroying cancer cells harboring a relevant DNA damage repair dysfunction, through the inhibition of a different other pathway of DNA repair, thus realizing the synthetic lethality. PARP inhibitors target key enzymes of the base excision repair pathway, involved in repairing DNA single-strand breaks, more specifically when the preferred homologous recombination (HR) mechanism for repairing double-strand breaks is lost due to BRCA1 dysfunction. HR defects such as occurring in cancers harboring BRCA1/BRCA2 predisposition are extremely sensitive to PARP inhibitors.

The safety of dose-dense liposomal-encapsulated doxorubicin in association with docetaxel (MyTax) in breast cancer.

CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2008 Abstracts Abstract #2157 Background: Liposomal-Encapsulated Doxorubicin (LED) shows equivalent efficacy, better cardiac tolerability at higher cumulative dose than conventional anthracyclines in breast cancer treatment. Methods: Sixteen pts were enrolled in a dose-finding study of LED (TLC-D99 Myocet ®) associated to Docetaxel (TXT). Twelve pts were treated with a fixed TXT dose (50 mg/m2) and TLC-D99 at three dose levels, 40-45-50 mg/m2, days 1 and 15 every 2 weeks using an intra- and inter-patient approach; four pts wrere treated at the TLC-D99 recommended dose (50 mg/m2). Cardiac monitoring of LVEF was performed every two cycles; Precursor Brain Natriuretic Peptide (proBNP) and cardiac Troponin (c-TnI) before and after 24 h chemotherapy was evaluated. Results : Breast cancer (BC) disease extension: metastatic (MBC), 8; locally advanced BC, 5; T2-T3 BC, 3. Previous chemotherapy: untreated, 11 pts; adjuvant, 5 pts. Enrolled pts for each dose-level: I, 7; II, 9; III, 14. Newly treated pts: I dose-level, 7; II dose-level, 3; III dose-level, 6. Valuable cycles for each dose-level in a total 77 cycles: I, 14; II, 21; III, 42. DLTs were observed in 3 pts, 21%, and 3 cycles, 4%: 2 cardiac, characterized by a 19% LVEF decrease and a symptomatic arrhythmia; one G4 hematologic resistant to G-CSF. DLTs for each dose-level by pts and cycles, respectively: I, 14% (1/7 pts) and 7% (1/14 cycles); II, no DLT in 9 pts and 21 cycles; III, 14% (2/14 pts) and 5% (2/42 cycles). Cumulative G3-4 toxicities by pts and cycles, respectively: cardiac arrhythmia 6% and 1,3%, cardiac general (symptomatic LVEF decrease), 6% and 1,3%; alopecia 81% and 65%; neutropenia resistant to G-CSF, 6% and 1,3%. Cardiac DLTs were observed in 2 elderly pts (>65 y). The 2 cardiac DLTs were observed in 2 out of 3 pts with pre-existing diastolic dysfunction. No pathologic increase of c-TnI levels was detected. Seven pts showed increased pro-BNP after chemotherapy; 1 of these with increased pro-BNP after chemotherapy, persistent the day 1 of each subsequent chemotherapy showed a DLT; G2 toxicities by patients and cycles, respectively: asthenia 37% and 18%, stomatitis/mucositis 12% and 5%, nausea 31% and 12%. Median rDI of TLC-D99 was 25 mg/m2/w and TXT 25 mg/m2/w for pts, respectively. Preliminary efficacy in 16 assessable pts: LA-BC and MBC, 1 CR (pCR) 7 PR (OR 62%), 4 SD and 1 PD; T2-T3 BC, 2 PR and 1 SD. Conclusion: dose-dense TLC-D99/Docetaxel association can be safely recommended at the dose of 50 mg/m2 for each drug. Docetaxel intensification is ongoing. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2009;69(2 Suppl):Abstract nr 2157.