Paolo Foggi

Docetaxel in Patients with Anthracycline-Resistant Advanced Breast Cancer

Objective: To better determine docetaxel activity in patients with well-defined anthracycline-resistant breast cancer. Methods: From October 1996, we carried out a phase II trial in 69 heavily pretreated patients with advanced breast cancer with docetaxel 100 mg/m2 by a 1-hour infusion on day 1, with cycles repeated every 3 weeks. Patients were classified as having primary anthracycline resistance (n = 32), secondary anthracycline resistance (n = 7), anthracycline pretreatment (n = 22) or no anthracycline pretreatment (n = 8). Results: Among 68 evaluable patients, we observed 6 (9%) complete responses and 27 (40%) partial responses, for an overall response rate of 49% (95% confidence interval 37–61%); the disease remained stable in 17 patients (25%). Responses according to the above subgroups were as follows: primary anthracycline resistance 41%, secondary anthracycline resistance 43%, anthracycline pretreatment 64% and no anthracycline pretreatment 43%. The median time to response, median time to progression and median overall survival were 2, 7 and 10 months, respectively. Myelosuppression was the dose-limiting toxicity, with grade 4 neutropenia occurring in 47% of the patients and neutropenic fever in 12%. G-CSF was added in the case of grade 4 febrile neutropenia; a 25% reduction in the dose of docetaxel was required in 4 patients. Other side effects were mild. Conclusions: The results of the present trial confirm the high activity of docetaxel in heavily pretreated patients with advanced breast cancer, including those with strictly defined anthracycline resistance.

Irinotecan, docetaxel and oxaliplatin combination in metastatic gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma

This phase II study was designed to evaluate the activity and safety of a combination of irinotecan, docetaxel and oxaliplatin in metastatic gastric or gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) adenocarcinoma. Forty patients with measurable distant metastasis received irinotecan 150 mg m−2 and docetaxel 60 mg m−2 on day 1, and oxaliplatin 85 mg m−2 on day 2. Cycles were repeated every 3 weeks. The primary end point was to demonstrate a 50% improvement in time-to-progression (TTP) over historical controls. All patients were evaluable. Median TTP was 6.5 months (95% confidence interval (CI) 5.6–7.4), the overall response rate was 50% (95% CI 35–65%) and the median overall survival was 11.5 months (95% CI 8.7–14.3). Grade 3/4 neutropaenia occurred in 47.5% of patients. There were four episodes of febrile neutropaenia in three patients. Other non-haematological grade 3 toxicities included diarrhoea in four patients (10%), vomiting in three patients (7.5%) and mucositis in two patients (5%). The irinotecan, docetaxel and oxaliplatin combination chemotherapy is an active and well-tolerated novel regimen for treating metastatic gastric or GEJ adenocarcinoma and deserves further evaluation in randomised trials and in combination with molecular targeting agents.

A phase II trial of docetaxel and vinorelbine in patients with advanced breast cancer previously treated with anthracyclines

Background: It was the aim of this study to evaluate the efficacy of docetaxel and vinorelbine combination in well-defined anthracycline-‘exposed’ or -‘resistant’ advanced breast cancer patients. Patients and Methods: A phase II trial was carried out enrolling 43 advanced breast cancer patients, all previously treated with anthracyclines, both in an adjuvant or advanced setting. Docetaxel 75 mg/m2 as 1-hour infusion and vinorelbine 25 mg/m2 as 30-min infusion were administered on day 1, every 3 weeks. Results: According to an intent-to-treat analysis, the response rate was 37.2% (95% CI 22.8–51.6) in 43 patients, whereas responses were observed in 16 (1 complete response, 15 partial response) out of 39 evaluable patients (41%, 95% CI 25.6–56.5); there were 50% with first-line and 33% with second-line therapy, and 50 and 29% of patients were considered anthracycline ‘exposed’ and ‘resistant’, respectively; responses by estrogen receptor (ER) status were given in 48% (ER positive) and 25% (ER negative), and by HER2 status, in 21% (HER2 positive) and 52% (HER2 negative). Median time to progression and median overall survival were 7.7 and 28.7 months, respectively. Toxicity was generally acceptable, with grade 3 neutropenia encountered in 15 (35%) patients and grade 4 neutropenia in 1 (2%) patient. Neutropenic fever occurred in 7 patients (16%), usually short-lasting. Grade 3 mucositis was encountered in 2 patients (5%). Conclusions: The combination of docetaxel and vinorelbine as a 3-weekly schedule is active and manageable in advanced breast cancer patients previously treated with anthracyclines.

A multicenter phase III prospective randomized trial of high-dose epirubicin in combination with cyclophosphamide (EC) versus docetaxel followed by EC in node-positive breast cancer. GOIM (Gruppo Oncologico Italia Meridionale) 9902 study

BACKGROUND The Gruppo Oncologico Italia Meridionale 9902 trial compared four cycles of high-dose epirubicin plus cyclophosphamide (EC) with four cycles of docetaxel (Taxotere, D) followed by four cycles of EC as adjuvant treatment of node-positive breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients were randomly assigned to EC (E 120 mg/m2, C 600 mg/m2, arm A) for four cycles or four cycles of D (100 mg/m2) followed by four cycles of EC (arm B), both regimens every 21 days. Hormone receptor-positive patients were given hormonal therapy for 5 years. Primary end point was 5-year disease-free survival (DFS). Secondary objectives were overall survival (OS) and safety. RESULTS There were 750 patients enrolled. With a median follow-up of 64 months, 5-year DFS was 73.4% in both arms, and 5-year OS was 89.5% versus 90.7% in arm A and B [hazard ratio was 0.99 (95% confidence interval for DFS 0.75-1.31; P = 0.95)], respectively. Grade 3-4 toxicity was more common in arm B. CONCLUSIONS This study did not show advantages from the addition of docetaxel to high-dose EC as adjuvant chemotherapy in node-positive breast cancer. The small sample size and low number of DFS events may have limited the ability to observe statistically significant difference between the two arms.BACKGROUND The Gruppo Oncologico Italia Meridionale 9902 trial compared four cycles of high-dose epirubicin plus cyclophosphamide (EC) with four cycles of docetaxel (Taxotere, D) followed by four cycles of EC as adjuvant treatment of node-positive breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients were randomly assigned to EC (E 120 mg/m(2), C 600 mg/m(2), arm A) for four cycles or four cycles of D (100 mg/m(2)) followed by four cycles of EC (arm B), both regimens every 21 days. Hormone receptor-positive patients were given hormonal therapy for 5 years. Primary end point was 5-year disease-free survival (DFS). Secondary objectives were overall survival (OS) and safety. RESULTS There were 750 patients enrolled. With a median follow-up of 64 months, 5-year DFS was 73.4% in both arms, and 5-year OS was 89.5% versus 90.7% in arm A and B [hazard ratio was 0.99 (95% confidence interval for DFS 0.75-1.31; P = 0.95)], respectively. Grade 3-4 toxicity was more common in arm B. CONCLUSIONS This study did not show advantages from the addition of docetaxel to high-dose EC as adjuvant chemotherapy in node-positive breast cancer. The small sample size and low number of DFS events may have limited the ability to observe statistically significant difference between the two arms.