Paolo Marchettini

Commentary: the peripheral mechanisms of abnormal temporal summation.

: Tramadol is an option for the treatment of rheumatological pain. Its mode of action and safety profile distinguishes it from other opioids. Tramadol differs from other opioids by combining a weak opioid and a monoaminergic mode of action. It is effective in different types of moderate-to-severe pain, including neuropathic pain. Moreover, as the mode of action of tramadol does not overlap with that of NSAIDs, it is a useful agent to be combined with these drugs. Tramadol induces fewer opioid adverse reactions for a given level of analgesia compared with traditional opioids. Common adverse reactions of tramadol such as nausea and dizziness, which usually occur only at the beginning of therapy and attenuate over time, can be further minimized by up-titrating the drug over several days. Dose adjustment is only necessary in patients over 75 years of age, or in those with either hepatic or renal insufficiency. Tramadol should be avoided or used with caution in epileptics, or in individuals who are receiving seizure-threshold lowering drugs. Finally, tramadol has a low risk of abuse because it has only a weak opioid effect and its monoaminergic action could inhibit the development of dependence. The low abuse potential of tramadol has been demonstrated by postmarketing surveillance data.

Different time-courses of i.v. lidocaine effect on ganglionic and spinal units in neuropathic rats.

The effect of intravenous lidocaine (4 mg kg-1) on ganglionic and spinal neuronal hyperactivity following sciatic chronic constriction injury (CCI) was studied in anaesthetized and curarized rats. A significant difference in the time course and magnitude of the lidocaine effect on the two neuronal populations was found. Longer lasting and more potent inhibitory effects on the dorsal horn neurones in comparison with ganglionic neurones were observed. By contrast the magnitude and time course of the inhibitory effects were highly comparable in dorsal horn neurones before and after acute rhizotomy. The results indicate that peripheral and central effects of lidocaine are not sequentially related. The likelihood that lidocaine inhibition at central sites may have a role in its analgesic effect, at least in the neuropathic model, is discussed.

Selective inhibition by systemic lidocaine of noxious evoked activity in rat dorsal horn neurons.

The effect of systemically injected lidocaine (3-4 mg kg-1) on the responses to noxious and non-noxious stimuli on 28 wide dynamic range (WDR) neurons in the dorsal horn was studied in anesthetized and curarized rats. It was consistently found that lidocaine reduced or suppressed the responses to noxious stimuli whereas it did not act on the responses to non-noxious stimulation and on the spontaneous activity. Furthermore the noxious stimuli were completely ineffective from 10-15 min following the lidocaine injection while the non-noxious stimuli maintained their efficacy. The control responses, in all the cases, returned within 20 min. The results suggest that lidocaine exerts a selective inhibitory effect on nociceptive transmission at the spinal level.

Non-surgical treatments for the management of early osteoarthritis

AbstractNon-surgical treatments are usually the first choice for the management of knee degeneration, especially in the early osteoarthritis (OA) phase when no clear lesions or combined abnormalities need to be addressed surgically. Early OA may be addressed by a wide range of non-surgical approaches, from non-pharmacological modalities to dietary supplements and pharmacological therapies, as well as physical therapies and novel biological minimally invasive procedures involving injections of various substances to obtain a clinical improvement and possibly a disease-modifying effect. Numerous pharmaceutical agents are able to provide clinical benefit, but no one has shown all the characteristic of an ideal treatment, and side effects have been reported at both systemic and local level. Patients and physicians should have realistic outcome goals in pharmacological treatment, which should be considered together with other conservative measures. Among these, exercise is an effective conservative approach, while physical therapies lack literature support. Even though a combination of these therapeutic options might be the most suitable strategy, there is a paucity of studies focusing on combining treatments, which is the most common clinical scenario. Further studies are needed to increase the limited evidence on non-surgical treatments and their combination, to optimize indications, application modalities, and results with particular focus on early OA. In fact, most of the available evidence regards established OA. Increased knowledge about degeneration mechanisms will help to better target the available treatments and develop new biological options, where preliminary results are promising, especially concerning early disease phases. Specific treatments aimed at improving joint homoeostasis, or even counteracting tissue damage by inducing regenerative processes, might be successful in early OA, where tissue loss and anatomical changes are still at very initial stages. Level of evidence IV.

The Lindblom roller

Neuropathic pain is caused by injury of the peripheral or central nervous system. The neurological examination of the sensory system in neuropathic pain patients guides the anatomical localization of the injury. Among the sensory modalities to be tested, priority should be given to those subserved by small peripheral sensory fibers or by the spinothalamic tract that most commonly are abnormal in neuropathic pain patients. Testing of cold and warm perception was traditionally carried out in the clinic using tubes filled with water at different temperatures, a cumbersome method that has limited the routine examination of these sensory modalities. The Lindblom roller offers a practical and effective method of readily testing temperature perception and is among the best available clinical tools for delineating the anatomical boundaries of a sensory abnormality. Routinely use of the Lindblom roller shall be standard bedside clinical assessment of neuropathic pain patients. To exemplify this statement we describe two patients affected by complex and fluctuating painful sensory abnormalities caused by an extradural mass compressing the spinal cord. The level of the injury was readily localized with a roller kept at room temperature.

More on pain semantics.

My dear friends and estimated colleagues Per Hansson and Maija Haanpää have recently criticised as ‘‘unwarranted conclusion’’ my statement that in the clinic the search for ‘‘burning’’ as a pain descriptor has in itself crucial diagnostic value (Hansson and Haanpää, 2007). The statement appeared in the editorial written for the paper by Svendsen et al. (2005). The literal conclusion of my editorial was ‘‘when the time for a comprehensive examination is really short, the key question to ask for diagnosing neuropathic pain might be the burning one’’ (Marchettini, 2005). Maija Haanpää and Per Hansson underline that ‘‘the time issue is never a valid argument to turn to imprecise diagnostic approaches’’. In itself this statement has absolute scientific status and it is comforting that clinical scientists rank it as priority in their methodological approach. European epidemiological surveys however teach us that poor pain management remains a medical burden for our population and that inappropriate recognition and therefore treatment of neuropathic pain is likely among the main causes for what a civilised world must judge needless suffering (Breivik et al., 2006). In their paper, Svendsen et al. found that ‘‘choosing the items of the McGill pain questionnaire the patients with neuropathic central pain differed significantly from the musculoskeletal pain patients only for the word burning, that was indicated by 12/ 29 neuropathic pain patients versus 1/15 with musculoskeletal pain patients (P, 0.034). This finding reminds that pain descriptors are valuable for the final diagnosis and if one has to select the most suspicious for neuropathic pain burning is the word. The main message of my editorial is that asking for pain descriptors is a crucial component of a careful history taking, a step in the clinical decision that might be as valuable as the clinical examination. Smart patients with multiple types of pain discriminate characteristics and quality of their pains and actually might help the clinician in diagnosing a neurological condition, as it is for example the case of patients affected by pain in multiple sclerosis (Marchettini et al., 2006). Attentive listening to pain patients is often more useful than jumping

Risk Factors Linked to Psychological Distress, Productivity Losses, and Sick Leave in Low-Back-Pain Employees: A Three-Year Longitudinal Cohort Study

Background. Low back pain (LBP) is one of the most common health problems worldwide. Purpose. To investigate the link between baseline demographic and occupational, medical, and lifestyle data with following psychological and occupational outcomes in a large sample of employees with LBP over a 3-year period. Study Design. Three-year prospective cohort study. Methods. Italian-speaking employees (N = 4492) with a diagnosis of LBP were included. Screening at Time 1 was done in order to collect information about severity and classification of LBP, demographic, lifestyle, and occupational status data. Psychological distress (PGWBI) and occupational burden were assessed after 3 years. Results. After 3 years, employees with LBP not due to organic causes had an increased risk of psychological distress. Gender appears to be an important variable for following occupational burden. Indeed, being a white-collar man with a LBP without organic causes seems to be a protective factor for following work outcomes, while being a white-collar woman with a LBP not due to organic causes appears to be a risk factor for subsequent sick leave. Moreover, LBP severity affects psychological and occupational outcomes. Conclusion. Our findings have several implications that could be considered in preventive and supportive programs for LBP employees.

Heart rate variability during acute psychosocial stress: A randomized cross-over trial of verbal and non-verbal laboratory stressors

Acute psychosocial stress is typically investigated in laboratory settings using protocols with distinctive characteristics. For example, some tasks involve the action of speaking, which seems to alter Heart Rate Variability (HRV) through acute changes in respiration patterns. However, it is still unknown which task induces the strongest subjective and autonomic stress response. The present cross-over randomized trial sought to investigate the differences in perceived stress and in linear and non-linear analyses of HRV between three different verbal (Speech and Stroop) and non-verbal (Montreal Imaging Stress Task; MIST) stress tasks, in a sample of 60 healthy adults (51.7% females; mean age = 25.6 ± 3.83 years). Analyses were run controlling for respiration rates. Participants reported similar levels of perceived stress across the three tasks. However, MIST induced a stronger cardiovascular response than Speech and Stroop tasks, even after controlling for respiration rates. Finally, women reported higher levels of perceived stress and lower HRV both at rest and in response to acute psychosocial stressors, compared to men. Taken together, our results suggest the presence of gender-related differences during psychophysiological experiments on stress. They also suggest that verbal activity masked the vagal withdrawal through altered respiration patterns imposed by speaking. Therefore, our findings support the use of highly-standardized math task, such as MIST, as a valid and reliable alternative to verbal protocols during laboratory studies on stress.

Subjective correlates of stress management in outpatient cardiac rehabilitation: the predictive role of perceived heart risk factors

Introduction: The causal attributions and perceived risk factors can affect patients’ health behaviors. Therefore, the present study aimed to assess (i) the effect of an outpatient cardiac rehabilitation (CR) program on perceived heart risk factors (PHRFs) and on psychological stress, and (ii) the role of changes of PHRFs at pre-post CR in predicting changes in psychological stress. Methods: In this longitudinal study, 110 CR patients were assessed from June to November 2016 in a hospital in Iran. Perceived heart risk factors and perceived stress were investigated using the PHRFs scale and the Depression, Anxiety, Stress Scale-21, respectively. PHRFs and DASS-21 Stress scale scores were compared before and after 26 sessions of exercise-based CR through paired sample t-tests. In addition, we investigated the effect of PHRF’s change scores on DASS-21 Stress scale scores using linear regression analysis. Results: Results showed that CR has a little impact in improving the patients’ perception of heart risk factors, However, CR is significantly effective in reducing stress (P < 0.05). Regression analysis evidenced that improvements in patients’ perception of risk factors can significantly predict a reduction in psychological stress (P = 0.030). The model explained 11.2% of the variance in the results. Conclusion: PHRFs appear to be significant predictive components of CR’s stress reduction. Practitioners should focus on patients’ perception of risk factors to facilitate stress management in CR program.