Paolo Palatini
University of Padua
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Paolo Palatini.
The New England Journal of Medicine | 1999
Jaakko Tuomilehto; Daiva Rastenyte; W. H. Birkenhäger; Lutgarde Thijs; Riitta Antikainen; Christopher J. Bulpitt; Astrid E. Fletcher; Françoise Forette; A Goldhaber; Paolo Palatini; Cinzia Sarti; Robert Fagard
Background Recent reports suggest that calcium-channel blockers may be harmful in patients with diabetes and hypertension. We previously reported that antihypertensive treatment with the calcium-channel blocker nitrendipine reduced the risk of cardiovascular events. In this post hoc analysis, we compared the outcome of treatment with nitrendipine in diabetic and nondiabetic patients. Methods After stratification according to center, sex, and presence or absence of previous cardiovascular complications, 4695 patients (age, ≥60 years) with systolic blood pressure of 160 to 219 mm Hg and diastolic pressure below 95 mm Hg were randomly assigned to receive active treatment or placebo. Active treatment consisted of nitrendipine (10 to 40 mg per day) with the possible addition or substitution of enalapril (5 to 20 mg per day) or hydrochlorothiazide (12.5 to 25 mg per day) or both, titrated to reduce the systolic blood pressure by at least 20 mm Hg and to less than 150 mm Hg. In the control group, matching placeb...
Journal of Hypertension | 2013
Eoin O'Brien; Gianfranco Parati; George S. Stergiou; Roland Asmar; Laurie Beilin; Grzegorz Bilo; Denis Clement; Alejandro de la Sierra; Peter W. de Leeuw; Eamon Dolan; Robert Fagard; John Graves; Geoffrey A. Head; Yutaka Imai; Kazuomi Kario; Empar Lurbe; Jean-Michel Mallion; Giuseppe Mancia; Thomas Mengden; Martin G. Myers; Gbenga Ogedegbe; Takayoshi Ohkubo; Stefano Omboni; Paolo Palatini; Josep Redon; Luis M. Ruilope; Andrew Shennan; Jan A. Staessen; Gert vanMontfrans; Paolo Verdecchia
Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) is being used increasingly in both clinical practice and hypertension research. Although there are many guidelines that emphasize the indications for ABPM, there is no comprehensive guideline dealing with all aspects of the technique. It was agreed at a consensus meeting on ABPM in Milan in 2011 that the 34 attendees should prepare a comprehensive position paper on the scientific evidence for ABPM.This position paper considers the historical background, the advantages and limitations of ABPM, the threshold levels for practice, and the cost-effectiveness of the technique. It examines the need for selecting an appropriate device, the accuracy of devices, the additional information and indices that ABPM devices may provide, and the software requirements.At a practical level, the paper details the requirements for using ABPM in clinical practice, editing considerations, the number of measurements required, and the circumstances, such as obesity and arrhythmias, when particular care needs to be taken when using ABPM.The clinical indications for ABPM, among which white-coat phenomena, masked hypertension, and nocturnal hypertension appear to be prominent, are outlined in detail along with special considerations that apply in certain clinical circumstances, such as childhood, the elderly and pregnancy, and in cardiovascular illness, examples being stroke and chronic renal disease, and the place of home measurement of blood pressure in relation to ABPM is appraised.The role of ABPM in research circumstances, such as pharmacological trials and in the prediction of outcome in epidemiological studies is examined and finally the implementation of ABPM in practice is considered in relation to the issue of reimbursement in different countries, the provision of the technique by primary care practices, hospital clinics and pharmacies, and the growing role of registries of ABPM in many countries.
Journal of Hypertension | 2008
Gianfranco Parati; George S. Stergiou; Roland Asmar; Grzegorz Bilo; Peter W. de Leeuw; Yutaka Imai; Kazuomi Kario; Empar Lurbe; Athanasios J. Manolis; Thomas Mengden; Eoin O'Brien; Takayoshi Ohkubo; Paul L. Padfield; Paolo Palatini; Thomas G. Pickering; Josep Redon; Miriam Revera; Luis M. Ruilope; Andrew Shennan; Jan A. Staessen; András Tislér; Bernard Waeber; Alberto Zanchetti; Giuseppe Mancia
This document summarizes the available evidence and provides recommendations on the use of home blood pressure monitoring in clinical practice and in research. It updates the previous recommendations on the same topic issued in year 2000. The main topics addressed include the methodology of home blood pressure monitoring, its diagnostic and therapeutic thresholds, its clinical applications in hypertension, with specific reference to special populations, and its applications in research. The final section deals with the problems related to the implementation of these recommendations in clinical practice.
Blood Pressure Monitoring | 2002
Eoin O'Brien; Thomas G. Pickering; Roland Asmar; Martin G. Myers; Gianfranco Parati; Jan A. Staessen; Thomas Mengden; Yutaka Imai; Bernard Waeber; Paolo Palatini; William Gerin
Working Group on Blood Pressure Monitoring of the European Society of Hypertension International Protocol for validation of blood pressure measuring devices in adults Eoin O’Brien,Thomas Pickering, Roland Asmar, Martin Myers, Gianfranco Parati, Jan Staessen, Thomas Mengden, Yutaka Imai, Bernard Waeber and Paolo Palatini and with the statistical assistance of Neil Atkins and William Gerin, on behalf of the Working Group on Blood Pressure Monitoring of the European Society of Hypertension
Journal of Hypertension | 1997
Paolo Palatini; Stevo Julius
In recent years evidence has been accumulating that the heart rate is a major correlate of blood pressure, that it may predict the development of sustained hypertension in subjects with normal or borderline elevated blood pressure values, and that it is associated with increased risks of cardiovascular and noncardiovascular death. In spite of the evidence physicians tend to overlook these facts, and the heart rate is either ignored or viewed as a particularly benign prognostic sign. The educators in our field also tend to underestimate the value of the topic; most textbooks contain little reference to research results on relationships among the heart rate, hypertension and cardiovascular prognosis.
Journal of Human Hypertension | 2010
Gianfranco Parati; George S. Stergiou; Roland Asmar; Grzegorz Bilo; P.W. de Leeuw; Yutaka Imai; Kazuomi Kario; Empar Lurbe; Athanasios J. Manolis; Thomas Mengden; E. O'Brien; Takayoshi Ohkubo; Paul L. Padfield; Paolo Palatini; Thomas G. Pickering; Josep Redon; Miriam Revera; L.M. Ruilope; Andrew Shennan; Jan A. Staessen; András Tislér; Bernard Waeber; Alberto Zanchetti; Giuseppe Mancia
Self-monitoring of blood pressure by patients at home (home blood pressure monitoring (HBPM)) is being increasingly used in many countries and is well accepted by hypertensive patients. Current hypertension guidelines have endorsed the use of HBPM in clinical practice as a useful adjunct to conventional office measurements. Recently, a detailed consensus document on HBPM was published by the European Society of Hypertension Working Group on Blood Pressure Monitoring. However, in daily practice, briefer documents summarizing the essential recommendations are needed. It is also accepted that the successful implementation of clinical guidelines in routine patient care is dependent on their acceptance by involvement of practising physicians. The present document, which provides concise and updated guidelines on the use of HBPM for practising physicians, was therefore prepared by including the comments and feedback of general practitioners.
Circulation | 2000
Robert Fagard; Jan A Staessen; Lutgarde Thijs; Jerzy Gasowski; Christopher J. Bulpitt; Denis Clement; Peter W. de Leeuw; Jurij Dobovisek; Matti Jääskivi; Gastone Leonetti; Eoin O’Brien; Paolo Palatini; Gianfranco Parati; Jose L. Rodicio; H Vanhanen; John Webster
BackgroundThe goal of the present study was to assess the effect of antihypertensive therapy on clinic (CBP) and ambulatory (ABP) blood pressures, on ECG voltages, and on the incidence of stroke and cardiovascular events in older patients with sustained and nonsustained systolic hypertension. Methods and ResultsPatients who were ≥60 years old, with systolic CBP of 160 to 219 mm Hg and diastolic CBP of <95 mm Hg, were randomized into the double-blind placebo-controlled Systolic Hypertension in Europe (Syst-Eur) Trial. Treatment consisted of nitrendipine, with the possible addition of enalapril, hydrochlorothiazide, or both. Patients enrolled in the Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring Side Project were classified according to daytime systolic ABP into 1 of 3 subgroups: nonsustained hypertension (<140 mm Hg), mild sustained hypertension (140 to 159 mm Hg), and moderate sustained hypertension (≥160 mm Hg). At baseline, patients with nonsustained hypertension had smaller ECG voltages (P <0.001) and, during follow-up, a lower incidence of stroke (P <0.05) and of cardiovascular complications (P =0.01) than other groups. Active treatment reduced ABP and CBP in patients with sustained hypertension but only CBP in patients with nonsustained hypertension (P <0.001). The influence of active treatment on ECG voltages (P <0.05) and on the incidence of stroke (P <0.05) and cardiovascular events (P =0.06) was more favorable than that of placebo only in patients with moderate sustained hypertension. ConclusionsPatients with sustained hypertension had higher ECG voltages and rates of cardiovascular complications than did patients with nonsustained hypertension. The favorable effects of active treatment on these outcomes were only statistically significant in patients with moderate sustained hypertension.
Hypertension | 1997
Jan A. Staessen; Leszek Bieniaszewski; Eoin O'Brien; Philippe Gosse; Hiroshi Hayashi; Yutaka Imai; Terukazu Kawasaki; Kuniaki Otsuka; Paolo Palatini; Lutgarde Thijs; Robert Fagard
A wide range of definitions is used to distinguish subjects in whom blood pressure (BP) falls at night (dippers) from their counterparts (nondippers). In an attempt to standardize the definition of nondipping, we determined the nocturnal BP fall and night-day BP ratio by 24-hour ambulatory monitoring in 4765 normotensive and 2555 hypertensive subjects from 10 to 99 years old. In all subjects combined, the systolic/diastolic nocturnal fall and corresponding ratio averaged (+/- SD) -16.7 +/- 11.0/ -13.6 +/- 8.1 mm Hg and 87.2 +/- 8.0%/83.1 +/- 9.6%, respectively. In normotensive subjects, the 95th percentiles were -0.3/-1.1 mm Hg for the nocturnal fall and 99.7%/98.3% for the night-day ratio. Both the fall and ratio showed a curvilinear correlation with age. The smallest fall and largest ratio were observed in older (> or = 70 years) subjects. A higher BP on conventional sphygmomanometry was associated with a larger systolic (partial r = .11) and diastolic (r = .12) nocturnal BP fall. The diastolic (r = .08) but not the systolic night-day ratio increased with higher conventional BP. The nocturnal BP fall was larger and the corresponding night-day ratio smaller in oscillometric (n = 5884) than in auscultatory (n = 1436) recordings, in males (n = 3730) than in females (n = 3590), and in Europe (n = 4556) than in the other continents (n = 2764). The distributions of the nocturnal BP fall and night-day ratio showed considerable overlap among normotensive and hypertensive subjects, but the overlap tended to be larger for the ratio than for the fall. Of all subjects, 3.2% had systolic and diastolic ratios of 100% or more. With adjustments applied for confounders, the probability of being a nondipper increased 2.8 times (95% confidence interval, 2.0-4.0) from 30 to 60 years and 5.7 times (4.4-7.4) from 60 to 80 years. The odds ratios were 1.0 (0.8-1.4) for males versus females. 1.6 (1.2-2.1) for subjects with definite hypertension versus normotensive subjects, 2.4 (1.2-4.7) for Asians (n = 2213, 96% Japanese) versus inhabitants of the other continents, and 2.4 (1.5-3.8) for subjects examined with auscultatory versus oscillometric devices. In conclusion, the mathematical definition of nondipping, ie, having a night-day ratio of 100% or more for systolic and diastolic BPs, closely approximated the 95th percentiles of the night-day ratio in normotensive subjects. The ratio depends less on BP level than the nocturnal BP fall and is therefore to be preferred in the definition of dipping status. Notwithstanding the present findings, the reproducibility of nondipping and its prognostic significance need further clarification.
Journal of Hypertension | 2014
Gianfranco Parati; George S. Stergiou; Eoin O'Brien; Roland Asmar; Lawrence J. Beilin; Grzegorz Bilo; Denis Clement; Alejandro de la Sierra; Peter W. de Leeuw; Eamon Dolan; Robert Fagard; John Graves; Geoffrey A. Head; Yutaka Imai; Kazuomi Kario; Empar Lurbe; Jean Michel Mallion; Giuseppe Mancia; Thomas Mengden; Martin G. Myers; Gbenga Ogedegbe; Takayoshi Ohkubo; Stefano Omboni; Paolo Palatini; Josep Redon; Luis M. Ruilope; Andrew Shennan; Jan A. Staessen; Gert A. van Montfrans; Paolo Verdecchia
Given the increasing use of ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) in both clinical practice and hypertension research, a group of scientists, participating in the European Society of Hypertension Working Group on blood pressure monitoring and cardiovascular variability, in year 2013 published a comprehensive position paper dealing with all aspects of the technique, based on the available scientific evidence for ABPM. The present work represents an updated schematic summary of the most important aspects related to the use of ABPM in daily practice, and is aimed at providing recommendations for proper use of this technique in a clinical setting by both specialists and practicing physicians. The present article details the requirements and the methodological issues to be addressed for using ABPM in clinical practice, The clinical indications for ABPM suggested by the available studies, among which white-coat phenomena, masked hypertension, and nocturnal hypertension, are outlined in detail, and the place of home measurement of blood pressure in relation to ABPM is discussed. The role of ABPM in pharmacological, epidemiological, and clinical research is also briefly mentioned. Finally, the implementation of ABPM in practice is considered in relation to the situation of different countries with regard to the reimbursement and the availability of ABPM in primary care practices, hospital clinics, and pharmacies.
Hypertension | 1996
Gian Paolo Rossi; Alfredo Sacchetto; Pieralberto Visentin; Cristina Canali; Gian Rocco Graniero; Paolo Palatini; Achille C. Pessina
We investigated the effects on the heart of hypertension due to the excess of aldosterone and suppression of the renin-angiotensin system caused by primary aldosteronism with M-mode echocardiography and transmitral Doppler flow velocity measurements. We studied 34 consecutive patients with primary aldosteronism and 34 with essential hypertension individually matched for age, gender, race, body mass index, blood pressure values, and duration of hypertension. The groups were similar in age, body mass index, blood pressure, and duration of hypertension. However, lower serum potassium levels (3.5 +/- 0.6 versus 4.1 +/- 0.2 mmol/L, P < .0001) and plasma renin activity (0.53 +/- 0.45 versus 1.82 +/- 1.59 ng Ang I x mL-1 x h-1, P < .0001) and higher plasma aldosterone levels (1107 +/- 774 versus 206 +/- 99 pmol/L, P < .0001), left ventricular wall thickness, and left ventricular mass index (112 +/- 4.7 versus 98 +/- 3.7 g/m2, P = .029) were found in patients with primary aldosteronism compared with those with essential hypertension. Similarly, the PQ interval was longer (173 +/- 20 versus 141 +/- 14 milliseconds, P < .001) in primary aldosteronism than in essential hypertension patients. Significantly more primary aldosteronism than essential hypertension patients had left ventricular hypertrophy or left ventricular concentric remodeling (50% versus 15%, chi 2 = 11.97, P = .007). Both the E wave flow velocity integral (1063 +/- 65 versus 1323 +/- 78, P = .013) and the E/A integral ratio (0.91 +/- 0.05 versus 1.25 +/- 0.08, P < .001) were lower, and atrial contribution to left ventricular filling was higher (53.3 +/- 1.5% versus 45.5 +/- 1.3% P < .001) in patients with primary aldosteronism compared with essential hypertension patients. After 1 year of follow-up, highly significant decreases of left ventricular wall thickness and mass were observed in patients treated with surgical excision of an aldosterone-producing tumor, but not in those with medical therapy. Thus, in patients with primary aldosteronism, the excess aldosterone with suppression of the renin-angiotensin system is associated with both increased left ventricular mass and significant changes of left ventricular diastolic filling. The former changes appear to be reversible on removal of the cause of excessive aldosterone production.