Parminder J. Singh

The outcome of hip arthroscopy in Australian football league players: a review of 27 hips.

PURPOSE The purpose of this study was to investigate on hip pathology found at hip arthroscopy in Australian Football League (AFL) players and describe our current treatments and outcomes. METHODS From 2003 to 2008, 24 consecutive AFL players (27 hips) had arthroscopic hip surgery by use of the lateral position. Patients were assessed preoperatively and postoperatively with the modified Harris Hip Score (MHHS) and Nonarthritic Hip Score (NAHS) and postoperatively with a satisfaction survey. RESULTS All hips were available for review. The mean duration of follow up was 22 months (range, 6 to 60 months). The mean age was 22 years (range, 16 to 29 years). The mean body mass index was 24 points (range, 21 to 26 points). The mean traction time was 21 minutes (range, 11 to 60 minutes). The most common pathology was a rim lesion, affecting 93% of cases. Microfracture was performed in 22%. Synovitis was found in 70%, and this was most commonly associated with a rim lesion. Labral pathology was present in 33%, the most common of which was labral separation. On the femoral side, 81% had cam impingement and underwent a femoral neck ostectomy. Rim lesions and labral pathology were the most commonly associated lesions. Also seen were loose os acetabuli in 7% and loose bodies in 7%. The former were associated with labral tears and required repair. The MHHS and NAHS improved in all patients postoperatively, and they maintained their improvement from 1 year up to 4 years. In all but 1 case, the players returned to playing at the AFL level and were satisfied with their outcome. CONCLUSIONS Using hip arthroscopy, we have observed high satisfaction levels and return to preinjury levels of play in all but 1 case. Postoperative hip scores (MHHS and NAHS) have improved significantly, and this improvement has been maintained for up to 4 years. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Level IV, therapeutic case series.

Early mobilization of patients who have had a hip or knee joint replacement reduces length of stay in hospital: a systematic review

Objective: To systematically review the effect of early mobilization after hip or knee joint replacement surgery on length of stay in an acute hospital. Methods: Randomized controlled trials were selected from electronic databases based on inclusion criterion requiring an experimental group mobilizing (sitting out of bed/walking) earlier than a comparison group post joint replacement surgery of the hip or knee in an acute hospital. Clinically homogeneous data were analyzed with meta-analysis. Results: Five randomized controlled trials (totaling 622 participants) were included for review. A meta-analysis of 5 trials found a reduced length of stay of 1.8 days (95% confidence interval 1.1 to 2.6) in favor of the experimental group. In 4 of the 5 trials the experimental group first sat out of bed within 24 hours post operatively. In 4 of the 5 trials the experimental group first walked within 48 hours post operatively. Individual trials reported benefits in range of motion, muscle strength and health-related quality of life in favor of the experimental group. There were no differences in discharge destinations, incidence of negative outcomes or adverse events attributable to early mobilization when compared to the comparison groups. Conclusion: Early mobilization post hip or knee joint replacement surgery can result in a reduced length of stay of about 1.8 days. Trials that reported these positive results showed that early mobilization can be achieved within 24 hours of operation. This positive gain was achieved without an increase in negative outcomes.

The Ligamentum Teres Test A Novel and Effective Test in Diagnosing Tears of the Ligamentum Teres

Background: A ligamentum teres (LT) injury is a common finding at the time of hip arthroscopic surgery in patients with chronic groin and hip pain; however, LT tears have been difficult to identify before surgery. There have been no unique features identified on history assessment, physical examination, or imaging that reliably identify injuries of the LT preoperatively. Purpose: To report a new clinical examination to assess the presence of an LT tear: the LT test. Study Design: Cohort study (diagnosis); Level of evidence, 2. Methods: The study consisted of 75 patients undergoing hip arthroscopic surgery for multiple lesions. Each patient was evaluated by 2 independent examiners using the LT test, leading to a total of 150 tests being performed. The LT test is conducted with the hip flexed at 70° and 30° short of full abduction; the hip is then internally and externally rotated to its limits of motion. Pain on either internal or external rotation is consistent with a positive LT test result. Hip arthroscopic surgery was then performed and all intra-articular abnormalities noted. Arthroscopic images were taken of each LT and examined by a third independent examiner who determined the presence or absence of a tear. Clinical examination findings were compared with the arthroscopic findings to determine the sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values. In addition, the presence of intra-articular pathological lesions was compared with the test results to determine if there was a correlation between the presence of an intra-articular pathological abnormality and a positive LT test result. Results: Of the 150 examinations performed, the test result was positive 55% of the time (77 examinations). The sensitivity and specificity of the test were 90% and 85%, respectively. The positive predictive value was 84%, and the negative predictive value was 91%. The presence of an LT tear, pincer lesion, and labral tear that required repair was associated with a positive LT test result. The κ coefficient for interobserver reliability was .80. Conclusion: The LT test is an effective way of assessing the presence of LT tears with moderate to high interobserver reliability. In addition to an LT tear, the presence of a pincer lesion or labral tear requiring repair are also associated with a positive LT test result.

The maximum tolerated dose of walking for people with severe osteoarthritis of the knee: a phase I trial

OBJECTIVE To determine how much physical activity, in the form of walking, can be safely and feasibly tolerated for people with severe knee osteoarthritis (OA). DESIGN Phase I dose response trial with escalating walking doses of 10, 20, 35, 50, 70, and 95 min over 1 week, were prescribed non-randomly to people with severe knee OA. The primary stopping rule was a substantial increase in knee pain. The primary outcomes were an estimation of the maximum tolerated dose of walking; and the proportion of people who did not complete the dose for feasibility reasons. The secondary outcomes were pain, stiffness and activity limitation Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC). RESULTS Twenty-four participants (13 women) aged 53-83 years, and average body mass index (BMI) of 34 kg/m(2) (SD 9) were recruited. Three participants were assigned to each dose between 10 and 70 min, and nine participants assigned to the 95-min dose. The trial was stopped at 95 min due to the maximum number of adverse events occurring at this dose. Therefore, the maximum tolerated dose was 70 min. No participant stopped due to reasons related to feasibility. There was a moderate association between dose and increased activity (linear R(2) = 0.31, cubic R(2) = 0.69) and reduced stiffness (linear R(2) = 0.20, cubic R(2) = 0.52), with increased benefits at moderate to higher doses. CONCLUSIONS There is preliminary evidence that 70 min per week of moderate intensity supervised walking was safe and feasible for people with severe OA of the knee; for higher doses there was a risk of exacerbating knee pain levels.

Perceptions about participation in a 12-week walking program for people with severe knee osteoarthritis: a qualitative analysis

Abstract Purpose: To explore the perceptions of people with severe knee osteoarthritis and increased cardiovascular risk about participating in a walking program. Methods: Qualitative study using semistructured interviews for people with severe knee osteoarthritis and increased cardiovascular risk who participated in a 12-week walking program. Interviews were audiotaped, transcribed verbatim, member-checked, coded and themes developed using thematic analysis. Findings were triangulated with quantitative data including pain, function and cardiovascular risk factors from previously reported data. Results: Twenty-one participants were interviewed after the completion of the walking program. The main theme identified was the preoccupation with the knee including pain, damage and the view that surgery was required. Three subthemes to emerge were (i) the perception of functional, cardiovascular and psychosocial benefits with the walking program; (ii) that supervision, monitoring and commitment were important enablers; and (iii) external factors such as ill-health, weather and the environment were key barriers. The perceived functional and cardiovascular benefits converged with results from quantitative data. Conclusions: Even when patients with severe osteoarthritis of the knee report other benefits from participating in a walking program, the core theme to emerge was their preoccupation with knee pain, knee damage and the view that they needed a knee replacement. Implications for Rehabilitation Patients with severe osteoarthritis of the knee and moderate cardiovascular risk reported functional, cardiovascular and psychosocial benefits from participating in a walking program. Despite patients reporting functional, cardiovascular and psychosocial benefits, the core theme to emerge was their preoccupation with knee pain, knee damage and the view that they needed a knee replacement. The core theme highlights the challenges in promoting physical activity for patients with severe knee osteoarthritis.

Setting Up a Hip Arthroscopy Service

Hip arthroscopy constitutes one of the techniques that the surgeon uses to treat his, or her, patients. In consequence, a hip arthroscopy service is normally offered in parallel with other surgical interventions and the effort that a surgeon commits to this part of their practice will depend upon their desire to sub-specialise in arthroscopic hip surgery. This chapter discusses choice of practice location, the commercial viability of a hip arthroscopy practice, the types of patients that may require treatment, the different healthcare providers who may refer to the practice, communication requirements, strategic links that may be beneficial, options for patient assessment, the requirement for imaging services, the importance of data capture, provision of appropriate operating facilities, patient education and expectations, office staff and billing and the provision of contact numbers for patients and healthcare providers. The recommendations provided in this chapter are primarily intended for surgeons who have recently completed their specialist surgical training in orthopedics, have undertaken one or more fellowships in hip arthroscopy and are looking to establish themselves as a hip surgeon with a special interest in hip arthroscopy.