Parth K. Shah

Surgery for metastatic neuroendocrine tumors with occult primaries.

INTRODUCTION Neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) frequently metastasize prior to diagnosis. Although metastases are often identifiable on conventional imaging studies, primary tumors, particularly those in the midgut, are frequently difficult to localize preoperatively. MATERIALS AND METHODS Patients with metastatic NETs with intact primaries were identified. Clinical and pathologic data were extracted from medical records. Primary tumors were classified as localized or occult based on preoperative imaging. The sensitivities and specificities of preoperative imaging modalities for identifying the primary tumors were calculated. Patient characteristics, tumor features, and survival in localized and occult cases were compared. RESULTS Sixty-one patients with an intact primary tumor and metastatic disease were identified. In 28 of these patients (46%), the primary tumor could not be localized preoperatively. A median of three different preoperative imaging studies were utilized. Patients with occult primaries were more likely to have a delay (>6 mo) in surgical referral from time of onset of symptoms (57% versus 27%, P = 0.02). Among the 28 patients with occult primary tumors, 18 (64%) were found to have radiographic evidence of mesenteric lymphadenopathy corresponding, in all but one case, to a small bowel primary. In all but three patients (89%), the primary tumor could be identified intraoperatively. CONCLUSION The primary tumor can be identified intraoperatively in a majority of patients with metastatic NETs, irrespective of preoperative localization status. Referral for surgical management should not, therefore, be influenced by the inability to localize the primary tumor.

Role of adrenal vein sampling in primary aldosteronism: Impact of imaging, localization, and age

The role of adrenal vein sampling (AVS) has been debated, with some authorities advocating selective use in younger patients (≤40 years), and those localized by preoperative imaging. We examined our experience to determine the impact of AVS in patients who routinely underwent AVS with a high success rate.

Strategies for Managing Smart Pump Alarm and Alert Fatigue: A Narrative Review

Although smart infusion pumps are intended to prevent medication errors by alerting users about doses that exceed set thresholds, a large number of clinically insignificant alarms and alerts create the potential for alert and alarm fatigue. We searched the PubMed, Scopus, and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL) databases for peer‐reviewed literature (January 1, 2004–August 31, 2017) on managing smart pump alerts, alarms, and related fatigue. Twenty‐nine articles that met the inclusion criteria were reviewed and organized into themes. Smart pumps give users two types of signals: alarms that indicate mechanical issues such as occlusion, air in the line, or low battery; and clinical alerts that indicate that a programmed dose exceeds a predefined safety limit. Mechanical alarms occur with greater frequency than clinical alerts, but alarms and alerts vary widely by pump model, patient population, time of day, month, and type of drug. Several causes of clinically insignificant alerts and alarms may be actionable, and strategies proposed in the literature include development of a multidisciplinary team to oversee the quality improvement effort with involvement of end users, standardization of medication administration practices, widening of drug limit library thresholds when clinically appropriate, maintaining up‐to‐date drug limit libraries, and interoperability. Whereas many strategies have been proposed, and case studies have been reported, none have been rigorously evaluated. In addition, more research is needed related to managing occlusion and air‐in‐line alarms, especially for complicated infusions. Future work should focus on the evaluation of specific and replicable alert and alarm reduction strategies with a greater emphasis on quantitative metrics.