Parthasarathy Manavalan

Maturation and function of cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator variants bearing mutations in putative nucleotide-binding domains 1 and 2

One feature of the mutations thus far found to be associated with the disease cystic fibrosis (CF) is that many of them are clustered within the first nucleotide-binding domain (NBD) of the CF transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR). We sought to discover the molecular basis for this clustering by introducing into the two NBDs of CFTR mutations either mimicking amino acid changes associated with CF or altering residues within highly conserved motifs. Synthesis and maturation of the mutant CFTR were studied by transient expression in COS cells. The ability of the altered proteins to generate cyclic AMP-stimulated anion efflux was assessed by using 6-methoxy-N-(sulfopropyl) quinolinium (SPQ) fluorescence measurements in HeLa cells expressing mutated plasmids. The results show that (i) all CF-associated mutants, with one exception, lack functional activity as measured in the SPQ assay, (ii) mutations in NBD1 are more sensitive to the effects of the same amino acid change than are the corresponding mutations in NBD2, (iii) cells transfected with plasmids bearing CF-associated mutations commonly but not exclusively lack mature CFTR, (iv) NBD mutants lacking mature CFTR fail to activate Cl- channels, and (v) the glycosylation of CFTR, per se, is not required for CFTR function. We reason that the structure of NBD1 itself or of the surrounding domains renders it particularly sensitive to mutational changes. As a result, most NBD1 mutants, but only a few NBD2 mutants, fail to mature or lack functional activity. These findings are consistent with the observed uneven distribution of CFTR missense mutations between NBD1 and NBD2 of CF patients.

Sequence homologies between nucleotide binding regions of CFTR and G‐proteins suggest structural and functional similarities

Sequence homology between the α‐subunits of G‐proteins and other GTP‐binding proteins and certain regions within the nucleotide binding domains (NBDs) of cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) indicates that these protein structures may be similar. A sequence allignment of the NBDs of CFTR and NBDs from other membrane transporters, forms the basis of a structural model. This model predicts that one of the conserved sequences GGQR, within which a number of CF mutations occur, forms part of the nucleotide binding pocket and serves as an ON/OFF conformational switch as observed in GTP binding proteins. Furthermore, based on subtle sequence differences between the first and second NBDs of CFTR and from structure‐activity data, we suggest that the nucleotide binding site environments of the two NBDs are different.

Sequence and structural homology among membrane-associated domains of CFTR and certain transporter proteins

A sequence comparison of the two membrane-associated (MA) domains of the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR), multidrug resistance transporter (MDR), and α-factor pheromone export system (STE6) proteins, each of which are believed to contain a total of 12 transmembrane (TM) segments, reveals significant amino acid homology and length conservation in the loop regions that connect individual TM sequences. Similar structural homology is observed between these proteins, hemolysin B (HLYB) and the major histocompatibility-linked peptide transporter, HAM1, the latter two which contain a single MA domain composed of six TM segments. In addition, there are specific sequences that are conserved within the TM segments of the five different membrane proteins. This observation suggests that the folding topologies of the MA domains of MDR, STE6, and CFTR in the plasma membrane are likely to be very similar. The sequence analysis also reveals that there are three characteristic motifs (a pair of aromatic residues, LTLXXXXXXP and GXXL) that are conserved in MDR, STE6, HLYB, HAM1, but not in CFTR. We propose that although CFTR may be evolutionarily related to these other membrane proteins, it belongs to a separate subclass.

Sequence and structural relationships in the cytokine family

The sequences of nine different cytokines, growth hormone, and prolactin have been aligned and their secondary structure predicted. The alignment reveals that each exon has a characteristic sequence pattern shared by all cytokines. The most striking sequence similarity is observed in exon 4, where the residue pair Phe-Leu is conserved in many cytokines. In addition, there are discreet homologous regions between two specific growth factors, including a high degree of homology between granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) and interleukin 3 (IL-3). The secondary structure analysis predicts that exon 3 of all cytokines has an antiparallel helix-turn-helix motif, which is likely to form the central helical segments of a four α-helical bundle-type structure. Based on the secondary structure and the disulfidebonding pattern, the topological connectivity for a number of cytokines has been predicted.