Parvati Singh

Adipose Tissue Inflammation and Adiponectin Resistance in Patients with Advanced Heart Failure: Correction after Ventricular Assist Device Implantation

Background— Heart failure (HF) is characterized by inflammation, insulin resistance, and progressive catabolism. We hypothesized that patients with advanced HF also develop adipose tissue inflammation associated with impaired adipokine signaling and that hemodynamic correction through implantation of ventricular assist devices (VADs) would reverse adipocyte activation and correct adipokine signaling in advanced HF. Methods and Results— Circulating insulin, adiponectin, leptin, and resistin levels were measured in 36 patients with advanced HF before and after VAD implantation and 10 healthy control subjects. Serum adiponectin was higher in HF patients before VAD implantation compared with control subjects (13.3±4.9 versus 6.4±2.1 &mgr;g/mL, P=0.02). VAD implantation (mean, 129±99 days) reduced serum adiponectin (7.4±3.4 &mgr;g/mL, P<0.05) and improved insulin resistance (Homeostasis Assessment Model of insulin resistance: 6.3±5.8–3.6±2.9; P<0.05). Adiponectin expression in adipose tissue decreased after VAD implantation (−65%; P<0.03). Adiponectin receptor expression was suppressed in the failing myocardium compared with control subjects and increased after mechanical unloading. Histomorphometric analysis of adipose tissue specimens revealed reduced adipocyte size in patients with advanced HF compared with control subjects (1999±24 &mgr;m2 versus 5583±142 &mgr;m2 in control subjects; P<0.05), which increased after VAD placement. Of note, macrophage infiltration in adipose tissue was higher in advanced HF patients compared with control subjects (+25%; P<0.01), which normalized after VAD implantation. Conclusions— Adipose tissue inflammation and adiponectin resistance develop in advanced HF. Mechanical unloading of the failing myocardium reverses adipose tissue macrophage infiltration, inflammation, and adiponectin resistance in patients with advanced HF.

Markers of extracellular matrix turnover and the development of right ventricular failure after ventricular assist device implantation in patients with advanced heart failure

BACKGROUND Cardiac extracellular matrix (ECM) is a dynamic and metabolically active collagenous network that responds to mechanical strain. The association between ECM turnover and right ventricular failure (RVF) development after left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation in patients with advanced heart failure (HF) was investigated. METHODS Circulating levels of osteopontin, metalloproteinases (MMP)-2 and MPP-9, and tissue inhibitor of MMP (TIMP)-1 and TIMP-4 were measured in 61 patients at LVAD implantation and explantation and in 10 control subjects. RVF was defined as the need for RVAD, nitric oxide inhalation > 48 hours and/or inotropic support > 14 days. RESULTS All ECM markers were elevated in patients with HF compared with controls (all p < 0.05). RVF developed in 23 patients (37.7%) on LVAD support. All ECM markers decreased on LVAD support in patients without RVF (all p < 0.05), but serum MMP-2, TIMP-1, TIMP-4, and osteopontin remained elevated in RVF patients. Multivariate analysis identified that right ventricular stroke work index (RVSWI), circulating B-type natriuretic peptide, and osteopontin were associated with RVF (all p < 0.05). Osteopontin correlated inversely with RVSWI (r = -0.44, p < 0.001). Osteopontin levels > 260 ng/ml discriminate patients who develop RVF from those without RVF (sensitivity, 83%; specificity, 82%). CONCLUSIONS Marked elevation of osteopontin levels before LVAD placement is associated with RVF development. Persistent elevation of circulating ECM markers after LVAD implantation characterizes patients who develop RVF. These novel biomarkers would have a potential role in the prediction of RVF development in patients undergoing LVAD implantation.

Effects of Continuous- Versus Pulsatile-Flow Left Ventricular Assist Devices on Myocardial Unloading and Remodeling

Background— Continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices (LVAD) are increasingly used for patients with end-stage heart failure (HF). We analyzed the effects of ventricular decompression by continuous-flow versus pulsatile-flow LVADs on myocardial structure and function in this population. Methods and Results— Sixty-one patients who underwent LVAD implantation as bridge-to-transplant were analyzed (pulsatile-flow LVAD: group P, n=31; continuous-flow LVAD: group C, n=30). Serial echocardiograms, serum levels of brain natriuretic peptide (BNP), and extracellular matrix biomarkers (ECM) were compared between the groups. Myocardial BNP and ECM gene expression were evaluated in a subset of 18 patients. Postoperative LV ejection fraction was greater (33.2±12.6% versus 17.6±8.8%, P<0.0001) and the mitral E/E′ was lower (9.9±2.6 versus 13.2±3.8, P=0.0002) in group P versus group C. Postoperative serum levels of BNP, metalloproteinases (MMP)-9, and tissue inhibitor of MMP (TIMP)-4 were significantly lower in group P compared with group C (BNP: 552.6±340.6 versus 965.4±805.7 pg/mL, P<0.01; MMP9: 309.0±220.2 versus 475.2±336.9 ng/dL, P<0.05; TIMP4: 1490.9±622.4 versus 2014.3±452.4 ng/dL, P<0.001). Myocardial gene expression of ECM markers and BNP decreased in both groups; however, expression of TIMP-4 decreased only in group P (P=0.024). Conclusions— Mechanical unloading of the failing myocardium using pulsatile devices is more effective as indicated by echocardiographic parameters of systolic and diastolic LV function as well as dynamics of BNP and ECM markers. Therefore, specific effects of pulsatile mechanical unloading on the failing myocardium may have important implications for device selection especially for the purpose of bridge-to-recovery in patients with advanced HF.

Response to Letter Regarding Article “Adipose Tissue Inflammation and Adiponectin Resistance in Patients With Advanced Heart Failure: Correction After Ventricular Assist Device Implantation”

We thank Haufe et al for their insightful comments on our study of adipose tissue inflammation and adiponectin resistance in patients with advanced heart failure (HF) and the impact of mechanical unloading.1 We appreciate the observation that incorrect homeostasis model of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) values were listed in Table 3. Upon recalculation using the HOMA-IR formula, the correct values were found to be 1.0±0.6 for controls, 7.6±7.7 in advanced HF ( P =0.02 versus controls) and 4.5±3.6 after left ventricular assist device (LVAD) support ( P =0.01 versus HF). This supports the conclusion …

Adipose Tissue Inflammation and Adiponectin Resistance in Patients With Advanced Heart FailureClinical Perspective: Correction After Ventricular Assist Device Implantation

Background— Heart failure (HF) is characterized by inflammation, insulin resistance, and progressive catabolism. We hypothesized that patients with advanced HF also develop adipose tissue inflammation associated with impaired adipokine signaling and that hemodynamic correction through implantation of ventricular assist devices (VADs) would reverse adipocyte activation and correct adipokine signaling in advanced HF. Methods and Results— Circulating insulin, adiponectin, leptin, and resistin levels were measured in 36 patients with advanced HF before and after VAD implantation and 10 healthy control subjects. Serum adiponectin was higher in HF patients before VAD implantation compared with control subjects (13.3±4.9 versus 6.4±2.1 &mgr;g/mL, P=0.02). VAD implantation (mean, 129±99 days) reduced serum adiponectin (7.4±3.4 &mgr;g/mL, P<0.05) and improved insulin resistance (Homeostasis Assessment Model of insulin resistance: 6.3±5.8–3.6±2.9; P<0.05). Adiponectin expression in adipose tissue decreased after VAD implantation (−65%; P<0.03). Adiponectin receptor expression was suppressed in the failing myocardium compared with control subjects and increased after mechanical unloading. Histomorphometric analysis of adipose tissue specimens revealed reduced adipocyte size in patients with advanced HF compared with control subjects (1999±24 &mgr;m2 versus 5583±142 &mgr;m2 in control subjects; P<0.05), which increased after VAD placement. Of note, macrophage infiltration in adipose tissue was higher in advanced HF patients compared with control subjects (+25%; P<0.01), which normalized after VAD implantation. Conclusions— Adipose tissue inflammation and adiponectin resistance develop in advanced HF. Mechanical unloading of the failing myocardium reverses adipose tissue macrophage infiltration, inflammation, and adiponectin resistance in patients with advanced HF.

Adipose Tissue Inflammation and Adiponectin Resistance in Patients With Advanced Heart FailureClinical Perspective

Background— Heart failure (HF) is characterized by inflammation, insulin resistance, and progressive catabolism. We hypothesized that patients with advanced HF also develop adipose tissue inflammation associated with impaired adipokine signaling and that hemodynamic correction through implantation of ventricular assist devices (VADs) would reverse adipocyte activation and correct adipokine signaling in advanced HF. Methods and Results— Circulating insulin, adiponectin, leptin, and resistin levels were measured in 36 patients with advanced HF before and after VAD implantation and 10 healthy control subjects. Serum adiponectin was higher in HF patients before VAD implantation compared with control subjects (13.3±4.9 versus 6.4±2.1 &mgr;g/mL, P=0.02). VAD implantation (mean, 129±99 days) reduced serum adiponectin (7.4±3.4 &mgr;g/mL, P<0.05) and improved insulin resistance (Homeostasis Assessment Model of insulin resistance: 6.3±5.8–3.6±2.9; P<0.05). Adiponectin expression in adipose tissue decreased after VAD implantation (−65%; P<0.03). Adiponectin receptor expression was suppressed in the failing myocardium compared with control subjects and increased after mechanical unloading. Histomorphometric analysis of adipose tissue specimens revealed reduced adipocyte size in patients with advanced HF compared with control subjects (1999±24 &mgr;m2 versus 5583±142 &mgr;m2 in control subjects; P<0.05), which increased after VAD placement. Of note, macrophage infiltration in adipose tissue was higher in advanced HF patients compared with control subjects (+25%; P<0.01), which normalized after VAD implantation. Conclusions— Adipose tissue inflammation and adiponectin resistance develop in advanced HF. Mechanical unloading of the failing myocardium reverses adipose tissue macrophage infiltration, inflammation, and adiponectin resistance in patients with advanced HF.

Effects of Continuous-Flow Versus Pulsatile-Flow Left Ventricular Assist Devices on Myocardial Unloading and RemodelingClinical Perspective

Background— Continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices (LVAD) are increasingly used for patients with end-stage heart failure (HF). We analyzed the effects of ventricular decompression by continuous-flow versus pulsatile-flow LVADs on myocardial structure and function in this population. Methods and Results— Sixty-one patients who underwent LVAD implantation as bridge-to-transplant were analyzed (pulsatile-flow LVAD: group P, n=31; continuous-flow LVAD: group C, n=30). Serial echocardiograms, serum levels of brain natriuretic peptide (BNP), and extracellular matrix biomarkers (ECM) were compared between the groups. Myocardial BNP and ECM gene expression were evaluated in a subset of 18 patients. Postoperative LV ejection fraction was greater (33.2±12.6% versus 17.6±8.8%, P<0.0001) and the mitral E/E′ was lower (9.9±2.6 versus 13.2±3.8, P=0.0002) in group P versus group C. Postoperative serum levels of BNP, metalloproteinases (MMP)-9, and tissue inhibitor of MMP (TIMP)-4 were significantly lower in group P compared with group C (BNP: 552.6±340.6 versus 965.4±805.7 pg/mL, P<0.01; MMP9: 309.0±220.2 versus 475.2±336.9 ng/dL, P<0.05; TIMP4: 1490.9±622.4 versus 2014.3±452.4 ng/dL, P<0.001). Myocardial gene expression of ECM markers and BNP decreased in both groups; however, expression of TIMP-4 decreased only in group P (P=0.024). Conclusions— Mechanical unloading of the failing myocardium using pulsatile devices is more effective as indicated by echocardiographic parameters of systolic and diastolic LV function as well as dynamics of BNP and ECM markers. Therefore, specific effects of pulsatile mechanical unloading on the failing myocardium may have important implications for device selection especially for the purpose of bridge-to-recovery in patients with advanced HF.