Patrice Couzigou

A COMPARISON OF THREE INTERFERON ALFA-2B REGIMENS FOR THE LONG-TERM TREATMENT OF CHRONIC NON-A, NON-B HEPATITIS. MULTICENTER STUDY GROUP

BACKGROUND We studied the effects of long-term treatment with interferon on histologic features of the liver and serum alanine aminotransferase concentrations in patients with chronic non-A, non-B hepatitis. METHODS Consecutive patients who met the inclusion criteria were enrolled in the study. The diagnosis of chronic non-A, non-B hepatitis was established on the basis of the liver-biopsy findings and an abnormal serum alanine aminotransferase value (greater than 1.5 times the normal value) for at least one year. All patients were treated for six months with 3 million units of interferon alfa-2b given subcutaneously three times a week and were then randomly assigned to the same treatment for an additional 12 months (group 1), a regimen of 1 million units three times a week for 12 months (group 2), or no further treatment (group 3). Patients in group 3 who had elevated serum alanine aminotransferase concentrations for three consecutive months underwent the initial regimen once again. Follow-up continued for two years after the discontinuation of treatment. Histologic improvement was defined as a decrease of at least one grade in the score for necroinflammatory activity (0, no activity; 1, mild; 2, moderate; or 3, severe) between the first liver biopsy and a biopsy performed at 18 months. RESULTS Of the 329 patients initially treated, 303 were randomized: 103 to group 1, 101 to group 2, and 99 to group 3. Of the 286 patients tested, 252 (88.1 percent) had antibodies to hepatitis C virus. In an intention-to-treat analysis, 46 of the patients in group 1 (44.7 percent) had normal serum alanine aminotransferase values at 18 months, as compared with 27 of the patients in group 2 (26.7 percent, P = 0.008) and 30 of those in group 3 (30.3 percent, P = 0.04). Between 19 and 42 months, 23 of the patients in group 1 (22.3 percent) continued to have normal serum alanine aminotransferase values (measured every six months), as compared with 10 of the patients in group 2 (9.9 percent, P = 0.02) and 8 of those in group 3 (8.1 percent, P = 0.005). Among the 176 patients with repeated liver biopsies at 18 months, more patients in group 1 had improved histologic-activity scores (69.6 percent) than in group 2 (47.6 percent, P = 0.02) or group 3 (38.6 percent, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Among patients with chronic non-A, non-B hepatitis, a regimen of 3 million units of interferon alfa-2b given three times a week for 18 months produced better histologic findings and serum alanine aminotransferase values than regimens involving a lower dose or a shorter duration of treatment.

Ursodeoxycholic acid for primary sclerosing cholangitis.

The effects of ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA, 750-1250 mg/day) were evaluated prospectively in 15 patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC). Five patients had associated inflammatory bowel disease. After 6 months of treatment, the proportion of patients suffering from fatigue or pruritus decreased from 60% to 20% and from 33% to 20%, respectively. No exacerbation of associated disorders was observed. Serum alkaline phosphatase levels (normal less than 100 IU/l) decreased from 401 +/- 53 to 222 +/- 42 (mean +/- S.E.; p less than 0.001), those of gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase, (normal less than 40 IU/l) from 520 +/- 89 to 185 +/- 32 (p less than 0.001) and those of alanine aminotransferases, (normal less than 30 IU/l) from 79 +/- 12 to 42 +/- 6 (p less than 0.02). In three patients, the discontinuation of UDCA was associated with an aggravation of the liver test results. In conclusion, this study shows that 6 months of treatment with UDCA leads to clinical and biochemical improvements in patients with PSC. These results suggest that UDCA could be an effective treatment for PSC, and may justify a controlled therapeutic trial.

Severe hepatic cytolysis : incidence and risk factors in patients treated by antiretroviral combinations Aquitaine Cohort, France, 1996-1998

OBJECTIVE To study hepatic cytolysis in patients treated by highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) with protease inhibitor or with two nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs). METHODS We selected patients of the Aquitaine Cohort who initiated HAART or two NRTIs before 1 January 1998, had alanine amino-transferase (ALT) < or = 200 IU/I at baseline and at least one follow-up measure. Cox model was used to study the association between occurrence of severe hepatic cytolysis (ALT>200 IU/l) and age, gender, HIV transmission group, baseline CD4 and CD8 cell count, history of hepatic cytolysis, antiretroviral drug, baseline liver enzymes (WHO classification level 0: < or = 50 IU/l, level 1: 51 to 100, level 2: 101 to 200), hepatitis B and C co-infection. RESULTS Sixty-four of 748 (8.5%) patients treated with HAART and 71 of 1249 (5.7%) treated with two NRTIs developed cytolysis. The probability of occurrence was 7.9% after 1 year [95% confidence interval (CI), 5.9-10.4] for patients treated with HAART and 4.8% (95% CI, 3.6-6.4) for patients treated with two NRTIs (log-rank test, P = 0.01). The median time to occurrence was 164 days for HAART-treated patients and 252 days for those treated with two NRTIs. In multivariate analysis, the history of cytolysis [hazard ratio (HR) = 2.3; 95% CI, 1.2-4.4], baseline value of ALT (HR = 2.4; 95% CI, 1.2-4.8 and HR = 3.3; 95% CI, 1.4-7.4 for levels 1 and 2, respectively), hepatitis B (HR = 3.0; 95% CI, 1.4-6.2) and C co-infections (HR = 3.2; 95% CI, 1.7-6.2) remained significantly associated with the occurrence of severe hepatic cytolysis among HAART-treated patients. History of cytolysis, hepatitis B and C were associated with cytolysis in patients treated with two NRTIs (HR = 14.8, 2.6 and 2.7, respectively). CONCLUSION Hepatic cytolysis is more frequent among patients treated with HAART than with two NRTIs. Hepatitis B and C are the major risk factors after initiation of HAART or treatment with NRTIs. Co-infections with hepatitis B virus or hepatitis C virus may modify the management of HIV-infected patients treated by HAART.

Does HIV-infection influence the response of chronic hepatitis C to interferon treatment? A French multicenter prospective study

BACKGROUND/AIM The aim of this prospective study was to compare the response to alfa-interferon treatment of chronic hepatitis C in two groups of patients: coinfected with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) (G I) or not (G II). METHODS One hundred and fifty-three patients with chronic hepatitis C had been enrolled in 30 French liver units or infectious diseases units between May 1992 and January 1995 (G I: 76, G II: 77) to receive alfa-2a interferon: 3 MU thrice weekly for 6 months. RESULTS One hundred and twenty-seven patients (G I: 63, G II: 64) fulfilled all criteria for analysis. The two groups were comparable for all demographic data, while significantly more severe biological and histological (p=0.001) parameters attested to more serious hepatitis among HIV-HCV coinfected patients. HCV viremia was higher among HIV-coinfected patients (p=0.0169), while genotype repartition was identical among the two groups (more than 52% of genotype 1, more than 31% of genotype 3). ALT normalization was, respectively, (G I/G II) obtained in 17.46%/26.56% (not significant) of patients at the end of treatment and in 11.11%/12.5% (not significant) of patients after 6 months of follow-up. In a multivariate analysis, GGT level before therapy (relative risk 2.1, confidence interval 1.1-5.8) and body surface area (relative risk 1.9, confidence interval 1.1-3.7) were the variables independently associated with the response to alfa-interferon treatment (higher GGT and more elevated body surface area were associated with a risk of non-response). CONCLUSION In our study HIV infection did not affect the alfa-interferon treatment response of chronic hepatitis C, and response could be achieved among HIV-coinfected patients. Present therapeutic anti-HCV schedules need to be proposed to HIV-HCV coinfected patients before severe immunosuppression occurs. On the other hand, more severe biological and histological parameters were observed among HIV-HCV coinfected patients, which suggests a need to study whether HIV infection is associated with a worsening course of chronic hepatitis C.

Screening of esophageal varices by esophageal capsule endoscopy: results of a French multicenter prospective study.

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIM Esophageal video capsule endoscopy (ECE) is a new technique that allows examination of the esophagus using a noninvasive approach. The aim of this study was to compare ECE with esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) for the diagnosis of esophageal varices in patients with cirrhosis. PATIENTS AND METHODS A total of 330 patients with cirrhosis and with no known esophageal varices were prospectively enrolled. Patients underwent ECE first, followed by EGD (gold standard). The endoscopists who performed EGD were blind to the ECE result. Patient satisfaction was assessed using a visual analog scale (maximum score 100). RESULTS A total of 30 patients were excluded from the analysis because they did not undergo any endoscopic examinations. Patients (mean age 56 years; 216 male) had mainly alcoholic (45 %) or viral (27 %) cirrhosis. The diagnostic indices of ECE to diagnose and correctly stage esophageal varices were: sensitivity 76 % and 64 %, specificity 91 % and 93 %, positive predictive value 88 % and 88 %, and negative predictive value 81 % and 78 %, respectively. ECE patient satisfaction scored significantly higher than EGD (87 ± 22 vs. 58 ± 35; P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS ECE was well tolerated and safe in patients with liver cirrhosis and suspicion of portal hypertension. The sensitivity of ECE is not currently sufficient to replace EGD as a first exploration in these patients. However, due to its excellent specificity and positive predictive value, ECE may have a role in cases of refusal or contraindication to EGD. ECE might also improve compliance to endoscopic follow-up and aid important therapeutic decision making in the prophylaxis of bleeding. TRIAL REGISTRATION EudraCT (ID RCB 2009-A00532-55) and ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT00941421).

Prevention of relapse in patients with chronic non-A, non-B/C hepatitis who respond to alpha-interferon. A controlled multicenter trial of low-dose maintenance therapy

We tested the efficacy of maintenance treatment with alpha-2a interferon, 1 megaunit thrice weekly for 6 months, in preventing relapse of non-A, non-B/C hepatitis in remission after treatment with alpha interferon given thrice weekly according to the following dose schedule: 3 megaunits for 3 months, 2 megaunits for 2 months and 1 megaunit for 1 month. Fifty-three patients with hepatitis C in remission were randomly allocated to a treatment group (n = 26) or a control group (n = 27). A relapse (aminotransferase activity > 1.5 times the upper limit of normal) occurred in 46% of the controls and 35% of the treated patients (NS). Maintenance treatment had no significant influence on histopathologic changes evaluated by three independent observers: in both groups the overall score for histologic lesions improved between the initiation of interferon therapy and the end of the study. We conclude that relapses in patients with non-A, non-B/C hepatitis in remission after treatment with alpha interferon at tapering doses are not prevented by maintenance therapy with low-dose alpha interferon. Journal of Hepatology.