Patricia C. Bergen

Factors Affecting Recurrence following Incisional Herniorrhaphy

The purpose of this study was to determine the influence of chronic illness, obesity, and type of repair on the likelihood of recurrence following incisional herniorrhaphy. The medical records of 77 patients who underwent elective repair of a midline incisional hernia at the Dallas Veterans Affairs Medical Center between 1991 and 1995 were reviewed. Demographic data, presence of chronic illnesses, type of repair, and presence of recurrence were noted. Ninety-six percent of the patients were men, with an average age of 59 years. More than 50% of the patients had chronic lung or cardiac diseases and more than 40% weighed ≥120% of their ideal body weight and had a body mass index (BMI) ≥30. Sixty-two percent of the patients underwent primary reapproximation of the fascia (tissue repair), whereas 38% underwent repair with prosthetic material (prosthetic repair). The overall recurrence rate was 45%, with a median follow-up of 45 months (range 6–73). Seventy-four percent of the recurrences presented within 3 years of repair. The recurrence rate for those patients undergoing a tissue repair was 54%, whereas the recurrence rate following prosthetic repair was 29%. The incidence of recurrence for patients with pulmonary or cardiac disease or diabetes mellitus was similar to that of patients without these illnesses. The percent ideal body weight and BMI of patients who developed a recurrent hernia, particularly following a prosthetic repair, were significantly greater than those of patients whose repairs remained intact. These data strongly support the use of prosthetic repairs for incisional hernias, particularly in patients who are overweight.

Comparison of video trainer and virtual reality training systems on acquisition of laparoscopic skills

Training on a video trainer or computer-based minimally invasive surgery trainer leads to improved benchtop laparoscopic skill. Recently, improved operative performance from practice on a video trainer was reported. The purpose of this study was three fold: (a) to compare psychomotor skill improvement after training on a virtual reality (VR) system with that after training on a video-trainer, (VT) (b) to evaluate whether skills learned on the one training system are transferable to the other, and (c) to evaluate whether VR or VT training improves operative performance. For the study, 50 junior surgery residents completed baseline skill testing on both the VR and VT systems. These subjects then were randomized to either a VR or VT structured training group. After practice, the subjects were tested again on their VR and VT skills. To assess the effect of practice on operative performance, all second-year residents (n = 19) were evaluated on their operative performance during a laparoscopic cholecystectomy before and after skill training. Data are expressed as percentage of improvement in mean score/time. Analysis was performed by Students paired t-test. The VR training group showed improvement of 54% on the VR posttest, as compared with 55% improvement by the VT group. The VR training group improved more on the VT posttest tasks (36%) than the VT training group improved on the VR posttest tasks (17%) (p <0.05). Operative performance improved only in the VR training group (p <0.05). Psychomotor skillsimprove after training on both VR and VT, and skills may be transferable. Furthermore, training on a minimally invasive surgery trainer, virtual reality system may improve operative performance during laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Measuring Operative Performance after Laparoscopic Skills Training: Edited Videotape versus Direct Observation

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Global assessment by direct observation has been validated for evaluating operative performance of surgery residents after formal skills training but is time-consuming. The purpose of this study was to compare global assessment performed from edited videotape with scores from direct observation. MATERIALS AND METHODS Junior surgery residents (N = 22) were randomized to 2 weeks of formal videotrainer skills training or a control group. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy was performed at the beginning and end of the rotation, and global assessment scores were compared for the training and control groups. Laparoscopic videotapes were edited: initial (2 minutes), cystic duct/artery (6 minutes), and fossa dissection (2 minutes). Two independent raters performed both direct observation and videotape assessments, and scores were compared for each rater and for interrater reliability using a Spearman correlation. RESULTS Correlation coefficients for videotape versus direct observation for five global assessment criteria were <0.33 for both raters (NS for all values). The correlation coefficient for interrater reliability for the overall score was 0.57 (P = 0.01) for direct observation v 0.28 (NS) for videotape. The trained group had significantly better overall performance than the control group according to the assessment by direct observation (P = 0.02) but not by videotape assessment (NS). CONCLUSIONS Direct observation demonstrated improved overall performance of junior residents after formal skills training on a videotrainer. Global assessment from an edited 10-minute videotape did not correlate with direct observation and had poor interrater reliability. Efficient and valid methods of evaluating operative performance await development.