Patricia Fuchs

Breath gas aldehydes as biomarkers of lung cancer

There is experimental evidence that volatile substances in human breath can reflect presence of neoplasma. Volatile aldehydes were determined in exhaled breath of 12 lung cancer patients, 12 smokers and 12 healthy volunteers. Alveolar breath samples were collected under control of expired CO2. Reactive aldehydes were transformed into stable oximes by means of on‐fiber‐derivatization (SPME‐OFD). Aldehyde concentrations in the ppt and ppb level were determined by means of gas chromatography‐mass spectrometry (GC‐MS). Exhaled concentrations were corrected for inspired values. Exhaled C1–C10 aldehydes could be detected in all healthy volunteers, smokers and lung cancer patients. Concentrations ranged from 7 pmol/l (161 pptV) for butanal to 71 nmol/l (1,582 ppbV) for formaldehyde. Highest inspired concentrations were found for formaldehyde and acetaldehyde (0–55 nmol/l and 0–13 nmol/l, respectively). Acetaldehyde, propanal, butanal, heptanal and decanal concentrations showed no significant differences for cancer patients, smokers and healthy volunteers. Exhaled pentanal, hexanal, octanal and nonanal concentrations were significantly higher in lung cancer patients than in smokers and healthy controls (ppentanal = 0.001; phexanal = 0.006; poctanal = 0.014; pnonanal = 0.025). Sensitivity and specificity of this method were comparable to the diagnostic certitude of conventional serum markers and CT imaging. Lung cancer patients could be identified by means of exhaled pentanal, hexanal, octanal and nonanal concentrations. Exhaled aldehydes reflect aspects of oxidative stress and tumor‐specific tissue composition and metabolism. Noninvasive recognition of lung malignancies may be realized if analytical skills, biochemical knowledge and medical expertise are combined into a joint effort.

Assessment of propofol concentrations in human breath and blood by means of HS-SPME–GC–MS

BACKGROUND Breath analysis could offer a non-invasive means of drug monitoring if adequate analytical methods and robust correlations between drug concentrations in breath and blood can be established. We therefore applied headspace solid-phase microextraction coupled with gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (HS-SPME-GC-MS) to assess breath and blood concentrations of the intravenous drug propofol in patients under anesthesia or sedation. METHODS Arterial, central- and peripheral-venous blood and alveolar breath samples were drawn in parallel from 16 mechanically ventilated patients. In addition, six patients undergoing lung resection were investigated. Substances were preconcentrated by means of HS-SPME, separated by GC and identified by MS. RESULTS Propofol detection limits were 0.006 nmol/L in breath and 72.20 nmol/L in blood, the quantitation limits were 0.009 nmol/L and 75.89 nmol/L (end tidal breath/blood). Intraday precision was 8-11%, recovery 97-103%. Propofol concentrations were 0.04-0.5 nmol/L in breath and 2-120 micromol/L in blood. Only arterial propofol concentrations showed a correlation with concentrations in breath. Impaired ventilation/perfusion ratios in patients under lung resection resulted in changes of correlation coefficients. CONCLUSIONS Reliable and precise analytical methods such as HS-SPME-GC-MS represent basic requirements if breath analysis is to be set up for non-invasive monitoring of intravenous drugs and control of anesthesia.

Polypyrrole solid phase microextraction: A new approach to rapid sample preparation for the monitoring of antibiotic drugs.

Simple or even rapid bioanalytical methods are rare, since they generally involve complicated, time-consuming sample preparation from the biological matrices like LLE or SPE. SPME provides a promising approach to overcome these limitations. The full potential of this innovative technique for medical diagnostics, pharmacotherapy or biochemistry has not been tapped yet. In-house manufactured SPME probes with polypyrrole (PPy) coating were evaluated using three antibiotics of high clinical relevance - linezolid, daptomycin, and moxifloxacin - from PBS, plasma, and whole blood. The PPy coating was characterised by scanning electron microscopy. Influences of pH, inorganic salt, and blood anticoagulants were studied for optimum performance. Extraction yields were determined from stagnant media as well as re-circulating human blood using the heart-and-lung machine model system. The PPy-SPME fibres showed high extraction yields, particularly regarding linezolid. The reproducibility of the method was optimised to achieve RSDs of 9% or 17% and 7% for SPME from stagnant or re-circulating blood using fresh and re-used fibres, respectively. The PPy-SPME approach was demonstrated to meet the requirements of therapeutic monitoring of the drugs tested, even from re-circulating blood at physiological flow rates. SPME represents a rapid and simple dual-step procedure with potency to significantly reduce the effort and expenditure of complicated sample preparations in biomedical analysis.

New coated SPME fibers for extraction and fast HPLC determination of selected drugs in human blood.

Polythiophene (PTh) and polypyrrole (PPy) as sorbent phases for solid phase microextraction (SPME) were applied in order to extract the multi-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) antibiotic drugs (linezolid and daptomycin) from whole blood followed by high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) determination with UV detection. Relative standard deviations (RSDs) of in vitro and pseudo in vivo measurements performed in whole blood were in the range of 4.58-15.91% and 6.09-17.33% for linezolid and daptomycin, respectively. Determination coefficients (R(2)) were in range of 0.9884-0.9945 and 0.9807-0.9818 for linezolid and daptomycin, respectively. This study proved better adsorption capacity of PTh SPME coating compared to PPy coating for both, linezolid and daptomycin.

Drug detection in breath: effects of pulmonary blood flow and cardiac output on propofol exhalation

AbstractBreath analysis could offer a non-invasive means of intravenous drug monitoring if robust correlations between drug concentrations in breath and blood can be established. In this study, propofol blood and breath concentrations were determined in an animal model under varying physiological conditions. Propofol concentrations in breath were determined by means of two independently calibrated analytical methods: continuous, real-time proton transfer reaction mass spectrometry (PTR-MS) and discontinuous solid-phase micro-extraction coupled with gas chromatography mass spectrometry (SPME-GC-MS). Blood concentrations were determined by means of SPME-GC-MS. Effects of changes in pulmonary blood flow resulting in a decreased cardiac output (CO) and effects of dobutamine administration resulting in an increased CO on propofol breath concentrations and on the correlation between propofol blood and breath concentrations were investigated in seven acutely instrumented pigs. Discontinuous propofol determination in breath by means of alveolar sampling and SPME-GC-MS showed good agreement (R2 = 0.959) with continuous alveolar real-time measurement by means of PTR-MS. In all investigated animals, increasing cardiac output led to a deterioration of the relationship between breath and blood propofol concentrations (R2 = 0.783 for gas chromatography-mass spectrometry and R2 = 0.795 for PTR-MS). Decreasing pulmonary blood flow and cardiac output through banding of the pulmonary artery did not significantly affect the relationship between propofol breath and blood concentrations (R2 > 0.90). Estimation of propofol blood concentrations from exhaled alveolar concentrations seems possible by means of different analytical methods even when cardiac output is decreased. Increases in cardiac output preclude prediction of blood propofol concentration from exhaled concentrations. FigureExperimental setup for simultaneous real-time (PTR-MS) and discontinuous (SPME-GC-MS) drug determination in the breath of acutely instrumented pigs (A). In order to assess the influence of hemodynamic variables pulmonary artery blood flow was determined by means of Doppler-measurement (B).

Breath analysis during one-lung ventilation in cancer patients

Noninvasive breath analysis may provide valuable information for cancer recognition if disease-specific volatile biomarkers could be identified. In order to compare nondiseased and diseased tissue in vivo, this study took advantage of the special circumstances of one-lung ventilation (OLV) during lung-surgery. 15 cancer patients undergoing lung resection with OLV were enrolled. From each patient, alveolar breath samples were taken separately from healthy and diseased lungs before and after tumour resection. Volatile substances were pre-concentrated by means of solid-phase microextraction, and were separated, identified and quantified by means of gas chromatography–mass spectrometry. Different classes of volatile substances could be identified according to their concentration profiles. Due to prolonged fasting and activation of lipolysis, concentrations of endogenous acetone significantly increased during surgery. Exogenous substances, such as benzene or cyclohexanone, showed typical washout exhalation kinetics. Exhaled concentrations of potentially tumour associated substances, such as butane or pentane, were different for nondiseased and diseased lungs and decreased significantly after surgery. Separate analysis of volatile substances exhaled from healthy and diseased lungs in the same patient, together with thorough consideration of substance origins and exhalation kinetics offers unique opportunities of biomarker recognition and evaluation.

Metabolic monitoring and assessment of anaerobic threshold by means of breath biomarkers

Volatile breath constituents such as acetone and ammonia have been linked to dextrose, fat, and protein metabolism. Non-invasive breath analysis, therefore, may be used for metabolic monitoring, identification of fuel sources actually used for energy production and determination of the anaerobic threshold (AT). This study was intended to assess correlations between exhaled volatile organic compound (VOC) concentrations, metabolism, and physiological parameters. In addition, we tried to find out whether AT could be determined by means of non-invasive analysis of VOCs in breath. Exhaled concentrations of acetone, ammonia, and isoprene were determined in 21 healthy volunteers under controlled ergometric exercise by means of continuous real time Proton Transfer Reaction Mass Spectrometry (PTR-MS). In parallel, spiro-ergometric parameters (

Automated Needle Trap Heart-Cut GC/MS and Needle Trap Comprehensive Two-Dimensional GC/TOF-MS for Breath Gas Analysis in the Clinical Environment

{\dot{\text{V}}}