Patricia M. Meyer
Ohio State University
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Patricia M. Meyer.
Archive | 1965
Donald R. Meyer; F. Robert Treichler; Patricia M. Meyer
Publisher Summary This chapter presents the factors known to govern the efficiency with which the nonhuman primates learn in situations that involve a trial-by-trial approach. The variables of interest are the nature of the cues, their modes of presentation to the subject, and the spatiotemporal relations of cues to responses and rewards. There now is a most substantial body of research related to this group of variables, and it has been shown that very powerful effects can be produced by their manipulation. The chapter also presents methods that involve the use of discriminanda and presents experiments in which the visual cues are of a fairly complex nature.
Psychonomic science | 1965
Allan B. Wetzel; Venan E. Thompson; James A. Horel; Patricia M. Meyer
Kittens with lesions of the visual cortex and their normal littermates were tested on visual placing responses and two measures of activity. These Ss were also compared on a pattern discrimination with normal cats and cats with visual ablations. Ss that had sustained the operation as infants learned the pattern habit as well as normal adult cats, but removal of visual neocortex severely retarded the performance of adult SS.
Psychobiology | 1977
Donald R. Meyer; Patricia M. Meyer
A review of the principal results of a 20-year program, at Ohio State University, of quantitative studies of the problem of recovery from damage to the brain.
Physiology & Behavior | 1970
David A. Dalby; Donald R. Meyer; Patricia M. Meyer
Abstract Cats were trained on flux, equal-contour-pattern, unequal-contour-pattern and visual cliff discriminations. The stimuli used in the pattern discriminations either increased or decreased in the number of intersections. Subsequently, the animals were subjected to surgery with the intent to remove the neocortex from the lateral, posterolateral, suprasylvian, suprasplenial and splenial gyri. Postoperatively, all cats relearned the flux, visual cliff and unequal-contour-pattern discriminations. The most medial portions of area 17 were spared in these animals. Two of the cats also relearned the equal-contour-pattern discriminations. Different but additional sparing was noted in area 19. The results in terms of varying the number of intersections were equivocal.
Experimental Neurology | 1976
G.D. Ritchie; Patricia M. Meyer; Donald R. Meyer
Abstract Cats were trained on three classes of visual discriminations. The first was a large-checks vs small-checks problem in which the stimulus panels varied both in the total amount of contour and the number of enclosed spatial figures. The second class was a contour problem in which the number of objects per panel was constant, but the amount of contour was greater in one panel than in the other. The third class was a numerosity problem in which the stimuli contained more objects in one panel than the other, but the amount of contour was the same for both panels. The discriminanda in all three classes were equated for flux and were designed to eliminate local flux and local contour differences as cues for solving the discrimination. Normal cats learned all three classes of problems and subsequently sustained removals of the visual neocortex. Postoperatively, the animals discriminated flux-equated stimuli that varied with respect to both contour and numerosity. However, when flux and contour were equated, the cats never exceeded chance performance after nearly a year of retraining on the numerosity problem. These results, together with previous findings, indicated that the animals were form-blind despite their abilities to learn some classes of flux-equated visual pattern tasks. After completion of the learning phase of the experiment, visual placing was studied in these animals. With very few exceptions, placing was absent after postoperative recovery periods of more than 1 year, but could be reinstated for periods up to three weeks following a single injection of d -amphetamine. Hence, although visually-decorticated cats fail to learn form discriminations, they nonetheless are able, if appropriately treated, to localize surfaces in space.
Psychobiology | 1978
David G. Lavond; Mary G. Hata; Thackery S. Gray; Cheri L. Geckler; Patricia M. Meyer; Donald R. Meyer
Rats prepared with serial visual-cortical ablations can relearn the horizontal-vertical stripes discrimination problem if given interoperative training. However, they fail to discriminate between obliquely oriented stripes. The findings are discussed in relation to the concept that pattern perception is completely dependent upon the integrity of cortically related systems. Furthermore, the criteria for constructing pattern discriminanda are outlined, and reasons are presented for abandoning some of the classical stimuli used to test form perception in striate-extra-striate preparations.
Brain Research | 1970
Patricia M. Meyer; David A. Johnson; Derrald Wayne Vaughn
Summary Septal lesions facilitate acquisition of a CAR habit even in the absence of the anterior, posterior or entire neocortex. Small, but insignificant, deficits are found with anterior or posterior removals alone, but aspiration of all the neocortex severely impairs performance.
Brain Research | 1968
Patricia M. Meyer; David A. Yutzey; David A. Dalby; Donald R. Meyer
Summary Rats were trained on a black-white discrimination task, and then were assigned to one of the following groups: (1) normal control S s; (2) S s with septal lesions; (3) S s with anterior neocortical ablations; (4) S s with visual neocortical ablations; (5) S s with anterior and visual neocortical ablations; (6) S s with anterior neocortical and septal lesions; (7) S s with visual neocortical and septal lesions. Following a 21 day recovery interval all S s were tested for retention of the black-white habit. Deficits of varying magnitude occured in operated groups. Data from the normal septal, anterior and visual groups replicated previous studies. S s with anterior neocortical and septal lesions behaved like S s with anterior neocortical lesions. S s with anterior and visual neocortical ablations and S s with visual neocortical and septal lesions relearned at about the same rate. The results suggested that the anterior neocortex and septal area might be components of the same system.
Archive | 1982
Patricia M. Meyer; Donald R. Meyer
Memories, and particularly long-term memories, are the basic ingredients of knowledge. Hence it is important that we ask where their traces, or engrams, are stored within the brain, and also that we understand the possible fates of the engrams while they are in storage. Moreover, inasmuch as knowledge is worthless if it cannot be expressed, it is equally important that we understand the variables that govern the remembering of memories.
Psychonomic science | 1966
Patricia M. Meyer; Roy A. Anderson; Mary Goolsby Braun
Normal cats, cats with lesions of the visual neocortex, normal rats, enucleated rats, and rats with lesions of the visual neocortex were tested on Gibson’s visual cliff for visual depth perception. All animals preferred the shallow side except rats that were enucleated and rats that sustained visual neocortical ablations.